Altieri Shakes Down Contractors for MS
by Paul Bass | January 27, 2006 1:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
City budget chief Frank Altieri (in photo) vowed never to file a disclosure form required of other city officials, suggesting to his boss, Mayor John DeStefano, that he was prepared to quit first. That revelation comes amid e-mails obtained by the Independent, which also reveal that Altieri has been soliciting charitable contributions from businesses he deals with as a city official.
On Nov. 2, 2005, Altieri wrote to DeStefano that city Corporation Counsel Tom Ude “spoke to me today about the possibility” that he would file an ethics disclosure form that all other city officials file. Altieri, largely believed to be City Hall’s most powerful official after the mayor, has refused to fill out the form because he is technically a city “contractor” rather than a city “employee” under an arrangement he worked out with DeStefano that allows him to live outside the city and double-dip into state pension coffers as well as the city budget. (Click here and here to read our original stories on the subject.)
“Tom spoke to me today about the possibility of me including more information than is required of other contractors,” Altieri wrote to DeStefano. “On principal I will NOT do that. This might be a good time for both of us to decide on my exit strategy.”
Altieri’s message neglected to mention that all other top city officials, including those below him in the city bureaucratic ladder, must fill out a disclosure form that notes whether relatives work for the city government and whether relatives have a financial interest in companies doing business with the city any time over his term in public office. The form Altieri fills out as a “contractor” requires him to do neither. (It does require him to state whether he personally owns a share in companies doing business with the city over the past year. He stated that he has no ownership interest in other companies.)
The Independent filed a Freedom of Information request to both Altieri and DeStefano for copies of Altieri’s city e-mail correspondence over the final three months of 2005. Altieri returned the request in an unopened envelope. But DeStefano’s legal staff promptly complied with the request.
The file does not show DeStefano responding by e-mail to Altieri’s Nov. 2 missive. It does show a correspondence between the two on the subject on Oct. 24 and 25.
“As you requested I have reviewed the disclosure form. Other than Carol [Altieri’s wife] working for the Board of Ed, all other matters are covered by the contract,” Altieri wrote. “As I mentioned to you several times if my position in any way becomes a problem for you I will leave. In my tenure what I have done only reflects positively on the City. When in the history of the City has its finances been in such good order?” [Note: A ratings agency recently criticized the city’s financial management and lowered New Haven’s bond rating, although the agency also praised some of the work of Altieri’s department.]
“No disagreement,” DeStefano responded to Altieri. “I just don’t want a non-issue becoming an issue.”
As he has repeatedly in the past, Altieri declined comment to a reporter this week about his ethics lapses. Reached by phone, he stayed silent.
Mayor DeStefano, too, reverting to a bunker mentality he adopted during ethics scandals of the late ’90s, ducked answering questions. (He eventually came forward and embraced transparency and accountability reforms in City Hall, which he has apparently now ditched as he builds a campaign chest to run for governor.) His spokesman issued a statement that didn’t address the major questions but did say Altieri is not leaving city government. (See below.)
Shakedown Artist
The file also reveals that Altieri solicited and received contributions to MS from three companies with which the file shows him doing city business: Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield; McGlarey & Pullen; and Public Financial Management (PFM) of Philadelphia. Altieri served on a fund-raising group called the “MS Corporate Achievers Greater New Haven.”
On Nov. 2, Altieri informed Dominique Soucy, then the development coordinator of the National MS Society, Greater Connecticut chapter, that he was “expecting the following contributions: Anthem BC/BS $1500.00, PFM $1000.00. And McGladury $500.00.”
“I want to thank you for following up with my request for a $1500.00 tax deductible contribution to MS. Your company is very generous. Frank,” Aliteri wrote on Oct. 26 to Michele Zettergen of Anthem.
The file also shows Altieri working directly day to day with the companies, as director of budget and management office hires.
On Nov. 18, he wrote to Katherine Klarman, another Anthem official, “Just a reminder, we need to meet with the prescription drug rep. to discuss some of my concerns. Also, could you give us copies of the plans that you use to administer retiree claims. Thanks Frank.”
“Malik,” Altieri wrote to Malik Muhammad of PFM on Jan. 3, in advance of a conference call with the credit ratings agencies, “I have the a.m. on the 3 Jan. scheduled. I am available in the pm. Please reschedule. Thanks.”
