38%? 48%? 79%? You Pick!
by Paul Bass | December 5, 2006 4:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (9)
Whatever the real number, United Illuminating’s “tsunami” proposed rate increase just keeps getting bigger. Both the governor (pictured) and attorney general Tuesday called for regulators to postpone approving the increase. Meanwhile, no one can agree just how much your electric bill will jump — except that it will jump a whole lot.
Welcome to the wacky world of Connecticut electricity new math.
The OCC
The new math started last week, following UI’s Thanksgiving Eve bombshell that it needs to raise electric rates an average of 38 percent for residential customers and 50 percent for businesses. UI has around 300,000 customers in Greater New Haven and Bridgeport.
The rate increases need approval by the state Department of Utility Control (DPUC). Originally the DPUC planned to vote this week. Now it has scheduled a Dec. 19 vote.
Meanwhile, the state’s Office of Consumer Counsel (OCC) had a hunch the rate hike was even higher than announced. So it submitted questions through the DPUC that UI had to answer: It asked UI to break down the rate hikes by type of customer. When UI did that, it became clear that all sorts of people will be paying more than a 38 percent hike, including residential customers.
Click here to read the rate-hike chart UI submitted to the DPUC in response to the questions. (You’ll have to cock your head to the side.)
The chart features initials for different categories of ratepayers and the percentage rate hike in each category. To decode the initials, click here to read descriptions provided by UI spokesman Steve Bravar.
The numbers show people’s rates rising as little as 37.77 percent, or upwards of 57 percent.
Up, Up, Up…
And those numbers may prove low, even by UI’s figuring. Bravar said those numbers include only “what we know” about increased supply costs. Other possible added costs that are out of UI’s control — and in the DPUC’s control — could drive the hike up further, such as how to spread costs of service across different customer classes, according to Bravar. The DPUC held a hearing on those issues Tuesday.
Meanwhile the governor’s office did its own figuring. It came up with an average 44 percent rate hike for residential customers, 37.7 percent for small and medium-sized business… and a devastating close-to 79 percent for larger businesses.
So the governor sent DPUC a letter Tuesday reiterating her plea to hold off approving the hike until the legislature can deal with larger issues of energy conservation and development of alternative energy sources. Click here to read the letter and accompanying release.
Attorney General Richard Blumenthal seconded the call for both a “band-aid” temporary delay and broader action by the legislature, including creation of a Connecticut Electric Authority. “A delay in implementing rate increases should not cause or excuse a legislative delay in requiring real reform,” Blumenthal said in a release. Click here here to read it. And click here to read a previous Independent article discussing different ideas about long-term responses to the rate hike.
The heavy-hitters’ calls for delay didn’t produce an immediate effect at the DPUC Tuesday. “As far as I know,” said spokeswoman Beryl Lyons, the vote on the UI rate hike remains set for Dec. 19.
About Rell’s request, UI’s Bravar said, “The company signed and the DPUC approved power supply contracts that are binding. UI is now liable to the suppliers for approximately $40 million per month that we would not be able to recover from the end users if the deferral was granted.
“UI is a regulated company and under statue and regulation we have acted in concert with and following the power supply procurement guidelines provided. The marketplace is what set the price of the electricity, not U.I.”
UI’s request would cover the first six months of 2007. Then it would come before the DPUC with a new rate request.
On a related question, click here to read Hamden Daily News columnist Steve Kalb’s take on the “transparency of mud” in the rate process.
Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook
Comments
Posted by: Joe | December 5, 2006 9:49 PM
Deregulation has boxed DPUC into a corner. The rates will stand and business and residents will get nailed. Deregulation is such a mistake. There is no open market. DPUC should be gutted.
Posted by: strangerthanfiction | December 5, 2006 11:29 PM
We know the property tax system is broken. We know the health care system is broken. But this beats all. The fact that our state government sat quietly for a year all the while knowing that our electric rates were heading for an off-the-charts increase is absolutely unconscionable. Whatever happened to solving the people's problems? What is it they do up in Hartford anyway? They made this problem by deregulating energy in 1998 and now they send out a distress call at the last hour!?
