Trash Vote Postponed

by Melissa Bailey | March 5, 2007 9:43 PM | | Comments (1)

IMG_7371.JPGAfter outcry from East Rock activists, aldermen opted not to vote on the trash bill Monday, instead sending the item back for another public hearing. Read on to see what aldermen did take action on at their monthly meeting — including honoring this woman (pictured) for behind-the-scenes aldermanic work.

In the hallway before Monday’s Board of Aldermen meeting, a half-dozen trash haulers gathered. They weren’t going to miss this meeting as they did the last public hearing, when neighbors’ lobby prevailed on a trash bill restricting the hours they can pick up trash.

IMG_7374.JPGIn the week leading up to Monday’s meeting, East Rock Alderman Roland Lemar and sleep-protecting neighbors like Alex Marathas (pictured) were concerned because an unofficial last-minute agreement had been made with trash haulers behind closed doors. They called City Hall, worried the gains they’d made in the public hearing process would be reversed.

Neighbors’ words were heard. The ordinance amendment has been recommitted to the Legislation Committee so that all parties can discuss the bill at a special public hearing on March 21 at 6 p.m. in City Hall.

The minority State of the City address, scheduled to be given Monday by the board’s one Republican alderperson, was also postponed. Here’s what did happen.

Phase-In

It’s official: You won’t be hit all at once with that 88 percent hike in residential property value that came with state-mandated property revals. The new value of your property will be phased in over the course of five years, according to an ordinance approved Monday.

The mayor’s other proposal to soften the blow of this year’s budget for homeowners — an elderly tax freeze — has yet to be voted on.

Democracy Fund

As the city prepares to undertake Connecticut’s first publicly funded municipal election in November, a bill was passed to increase the spending cap for municipal candidates. In an amendment to the city’s Democracy Fund Ordinance, aldermen voted 25-2 to increase the cap from $225,000 to $300,000.

Hill Alderwoman Andrea Jackson-Brooks voted nay. “I have a problem with public money going to public candidates whom I may or may not support,” she explained after the vote.

A Break for Vets

In what is expected (but not known) to have minimal fiscal impact on the city, a tax break was approved Monday for veterans. The break, which augments two others for which the state reimburses the city, will give veterans of a low enough income a break on property tax.

“My general feeling is we ought to protect people on fixed incomes” from being driven out of town by rising taxes, said East Rock Alderman Ed Mattison, joining unanimous approval of the bill. The tax crunch is spurred not just by a growing budget, but by recent property revals that shift the tax burden from businesses to those who own homes.

The tax break passed Monday lets veterans under a certain income level knock 10 percent off their assessment, up to $10,000, before calculating taxes. That income level is set at: $39,600 for a single tax filer and $45,600 for a couple filing jointly. The estimated fiscal impact on the city ranges from $50,000 to $500,000, depending on how many people sign up.

The Hand Behind The Public Record
IMG_7371.JPGEach time aldermen gather for a public meeting, a tireless public servant rewinds the cassette tapes and turns a web of voices into a transcript for the public record. Who does it? Shirley Dixon (pictured). She was honored in a pre-board aldermanic bash for 20 — yes, 20! — years of public service in the legislative services office.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: Cedar Hill Resident | March 6, 2007 8:39 AM

Andrea Jackson-Brooks thank you for your nay! I could not agree more! I am glad they passed the vet bill. How hard is that if we are reimbursed for the funds! But we will not be reimbursed for the seniors. And as stated by someone in another article will that change the people living in New Haven into a city of Seniors? That got me thinking. There should be somekind of time thing on the Seniors they have had to live in there house for so many years to qualify for this tax thing. Another words this should be a benefit for people that are long time New Haven residents. Which I am all for. But not for people looking to hide there assets. This should be reviewed to make sure that there is some kind of guide line to make sure it is not abused. By the families of said seniors.

20 Year CONGRATES Ms. Dixon

Note: Some get party after 20 so lose there jobs.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35