New Haven Independent

Chief Faces Crowd; Mayor A No-Show

by Paul Bass | March 28, 2007 8:28 AM | Permalink | Comments (20)

Jefferson%20and%20Westbrook.jpg Ortiz%20at%20Elks.jpg (Updated) In the first major community debate over New Haven’s police bribery and theft scandal, Police Chief Francisco Ortiz (at left) faced a standing-room-only crowd and a grilling over the signals his department sends to cops about whether to come forward with reports of misconduct by fellow officers. Mayor John DeStefano turned down an invitation to attend what his spokesman dismissed as a not-“legitimate” gathering — a word DeStefano later called “unfortunate” in explaining why he didn’t show up.

It was fortunate for organizers that Tuesday night’s event concerned the police, not the fire department. Because the fire department could have probably shut it down: Some 250 people streamed into an Elks Club hall on Webster Street with about half as many chairs. They came to air their views about the scandal and to watch a panel of activists grill expert witnesses.

The star witness was Ortiz. Rather than duck what promised to be a confrontational event, Ortiz decided to attend. He sat up front and listened, and appeared as a witness questioned by the most visible critics of his department. Some of his answers mollified the crowd; a few elicited jeers, notably an exchange over a 2004 incident involving his discipline of a black cop who claimed white fellow officers were mercilessly beating an unarmed black suspect.

Ortiz also had his top cops — his assistant chiefs, his district managers — present in the hall. They listened quietly, respectfully, through almost three hours of what at times was pointed, passionate criticism of their force.

On the other hand, as the night progressed and difficult questions were mined, speakers expressed support for the many cops who do their jobs well. Those comments were tempered by outrage over the scandal and concern over whether the police can adequately police themselves over misconduct that does occur. The deepest anger expressed centered on the missing man of the evening, Mayor John DeStefano.

Reached Wednesday morning, DeStefano called the event “valuable on its own terms” but said he felt the organizers “had their minds made up” about the issues before it began.

The event was organized by three longstanding New Haven critics of police misconduct: city and state NAACP chief Scot X. Esdaile; State African-American Affairs Commission Chairman Michael Jefferson; and state ACLU head Roger Vann. They, along with Middletown-based civil rights lawyer Dawne Westbrook (pictured alongside Jefferson at the top of this story), questioned the witnesses and moderated public comments. They organized the event in response to the recent arrests of two narcotics cops by the FBI during a still-ongoing investigation of bribe-taking and theft of tens of thousands of dollars of suspects’ cash. (Click here to read a potboiler 57-page FBI affidavit about the case against Lt. White and co. For other related stories on the scandal, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here , here and here.)

Roach Revisited

The most dramatic exchange of the evening took place during Ortiz’s testimony, when Michael Jefferson brought up the 2004 case of Officer Cleveland Roach.

Chief Ortiz had just spoken about how “We need to do something different” in the police department. He said he wants “to create a culture” in which “an officer walks into [internal affairs] and says, ‘I know something and I want to report it.’” The chief noted that officers who probably knew that Lt. Billy White was allegedly stealing cash never came forward to report it; he predicted more arrests are forthcoming.

Jefferson suggested Ortiz was helping sending the message that officers shouldn’t come forward. He cited Ortiz’s 2004 reprimand of Officer Roach as an example. In April of 2004, Roach was among a group of officers chasing a couple of suspects in Newhallville; one of the suspects had fired a gun in Fair Haven and helped lead cops on a cross-town chase, first by car, then on foot.

The cops found one of the suspects in a backyard. Roach claimed the other officers were kicking and dragging and otherwise roughing up the unarmed suspect. Roach, like the suspect, is black; the other officers are white. Roach came to the man’s defense. He disobeyed a superior’s orders to get out of the way; Roach claimed he feared the alleged beating would continue.

After months of investigation, Ortiz reprimanded Roach for disobeying a superior’s order. Ortiz said at Tuesday night’s meeting that the investigation showed no corroborating evidence for Roach’s claims. Indeed, other officers present disputed Roach’s version.

At the time, two eyewitnesses from the neighborhood described the incident to a reporter in much the same terms as Roach’s. (Disclosure: I was the reporter, and quoted the eyewitnesses in a story in the New Haven Advocate.)

Ortiz responded to Jefferson Tuesday night by describing the case as a chase by officers of some dangerous “bad guys.” Click on the play arrow at right to watch part of Ortiz’s response.

