The Tyranny of the Letters
by Marcia Chambers | March 1, 2007 9:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (6)
At a tumultuous RTM meeting this week, angry members from both sides of the aisle castigated Moderator James Bruno, saying he had hijacked the authority of the RTM, abused his power and tarnished their reputations.
His conduct, they assert, is the result of series of misguided decisions guided by political forces whose dictates he seems unable to reject. At this week’s meeting, Bruno’s actions centered on accepting a school case that was not within the RTM jurisdiction and sending an election case involving Rep. Lonnie Reed to state election authorities when it should have been handled by the RTM. Section 3G of the Town Charter says the RTM “shall be the judge of the election and qualification of its members.” In each case, Bruno went far beyond his authority as Moderator.
In a night of bitter confrontation that few could ever remember having so serious an impact, members decried what has now become a pattern of targeting political enemies, including RTM members and others.
This particular form of character assassination comes by way of a category that seems innocent enough”“Correspondence. It is what it says it is, a way for citizens to write a letter to the RTM about matters concerning the town. But recently, “correspondence” has taken on a whole new meaning. Letters appear and Bruno reads them to the RTM and beyond (meetings are televised for cable) regardless of their veracity. The targets hear the letters for the first time along with everyone else.
Whether Bruno is acting on his own is another question. At one point, Reed pointed out to him that it was reprehensible that these letters, “these allegations” are “being read off right onto television.”
To that Bruno replied, “I am sorry. I did what I was told to do.”
In January, Bruno read the now infamous Michael Milici- Daniel F. Baughman, Sr.
letter. The two former chairmen of the Democratic Town Committee (Baughman also ran Cheryl Morris’s First Selectman election campaign), accused Reed and three other RTM members of unethical conduct.(One has taken a new job and since resigned.)
The main target of the letter was Reed, a much respected, hard working and well-liked member of the RTM, who has publicly split with the Cheryl Morris-Ed Marcus administration and is now one of their targets. She has since become a key leader in a newly formed effort to return Anthony Unk DaRos to office as Democratic First Selectman.
Reed told the RTM she had hired a lawyer, that the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) had put the case on a fast track, and her answers to the complaint are due March 2nd.
“I am innocent. However, the fact that this was given a boost—-it arrived at the SEEC pretending to be sanctioned by the RTM, as if we had given it the dignity of our attention, let alone a vote, and you signed this, not as a private citizen but as Jim Bruno, moderator, is a hijacking of the process,” an intent to deceive the SEEC, she told the room of some 35 residents.
“Look at your job description. You are our moderator, not our dictator,” she declared as shouts and applause filled the room.
“I think a lot of us feel that the current mantra is: ‘you’re next.’ Folks on the RTM, on both side of the aisle, are very concerned about the modus operandi we can see going on in the town recently, that those of us who speak out, and there are many of us, are going to be targeted.“
The clear objective of the January Milici-Baughman campaign was to remove her from elected office on a residency issue that the RTM knew of at the time of the election, as did Bruce Morris, Cheryl’s husband and Branford’s representative to the state’s Central Democratic Committee. Bruce Morris thought so little of the so-called residence issue that he actually told Reed to use the couple’s address as her mail drop.
According to Bruno, someone”“he does not say who”“dropped the Milici-Baughman letter in his hands just before the January RTM meeting. He said he had not had a chance to read it. Then he read it. Many RTM members were stunned and upset and said so.
Then, quite off handedly, he said he would send the letter to the SEEC. As it turned out, Bruno was far more active than he let on, said RTM Rep. Anthony Giardiello as he stood to mount what would be a devastating critique of Bruno’s actions.
“This body, if I remember correctly, dispensed with the Milici-Baughman letter as without merit, without one dissenting vote,” Giardiello, a Democrat, said. “Yet I saw in the newspaper that Mike Milici was going to send a complaint up to the SEEC. Now I realize that curiosity killed the cat, but I had to see this thing. So I called them up and I asked them to send me a copy.” The SEEC sent Giardiello the Milici complaint and other documents. Milici signed and swore to the complaint on Jan 26 about two weeks after the RTM meeting.
