Insiders Paid $250K; He Would Have Paid $350K

by Melissa Bailey | February 21, 2007 8:37 AM | | Comments (8)

Halloween%20family.JPGLooking to settle down with his family in East Rock, Brady Stone said he would have paid $350,000 for a widow’s estate just down the street. He was discouraged to find it had already been sold for far less through an insider deal to Sal Brancati and a business partner, in a deal whose proceeds were marked for a “crippled children’s” fund.

Stone lived on East Rock’s Cottage Street with his wife, Jodi, and his son, Jaden (pictured above at Halloween of 2004 in front of their former abode). Their home sat across the street from the hopping neighborhood hub, Lulu’s coffee shop. They’d rented apartments in the area for four years. With another baby on the way, they started looking to buy a home.

Stone started his search in August 2005. He wanted to live in East Rock: The high concentration of young parents, rolling strollers down to Lulu’s, made the neighborhood a good fit.

In September 2005, he found out about a house just down the street. The elderly widow who had lived at 18 Cottage St., Margaret Amrich, had passed away in February. A neighbor had tipped him off the home was up for sale. Though it needed a paint job and some fixing up, the tan two-family house looked appealing. He thought he could rent out parking spaces in the spacious, 1,156 square-foot garage.

Stone, an architect, was looking for a fixer-upper. He said he decided he would pay up to $350,000 for the prime real estate. He called the number of the executor of the woman’s estate, attorney Gabriel H. Cusanelli. Stone left a voice message.

“I tried to induce pity,” recalled Stone Tuesday. “I told him we have a child, we’re having another, we live right down the street.”

To Stone’s disappointment, he found out that the home had already been sold.

In a swift insider deal, business partners of Cusanelli’s had nabbed the property in August, according to realtor Robert Sacco, who sold the home to Mark Perez and former city dealmaker Sal Brancati for $250,000.

That sale drew concern from Attorney General Blumenthal after this question was raised: Was a “crippled children’s fund” shortchanged by the deal? The city has called the transaction “not [an] honest” reflection of the market.

Stone, too, was shocked when he heard the sale price: “We were just totally floored, because quite obviously that is undervalued.”

Their hopes at settling down on Cottage Street dashed, Stone and his family ended up moving to Westville. He said he has no complaints with the new neighborhood, but “I definitely miss Saturday morning trips to Lulu’s.”

The house is now back up for sale — for a listed price of $379,000. The owners claim they rehabbed it. The city has no building permits on file. If it sells for that price, the $129,000 profit would go to the current owners, not to the children’s fund.

“It’s Standard To Call People You Know”

How did the property get whisked off the market before neighbors like Stone got a chance to make a bid for more money?

Robert Sacco, of Sacco Vollero Realty Group LLC, gave his explanation in a conversation Tuesday.

Sacco was brought into the transaction by Attorney Cusanelli, whom the widow had appointed to take care of her estate. In her will she directed the attorney to bequeath the property to a “crippled children’s fund” run by the Community Foundation of Greater New Haven.

Cusanelli’s job was to sell the home for as much as it was worth. He hired Sacco to do the job.

The city and neighbors have questioned the sale price, suggesting an undervalued sale might have shortchanged the “crippled children.”

IMG_7251.JPGSacco (pictured at right) stood by the sale price Tuesday, and made his case why.

After Cusanelli contracted with him to sell the house, Sacco studied recent sales in the area and decided Amrich’s estate, with its leaky roof and leaky oil furnace, could go for up to $259,000.

Then, he said, he did what he always does: He set up a chance for investors with whom he had a relationship to snatch up the property for that asking price.

Sacco put the listing up on the MLS real estate database, accessible via password to Realtors. Before putting the home up for sale, “it’s standard to call people you know” to give them a heads up. “We have a customer base”: Cusanelli had given him a list of potential investors; Sacco had his own list, too. “You alert people ahead of time to get on [MLS] that day. “¦ You alert everybody “” that’s the name of the game.”

A PCB Ventures Member Pays Cash, Quick

Sacco said he listed the property on Aug. 20, 2005. Three people, all from the insider shortlist, made a bid on the home, according to Sacco: “One was my business partner, one was a friend of mine,” and the third was Mark Perez.

At the time, Perez happened to be in business with attorney Cusanelli. Prior to that year, Perez had been buying and selling property with Sal Brancati and Cusanelli through a business partnership called PCB Ventures, LLC.

Tuesday, Sacco revealed Perez agreed to buy the home while Perez and Cusanelli were still in business through that LLC, which had been formed on the day Amrich died.

IMG_7261.JPGWhen Sacco listed the sale, Perez “came in the same day to buy it.” He offered to buy 18 Cottage St. (pictured) with no mortgage contingency or inspection, said Sacco. Perez put down a cash deposit of $5,000, and entered a contract to buy the home that day.

What about neighbors like Stone who might have been interested in the deal, and might have paid more for the home?

“He came in too late. It’s easy to say what you would’ve paid,” said Sacco. “If you weren’t sharp enough to look at the MLS every day, oh well.”

People who buy multi-family homes in East Rock are part of a small group of investors, said Sacco. They buy up homes to rent them out to Yalies. These investors usually end up getting first dibs at a home, he said. Sacco described a property in Bridgeport he plans to sell next week. He’ll alert interested investors beforehand, put it on MLS at night, then expect an investor to sign a contract the next day.

“Probably that sale will sell” in a short amount of time. “It’s going to go before a neighbor ever sees it.”

