The Empty Room

by Marcia Chambers | August 23, 2006 8:25 AM | | Comments (4)


photo by Marcia Chambers

Why is this room empty? Because First Selectwoman Cheryl Morris changed a special meeting of the Board of Selectman (BOS) scheduled for tonight, Wednesday, August 23, to yesterday. Morris may have given the obligatory 24-hour notice, but that is hardly sufficient time to alert the town’s citizens. Moreover, this is the third time the BOS meeting has been changed this month.

Asked why the change, Mrs. Morris told the Eagle that the ad hoc committee meeting investigating Granite-gate was expected to be a long one. The Ad Hoc committee meets tonight at 7 p.m. at the Canoe Brook Center. The BOS was supposed to meet an hour earlier.

The failure of the public to receive sufficient notice of the BOS meeting means that citizens will not have the opportunity to question Mrs. Morris about significant witness issues. For example, for the second time, Branford police detective Duncan Ayr, who investigated the granite found at Former First Selectman Anthony “Unk” DaRos’s business, has declined to attend. Other witnesses slated for tonight’s event are DaRos, who makes his first appearance as a witness, along with prior witnesses Police Chief Robert Gill, Mrs. Morris, and Ed Marcus, the town counsel.

Marcus, who asked Ayr to investigate the matter, has said the meeting between himself and Ayr fell under the attorney-client privilege and was confidential. But John Opie, the Republican Third Selectman, and Short Beach Republican RTM member Peter Black, have said previously the privilege belongs to the client and the client is the town. Black, an attorney, had suggested that the BOS waive the privilege. Opie pressed for full Marcus disclosure. Mrs. Morris asked Shelley Marcus, Ed’s daughter, and a partner in their firm, to speak.

Shelley Marcus said the firm had consulted the law books and found two cases on point, one right in the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which covers Connecticut.

And while she did not say that Daddy was wrong, she did report that the attorney-client privilege had been waived once Detective Ayr’s police report became public. “Ed Marcus,” she added, “will provide a full explanation. He will fully cooperate with the ad hoc committee.” Opie took her at her word, but not before saying, “I don’t want anything to come between the RTM and the truth.”

In yet another controversy over a citizen appointment to a board or a town Commission — a recurrent theme for the Morris Administration— a mini battle erupted when Morris and Dick Sullivan, the Second Selectman, sought to remove Fannie Ungemack, a landscape architect, from the Center Revitalization Review Board, which examines projects for Branford’s downtown.

“It is bad judgment,” said the board’s chair, Otty Norwood, who asked to be heard. He was deeply upset with the Morris-Sullivan decision. Opie recommended she stay.

“We are preparing to do major work that will probably last for the next one hundred years. This is a critical time in the history of the town center,” Norwood told the BOS and the two citizens in attendance.

“Add to that the work that is coming up on the Green and you want to replace a person with three generations of experience in landscape design. It makes absolutely no sense.” The Morris-Sullivan decision had created havoc on his board, he said. “In the last day I may have lost three members from our board partially in response to this. Your communications have been dreadful. If I were still a school teacher you would get a failing grade.

“Fannie Ungemack got a call from someone saying she was not going to be reappointed. She said, ‘what I have done wrong?’ This is a volunteer who works hard in this town…And if that is a message to other volunteers … Norwood made his point.

Opie pressed for her reappointment and ultimately Morris and Sullivan reconsidered and gave her another three -year term. Town historian Jane Bouley, who was to replace her, is expected to be appointed to the board when a vacancy occurs in the next year.
###








Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: Tyrone Speaks | August 23, 2006 10:49 AM

Lets see now! BOS meeting time changes, the most recent of which would have been well attended by the public, a Police Detective being told not to testify, Oh, and last but certainly not least Town Council making bad if not impaired not to mention uninformed legal judgements concerning attorney-client privilege. Cover up! Plain and simple. Do they really think no one is watching?
Yes ladies and gentleman welcome to Branford and see how your tax dollars are used.

Posted by: Kyle Nelson | August 23, 2006 10:25 PM

Thanks to Selectman John Opie and Commission Chair Otty Norwood for standing their ground regarding Fannie Ungemack reappointment to the Center Revitalization Review Board.

Cheryl Morris and Dick Sullivan are sending a message to all volunteers on Boards and Commissions in Town, that your time and efforts mean nothing and that if you were not waving the Morris/Sullivan banner in the last election be sure you will be replaced. And if that's not bad enough, neither Mrs. Morris nor Mr. Sullivan will have the decency to let you know in advance what they are doing. They are telling you that your hours upon hours of volunteering to make Branford the community we know and love is not appreciated.

Well this citizen is grateful to the Board and Commission volunteers. Having served on the Town's Shellfish Commission for three years, I appreciate the time it takes away from family and personal life and the sacrifices that you make for all of us.

So, I say thanks to Selectman Opie and Mr. Norwood for standing their ground and not letting the Morris Administration push another valuable volunteer out.

The Morris/Sullivan replacement program has to be stopped. Branford's life-blood is its volunteers on Town Boards and Commissions, without them this Branford would not function and if the Morris/Sullivan administration wants to ignore their contribution, them maybe we should ignore their campaign propaganda next election and send them home.

Keep up the good fight John, there are many of us still behind you.

Posted by: Jim McGuire | August 24, 2006 11:24 AM

Once again I read in disbelief what is happening within the town politics of Branford. My questions now are (1) who is paying the legal expenses for our town councils own defence of granit gate and (2) how do our legal fees this year compare to the fees for this same period last year? It's almost comical were it not for the fact that we're all paying for all of this mismanagement. When is the next meeting scheduled to be cancelled !!

Posted by: scjerry | September 15, 2006 12:00 PM

Since when does a vendor of legal services to the exectutive branch have the authority to provide legal counsel to our legislative branch?

What happened to the separation of powers?

I agree with other commentors who advocate a change in the town charter to allow recall of incompetent public officials.

I would also include in the charter revision, a legislative review process of town counsel appointments by the 1st select person.

Let's hope the BDTC has the moral and political courage to censure the current administration and Mr. Bruno. If it doesn't, town Democrats can never expect to ever win another election.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35