Posted by: Paul Wessel | December 6, 2006 4:22 AM
The saddest thing about all this is that the Governor and the legislature knew this was happening. Now, after the barn doors are open and the cows are fleeing, everyone starts running around, flailing their arms, saying "What can do to stop this?"
Pity more of the voters didn't listen to gubernatorial candidate DeStefano on this issue - he was right on about what was going to happen, that leadership was needed on the issue, and he offered it.
Hopefully we will live and learn....
Posted by: Cedar Hill Resident | December 6, 2006 8:26 AM
ok for some reason when read the articals about the hike this song keeps popping up in my head...
The wonder ball, goes round and round
To pass it quickly, you are bound
If you're the one, to hold it last
The game is past, and you are out!
looks like the people of Conn. have the ball.
Posted by: THREEFIFTHS | December 6, 2006 11:11 AM
It Would Have Not Made A Diference If John Destefano Would Have Become Governor, Both Of Them Are Puppets For The Corporatist Who Have Give Both Of These Charlatans Corp Money for There Campaign Coffins. If We The People Want to Solve This, Then We Must Find Other Means Of Cheap Energy Sources, Solar Energy? Also Have These Ceo Give Up The Big Bucks That They Make!! P.S You Better Start Watching The Water Company, I Hear That They Are Next In Line.
Posted by: Esbe
| December 6, 2006 12:12 PM
The Governor's election strategy was to pretend that this wasn't going to happen, now she calls for an emergency delay. But her position is ridiculous: a short-term delay to discuss long-term solutions. Long-term solutions aren't going to help us in January and the delay is just a political stunt. If folks want electricity in Jan. someone is going to have to pay for it and delaying the decision won't change a thing, just provide the illusion of "doing something".
Posted by: strangerthanfiction | December 7, 2006 1:44 AM
This dramatically highlights the glaring flaw in Rell's leadership style -- she's reactive, never proactive. An 11th hour, bubble gum fix to a major problem like this is simply unacceptable when it was known about for a long time. Another reason for people and jobs to flee CT. Shame on you Jodi.
Posted by: nlgeconomist | December 11, 2006 11:01 PM
I don't see the problem here. This is a functioning market. If you don't want rate hikes, stop consuming so much energy. If the market needs prices to increase, it's only a reflection of increased demand. Better turn in those second cars, hop on the bus and turn off your plasma TVs. This isn't corporate America running amuck; this is the capitalist system working. What's the other option - parastatal organizations that can turn power on and off at will? Gas lines? I remember the '70s. Who wants to be stuck at home in the dark again... ? Take some of that equity out of those over priced homes to power that extra 2000 sq feet financed on the cheap. Because if a 38% rate hike in power is going to break the bank, then we should be worried about the larger issues of the soundness of our financial system as a whole. The state’s only concern should be putting in place a support program or cross subsidy for the poorest consumers. Make your political and personal stand by choosing to change YOUR OWN consumption habits – these local lawmakers are powerless against the industry and the global market.
Posted by: Brian | December 16, 2006 9:31 AM
There is a way it can be stopped...PRICE CONTROLS. the UIL stock was at 27 a year ago, now it is about to cross the $50 threshold. The problem here is that we have a market incentivized monopoly...their primary goal is to make $ for the stockholder, not serve the community.
I suggest everyone go out and buy UIL stock..by the thousands...millions...Is a corporate takeover by the people too much to ask, since the government won't do anything to break their stranglehold on all of us?
The Gov and her pals all talk about "a great environment for business..." how do we get that when the power company is allowed to act like a robber baron?
Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Branford Eagle
- Brian's Commentaries
- Business NH
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Folk Alley
- Gina Coggio
- Gotham Gazette
- Hamden Daily News
- Josiah Brown
- La Voz Hispana
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Medical Intelligence
- Metrocrawl
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- Some Stuff To Do Today
- St. Louis Beacon
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bioregional Group
- Birthright
- Boys & Girls Club
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City Point
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- Friends of East Rock Park
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- NH Land Trust
- NH Safe Streets
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- New Haven 828
- New Life Corp.
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- ROOF
- Register Calendar
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- W'ville Synagogue
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Youth Continuum
Legal Notices
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35