“And much to my surprise, just so people understand procedures at SEEC, any citizen can make a complaint that is in writing and is notarized. And Mr. Milici filled out a complaint on their form and had it notarized. But apparently he did not send it up to them. Instead he gave it to Bruno. Jim Bruno had no cause to get involved. He is not Milici’s personal secretary.” But he did, Giardiello said.
The reason we know that Milici’s formal complaint wound up in Bruno’s hands is that Bruno himself wrote the cover letter to the SEEC, provided the Milici complaint, a DVD of the meeting, a copy of a column written by the Eagle, and the original Milici-Baughman letter. Neither the actual Milici complaint nor the Bruno cover letter dated January 31st ever came before the RTM.
Reed stood and gave Giardiello permission to read the material. Rep.Dennis Flanagan, the clerk, did so. And that was how the RTM heard for the first time the actual Milici complaint, a complaint that cites purported violations of elections statutes, statutes, we might add, that hold prison terms and fines, We do not know how Milici came to learn about these statutes, or who might have advised him. The RTM also heard Bruno’s cover letter that gives the complaint “some credence that we do not intend for it to have,” Giardiello said.
In his cover letter, Bruno asks the SEEC whether Reed’s prior votes on various issues are still valid. Then he asks: “Do I allow her to continue as a representative while the investigation is ongoing ?”
Giardiello was really furious about this question. “He can’t unilaterally remove a member. For whatever reason he implied to SEEC that he had the authority to decide that,” he said. Bruno claimed that the RTM agreed in January to send the material to the SEEC.
“We all agreed upon that,” Bruno insisted. But the majority of the RTM held firm, saying no way. Well, said Bruno, incredulously, I had the right to send it. “No, you didn’t,” many simply blurted out.
Rep. Sandra Reiners stood up: “Mr. Moderator, the fact that this is a correspondence from the moderator of the RTM I believe misrepresents the action or the inaction of the RTM one month ago. There was no action. There was no motion, there was no action taken by this body. That letter sent to the Secretary of State implies that this body is behind that letter. It is not.” The SEEC falls under the Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz’s authority. (She happens to be a friend of Town Counsel Ed Marcus, so much so that she came down to Branford to swear Ms. Morris into office in November, 2005.)
As the RTM seemed determined to hang Bruno, he now changed course. He told them he would send a letter to the SEEC to tell them that “the RTM is not in support of this. How’s that?” Ms. Reiners said that would be appropriate.
Then he confessed: “I misunderstood what my duty is here.” The response was a collective gasp.
“I thought when I said I will forward the complaint to the SEEC and when no one said, no you can’t, no you shouldn’t, well, why didn’t anyone say anything then?” Republican Michael Nardella responded: “I think we were dumbstruck.”
Giardiello noted that Milici’s formal complaint is a “specific request for action from a state agency.
“I want to make one more point because we are under attack. There is a provision in the Branford Town Charter that gives this body the sole right to judge the qualifications and elections of its members. And whatever submittal you send to the SEEC, I hope will make clear to them that they not take any action that infringes upon that right of this body. Because I believe that no matter what they decide that we will still retain the right to decide the qualifications of our own members.”
As for Bruno’s reading of a letter from parents whose children attend the John Sliny school, this letter, like the Milici-Baufman letter, set off a veritable scream within the room. Bruno insisted it be sent to an RTM committee.
The letter centered on a so-called “tickling” incident involving second and fourth grade girls and a male teacher at the school. RTM members, both Republican and Democrat, as well as the head of the Board of Education, Frank Carrano, became incensed.
Carrano called Bruno’s decision to read the letter “reprehensible.
Absolutely reprehensible. And I think you ought to apologize to the Board of Ed and to the Superintendent of Schools, because you don’t know what’s going on.” Others like Republicans Dennis Flanagan, Jim Walker, Robert DeFord, Pam Fowler, and Kurt Schwanfelder, and current Third Selectman John Opie, to cite a few, agreed. Some Democrats were furious that Bruno was trying to intervene in BOE policy when the RTM has no authority to do so.
