Storm Impact, Fusco & Gilbane School $$$s Explained

by Allan Appel | April 17, 2007 8:42 AM | | Comments (10)

IMG_1356.JPGWhen, in the not too distant future, you’re enjoying a thrilling performance of A Midsummer Night’s Dream in the new Cooperative Arts and Humanities High School’s 350-seat auditorium, and Puck comes tearing down from above to declare “Lord, what fools these mortals be,” remember this picture. This is the concrete form of the fly loft of the school’s new theater, currently under construction at College and Crown streets. The fly loft (which contains equipment for hoisting scenery as well as actors) and the steel girders beginning to rise around it were unharmed by the weekend’s nor’easter.

The effects of the storm were among the subjects of discussion at Monday’s meeting of the Board of Education’s (BOE) Administration and Finance Committee, where major decisions amounting to millions are regularly made. Some of the latest decisions — involving contracts for builders of schools under construction — also came up for discussion.

IMG_1360.JPGRegarding the weather’s effects, Tom Smith, the BOE’s project manager in charge of Coop school construction, said, “The site is basically a big sandbox. It’s fortunate. The rain falls on all the native sand that’s there and gets soaked right down. No problem. It’s a very good setting.” By early to midwinter 2007, he said, the girders should all be in place, along with the “skin” of the building, and then the curtain can rise on the new school in the fall of 2008.

Smith is one of seven project managers who work for Gilbane Building Company, which the BOE has retained since 1997, when the school construction program began. Gilbane is to the BOE’s school construction program what Aramark is to the BOE’s operations, the primary subcontractor. “We basically function as the owner of the building, that is, on behalf of the BOE,” Smith explained, saying that each project manager has three or four schools in varying stages of design or construction that he or she oversees.

IMG_1354.JPGThe managers attend the regular BOE committee meetings submitting requests for change orders, new contracts, which in turn are either concurred with and sent on to the full BOE for approval, or not; most items on a committee agenda usually get sent up for full BOE review. Gilbane’s project managers manage the construction companies retained to do the work, and the managers in turn report to BOE supervisory staff, headed by Sue Weisselberg (pictured below), and then to the board.

In addition to Coop, Smith is in charge of the Vincent Mauro school project. He asked the committee on Monday to approve an architectural agreement for $105,000 for “pre-design” services. “We need to see if it’s more economical for a complete new construction of this school or if we stick with the original plan to demolish one wing and renovate the other.”

IMG_1361.JPGBOE member Richard Abatiello (pictured on the right with school construction “czar” Sue Weisselberg and BOE chief administrative officer Robin Golden), who was subbing for the committee’s regular chair John Prokop, asked for an explanation

“Well,” said Smith, “the building we were going to renovate has some odd pie-shaped rooms. To get the mechanicals in there is going to require a lot of expense that we didn’t previously foresee, and it might be trouble. Weisselberg said that budgeting for both options needs to be studied.

Smith also requested $210,000 towards a construction management agreement with Fusco Corporation, which is going to build the new Metropolitan Business Academy on Water Street. Abatiello wanted to know what the BOE gets for the $210,000. “It’s all the schematics,” Smith elaborated. “All the material for the design phase, the project schedule, and all the bidding documents for contractors. It basically gets us right up to the beginning moment of construction.”

The BOE has acquired one of the two properties on Water Street, which will the site of the new high school. If the manager and construction companies stay on schedule, the new MBA should open in the summer or fall of 2009.

Robin Golden, referring once again to the weekend storm’s effects, said it would not be a moment too soon. MBA’s students are now housed in a leased building at 495 Blake St.. Golden said she had heard the parking lot of the school, where Whalley Avenue dips at Blake and Valley, was completely under water Monday. Likewise, the rug or carpet leading into the school is soaked. “The basement is flooded too,” she said, “but fortunately we don’t use or lease that space. The landlord is going to have to deal with that. Our kids and the principal at Metropolitan can’t wait to get into the new space.

“I’m going out to the school tomorrow to check things out. At a number of our schools, we use the spring break to do a big cleaning, too, and some of this might be hampered because of the water. We’ll see. In general, however,” she said, “we fared pretty well.”

IMG_1363.JPGThese fellows were happy at the committee meeting too. Anthony Maselli and Nick Pagani, the project executive and the project manager, respectively, of C & R Development Company (of East Granby) were getting ready to turn the Beecher School over to the BOE. At the end of 16 months of construction, the $40 million new pre-K-8 school at 100 Jewell Ave. will receive its kids on Monday. Masseli said that his company has a terrific relationship with Gilbane, and that the team worked well on Beecher, and the community loves the school.

