Jones Makes Final Pitch For A “Legitimate” Review Board

by VJ Vitkowsky | May 31, 2007 12:42 PM | | Comments (9)

Emma%20Jihad%20Jones.JPGEmma Jones made one last pitch for the city to create a truly independent civilian review board with subpoena power to investigate police misconduct.

Jones was called to testify in front of the Aldermanic Public Safety Committee, who met Wednesday night at City Hall to hear testimony to codify the Civilian Review Board into a municipal agency, as recommended by the Task Force on Deadly Force.

In the ten years after her son’s death at the hands of an East Haven cop, Jones has helped lead the fight first for the creation of the review board, then for giving the board more of an ability to act as an effective investigatory agency outside the purview of the police department.

“I am so embarrassed to be here in front of this board again,” Jones said. “Here I am 10 years later, still struggling. I don’t know what’s wrong with me. People get exacerbated and give up all the time, but I’m still here.” She said this would be her last appearance.

Currently, the Civilian Review Board forwards complaints about police misconduct to internal affairs, aka “Internal Values and Ethics”, a unit of the police department. After IVE conducts an investigation, the board reviews the investigation. If it finds any evidence that was overlooked, it sends the information back to IVE, according to CRB chair Shirley Wayne-Washington. Although the board includes some attorneys, Washington said she pays her own way to attend conferences on Civilian Review Board investigation techniques every year.

Created by an executive order from the mayor in 2004, the Civilian Review Board has no operating budget, except for a coordinator, who gets paid $3,000 to 4,000 a year. Jones and former Alderman Anthony Dawson said the board should have a budget of $300,000-400,000 a year, with an independent investigator.

“We all know that when police officers and mayors establish these investigative boards, and they are investigating themselves, they always find themselves innocent,” Jones said.
“If you say to me that it is the role of the Civilian Review Board to receive complaints, and you don’t have the power to investigate the [complaints] —then I’m through with you. When Internal Values and Ethics completes an investigation, that we can recommend that they go back and look again — that for me is light years away from a legitimate Civilian Review Board.”

Jones was joined by Dawson, the current Hill North Community Management Team chairman. As an alderman Dawson submitted Jones’s proposal for an All-Civilian review board in 1997, then again in 2000.

“Tonight you are either going to have to do something or say you are doing nothing,” Dawson said.

Wayne-Washington said the aldermen wouldn’t need to ask how they could assist the Civilian Review Board if one of their members had filled the seat they were allotted when it was founded. While conducting investigations, Wayne-Washington said she has repeatedly struggled with the question of whether or not the police are capable of policing themselves.

“I’m putting the ball back in your court,” Wayne-Washington said. “Because you have a seat, and it is not filled.”

Wayne-Washington delivered one of the most surprising pieces of testimony in March during a Dixwell public forum on police misconduct, attended by 250 people. Moderator Michael Jefferson asked her to tell a success story over her years on the board, in which the board accomplished something or affected a decision involving a misconduct complaint. Wayne-Washington couldn’t think of one.

Proposals Offered

Jones and Dawson did have some concrete proposals Wednesday night. First, they said they want an attorney to represent the Civilian Review Board and accompany complainants during the interviews with internal affairs, because police officers are accompanied by union representatives.

In 2001, Jones and Dawson requested the Board of Aldermen give the Civilian Review Board the power to subpoena police officers. According to Corporation Council Tom Ude, this could not be done because of a state law. On Wednesday night, Jones and Dawson suggested the Board of Police Commissioners should use their powers to force testimony from police officers at the request of the Civilian Review Board. Ude said that would work, but that federal law prohibits coerced testimony from being used in criminal or civil complaints against police officers.

The committee voted to recommend using the relevant and factual information in a proposal submitted to the board in 2000 as a framework to codify the Civilian Review Board.

After her testimony, Jones was approached by Chief Administrative Officer Rob Smuts. He said he hopes to work with Jones and Dawson to rebuild the CRB, but that some of their recommendations would be hard for his office to support.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: Rob Smuts | May 31, 2007 4:39 PM

Two corrections on a good article:

1) The CRB was created in early 2001 (not 2004). The coordinator is paid $65,659 and they draw from my office's "rentals and services" of $23,202, and my "materials & supplies" of $1200 (reduced from $1530 last year).

2) I am keeping an open mind about what we will support, but I said it might be difficult to accomplish some of the points Ms. Jones laid out (not that "some of their recommendations would be hard for his office to support"). For instance, her proposal sets a time limit of 90 days for investigations to be completed - while we should always aim for quick investigations, the state's attorney, US attorney, FBI and whomever else you could mention that conducts similar types of investigations all often take much, much longer. The underlying concern is important, however, which is why a dialogue about how to address these issues should be fruitful. That is: it's a good and important idea, but one we'll have to do some work in order to find a feasible way of implementing it.

I look forward to speaking with Ms. Jones and Mr. Dawson more on this important issue.

