The War on Sprawl, and … Drugs?

by Melissa Bailey | October 26, 2006 2:06 PM | | Comments (6)

GOP State Sen. Fasano and Green candidate Thornton.It promised to be another everyone-agrees-with-each-other confab at the Chamber of Commerce about regionalism and “smart growth.” Then the Greens crashed the party and forced a touchy issue they say underlies the barriers to rebuilding cities — the war on drugs.

Candidates for state offices joined a forum Thursday morning hosted at 900 Chapel St.’s 10th floor (Chamber of Commerce headquarters) by the 1,000 Friends of Connecticut, a non-profit group that aims to bring people together to talk about statewide smart growth — the idea of towns and cities working and planning together to preserve small-town life and revive urban life.

Heidi Green, 1,000 Friends’ president, gave a PowerPoint on the agency’s goals: Less reliance on the property tax. Better public transit to reduce gridlock. Instead of sprawl and car-dominated transit, public transit and growth that respects open space. “Reclaim our downtowns,” “remagnetize our communities.”

The conversation began about what Connecticut could do to attract more jobs.

John Cirello, a Republican attorney who was so frustrated with Q Bridge traffic that he decided to run for state rep in the 97th district, suggested highway gridlock was losing Connecticut jobs.

Just look at New Jersey, he said. South of Manhattan, you have a six-lane highway each way. A similar distance away from Manhattan in Connecticut, you’re lucky to get three lanes each way.” To make the state more attractive, Connecticut needs “wider highways like they have in New Jersey,” said Cirello, who’s from the Garden State.

More highways to shuttle people to suburbs and pollute the air? That’s not smart growth! retorted agency friends.

“I’m not sure that I’d use northern Jersey as a model for what Connecticut should be,” remarked Democratic Hamden State Rep. J. Brendan Sharkey, who also grew up in Northern N.J. “What draws people to Connecticut is that we’re not northern Jersey,” where car-dominated strip-malls abound.

Ken Krayeske (pictured at right, with Cirello), a bicycling advocate and campaign manager for Green Party gubernatorial candidate Cliff Thornton, jumped in. “Building highways is not going to solve it.” How about getting 400,000 people out of their cars, onto bikes and feet and into car pools? How about a tax structure that doesn’t subsidize sprawl? he offered.

“How does a town like North Haven compete? We get three cents for every $1 we send to Hartford,” cut in Republican State Sen. Len Fasano, who represents East Haven, North Haven and Wallingford.

Then the Greens took the conversation off script by mentioning an issue rarely discussed in business-oriented conferences on suburban sprawl and urban redevelopment.

“We’re wasting money on a runaway war on drugs,” said Krayeske. If we want to revitalize our cities — as everyone in the room agreed they’d like to do — we need to tackle drugs, Krayeske said. “Nobody’s going to move back to our cities until we deal with crime and violence.”

“Is the war on drugs a culprit of sprawl? I’d have to say, yes!” said Thornton, the gubernatorial candidate. The war on drugs wastes state money, fills our prisons and destroys the neighborhoods that we should focus on revitalizing by, among other things, sending a huge chunk of young African-American males into the criminal justice system.

“The drug war is connected to everything. We have to bring the drugs within the law.”

Fasano was intrigued. “If you don’t send people to prison, won’t people say, That’s the crime-ridden neighborhood, and people will want to move away?’”

No, said Thornton. “Once you bring these drugs within the law, crime and violence goes away overnight.”

Wouldn’t that expose children to cocaine and heroin?

“Children are exposed to alcohol, without the crime and violence that goes along with the other drugs,” replied Thornton.

Heidi Green, the forum moderator, cut in. “This conversation is very interesting, but does anyone have a question about smart growth?”

“Oh, I was enjoying this,” said Fasano. He and Thornton met at the muffin table to introduce themselves and whisper a few more words.

The conversation resumed on tax reform, Greens got a few words in about education: How can we get people to move to cities unless the education system works better?

After the hour-long meeting, Cirello and Fasano approached the Greens to talk more about how the drug war relates to smart growth.

Cirello, a private attorney who does work as a public defender in New Haven court, wasn’t quite convinced by the Greens. He said he thought the criminal justice system was “very tolerant” on drug users, with options to avoid prison time through community service and rehab.

“Have you ever met a serious drug addict?” said Cirello. “Taking them out of their environment — that’s all you can really do. A lot of these people have had rehab, been through intervention.” He said the figure Thornton mentioned — 70 percent of those incarcerated in the state are there on mostly nonviolent drug charges — is “horrendous. But legalizing the drugs? I don’t think that’s a feasible solution.”

Thornton, who’d gotten an unexpected chance to engage state elected officials on an issue central to his gubernatorial campaign, maintained after the talk that the issue was also central to smart growth. “What causes sprawl? White flight, crime and violence. People don’t want to talk about that.”

1,000 Friends

Heidi Green, the 1,000 Friends president, said even though only 15 people showed up to Thursday’s forum at the Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce, the group has a list of 3,400 members statewide.

