Perez Charts A “Year of the Youth”

by Melissa Bailey | December 12, 2006 9:09 AM | | Comments (6)

Shifting their attention away from the unpopular proposed youth curfew, aldermen of the Black and Hispanic Caucus started focusing instead on a comprehensive plan for youth that would include a new citywide youth center and a revived Youth and Family Services Bureau.

Declaring 2007 the Year of the Youth, caucus president and Alderman Jorge Perez Monday night proposed creating a “coordinated strategy to deal with youth violence that does not have the curfew as a centerpiece of the puzzle.”

Perez proposed, and the caucus approved, drafting a plan that would make sure goals set by the 2000 Comprehensive Citywide Youth Plan come to fruition, with amendments where necessary.

“I believe that the year 2007 is going to be Youth Year, it’s going to be cool, it’s going to be hip” to talk about youth, said Perez. He predicted there will be “politicians tripping over each other to” draft initiatives in response to a spike in teen gun violence. The city should seize the opportunity to appeal to state and federal legislators for funds for youth programming, he said.

Meanwhile, the mayor’s office is drafting its own plans, with a press conference planned Tuesday to announce more youth programming a la CTRIBAT.

First on the caucus’ list is visiting successful youth programs as potential models for New Haven. Perez picked out three: The Door Program, the Harlem Children’s Zone and KIPP Academy, all in NYC. Such a program would go beyond even the Q House — it would be a “super-center” where youth could earn a GED, learn to paint, get help finding a job, eat dinner with friends, or even learn about conflict resolution.

“They keep saying they’ve got nowhere to go … we’ve gotta give them somewhere to go!” said Fair Haven Alderman Robert Lee. Lee suggested building a big YMCA in place of the soon-to-be-demolished Coliseum.

Aldermen hoped to organize a field trip to the model youth centers in the next month or so and draft a proposal before February, in time to appeal to state legislators for funds.

The caucus opted not to take a vote on the proposed youth curfew itself. With its main supporters, Aldermen Joyce Chen and Yusuf Shah, absent from the meeting, the proposal met scant support. One person, West Rock Alderwoman Michelle Edmonds-Sepulveda, said she’d support the proposal, but only for kids 15 years old and under, not 17 and under, as proposed.

The caucus agreed to withhold final judgment until the final curfew hearing on Wednesday.

Also Monday, caucus members met with top police brass to continue a dialogue that began in a boiling September meeting where they declared community policing “dead.” After that meeting, Police Chief Cisco Ortiz embarked on a campaign to restate the department’s commitment to community policing, and strengthen ties between residents and police.

As promised, Ortiz brought nearly every district manager, as well as other high-ranking cops, to respond to alders’ concerns. The decidedly less vitriolic meeting featured praise for hard-working district managers, as well as outstanding concerns on a few topics: school security, guns and communication.

Schools

Mayor John DeStefano’s plan to renovate or rebuild every school in the city will turn most schools into K-8. The idea is to give middle-schoolers a more intimate setting than a 4-8 middle school, hopefully improving behavior.

Alderman Gerald Antunes, a former city cop himself, said the school renovation poses a new twist for school security. With more schools with middle-school-aged kids, where will the school resource officers (“SROs,” cops who walk the halls in middle and high schools) go?

Ortiz said there are only 12 SROs now. He asks the schools chief where they’re needed most, and there they go. While he’s open to suggestion, Ortiz suggested “thinking out of the box” by using retired cops, retired teachers or parents in the hallways to perform a similar role to the SRO.

Meanwhile, Hill Alderwoman Jackie James reported daily drug dealing on the streetcorners near the John Daniels School. She goes by every day and asks people hanging out on the corners to get lost, and she’s getting tired of it. She suggested SROs help out. “I can’t do it every day — I can’t.”

Gun Buyback

Ortiz revealed the department had trouble getting any of its business partners to provide a discount on gift cards for the city’s gun buyback program, which kicks off today. In return for a working gun, residents will get a $100 gift card to Wal-Mart, Stop ‘n’ Shop or Shaw’s. Walgreens is expected to join as a fourth partner later this week.

Ortiz said the department had hoped companies would offer gift cards to the city at a reduced rate, say a $150 gift card for $100, but none would give the city “one dollar” in discount.

“It just totally blows my mind that the business community did not come on board with this buyback program,” said James.

The chief noted the sponsors of the $9,500 program were private companies.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: Ned | December 12, 2006 10:44 AM

"It just totally blows my mind that the business community did not come on board with this buyback program, said James."
Why should businesses contribute to a program that is ineffective and a waste of money? Businesses who did contribute probably did so either to placate a cheap shake-down artist, or to do pre-emptive damage control for their own pr. Politicians will pull any stunt to give other people's money away.

Posted by: Cedar Hill Resident | December 12, 2006 11:01 AM

Ok you know I have to give my 2 cents on this. First I do think that the curfew should be set up Temp. until programs are in place. But I agree with Alderwoman Michelle Edmonds-Sepulveda it should be for 15 and under. And I do like Alderman Robert Lee's idea about building a big YMCA in place of the Coliseum for several reasons...One it is downtown which is centraly located for all children. Since most kids now a days are taking city bus to schools.It would be near the soon to be Gateway collage which may or can have some involvment in the project. The Door seems to be the right direction.
I love the idea of a place for the kids to sit down and do dinner with eachother too.

My concern is with programs thing, are they going to be geared twoards teens or young children. I am hoping teens. My other concern is that we have a program or two set up in this city (not saying which ones) but they were set up for the kids and now it seems to me (I could be wrong) that the kids that are in it our the kids that have. Now don't get me wrong the programs are great but I see very few under privlaged kids using them. I hope to god that what ever is decided does not put the children in that position were they feel funny asking for fee wavering because they are poor! This is something that my community has descused on many occations when trying to get things for the kids to do. What the parents have to go through to get there kids in is a very humiliating thing sometimes. And then some kids parents will not even do that much for there children. This has to be a program the kids can do with out the parents assists. Sorry I know I am not wording this right. But some of you out there know what I am talking about.

Posted by: pinkbicycle | December 12, 2006 11:40 AM

Excuse me, how long has Perez been on the Board of Aldermen? And so now he is just starting to talk about youth. I am sorry, did young people just arrive in New Haven? Thanks to Bitsie Clark somebody on the BOA is actually interested in what young people have to say. Now the real trick will be to actually hear them and act on their thoughts and suggestions. Oh, and how will New Haveners pay for their desires, hopes and dreams.

Posted by: Nolan | December 12, 2006 1:17 PM

Why would these businesses not want to associate themselves with this program? Were they local businesses?

Posted by: THREEFIFTHS | December 12, 2006 5:40 PM

Where Will The Money Come From to Fund These Programs,When The City Can Not Even Afford To Fund
The New Haven School System!!! The Model Programs
In New York That Mr. Perez Is Talking About Are
Good Programs For The Youth, But These Programs
Are Fund By Big Name Celebrity And Big Corp Donation And Even The Corporatist Mayor Of New York puts Up His Own big Bucks!! Who Here In New Haven Has That Type Of Money, If Someone Did, Than They Could Have Save The Q House.

Posted by: observor | December 12, 2006 10:12 PM

The first problem with New Haven youth programs is that they are poorly run -- especially those run by the city -- and there is no accountability to make them better. Going down to NYC to look at -- and presumably copy -- existing programs is not the answer. The answer lies with giving kids something they want (a safe space with interesting, relevant activities) and hiring qualified, competent staff to run high quality programs. ANything the city touches goes to crap so keep them away from any youth initiaitve if there is to be any hope for success.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35