Beecher is the third school C & R has completed for the BOE; it also built Clarence Rogers and Katherine Brennan. And the happy marriage appears to be continuing. Among the other items approved at the meeting were various construction contract agreements for C & R to build the new Sheridan Magnet School, as well as to construct the West Hills Valley Swing Space, the first agreement for $2.8 million, and the latter for $1.1 million.

Sheridan is a $39 million project, Beecher was $40 million, and the Coop High School is slated to cost $66 million. For a complete summary of all NHPS’s construction projects and their status, click here.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: Our Town [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 17, 2007 9:14 AM

Putting the Cooperative Arts and Humanities High School downtown on prime commercial real estate will turn out to be, along with Gateway CC, the biggest white elephants of the DeStefano regime.

Posted by: Yair | April 17, 2007 9:36 AM

I'm so tired of this "prime commercial real estate" argument. What good was the prime commerical real estate in the 1970s and 80s when downtown was a mess? A thriving high school, community college, and of course Yale itself can keep downtown alive and bring in many visitors and residents. Take those things away and the wind will whistle through the weeds on your prime commercial real estate.

Posted by: Da Hill | April 17, 2007 10:21 AM

I dont understand the term white elephants. What do you mean?

Posted by: Our Town [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 17, 2007 10:55 AM

YAIR...A 19 story tax paying building is set to go across the street. The key phrase is 'TAX PAYING'; schools can built away from this type of real estate. Commercial development breeds more commercial development. Commercial development = TAX DOLLARS. I doubt there would be wind whistling though weeds. I want wind tunnels between tax paying commercial buildings.

Maybe you haven't noticed the year is 2007.

Posted by: charlie | April 17, 2007 11:10 AM

I agree with Our Town. This was a huge mistake. The college & Crown Street site could have been a massive development. The school should eventually be somewhere downtown, but it should be on the first 5 floors, with 10 floors of tax paying real estate above. Or it should have been built somewhere is unlikely to be developed privately, like the middle of the Route 34 strip.

Posted by: East Rocker | April 17, 2007 12:26 PM

Just one thing to remember - in order to assemble the parcel for the new school, the city had to buy out several parcels/existing businesses that might not have sold to a private developer who did not have the power of eminent domain. It is not clear that any private party could have acquired more than a small chunk of this site to build on. So, it might not have actually been a huge lost opportunity. The Gateway site was a different story in this regard, though there's not much use in debating that right now.

Posted by: JSJ [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 18, 2007 1:43 PM

You guys are right. It is shocking, absolutely shocking, that every last bit of useable downtown space (except, I guess, the old Coliseum lot, the Macy's lot, the Malley's lot, the vacant mall space-- am I leaving much out? probably...) is being eaten up by something as trivial, unimportant and short-sighted as a landmark urban high school! The nerve!- to build on a site, I'll remind you, that has a history of turnover and commercial instability. What's next? A balanced budget? Lower crime rates? Oh, the outrage.

Posted by: charlie | April 18, 2007 4:00 PM

Regardless, it would have been BETTER if it was retail and office on the first 3-4 floors, and a great urban school above that. The new school will be great, but it's too bad that our country has no vision for treating its cities in ways that aren't somewhat cookie-cutter.

The failed vision of our time is also evident in places like the old Chapel Square Mall, where a new Rite-Aid store was allowed to open on a prime corner without any windows onto the street. In any non-corporatized, non-cookie cutter environment, there would have been plenty of windows and a patio on which to sit and have a drink.

Posted by: TrueBlueCT | April 18, 2007 6:33 PM

I'm a downtown denizen who is in love with the new Arts school. Along with the College Square condos, it will have an impressive presence on a downtown corridor that sorely needed to be re-developed.

That being said, I think the Gateway project is just plain dumb. Why devote two prime block of downtown real estate to a commuter school? Plus Gateway will require a ton of parking, which is in short supply these days.

Please, please, please. I hope the city will use the Gateway delay to re-consider where it should go. Why not the vacant Rte 34 connector between the Ella Grasso Blvd and the Pfizer bldg. Or even on the other side of Air Rights, between Church and College streets? Or out on Long Wharf at the old TeleTrack site?

Gateway just doesn't have to be on the downtown grid, and for the life of me, with its expensive parking requirements, I don't see how the upsides outweigh the downsides on the proposed project.

Posted by: Jeff Klaus | April 23, 2007 9:59 AM


Charlie and JSJ,

On what basis do you believe that the school will be considered either a "landmark" and/or "great"?

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35