Six Women Lose City Jobs

by Melissa Bailey | February 8, 2007 5:43 PM | | Comments (6)

amendola.JPGDespite this man’s last-minute effort to save them from sudden layoffs, six city workers will lose their jobs Friday.

Larry Amendola (pictured), the president of city Union Local 3414, joined an effort to save six women’s jobs that were suddenly threatened with layoffs last week.

That effort bought them an extra week, but tomorrow, the women will be terminated, confirmed Derek Slap, the mayor’s spokesman. Slap framed the layoffs as a result of dwindling federal grants. The women all held positions funded by federal Community Development Block Grant money, but were also guaranteed certain benefits under the city’s union contract.

That combo was hard to sustain, said Slap. CDBG money has been cut by more than 15 percent since the program year of 2004-2005, he said. “This represents a decrease of $691,414 and the City is concerned there may be more cuts for FY 2008.”

Because of union contracts, the women’s salary and benefits were due to increase by 10.45 percent, according to Slap. Department heads, mulling how to deal with rising salaries and sinking CDBG money, determined which positions could be cut, he said.

Six women — four from the Livable Cities Initiative, one from the Finance Department and one from Public Works, were chosen.

A struggle to save their jobs ended Thursday in a string of reportedly heated meetings between city and union officials.

As a result of negotiations, the other women’s benefits will be extended: They’ll be paid until March 19 and receive medical benefits until the end of April, according to the city. Friday, they’ll report to the Human Resources office to end their careers after 10 to 20 years.

Scheri Walker, an LCI data analyst who’s worked with the city for 18 years, responded Thursday with shock at what she saw as a whimsical, unexplained layoff process. If her position’s funded by CDBG, why couldn’t she continue working until funds expire in June? And why weren’t people with less seniority laid off first? She asked.

“I’m still in awe of the way the city could do it the way they’re doing it, with no explanation for what criteria” led to their layoff, said Walker.

“I believe I have been deliberately targeted,” said another of the workers, Georgiann Dogolo. “The immediate common denominator is that we’re all single women over 40 [years old].” She said she and other workers signed a labor grievance Thursday. Amendola could not be reached for comment.

Dogolo was particularly ticked off to hear that another woman had recently been hired under the same grant. Susan Mizzoni will soon begin as a legal secretary for LCI, confirmed Slap.

Slap said while the position’s funded by the same grant, it is not expendable. “The department’s in need of a legal secretary. Unfortunately, none of the people who are being laid off have the experience as a legal secretary or the skill set.”

Slap said the women will be invited to apply for any vacant general fund positions.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: OH WELL | February 8, 2007 8:57 PM

This is very sad ,you tell people two day's before they will not have a job? What kind of #@# is that? What kind of union representation is THIS.

Posted by: bugupit | February 8, 2007 11:04 PM

So, has anyone figured out why they are axed 3/4 of the way through the grant's year? The City does work with budgets, right? Is the 10+% raise per contract mentioned the whole key, could not be swollowed, they had to go before it kicked in? Hey, is that raise just one year or over like three, and if more than one, why let Slap slap the truth around like that? How about why, after 20 years of dedication, someone's salary is dependent on annual renewal of Federal largess, rather than City general funds? So they promote a paralegal last year then when she is replaced they say they have to lay off three other staff? Don't expect much investigating from the board of aldermen and other politicos, they are too busy tugging like dogs fighting for a rag to pull the very same cdgb funds into their neighborhoods.

Posted by: Willie Williams Jr | February 9, 2007 9:16 AM

It's Unfortunate That Anyone Has To Be Laid Off, I Know The Feeling. I've Been Laid Off Three 3 Times In My Lifetime. If You Have 20, 25 or 30 Years of Service , It's Time To Go. People With That Kind of Experience and Time Should Be Able To Take Their Own Money, Experience and Brain and Open/Create Their Own Commercial Business. The Truth and Fact of The Matter Is The City of New Haven Needs To Cut Personnel By 25% In ALL Departments Except Emergency Services. By Cutting The Personnel Staff 25% Your Property Tax Will Be Cut In Half.

Posted by: deloresmariconde | February 10, 2007 5:23 PM

The official reason given for the lay-off is a reduction to a federal grant. If this is genuine then why hasn't the city imposed a hiring freeze with CDBG funded positions?

The women were not told they were being laid off because their positions were "expendable". That statement from Derek Slap should provide additional grounds for a lawsuit and a forensic audit.

Posted by: Raymond | February 12, 2007 7:39 PM

A year in Iraq getting shot at and using my brains to keep my men and I alive while the city of New Haven can't use their brains to properly care for their employees. I look forward to the day when these six women receive their justice.

Posted by: William | February 22, 2007 11:58 PM

they wont because they were paid from SPECIAL FUNDS which is basically grant money which can run out at any time. ALL special fund employees know this going in that at any time their funding source can be stopped and therefore those jobs are lost. it has nothing to do with anything else. what DOES need to be looked at is the issue of contractors that the City hires with pay double to triple they would pay a regular employee. this is done so the mayor can give out favors and get political gains in return. Just do a FOI and find out, you'll be amazed at how some people can make $75.00 an hour or 90K a year, but not be considered an "employee". That includes the City's longstanding practice of hiring it's own retirees to those super cushy, super high paying contractor jobs. wake up people, it's all about what john wants and BBJ gets what he wants - forget employee's right and absolutely forget what is best for the residents. remember, the City knows that 99% of the residents don't know, care or are even aware of city salaries, budgets and funding and the City certainly does not want anyone to know that all if it is PUBLIC INFORMATION. 6 women losing jobs is small potatoes compared to the horror show that is being run by the city, corp counsel and labor relations. WE DESERVE BETTER!!

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35