That response drew a sharp retort from panelist Westbrook — who happened to represent the two of the suspects in that case. She helped them sue the police department for violations of their civil rights. They collected money from the city in a settlement, she said; they’re also still in jail for their crimes. She offered a different version of events from Ortiz’s, as well as an argument that cops “don’t get to beat the crap out of the ‘bad guys.’” Click on the play arrow at right to watch her response in full, and Ortiz’s rejoinder.

Ortiz also underwent some pointed questions from panelist Vann, who asked him if he’d known about problems involving Lt. Billy White — currently the center of the police scandal after his arrest — when he originally promoted him to head of the narcotics unit.

Ortiz said he hadn’t known anything about White’s alleged misdeeds starting with the time Ortiz came on the force 29 years ago.

Vann%20at%20Elks.jpg Vann (pictured) proceeded to read aloud a 1990 Advocate article detailing, among other cases, an 1981 incident in which White confronted black boys in a soccer league whom he mistook for robbery suspects in the East Rock neighborhood. White allegedly pointed a gun at the kids and said, “The first n——- to move will get his f——-’ head blown off.” Ortiz said he hadn’t been aware of that allegation or others cited in the article.

Despite such exchanges, Ortiz kept his composure throughout the grilling. He praised Jefferson and the other panelists for holding the event; he invited them to take part in improving the department. He took full responsibility for the breakdown in the department. “I own this,” he said. “I’m not walking away from this.” At the same time, Ortiz repeatedly praised his rank and file; he deflected questions aimed at criticizing the mayor or the police union.

As Ortiz returned to his front-row seat following his testimony, Roger Vann asked the crowd to give the chief a round of applause for showing up and answering questions.

Does The Public Count?

That reception was in marked contrast to the barbs sprinkled throughout the evening aimed at Mayor DeStefano. DeStefano has sought to marginalize the event’s three organizers since they began publicly pressing questions about his responsibility for the scandal and about why the FBI, not the police department’s internal affairs unit, the police commission or the city’s civilian review board, discovered and stopped the alleged corruption. (Meanwhile, DeStefano has basically acted on their calls for a systemic look at what went wrong.)

Elks%20crowd.jpg DeStefano’s spokesman, Rob Smuts, gave the Register an explanation Monday that rankled many in the Elks Club crowd. Smuts contrasted the Elks Club gathering with “meetings that really have legitimacy”: neighborhood management team meetings and Board of Aldermen meetings, which routinely draw a fifth to a tenth the number of citizens who gathered Tuesday night at the Elks Club.

DeStefano took a more conciliatory tone when discussing the event Wednesday morning.

“I certainly don’t want to delegitimize anyone’s point of view,” he said. “That [“legitimate”] was an unfortunate word. Everyone’s opinion matters.”

The mayor said he feels two key questions need to be addressed right now: “What happened here? How do we prevent it from happening in the future?”

“The meeting last night, while valuable on its own terms, was not set up to get to what happened here and how we resolve it. Formats like that need to be set up so people can feel comfortable expressing their point of view.”

At the forum, the “l” word was invoked from the start.

“Y’all feeling legitimate?” the NAACP’s Esdaile asked the crowd Tuesday night.

“Yeah!”

“Just wanted to make sure,” Esdaile said. “This is not about a witch hunt. This is about our community being heard. We’re going to make sure our community is respected.”

Later, activist Barbara Fair told the crowd, “The mayor thought that the ‘legitimate’ community had already spoken. I guess we don’t matter. I’m glad we came out anyway, even though we’re illegitimate.”

In between, speakers took aim at DeStefano’s handling of the crisis, and of the police department.

King%20Downing.jpg Under questioning from Roger Vann, King Downing (pictured), who heads the national ACLU’s Campaign against Racial Profiling out of New York, poked holes at the mayor’s plan to hire a respected national law-enforcement study group called the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) to perform a top-to-bottom evaluation of the police department. The mayor has appointed a local “accountability” committee to oversee the group’s work — a committee without a single outspoken critic of police misconduct in New Haven.

Without true, broad community input, that process is doomed from the start to lack credibility, Downing said.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s PERF, Smurf, anybody,” he said. “The community is going to say, ‘We didn’t have any hand in it.’”

One woman speaking in the open-mic portion of the event scored the mayor for spending $130,000 of public money for PERF. She called on citizens to tell City Hall, “No, it’s not coming out of the taxpayers’ dollars. We pay enough taxes.”

John%20Daniels%20at%20Elks.jpg Another speaker, former Mayor John Daniels, used the occasion to blame DeStefano not just for the police scandal, but for the decline of community policing. Click here to read, and watch, his passionate, at times historically revisionist, remarks.