This year, the agency’s goal has been to push the issue of smart growth to the forefront of the gubernatorial campaign.

Green feels she’s had success: Gov. M. Jodi Rell released Executive order 15, establishing an Office of Responsible Growth.

Pushing smart growth wasn’t hard with Democratic candidate John DeStefano, who was one of the founding members of 1,000 Friends and is a strong proponent. (He withdrew membership from the board after announcing his candidacy, so the non-profit agency wouldn’t be confused with his campaign, said Green.) DeStefano just released a smart growth plan. Click here to read it.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: charlie | October 26, 2006 3:04 PM

Building more highways is the worst idea ever. In fact, the highways should all be shut down and turned into high-speed rail and bicycle lanes.

Posted by: LynneShapiro | October 27, 2006 11:25 AM

Most of the attendees at this event probably drove there rather than taking transit to this location that could not have been better for transit access. Also some people ended up by default on the 1000 Friends list because they were on lists of organizations like AllAboard! that became part of 1000 Friends.

That being said of course drugs and crime create sprawl by chasing businesses and people away from cities as to fear of crime in them some of which suburbanites create by coming in to buy drugs and patronize prostitutes!
However, there is as much danger of being harmed in the suburbs not only from crime but also from car and pedestrian accidents, fires, falling trees, electric power outages, family abuse especially when people "in the sticks" as I call them feel isolated, and even wild animals.

Posted by: Ned | October 27, 2006 1:35 PM

Is Hamden State Rep. J. Brendan Sharkey joking? Route 80, Dixwell Ave., Route 1 (anywhere in CT.), etc. they're all about strip malls. I don't buy (pun intended) the canard about suburbanites sustaining the inner city drug/prostitute business either. Most suburbanites have their own known, safe, dealers with whom they have established relationships, and there are buyers clubs for marijuana all over the region - the weed is even organically grown! - their not going to risk their lives and money trolling through Fair Haven to buy $10 of crack or some questionable pot (Meanwhile you can buy all of the booze you can drink). I also doubt that the used condoms littering the ground, in College Woods, are the leftovers from suburban Johns getting off behind a tree, at night, in an urban park with an unknown woman (OMG, someone is having an orgasm, call the police!). But, as all of this activity is futiley supressed, i.e. totally unregulated, rather than legally regulated, we will never know for sure. I suppose, if the U.S. didn't have twisted. irrational, Puritan hangups, and screwy "people of faith" meddling in public policy and trying to run everyone's life, that prostitution could be regulated like in a civilized country, such as the Netherlands. Maybe that's why the Dutch got fed up with the Puritans and sent them over here...

Posted by: Ned | October 31, 2006 3:42 PM

Maybe the buses are empty because people hate riding buses? People will gladly ride in a light rail car, but getting on a bus is a complete non-starter for anyone who can afford a car, which leaves bus transit with a literally poor constituency. Other than not having to drive yourself (or eco-consciousness), a bus offers no advantage over a car and riding the bus is more akin to punishment - slow, uncomfortable, exposed to weather, crime and grime. New Haven should focus on improving transit for its residents (take a trip to Portland, OR.) - imagine telling your suburban friends how convenient and easy it is to get around New Haven, without a car - that's the best marketing - nice to dream anyway.

Posted by: Matt Uva | November 1, 2006 11:02 AM

Ned, it's not a dream. I tell my suburban friends and family how easy it is to get around New Haven all the time. I ride a bicycle.

There are groups in New Haven, i.e. Elm City Cycling, GoAlition, that have taken the issue of sustainable transportation to the city, with some terrific results.
-Every city bus now has an easy to use bike rack mounted on the front, a trend that is now growing statewide.
-There are bike racks at every city owned building, as well as many more in the commercial districts.
-We now have bicycle-actuated traffic lights at many of the "scarier" intersections.
-Bike lanes abound.

I think the real reason more money isn't spent on viable transportation alternatives is that very few people want to use them. Besides, we live in a consumer culture where the automobile is your "greatest" achievement. You can't put chrome rims and a loud muffler on a light rail, and you sure as heck don't want to pick up your date with the city bus.

Mostly when I tell my suburban friends how easy it is to get around, they think I mean there's alot of parking.

Posted by: Ned | November 1, 2006 2:25 PM

Matt I totally agree (I've been riding my bicycle to work and around town for twenty years); however, while I would find a garland draped bicycle built for two most romantic, prospective dates might be more favorably impressed by a new Lexus. Strangely enough, if you ask most people to name ten kinds of trees or birds, they'll most likely fail, but almost everyone can name at least ten different cars - sad. In addition, bicycle riding is not for everyone; it takes a certain amount of daring to mingle with traffic and a strong self-preservation instinct, as well as reasonably good health and a bicycle friendly wardrobe. Bike racks on buses are great, but they still do not address the other bus problems. Portland Oregon's MAX rail system has bike racks inside the cars, or there's the folding bike option...

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35