If the purpose of selling the home was to get as much for the estate as possible to help “crippled children,” was it fair to sell the home to a business partner of Cusanelli’ before seeing what prices would have emerged from the general public?

Sacco didn’t see a problem with the alliance: “The fact that someone he knew bought it “” it happens every day.”

Unusual Timing

Perez put the deposit down in August, according to Sacco. He then waited over seven months to officially close on the home and list the sale in the city land records.

Cusanelli’s partnership with Perez and Brancati, the PCB Ventures LLC, was dissolved on March 16, 2006.

The home was then sold to Perez and Brancati for $250,000 on April 12, 2006.


To read more on the Cottage Street sale, see these previous Independent stories, listed in chronological order below:

“‘Crippled Children’ Shortchanged?”
“AG Investigating Cottage St. Deal”
“City: Deal Was ‘Not Honest’”
“No Permits On File For 18 Cottage St.”







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: robn | February 21, 2007 9:32 AM

Anyone who has spent five minutes in the East Rock neighborhood is smart enough to realize that ANY property for sale will have multiple aggressive bidders. There is absolutely no incentive for a seller to rush a property into sale. The question for Attorney Cusanelli and Mr.Sacco is not whether they followed Mr. Sacco's own customary procedure, but whether they observed the intent of the sale (directed by Ms.Amrich's will)... to sell for the benefit of the disabled childrens fund. The answer, bolstered by the City Assessors unwillingness to label the transaction as "honest transaction" appears to be NO. As to the suspicious circumstances of interlocking business partnerships between the sellers and buyers, they paint a fairly crisp picture of a conspiracy to defraud the estate of Ms Amrich, and thus, the disabled childrens fund.

New Haven needs your help A.G. Blumenthal.

Posted by: James | February 21, 2007 10:27 AM

“He came in too late. It’s easy to say what you would’ve paid,” said Sacco. “If you weren’t sharp enough to look at the MLS every day, oh well.”

"People who buy multi-family homes in East Rock are part of a small group of investors, said Sacco. They buy up homes to rent them out to Yalies. These investors usually end up getting first dibs at a home, he said."

If we're to believe Sacco, he has no understanding of what his job is. First of all anyone with a casual knowledge of the market at that time knows that the price is ludicrous, "fixer upper" or not. A "leaky roof" and "leaky furnace" and paint hardly justify selling a house for (minimum) $150,000 less than its market value.

Secondly, if you are trying to sell something for the highest price possible, why limit the bidders to essentially, a short list of your own invitees and then rush to sell it to the first person who makes an offer?

Sacco makes it sound like the property he was trying to sell was some sort of problematic structure in a marginal neighborhood that only specialist investors would be interested in. How absurd. The market for that area was red hot in summer 2005 and there would have been serious competition from Mr. Stone and many others in similar situations.

Posted by: Cedar Hill Resident | February 21, 2007 1:58 PM

I really don't care what the standard practice was; this was for a charity and the right thing to do, the ethical thing would of been to at least put it on the open market to see what it could pull in! Fiduciary duty right boys! Your obligation was to Community Foundation not the investor friends! Just makes you sick! They should pay the extra profit plus a very large donation to the foundation! They sale should be deemed illegal really.

Posted by: Esbe | February 21, 2007 2:26 PM

This is basically a confession from Sacco that he typically doesn't even try to get the best price for clients -- he quickly sells the house, pockets the commission and moves on. It is obviously profitable for him -- he has done almost no work and walks away with a fat commission. God forbid he hold an open house, God forbid he work for his commission, God forbid he try for the best price rather than the quickest sale.

This is a clear breach of professional responsibility to clients. And he says he does it all the time! This particular deal stinks so bad that Vision Appraisal could mark it as a "non-market" deal just by looking at the price and the neighborhood.

Posted by: TrueBlueCT | February 21, 2007 6:48 PM

Esbe--

Sacco, like every realtor, is honor bound to do everything within his power to get the best price for his principal. Regardless. This definitely means offering the property via the MLS to a fuller range of buyers, and probably an Open House or two, since the property seems to have been vacant.

This isn't a matter of debate. This is what any ethical broker would do. This idea that Sacco did his job by eliciting multiple offers from a business partner, friend, and a buddy of Cusanelli, -- well, it's a joke.

Someone should initiate a complaint against him to the Real Estate Commission at the Department of Consumer Protection.

Posted by: Outsider | February 22, 2007 9:59 AM

In my book, if you have $350,000 to toss around for a home, you are an insider! Sorry, you won't get any sympathy from me. One baby and another on the way? I know plenty of families in that situation, and they typically don't have $350K lying around to buy a posh home in a wealthy neighborhood. Let's remember who the real outsiders/insiders are.

Posted by: Cedar Hill Resident | February 22, 2007 1:18 PM

Outsider

I am not sure you have read the whole story. The extra 100,000 they were willing to spend could for been more more for a charity, which this why the insiders should never have been given a deal. The house was being sold to give the proceeds to a charity and these kind folks would of payed the price that the house was worth and the charity would have got what it should have received.

Posted by: strangerthanfiction | February 22, 2007 9:44 PM

Excellent investigative work by the Independent. This insider deal doesn't come close to passing the smell test. It stinks! It was always a puzzlement that when Sal Brancati was the city's chief development guy lots of money came into the city, but the city had little to show for it in terms of new development, and many existing businesses fled the city. Now it appears that Sal's plying his trade on a freelance basis.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35