No one would criticize someone for raising money for MS. Rather, the issue is whether a public official puts unspoken, unfair pressure on contractors to contribute to a cause since that official can determine how much money the contractors make with the city. Does the solicitation create the appearance that to do city business, companies have to pony up for an official’s favorite charity?
That issue has arisen in Hartford, too, where state House Speaker Jim Amman has been raising money for MS from lobbyists who have business before him. (Unlike Altieri, Amman gets paid to raise money for MS.)
As Courant columnist Kevin Rennie wrote in one of two columns exposing the Amman “shakedown,” “Let us all agree that multiple sclerosis is a debilitating and vicious disease and that the world will be a better place when a cure is found. The way to that happy day is not, however, for the speaker of the House to undermine the public’s trust in state government.”
Or to undermine the trust in New Haven government, argued Jorge Perez, who heads the Board of Aldermen’s Black and Hispanic Caucus.
“It does definitely give an appearance issue,” Perez said, “that you negotiate with one another. If I want to be on your good side, I’m more likely to do something for you.”
Spurred in part by Altieri’s ethical lapses, Perez has introduced an upgrade to the city’s ethics law. Click here to read about it.
Altieri has been revealed shaking down contractors before — in that case, hitting them up for campaign contributions for DeStefano.
DeStefano Ducks
The issue is a perilous one for John DeStefano. He’s running for governor in the wake of massive corruption and ethics scandals in state government. He claims he wants to run a cleaner government. But would he allow a state budget chief, for instance, to avoid ethics laws by calling himself a “contractor” rather than a state official, the way he allows Altieri to? Would he allow the budget chief to draw a government pension while working full time for government? Would he allow his officials to hit up companies with which they do state business for charity?
DeStefano refused to answer those questions when posed to him through a spokesman. Instead, the spokesman, Derek Slap, issued this “response”:
“There are no plans for Frank Altieri to leave. He has filled out every form that a contractor is required to fill out and he has provided all necessary information — including any ownership interests he has in any companies doing business with the city — of which he has none.
“The people who received personal gain from Mr. Altieri’s efforts are those who suffer from MS. If there’s something wrong with a contractor or city official helping a charity during the course of the day, then should the City give back the one ton of food it collected during the Demolish Hunger Food-Drive? And what about all the supplies collected for Hurricane Katrina families?”
The questions and facts DeStefano refused to address included:
• Would DeStefano allow a state budget chief to do what he allows Altieri
to do — avoid ethics requirements by calling himself a “contractor” rather than an “official”?
• There are clear differences between the form Altieri signs as a “contractor” and the other disclosure form filled by city officials. He has to list companies he has an ownership stake in, including those that do business with the city; but unlike on the other form, he doesn’t need to list companies in which his relatives have a stake. He also, as Altieri noted, doesn’t have to list the names of relatives working for the city.
• Has DeStefano ordered Altieri to fill out the ethics disclosure form?
Share this story
Comments
Posted by: Edward Mattison | January 31, 2006 11:36 AM
I am upset by your reckless attack on Frank Altieri. It is the flip side of the last story I complainted about. There you were entranced by an alderwomen who appeared to me to have accomplished little or nothing, but had all the right opinions. Here we have a man who without question has done a sensational job keeping New Haven solvent at a time when virtually all other Connecticut cities are effectively bankrupt. Yet his competence seems to mean nothing to you because he objects to a disclosure form than many think is pointlessly intrusive and he works hard at raising money for a charity he believes in. I am also troubled by the tone of your story. It isn't just disagreeing with his actions, it attacks him directly. If you think he has done something seriously wrong, tell us what it is. There isn't the slightest sign of corruption here. What's with you? I think you do great stuff, but you have a big blind spot here. Ed
Posted by: curious | February 1, 2006 6:12 AM
I wonder if the IRS agrees Altieri is a contractor? Neither he or the city meet the numerous requirements for an independent contractor relationship. The most obvious being that he works exclusively for the City and has no other clients.