“Ask your town attorney whether this is a matter that should be or could be discussed in public because she will tell you it is not,” Carrano said. Shelley Marcus, Town Attorney #2, and Ed’s daughter, was present. She sat silently in the room, next to Mrs. Morris, and said nothing to stop Bruno when it became clear what the lengthy letter was about.
And it wasn’t that she didn’t know it was coming. At the Democratic caucus earlier in the evening, Reiners and Reed raised strong objections to Bruno reading the letter. Neither Marcus nor David Doyle, also of the Marcus Law Firm, said a word to stop it, sources said, so Bruno went forward.
Carrano is also the head of the Democratic Town Committee, which sought to remove Ed Marcus from his town counsel position last year. The Morris folks actually proposed Bruno to be the chair, but he lost by a vote or two to, of all people, Frank Carrano. Cheryl Morris has made clear her deep distrust and unhappiness with her own party and some RTM members said as they left the room that Carrano had become the latest target.
####
Share this story
Comments
Posted by: Moshe Gai | March 2, 2007 1:31 PM
I had to miss the last RTM meeting due to a surgery. I knew I will miss a drama, but that was no drama. That was a battle. The battle for saving our (still) civilized town.
Once again Bruno violated town charter (e.g. he already refused to call an RTM meeting after being duly served with such a request, and the list goes on and on). Bruno shows very little respect for the very charter that dictates the way he is to serve this town (I doubt Bruno understands what it means to be a public servant).
It is time for the RTM to deal with these thugs that are running our town a muck.
It is time for the RTM to fire Jim Bruno and it is time for Lonnie Reed to consider whether he acted maliciously and in doing so broke the law.
If Bruno broke the law, than in my view he acted against the people of Branford, not just against an elected official (representative Reed) and it should be the responsibility of the RTM to press charges against Bruno.
Thus Spake Moshe Gai.
Posted by: E. Cleveland
| March 4, 2007 6:41 PM
It is a shame that the few RTM Democrats that still support the Morris/Marcus administration still haven't left the dark side: Jim and Margaret Bruno, Lisa Avitable, Janet Doyle, Scott Thayer, Bob Abels, Ralph Coppola and John Smith will have a great deal of explaining to do to their constituencies this coming November should they decide to run for re-election. Do any of them truly believe that the voters in Branford are OK with their blindly following the directives of the M/M administration rather than that of their constituents? These people are not beholden to those who elected them. They are beholden to the Morris/Marcus people who will no doubt, leave them out in the cold. Look what happened to Bruno. He was told to read the letter (by Shelly? by Cheryl? We don’t know.) But when the place erupted in disgust and mayhem after Bruno did read it, I saw Shelly and Cheryl sitting back doing and saying nothing. Bruno was out there looking like a total idiot all by himself. Bruno is being USED by these people and he doesn’t even see it. But thank god for the excellent democrats like Lonnie Reed and Sandra Reiners and Gail Chapman, Anthony Giardello, and others who stand up for themselves and their constituents against Morris/Marcus. There are a huge number of democrats in Branford who believe in the "public" part of public service -- and I know we'll be seeing more of them as the election nears. Please people, keep this in mind: It is literally only a few rotten apples that are trying to spoil the entire democratic barrel. The huge vast majority of democrats in Branford believe in doing the right thing and they DO the right thing. This administration reminds me of that of George Bush: This Morris/Marcus administration will probably go down in history as the WORST administration ever seen in Branford... Nice legacy, Cheryl!
Posted by: Joe | March 5, 2007 10:52 PM
Anthony for First Selectman!
Posted by: Taxpayer Too | March 6, 2007 11:48 AM
Good job, Anthony, for standing up to what's right. It's a shame what this administration is doing to the Town, and especially more shameful to what they're trying to do to the GOOD Democrats who are trying to represent their constituents. Nasty politics all in the name of money, power, and greed!!!!
