Budget Battle, Round Two

by Allan Appel | March 16, 2007 3:32 PM | | Comments (8)

IMG_1108.JPGAfter seniors sounded off to the aldermanic Finance Committee on Thursday night in support of the property tax freeze proposed in the proposed new $446 million city budget, Chairman Sergio Rodriguez opened the floor to public comment. A score of not-yet-senior New Haveners lined up to fill the alders’ ears with their thoughts. What aspect of the budget received most of the attention? You guessed it: property taxes. By turns wise and cranky, here’s a sampling of Elm City democracy in action:

Wearing a “Fight the Hike” T shirt, Wendy Hamilton (pictured above) angrily said: “Yale University is the elephant in the room. Look to them to solve the tax problem. They have a $20 billion endowment, and they spend an awful lot of it on advertising to make themselves look good. But how much do they pay in taxes? The answer is not nearly enough!”

IMG_1110.JPGLee Faulkner of Westville said that he is opposed to any tax increase for anyone. “The increase that we’ve all experienced is going to have serious impact on how well I can maintain my property. I mean you say to me that my house has doubled in value, but I can’t go to my employer and say to him: Excuse me, can you double my salary? There’s a serious disconnect here. I’m worried I’ll have to sell my house. Please find another way.”

IMG_1112.JPGLachelle Roundtree, also of Westville, spoke with passion of her pride in being representative of black people who have been educated in New Haven, are hard working, and are now in a position that they not only own their own home, but are landlord to others. “But these tax increases are extremely serious. Every pay increase I receive on my job or my husband receives on his job will now have to go to pay you,” she said, addressing the alders. “And also I’m going to have to increase the rents I charge to my tenants, and that’s going to have bad consequences for the city. I mean we’re the future leaders of New Haven. We’re trying to raise our children well, save money for their college educations, and your budget is making it extremely difficult. Something’s very wrong here. This is like a budget from The Sopranos. Long term, the only people who will be able to live here are poor people or rich people, and I don’t think even rich people will want to come to New Haven to pay all these taxes. Certainly people like myself — and I’m not alone — will seriously have to think of moving away unless something is done.”

IMG_1113.JPGMona Berman, who has lived on Lyon Street since 1977, said she too has been actively looking for another city to live in. She pays $11,000 in taxes, she said. “With my energy bill,” she said, “in an old house, and many of us have old houses, that’s another $800 a month in the coldest season, so that’s nearly a thousand a month.” How can the taxes have doubled, she wondered, and the Grand List not moved at all in the right direction? Berman presented the Finance Committee with a petition signed by 178 people protesting the ongoing property tax increases. To sign up or learn more, she encouraged people to visit this website.

IMG_1114.JPGAnd, finally, Lou Rizzo, who lives in the Annex, told the alders bluntly, “You’re just spending far more than you’re taking in. If I let the city run my house, I would lose it. This is the truth. If you can’t get that into your beads, we’re buried.”

IMG_1115.JPGCommittee members (left to right), Aldermen Ina Silverman, Roland Lemar, and Carl Goldfield, were left with much to chew over as the budget battle, as well as the budget babble, moves on into the spring. The next public hearing on the budget is scheduled for April 19, at 6 p.m.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: Bruce | March 18, 2007 10:49 AM

Wow, how did I miss this meeting? Oh well. In any case, I move at the end of the month. I'm done with paying outrageous taxes and getting crummy services in return. What incentive is there for anyone to stay?

Posted by: Moses | March 18, 2007 6:50 PM

This issue is almost unreal to me. New Haven will lose a lot or residents that have been loyal to the city for years, it something a little more reasonable isn't done. When I think of the number of people who work in the city and make more than 80K a year and don't live in New Haven, it makes me angry. The city should try to hire as many residents to become principals, detectives, and department heads that actually live in the city, so the tax dollars can be recycled instead of thrown away in other nearby towns. I also believe in common sense budgeting, spend only what's there. If this means combing the budget with a fine tooth comb then do it. And raising taxes should be an absolute last resort, instead of a quick fix.

Posted by: call a review | March 18, 2007 8:05 PM

By the city charter every property approved for defferal should be reported to the BOA at least once a year. Ask Economic development, and corp counsel to provided the agreements. Then get the permit taken out and compare the dates. Work must not begin until application was filed. Then look at all the post datyed agreements. Henry and John gave the city away and pushed the taxes onto the average homeowners. In fact, just ask either of the aforementioned departments or the controller to show contarct compliance with any agreements, and provide copies. They cannot do it!! I only hope the next few months of having investiagors from the FBI and the US Atty office collecting files and records is enough to show everyone how much B**lsh*t the city has passed along. In fact, just look at one organization, the Parking Authority and those agreements. Then show where the monies are. Or take New haven Terminal and the land they own on Fairmont. No payment, no billing. Ask the controller for the report we spent thousands of dollars to get that concluded the special agreements were missing and trying to analyze them was impossible. I think the city failed to pay the company, because they expected majic. Why did the treasurer resign? Why did the head of IT resign? Why is the assessor resigned? Why did the former deputy director of economic development and traffic and parking resign? I know most left becuae they were disgusted by the administration and the blatant disregard for acting in an ethical fashion. In fact the all powerful Alteiri, who cared less about he BOA, or anyone only left because NHI focused on him. He, essentially took more money than Billy White. The gy had a full pension from the Board of Ed. and still was contracted, given an office and ran a department, while he and the mayor called him an independent contractor. I see greater, or at least equal fraud in that type of behavior, but John had no problem with it.

Posted by: Jeffrey | March 18, 2007 8:12 PM

We're Organizing You can keep up-to-date about some of the organizing on this issue here http://newhavenissues.blogspot.com/

Posted by: robn | March 19, 2007 1:01 PM

Because the State mandates a uniform mill rate, the reassessment has SHIFTED the tax burden from commercial property owners to residential property owners. Until the property tax system is reformed so that our homes aren't treated as commercial entities, merely speculative profit centers, then we're all in indentured servitutde to our own government.

Posted by: MB | March 19, 2007 2:47 PM

Our elected officials have allowed revenue generating, viable commercial properties to be removed from the tax role. Until this policy is changed the tax burden on New Haven residents will continue to rise.
Here is an example---The new REGIONAL Business High School is slated to replace two revenue producing properties on Water Street. Despite alternative sites and over objection from the community, the 'powers that be' decided on the Water Street site. To make matters worse, the future students will be subjected to noise and air pollution generated by Rt 34 (across the street) and the nearby highway intersection of Rts. 91 & 95.
When will they ever learn????????????

Posted by: cedarhillresident [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 19, 2007 2:51 PM

robn is right! We are not protected on a higher level.
But there are other things that I see ... the lack of proper development to bring in other taxable sources. I see yale putting up alot of buildings but very little of anything that can help the rest of the city. We are in a catch 22 because if we rasise the commercial taxes we will not bring in new buisseness but as stated in the artical the mid-class will be forced to move out. And the city will be left with the poor and rich but the rich will not stay if it has to shove out even more taxes to pay for the poor so the future of new haven can be a grim one if this is not handled right.
DEVELOPMENT! is the answer but it needs to be the right kind ...what has brought money in ...what has not?? that is the answer.

Posted by: Ned | March 19, 2007 3:24 PM

"here's a sampling of Elm City democracy in action" More like futility in action. What's "democratic" about pleading for the government not to steal from you? It seems more degrading than democratic. Ten people in a room six of them vote to take all of the money out of your wallet and give it to their friends: democracy triumphs! Fitting picture of the alderman stuffing his face.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35