To What End?

In addition to allowing citizens a needed chance to let off steam, in addition to eliciting some answers to pressing questions about the scandal, what impact will the forum have on efforts to reform law enforcement in New Haven?

Norm%20Pattis.jpg Some speakers made concrete suggestions: Re-open all drug cases, or at least those involving Lt. White. Serve on juries. (That suggestion came from defense lawyer Norman Pattis, pictured, who said his urban clients have a fairer shot with racially mixed juries.) Give the civilian review board subpoena power — or scrap the board altogether and form one that’s more independent of the police department and armed with subpoena power. Include true community input (perhaps even a critic or two?) on the “accountability” panel overseeing PERF.

Alex Rhodeen, chair of the Board of Aldermen’s Public Safety Committee, watched the whole event from the back of the room, then approached organizers afterwards looking for more concrete suggestions. He, like other public figures from the mayor to the police chief to their critics, said he wants to take the process seriously — and use this scandal as an opportunity to make the city better.

Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: Susan Voigt | March 28, 2007 8:20 AM

Just want to say that I'm very proud of our chief, Francisco Ortiz. He is always willing to meet the people of New Haven at any time and at any place. This is the hallmark of open government and good policing.

Susan Voigt, Democratic Town Chair

Posted by: SWHAT | March 28, 2007 9:51 AM

It doesn't matter that cisco is good chief and showed up to represent "open government and good policing". Regardless of any positive steps that may have been achieved last night, Jefferson et al, want the Mayor's head on a platter and weren't given that satisfaction last night.

Posted by: Da Hill | March 28, 2007 11:42 AM

This is not about giving accolades to the chief for doing his job...It is his responsibility to attend these meetings and be accountable to the community, the fact that he showed up is not worthy of praise. The Mayor does deserve severe criticism for not attending, or sending a representative to at least offer a statement. These are the same citizens that you are going to be asking to vote for you by years end, the same community that makes up a portion of the BOA. While I understand your unwillingness to give credibility to the hosts of the event (which is understandable), the fact that 200+ of your citizen base was out expressing concern deserves your attention...you failed them.

I fail to see the racial implication involved in these crimes committed by the New Haven Police Department. I wish that all of the organizations that were present would make there position more clearly understandable. I hope this is not being used as a platform to further personal political goals...that would truly be unfortunate. What, specifically, do you want?

There is, however, an inherent issue with all that has taken place with this scandal. What accountability does the chief have when an entire department has to be investigated by an outside organization? If you can take care of your house, then you should step down and let someone who can run the show. The Chiefs blindness is costing the City $130,000.00, if this were any other business; a loss of this magnitude would be grounds for termination. What's different here?

Susie, you could learn a lot from last nights events. There is a lot to be said about making ones self available to the community that they represent, beyond when they want something...How many times do you frequent the Dixwell community? Every election cycle does not count...Dixwell knows the truth.

Posted by: pinkbicycle | March 28, 2007 12:36 PM

I think this is important. But I think there are bigger issues that this community could take on. If it were just about policing, cities all over America could fix that. But the larger issues seem to elude the African-American community. Perhaps White was over the top with African-American males, and perhaps he shook them down for their drug money, and maybe he kicked some ass. But here's the point, if parents and community were on top of their game, more responsible, more connected and more concerned about youth, then Billy White wouldn't/couldn't exist. Sure it is easy to say Billy White is the root cause of all that is wrong with communities of color, but at the end of the day, if Billy White and few others are off the streets and not working. Does that resolve the issues of the African American community. And what do they say about Black on Black crime?

Posted by: guest | March 28, 2007 3:06 PM

Da Hill says: "While I understand your unwillingness to give credibility to the hosts of the event (which is understandable), the fact that 200+ of your citizen base was out expressing concern deserves your attention"

Lots of people and the mayor regard the leaders of this group that way and I have been trying to figure it out. Can anyone give me a quick history of deficits in the leaders of this group that has formed the basis of this general dismissal of them?

I am genuinely in the dark, except for the mayor's accusation last week that one of them tried to shake him down. I want to know.

I attended the meeting, and they were great - they were pros.

Thanks

Posted by: cedarhillresident | March 28, 2007 8:05 PM

shoot if I was the mayor I would not have come; a room full of 200 angry people. Man, would he of heard it!!
He has his lackys running the field for him. I wonder how much rehearsal went into the answers given.

But my hats off to The Cisco Kid for showing up.

