A “Yale Secretary” Plan Sought

by Tess Wheelwright | March 24, 2006 8:43 AM | | Comments (4)

Housing prices have doubled in five years in the city’s poor neighborhoods and tripled in middle-class areas. Where, members of a committee on affordable housing led by Alderwoman Jacqueline James (pictured) asked Thursday night, will a Yale secretary be able to afford to live in this town?

James heads the Board of Aldermen’s Ad Hoc Committee on Strategies, Initiatives, and Alternatives to Preserve Affordable Housing. It formed over a year ago to work up legislative proposals to deal with the city’s high housing costs. The committee hired the consulting firm Holt, Wexler & Farnam, LLP, whose Jim Farnam met them Thursday to offer ideas for addressing the housing crunch — like legislating zoning breaks for developers who set some units aside for affordable rent, or families who want to add on separate “mother-in-law” apartments onto their houses.

Other ideas were to team up with not-for-profits who give classes to help families save, build good credit, and cut costs by doing their own maintenance once inside the door.

Committee members took away strategy sheets, and seemed in search of a specific, doable goal to move toward in next meetings. They’ve been tossing around something they informally call the “Yale Secretary plan” — an idea for a drive to secure affordable housing for people with, say, $40,000-a-year salaries, even while they’re still working to reach really struggling families.

Yale secretaries and cops and those people, at least, ought to be able to find housing in the city where they work, said East Rock Alderman Ed Mattison.

“We don’t want to be like Stamford,” agreed Hill Alderman Jorge Perez. “No cop can live in Stamford.”

Perez (at right in picture, next to Mattison) said that the way things are going in New Haven, only the Yale professors will able to afford to live in the city. “That’s not the city we want,” he said.

The aldermen didn’t seem surprised at charts showing housing sales prices in Newhallville, Fair Haven and the Hill to have more than doubled since 2001, and in Wooster Square, East Rock and Westville more like tripled. They were ready for the cost/wage-gap findings of studies like the one done by the economist Don Keppler-Smith of the New Haven-based Scillia, Dowling, & Natarelli Advisors. They’d seen the effects in their own neighborhoods.

Mattison said that where he lives, on Anderson Street in East Rock, it is plain to see rising costs “driving everybody out. We’re losing all the elderly — all the households without two incomes,” he said.

“Girlfriends are calling up old girlfriends, asking if they can stay for a while. It ends up being months and months,” said Hill and Dwight Alderwoman Dolores Colón. She said she used to live in the then-affordable not-for-profit-owned Trade Union Plaza, before it went private and expensive, and was among those worried not just about making affordable housing but keeping it affordable. “What are we going to do to replace places like Elm Haven and Brookside we demolished, and make sure prices don’t go right up like Trade Union Plaza?”

Alderwoman Jacqueline James said the committee under her watch would keep working together, with its hired consultant and with the city, in the name of those families for whom the market’s door was closed.

“That’s the main focus of our committee,” said James. “What are the solutions? What are some of the creative solutions for more affordable housing?”







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: charlie | March 24, 2006 9:26 AM

There are no real "solutions" to this, nor should there be. Cities change. Deal with it. And that's what the thousands of families who are working hard and investing in New Haven, rather than complaining about the price of living here, deserve.

Everyone else: take an half hour bus ride from New Britain or Hartford, where it's more affordable.

The only solution, ironically, is to lower taxes and stop "subsidizing" units so that developers can build more housing, more quickly. Increasing the urban density and having more units come on-line is the only thing that will make housing more affordable.

Rigging the system to create a tiny handful of sham affordable units is the least compassionate and least efficient thing you could possibly do, and even if it benefits a couple of families, is actually counterproductive for the rest of us.

Posted by: Matthew Nemerson | March 27, 2006 10:55 AM

The cost of urban housing has been shown to be in large part a function of local zoning. The types of legal restrictions that are placed on developers to create supply that will meet the demand that exists is legend in our town. New Haven could distinguish itself nationally by embarking on some experiments in reducing zoning requirements in a few neighborhoods. Increased density - artfully and aesthetically designed for sure - is the only way to solve the consequences of New Haven's popularity. Challenging each neighborhood to come up with its own plan to add 10% more units/houses cumulatively over the next five years would be a useful exercise.

Posted by: Esbe [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 27, 2006 5:28 PM

As hinted in the article, one good idea is to help lower-middle-income folks buy two-family homes, or make it easy to create rental appartments in existing single-family homes. This creates [i] a new-home owner and [ii] a new place for non-owners.

Matt's right about the cost of housing and thinking creatively about density. New Haven should think very carefully about zoning and the various approvals that new construction has to go through. I am not thinking of a Reaganesque "deregulation", but a Clinton-Gore "hard look" at what regs are really important and how the approval process can be made less painful without sacrificing important policy goals.

Posted by: Miss Secretary | April 5, 2006 4:03 PM

Why a Yale Secretary Plan? What about the City of New Haven Secretaries of Local 884? We have been working with no contract since last June. A full time, 12 month Secretary gets $28,000.00 and a ten month Board of Ed Secretary gets a whopping $23,900.00. Yale already has a housing program for their employees. They can get cash assistance to buy a home. Additionally, many Yale employees live outside of New Haven. I don't understand why a New Haven Alderperson would advocate for Yale employees in such a way.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35