Posted by: OH WELL | June 1, 2007 5:46 PM

The money that has been used to pay this perf group could have been better used. If we can sit down stop and think, it is known that New Haven is a close connected city ,EVERY thing that is worth something has to be shared (Metro).Anything that needs a lot of money and support is New Haven Burden example(housing Homeless people) so we have a panel of3 the area people sit on the review board , 2 outsider's 1 New Haven Elected Official one Doctor , One Clergy, one from juvenile dept 3other people and get this civian review board going with some POWER. It is a lot broken in the police Dept. Let get this ball going

Posted by: Mrs. D | June 1, 2007 10:08 PM

It stuns me that anyone would listen to this woman, much less take her advice. It's too bad her son made such a bad decision that it killed him. It's too bad that she failed to explain to him the simple premise 'if a police officer stops you, you stop'. End of story. She needs to stop blaming the police for protecting the rest of us from her criminal son.
Surely there are better parents out there for the board to ask advice from. Remember,a society that makes war with it's police had better start making friends with it's criminals.
This is her last appearance? Thank God!

Posted by: please | June 2, 2007 10:41 AM

Mr. Smuts, that's all well and good. Mr. Ude's comments were accurate too.

But you fail to perceive the fact that the mayor's office has almost zero credibility with most informed citizens on the issue of police officer integrity, nor does most of the panel he put together to look at the billy white affair.

Neither does the state's attorney's office.

What the community wants is very simple. The only difficulty is your refusal to fork it over:

The community wants criminal officers off the force and a city government that doesn't spend all its time covering up for them.

The community wants cops who file bogus reports gone. Wants cops who enjoy using excessive force gone. Wants cops involved in domestic violence gone. wants cops accused of crimes to be held to the same standards as ordinary citizens -- in other words, prosecuted with the same rabid zealotry the new haven state's attorney goes after every other allegation, no matter how baseless.

Posted by: please again | June 2, 2007 11:11 AM

Tax payers should support another independent review body with investigators to look into complaints for referral for criminal prosecution, wihtout subpoena power for now (Since change of state law would be required to initiate subpoena power) Those not rising to level of crime, can be referred to the office of Internal Ethics for investigation by police and in turn bumped up to a CRB.

Can be proposed locally or statewide. If statewide, maybe can be married to the Innocence Commission, and there can be one for each judicial district. Although Innocence commissions are focused heavily on DNA exoneration, they already have an understanding of falsely accused for more minor crimes, or crimes where there is no conviction or even DNA evidence.

We can increase funding through federal and state dollars to create the commissions and hire investigators.

Subpoena power and immunity for coerced testimony are a serious bar. Police will not take some criminal complaints against officers now except through Internal affairs, where they can be coerced into testifying but the testimony has limited use.

Alternatively, and maybe more cost effective -- drastically alter our concept of police officers. Make it a career that no longer attracts wife beaters, guys who tortured animals as kids, students who scored low on school tests throughout their lives (So unintelligent that when you hear them talk about what probable cause is you have to wince they are so incompetent), people obsessed with violence and assault rifles, guys with an irresistable attraction to personal power, people with infantile-level sense of duty ie - being unable to see beyond duty to themselves, their friends, their boss to anything larger that they serve.

1. Make it pay much better
2. Make a college degree a prerequisite. A full four-year degree.
3. Quit discouraging the people who max out on the test scores -- recruit and hire them aggressively.

oh, as well, prosecute and getting rid of any that pull these stunts or abuse the job after they get on the force.

Make it so that making up fake crimes is no longer considered cool, and beleive me, it is considered pretty cool right now, as if it is one of a thousand perks that go along with being a cop, along with not having to face prosecution for that and other crimes.

Posted by: THREEFIFTHS | June 3, 2007 9:19 PM

Ms.D
A Review Board Is Need To Bring Balance. If The Police Are So Good What About Billy White, How About Sean Bell In New York Shoot Fifty Times.
The Old Grandmother In Atlanta Georgia Who The Police Killed and They Planted False Evidence To
Make It Look Like She Was Dealing Drugs!! How About Mr. James Tillman Who Just Got Out Of Jail.
You Need A Review Board To Bring Balance. P.S.
Rember The Story Of The New York Cop Frank Serpico
Who Police Try To Kill Him For Not Taking Money.

Posted by: blackdog | June 4, 2007 9:06 AM

I fully support any necessary measures for internal and external police review. But I can't help noticing how, now that budget season has passed, people here are throwing out proposals costing hundreds of thousands of dollars with nary a thought to the budget. Armchair policymaking is all well and good--the more ideas out there the better--but "please." Remember how much these things cost next year when scrutinizing the budget, or this year when it comes time to vote for mayor again. As always in America, everyone wants more services, but nobody wants to pay for them...

Posted by: please again | June 4, 2007 8:16 PM

Blackbog:

Which is why I proposed drastically altering requirements for being a police officer. All this other expensive oversight would not be half as desperately needed if we hired better cops, period.

Yes, you'd have to raise officer pay, but you would get more bang (forgive the pun) for your buck.

We need intelligent educated officers and we need to break the back of a culture.

So recruit and pay top notch people, people who would never think of becoming cops in america today because of what being a cop is in america today. People who know and understand that New haven is trying to do something very very very different than anything done anywhere else in this country.

Posted by: please | June 4, 2007 8:22 PM

I could add to the requirments some more -- that we demand diversity -- poeple who have been doing all kinds of interesting things with their lives - activists, transvestites, whatever.

let the police department mirror the progressive community new haven really wants to be.

give it bucketloads of PR, promote it as a massive change and then back that up with a real committment.

Tell your politico friends to lay off them unless it is dire because too much new haven arm twisting will cause them to all quit, and voila, you have a great new police force.

Pay, and promote something radically new and they will come.

Make it a 10-year transition

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35