I think the city is just letting everyone blow off steam and they know this will just disappare in time. Why because no one want to come out and help the groups communitys have set up.

I am going to yell at the 200 plus people that showed up! How many of you go to Block Watch meetings!!!! how many of you get involved in getting your community clean!! HMMMMM!!!!!! I know some that went do but lets get real!! My whole area is screaming but I don't see them at our Block Watch meetings!! One hour a month?? Come on get real because you are complaining does not mean you are involved in helping!!! Get off your ass and join your block watch or Managment team or Greenspace group!!!!!!! Then Complain!!!!!!!

This is the city not the suburbs. It is to populated to not get involved!!

Sorry I am mad but I am listen to so many people screaming but none of them are involed in the solution!
To all that are Big Hugs

Posted by: A Voice | March 28, 2007 11:53 PM

The mayor continues to take the minority community for granted. Please understand that we as citizens and taxpayers of this city can not allow this issue be about scottx , michael jefferson or roger van. This issue is so much bigger. We all are aware of the systemic issues that are present in the police department,BOE and city hall. We also are that many are kept out of the process. How can you serve a city as diverse as New Haven and not have minorities as a part of your adminsitration and then be confident enough to believe that during election time you will have our vote. The Mayor of this city has set the tone for the Police department, BOE,and his adminstration.

Lets take a look at several areas of concern:

-How many alderman work for the BOE,etc.?
-We have a caucasian mayor, a caucasian city town clerk who also fails to understand what it means to be inclusive and a caucasian president of the Board of Alderman. All hand picked by the mayor. In a city were they are not the majority.
-The mayor also picks who will or will not serve on boards and commisions.

So remember it is the process that we must look at working on fixing and there are many ways to do that.

Posted by: John Padilla | March 29, 2007 6:27 AM

Give Cisco Ortiz credit for the respect he showed to the community in coming and answering questions in what he knew would be a difficult environment. I have to agree with other commentators above that so far, this scandal is about two people. We should not be so quick to indict an entire department based upon the actions of two people. If more officers are to fall in this scandal, its because they did something they have to account for. I am confident that the vast majority of New Haven Police officers have nothing to worry about.

Posted by: KAM B | March 29, 2007 7:44 AM

FANTASTIC! I love how the New Haven community, at the meeting, is so quick to come to the aid and defend the gun carrying animal that just shot up a neighborhood. And they're so quick to slam the cops for capturing this violent animal. The arrestee got roughed up by cops during his arrest?! What a joke. Those people who were at that meeting should look at New Haven back in the 50, 60, and early 70's. It was a great place to live. People raised their own children (the cops didnt have to) and the streets were safe because the PD was a no-nonsense blue collar department. For the community to even care about this arrestee is ridiculous. The difference between the PD today and of yesteryear is cops are under a microscope for everything they do. Its a vicious world and the streets will kill you. When these men and woman attempt to do their job, every Tom, Dick, and Harry, wants to second guess them, fire them, suspend, them, etc... So what happens? They do as little work as possible just to get by. Unhandcuff the cops and let them do their job. Stop bitching! Have a public forum discussion with all of those BS leaders and talk about adults leaving their kids unsupervised. Well, that might not work because THOSE LEADERS will probably blame the government, the city, and the tax payer, for not having more programs in the inner city to occupy their kids time so the parents can sit around, do nothing, and collect fat checks from the state.

Posted by: Da Hill | March 29, 2007 9:40 AM

Kam B,

Those are strong words you are spewing...I wonder if your position changes when you are on the recieving end of that roughing up. And please dont give me that ... about how you dont worry about it cause you are a law abiding citizen, cause I am hear to tell you, no one is safe when a pissed off cop pulls you over. So be carefull who you refer to as animals (you show your true colors when you type) cause for a police officer to beat a suspect who was reckless, makes that police officer worst than the "animal" hes beating. ...

See it does not matter if you are guilty, innocent, or otherwise. You are at the mercy of a gun carrying cowboy. And yes I am generalizing, cause thats what happens when you act reckless in your uniform, they all become the same. Unless you are a wm/wf, then you might be safe. Unfortunately, due to the high crime in our neighborhoods we all get lumped together and rather than treat everyone with respect they treat everyone like criminals, despite your social background, despite your education, despite the business that you own, despite being a father, despite being a husband, despite not having a criminal record. See you speak from an experience that is warm and safe when it comes to the law. While that group of 200 speak of completely different experience.