Posted by: Paul Bass | February 1, 2006 4:06 PM
In response to Ed: I would think that a good-government alderman would have a problem with the perception that there's a price for doing business with government -- namely that you have to contribute money to a key bureaucrat's pet charity to keep your contract. That's the appearance that's presented here, and that's a fundamental abuse of what's considered transparent and honest government worldwide. As for disclosure being meaningless -- then why have disclosure forms? If it's not meaningless, why should a top official not have to fill it out -- while his boss, and people who report to him, must? That's a double standard, and a very dangerous precedent to set for government. Once you allow a top official to be above the rules -- which Mayor DeStefano has allowed Frank Altieri to be for 12 years now -- you are sending a strong signal that the rules don't matter, which opens up a dangerous way of doing business in government. BTW, I think disclosure is crucial to credibility in government; in this case, Altieri doesn't have to say whether his relatives own an interest in companies which do business with the city. Other rules he doesn't have to follow, but others in similar positions must follow: living in the city, waiting to truly retire before simultaneously drawing a government pension. You might think these rules are meaningless, because the ends (your assessment of what a financial genius Frank Altieri is) justify the means. But other aldermen, and legislators at other levels of government, obviously valued these rules, or wouldn't have passed them. Even if you disagree, how can you expect people to follow the rules you happen to like when you pass them -- if a top official can continue so flagrantly get away with violating them year after year, cheered on by both the mayor and his good-government colleagues on the Board of Aldermen?
Posted by: Ed Mattison | February 1, 2006 4:43 PM
My problem is not our disagreements over the issue, it is your tone, which feels far too accusatory for what are, at worst, small mistakes of judgment. I ask Yale for money to keep the Overflow Shelter open in the spring. I wouldn't doubt it makes a contribution in the hope of obtaining my goodwill. Is this corrupt? There is a big difference between Frank Altieri who asks for money for something he believes in and Jim Annan who is a paid fundraiser. The way you talk about him, you think Altieri was Rowland. Best. Ed
Posted by: Daniel Sumrall | February 1, 2006 10:26 PM
"I ask Yale for money to keep the Overflow Shelter open in the spring. I wouldn't doubt it makes a contribution in the hope of obtaining my goodwill. Is this corrupt?"
If it is done to obtain your 'goodwill' and you make it plain that it will...then, yes, it is corrupt.
Posted by: nfjanette
| February 1, 2006 11:35 PM
My friend Paul and I have already exchanged our arguments about the use of loaded terms such as "double dipping" (into a pension already earned by contract terms), so let me just say this: I find the point made by "Curious" above very astute and potentially relevant. I've dealt with this issue in my own profession, and a 12 year contract for a one-man firm with a single client may indeed be a problem from an IRS perspective.
The IRS has been brutal with some large firms that used many contract information technology workers under similar circumstances; they imposed big fines and retroactive employment taxes. Microsoft was nailed for using contract firms to supply office "workers" that were not offered the same benefits and stock options as "employees"; the workers sued and won.
However, there is also an opposing argument that a professional specialist in a field may be treated as a different case than "commodity workers". After all, Mr. Altieri (or anyone) has the right to own and operate a business and to provide professional services to selected clients, and he doesn't need to be protected from the same potential abuse as the Microsoft workers. It's an interesting issue...
Posted by: truebluect | February 3, 2006 2:54 AM
Altieri has been exceedingly competent and a great boon to New Haven. No doubt about that.
Unfortunately, when he is seemingly above the law, particularly after being challenged on his special situation-- well, it sends a message.
What it reminds me of is George W. Bush, and his response to domestic eavesdropping. Some might call it the "arrogance of power".
Let Frank make his argument for special treatment to the Board of Aldermen. I'm sure they could legislate some kind of special waver.
In the absence of that, Paul Bass is doing the right thing in holding his feet to the fire. (and by extension the DeStefano administration.)
and again, I am otherwise an Altieri fan.
Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry
Special Sections
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- CT Business Litig
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- Reddit NH
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- St. Louis Beacon
- Tom Ficklin
- VT Digger
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- ALSO-Cornerstone
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- All Our Kin
- Alliance Theatre
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Bar Assn.
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bikur Cholim
- Bioregional Group
- Birthright
- BlackinCT
- Boys & Girls Club
- CCA
- CCNE
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City Point
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Elm Shakespeare
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- Fellowship Place
- Food Bank
- Friends of East Rock Park
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Halsey Associates
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- NH Land Trust
- NH Museum
- NH Safe Streets
- NH Scholarship Fund
- NH Youth Soccer
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- Neighborhood Music School
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- PAR Newsletter
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- ROOF
- Rail Trains Ecology
- Register Calendar
- Rotary
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Sister Cities
- Social Media Club
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- South Central Behavioral Health Network
- Squash Haven
- Temple Emanuel
- United Way
- Upper State Street Association
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Visiting Nurse Association of South Central Connecticut
- W'ville Synagogue
- W. Square Blockwatch
- WalkBIkeCT
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva of NH
- Youth Continuum
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35