Posted by: Brian Festa | March 13, 2007 9:55 PM
Dear Branford Citizens and Taxpayers,
I read with amazement what is happening in Branford and the RTM. Again, it is the town that is truly losing in this "quest" to amass" personal and political power in the Democrats desire to stay in power. If those truly "independent" members of the majority side were truly independent of Town Hall's grasp, then they ought to independently organize their own agendas apart from their "leaders"...since they seem to know what is coming down the "pike"...why be surprised and aghast...???
Branford citizens, why be surprised and upset--these are the same "politicans" who swore that Cheryl Morris and crew were the ones to bring the town to stability; these were the same ones who swore their allegiance to the top of the ticket at the last election...shame on them! And shame on those who are naive enough to put up with this mismanagement and misuse of power. Shame on the RTM Moderator as well.
It is time to have a vote of "no confidence" in the Moderator by the electorate...for us citizens and taxpayers a "no confidence" vote would be only symbolic, but would spell out to eveyone that something truly is rotten in town hall.....
Posted by: E. Cleveland
| March 15, 2007 8:44 AM
With all due respect, Mr. Festa, I believe you have not been paying very close attention. Or you would have realized that there are VERY FEW Democrats in Branford in support of the present Marcus/Morris administration. (Have we seen even one comment on this website showing support for them?) Unfortunately this handful of supporters happen to be on the RTM (like Jim Bruno), and thus it might seem like there are more than there actually are. Cheryl Morris blindsided the majority of the Democrats who voted for her when she immediately hired Ed Marcus as Town Attorney within hours of being sworn in. And then there was the Queach, Granite-Gate, Founders Village, and the list goes on. Those who voted for her had no idea that she had a different agenda than what she said publicly before her election. But now the 99% other Democrats are speaking up and keeping a watchful eye on her administration and exposing the problems.
Voting for someone is certainly not "swearing allegiance" to them. (I know a lot of Republicans who no longer support W.) Luckily, in our democracy we can, and do, vote people out of office who no longer represent the people's interests...which is what is going to happen to Marcus/Morris come November. The NON-Marcus/Morris majority of Democrats in town are eager to jump in behind Unk DaRos who, as a former 3-term First Selectman, ALREADY has a tremendous record of major accomplishments, a proven bi-partisan way of running the town, and for whom ethics in government is a mandate not just a bunch of empty words. And if Morris does try and run again or her little team puts up another candidate to force a primary, you can BET that that person, whoever it is, will have very close ties to the same people we are now trying to vote out of office...Follow the money trail...it will lead to Marcus friends and business associates outside Branford, developers and the like. And, if you are hoping to infer by your broad brushstroke painting all Democrats alike that a Republican would do a better job as First Selectman, you need only look at the record of what Republican First Selectmen did versus what Unk DaRos did.
Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- CT Business Litig
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- Reddit NH
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- St. Louis Beacon
- Tom Ficklin
- VT Digger
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- ALSO-Cornerstone
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- All Our Kin
- Alliance Theatre
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Bar Assn.
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bikur Cholim
- Bioregional Group
- Birthright
- BlackinCT
- Boys & Girls Club
- CCA
- CCNE
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City Point
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Elm Shakespeare
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- Fellowship Place
- Food Bank
- Friends of East Rock Park
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Halsey Associates
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- NH Land Trust
- NH Museum
- NH Safe Streets
- NH Scholarship Fund
- NH Youth Soccer
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- Neighborhood Music School
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- PAR Newsletter
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- ROOF
- Rail Trains Ecology
- Register Calendar
- Rotary
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Sister Cities
- Social Media Club
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- South Central Behavioral Health Network
- Squash Haven
- Temple Emanuel
- United Way
- Upper State Street Association
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Visiting Nurse Association of South Central Connecticut
- W'ville Synagogue
- W. Square Blockwatch
- WalkBIkeCT
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva of NH
- Youth Continuum