This is What I believe to be the point of all this anger. The fact that the high and mighty police department that is unforgiving when you are pulled over, who speaks to you as if you are less than a man, who is all powerfull when it comes to law...has shown that they are just as fallable, that they are flawed. So where is the slap in the face? where is the kick in the balls? where is the long arm of the law? Where is that attitude we get every fucking time we are accosted by the boys in blue?

No no no...we need to be concerned, it was only a few. It was not the whole department. They are all different people. We should treat all with dignity and respect until they prove otherwise. Thats the attitue we should take? When they living the golden rule, by gollie, they will start reaping the benefits of it. You treat people like shit and expect to be treated otherwise when the shoes on the other foot...no sir. Take the medicine as you give it...

Treat all men with respect and you shall be treated with respect.

Ortiz, you failed your position. It has cost the city of new haven enough. RESIGN. You are a great person, but you FAILED...RESIGN. You may not have been involved, but it happened under your watch...and its costing the city...RESIGN.

Posted by: KAM B | March 29, 2007 7:09 PM

DA HILL,
You're comparing apples to oranges. Getting spoken down to during a traffic stop (which is wrong for the PD to do) is totally different than comparing a cop tackling someone who just shot up a neighborhood. Then worrying about the cop using to much force to control and handcuff an animal. Thats right ANIMAL! Thats how I refer to a person who drives around and shoots the streets of NH up! They are animals with no morals. If you get pulled over by the cops and they're tlaing down to you obviously thats inappropriate and should be dealt with. BUT I have no sympathy for a drugs dealer, or gun carrying thug, or a suburbanite who comes to the city to get their drug fix. LET THEM ALL ROT AND DIE and the city will be a safer place for you and I.

Posted by: nfjanette | March 29, 2007 9:00 PM

Treat all men with respect and you shall be treated with respect.

What a beautiful thought - if only that was so. However, it has little to do with reality.

Reality is that citizens of all backgrounds are being preyed upon by criminals that could care less for the kind thoughts. Reality is that black men are the most likely victims of violent crime by other black men. Reality is that the teens that roam the city in bike gangs aren't looking for your respect, they're looking for your wallet, iPod, and watch. Reality is that some (most?) of the people that attended that meeting, as pointed out by a previous commentator, don't regularly participate in their neighborhood block watch and management team meetings. They care enough to sound off for one evening of political theater, but what about the day after?

All of these things have to change, and slogans will have little to offer toward that goal. Progress will only come from long, hard work by all involved, citizens and government, working together in coordinated efforts to both provide more education and employment opportunities for the next generation while at the same time better enforcing the law to protect the city residents now.

Posted by: KAM B | March 30, 2007 5:33 PM

Well said NFJANETTE.

Posted by: Ben Ross | March 31, 2007 12:31 PM

When we talk of community stock taking and responsibility much room for improvement exists. I like the one positive direct suggestion....vote so you are part of the jury pool...juries which reflect the actual make-up on NH treat offenders with more? grace.
This town's emphasis on criminalizing the drug situation has tragic consequences, new vision is needed. The drug court is no more. A 'member of' community report card on(cops) issues(reporting police irregularities) and open city web site...kinda like this might go a long way to nurture involvement.
The feeling of disenfranchisement and non participation for certain segments...like the black majority.... go way back...building a ethos of place and dignity (more than a job, house and a car,which are huge)take quite a bit of effort.
The continued questioning of public officials is everyones job...all the time. So give the mayor notice and ask him what legit is!

Posted by: Willie Williams Jr | April 4, 2007 7:11 AM

There Needs To Be A Black Town Hall Meeting Every Month At The Elks Club. Other Autrocities Such As Unsolved Murders of Black People Since 1900 Need To Be Investigated. The Mayor and The Police Chief Should Be Procecuted For Complicity, Hendering Procecution and Other Federal Crimes. The City of New Haven Should Cut It's City Personnel By 20% In ALL Departments Except Fire Services. The Primary Reason Why The Police Act The Way They Do Is Because They Are "Draft Dodgers" and Failed To Serve Their Country In The Military, The Police Force Should Be Cut By 25% NOW!.
African League Is A Civil Rights Organization. African League

Posted by: KAM B | April 6, 2007 10:17 PM

Hey WILLIE WILLIAMS JR,
Get a clue dope! The cops should cut their force by 25%?! Why, so you can go out and rob people and have an easier time of getting away. MORON! To all of the normal people who read this stuff, Willie is the exact reason so many cops are sick and tired of their jobs because they deal with idiots like Willie Williams on a daily basis. Its like Chinese torture. So Willie, go crawl back under your rock and stop licking stamps. It's having an effect on your sanity, again.

