“Our Lives Are In Danger Right Now”

by Melinda Tuhus | June 7, 2006 2:19 PM | | Comments (5)

Bicycle advocates trooped over to yet another Mayor’s Night In to express their frustration to Mayor John DeStefano and his aides over a lack of enforcement of motor vehicle laws, which they say is putting their lives at risk. One cyclist, David Streever (pictured, left, next to Police Chief Francisco Ortiz), ticked off his concerns after a particularly ugly literal run-in with an SUV, followed by a run-in with a police officer.

Streever, who filed a complaint with the police department over his rough treatment by the cop, said he appreciated that city officials are thinking about ways to make cyclists’ lives better in the future, by planning bike lanes and such. “But we feel like our lives are in danger right now,” he said. The dozen other cyclists in the room all had their own stories of close calls or actual impacts from motorists who don’t see them or sometimes actually try to hit them.

Mayor DeStefano (pictured) expressed some confusion at Tuesday’ night’s meeting about who these people in his office were, saying there had been a group of bicycle and pedestrian advocates who had been meeting with City Hall staff for two years about their concerns. It was established that that group (the Go-alition) was no longer meeting regularly, due to lack of attendance on the part of both cyclists and city staffers, and that those present at the meeting were members of the loose-knit group Elm City Cycling (in which, as an avid bicycle commuter, I participate).

The mayor emphasized the importance of enforcement in changing people’s behavior, putting him on the same page as the cyclists who’ve been calling for that. He bemoaned the failure in the General Assembly of a bill that would have allowed the city to install cameras at targeted intersections, to identify vehicles whose operators run red lights. “I need your help with our delegation,” he said, “because a majority of them voted against the bill.”

At the start of the meeting, Chief Ortiz said he had some police training materials he wanted to share with the cyclists, to get their input. But at the end of the meeting, he said he was going to work on the materials more and would send them out later. He also said the number of moving violation citations handed out in New Haven far outnumber those in other towns in the state; when asked for those numbers, he said they weren’t available. He also expressed frustration that the cyclists were going to the mayor when he felt they should be coming to him with their concerns.

Meanwhile, cyclist Joel Creswell reported on a conversation he’d had with Captain Steve Verrelli, who said he’d welcome members of Elm City Cycling to talk to officers about their safety concerns.

Before leaving the meeting, DeStefano said he would put a team of staffers together from the police department, City Plan, and his own office to work with bike advocates on next steps, including trying to resurrect the red light camera option, perhaps as a pilot project just in New Haven. Cyclist Rob Rocke (pictured) said he strongly supports that proposal, though he added that it won’t be a panacea.

After the meeting, some of the cyclists gathered on the steps outside City Hall, debriefing while they enjoyed the perfect late spring evening. Most were impressed that the mayor had brought several key players with him to the meeting — the police chief, Chief Administrative Officer John Buturla, and traffic and parking head Paul Wessel.

But they wondered how committed the top people are to really changing the car-dominated culture on New Haven’s streets. Ortiz, for example, had cautioned against having too high expectations, about being “realistic” in the face of many other demands for law enforcement. And they told stories of life in other states, like California, and even Massachusetts, where pedestrians and bicyclists are actually given the right of way in intersections. That’s the law here in Connecticut too, but it’s barely enforced.

Then the cyclists hopped on their bikes and rode off, hoping to avoid any four-wheeled encounters.








Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: Bruce | June 7, 2006 3:30 PM

I hope these concerns are taken seriously. The policeman in this case obviously was not familiar with the law as it pertains to bicycles riding in the streets. Cyclists have the all the same rights and responsibilities as motor vehicles (CT General Statute Sec. 14-286a).
What we need to do is establish a climate where motorists are aware of and respect bicyclists' and pedestrians' lawful rights. It's not that complicated -- stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk, and treat a bicycle like any other vehicle. These kind of things make a city a nicer and more desireable place to live.

Posted by: Joel Creswell | June 7, 2006 11:55 PM

The city officials present at this meeting seemed to be frustrated that the problem hadn't simply gone away since the last time we met, despite no effort taken on their part. DeStefano's rhetoric about making New Haven a model for a New England bikeable city is great, but it needs to be backed up with some serious action.

Posted by: Ned | June 8, 2006 8:27 AM

Increased enforcement = increased police state. Sounds like these bicyclists are just begging to give up their freedom. Bicycles are not cars, so they shouldn't be treated the same. (CT General Statute Sec. 14-286a) is lazy, bad legislation. And one jerk in an SUV does not make a crisis, in addition to which, it's stupid (and illegal) to put one's hand(s) on a cop! The Orange St. bicycle lane, while it does alert car drivers to the presence of bicycles, puts bicyclists directly in the path of opening car doors. The car problem could be solved by giving cars the lowest priority when designing roads. Pedestrians should always come first, then other forms of non-motorized transport, then cars. Route 80 in front of Loews is a perfect example of everything that is wrong with traffic engineering and road design. Trumbull St. is also terrible. Connecticut is so mentally ossified and backward looking, that I wouldn't plan on anything changing, although the police and the government will always be happy to restrict your freedom of movement... I use my bicycle as my primary vehicle, I also ride a motorcycle, so I'm aware of how bad car drivers can be.

Posted by: Rob N | June 9, 2006 8:56 AM

For starters, how about dedicated bicycle lanes on New Haven's two major cross arteries (Whitney and Whalley)? They could be two half lanes, one on each side, protected by low jersey barriers that are not visually obtrusive. Traffic lights could be modified to allow cyclists a head start and lessen the problem of jackrabbit right turns by automobiles.

Posted by: Bruce | June 9, 2006 9:46 AM

It's not just one jerk in an SUV. It's an entire population of uninformed drivers making this a crisis. Several cyclists have been hit and killed in this area over the last couple of years -- the latest just a few weeks ago. You can wait for the government to rip up and redesign all the roads properly, or you can try to make a workable situation out of what you have for now while lobbying for long-term change. The streets of New Haven were never intended to be used strictly for automobiles. Most of them were designed well before cars were even invented, much less used widely.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35