Posted by: Edward_H | April 7, 2007 2:22 PM

Kam B
This perpetrator is not an "animal". Unless sick, animals do not brazenly put people in danger the way the criminals described did. I believe the term "savage" is much more appropriate given the callous disrespect for human life the culprits in question showed.

Posted by: Edward_H | April 8, 2007 11:24 AM

Willie Williams
The Mayor and The Police Chief Should Be Procecuted For Complicity, Hendering Procecution and Other Federal Crimes.

Do you also support prosecuting people who have knowledge of such murders and various crimes but do not cooperate with the police because the don't want to "snitch on their homies" ?

The Primary Reason Why The Police Act The Way They Do Is Because They Are "Draft Dodgers" and Failed To Serve Their Country In The Military,

Interesting theory. Do you have any numbers showing police officers who lack military service have a propensity for corruption or how military training prevents such corruption.

The Police Force Should Be Cut By 25% NOW!.

Perhaps you should attend your neighborhoods management team meeeting and suggest to your fellow neighbors the NHPD reduce the patrols in your own neighborhood by 25%. If they agree there are many other areas of the city that would be glad to gain the additional police resource your neighborhood clearly does not need.

Posted by: KAM B | April 10, 2007 9:15 PM

Edward H,
Excellent points. Willie must be trying to figure out what to type or how to spell it.

Posted by: Willie Williams Jr | April 24, 2007 6:51 PM

Cut The New Haven Police Department 25% NOW!. Since Kam B. Wants To Become Personal, Why Don't You Creat A Link From Your FAKE Name?. The New Haven Police Department Has Done Nothing For Willie Williams Jr Since I Got Out of The U.S. Army In 1974 But Create Stress, Hell and Disruption. They Sided With Communists and Those Anti-Vietnam War Activists and The National News Media and Printed Some Wicket Lies About "Black Vietnam Veterans. They Discriminated Agaist Me and 140,000 Black Veterans Survived That War From 1958-1973 Because of The Vietnam War...They Scurged Us!. In 1976 I Opened My First 1st. Business In New Haven "Linda's Creative Styling" Downtown On Chapel Street. Some One Fire Bombed It...They Thought It Was Funny. In That Time Line 1976 Insurance Companies "Red Lined" Black Owned Businesses...Even If I Could Afford It I Would Have To Pay 3-5 Times The Insurance Rate. I Lost $8,000.00-$10,000.00 That I Worked Two 2 Full Time Jobs For. NOW! Since You! Kam B. and These Other Week Kneed Sissy Fied Black Negros Know So Much, Why Don't Yall Niggxx Boys Work Two 2 Full Time Jobs and Open Up Your Own Commercial Black Owned Businesses Down Town New Haven Without A Loan or A Grant. I Have Been Down Town New Haven Three 3 Times In My Life Time Since 1976: 1. Linda's Creative Styling(Womens Boutique), 2. Poor Willie's(General Store)The City of New Haven Evicted 350 Vendors At Caesars, and Downtown Drop Off Center 31 Orange Street(Merchandising) Burglerize Two 2 Times, As Time Go's On I'm Coming Back Downtown New Haven and I'm Going To Open Up Another Commercial Business A "Modeling Agency" "Black Models USA Since 1998". The Last Business I Had $500,000.00 Insurance Policy w/The Hartford Insurance Company Hoping That Someone To Include The Police Would Do Something Stupid...Like Not Respond or Another "Fire Bomb". Black Models USA Is The First 1st. and The ONLY! Black Owned Modeling Agency In The United States. In Addition, I Publish A Monthly Models Magazine. When I Come Back Downtown New Haven and Open Up A Full Service Modeling Agency, I Will Have A $1,000,000.00 Umbrella Policy plus "Lloyds of London" In Great Britton. I Hope Someone Fire Bombes It or The New Haven Police Department Interferes With My Commercial Business In These United States of America...So I Can Assist The F.B.I. As I Have Done Before In Haven Three 3 More Cops From New Haven Sent To A Federal Prison Where They Belong.
NOTE: Speak That That You Know, and That You Know NOT! About, Speak NOT! About It...Less You Believe In "Willie Lynch 1712". You Don't Know Me...So! Stand Down!.
Black Models USA
http://supermodels.com/profile.php?id=19939

Chief Faces Crowd; Mayor A No-Show

Comments

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

News Feed