Parking Garages May Get An Extra Look

by Melissa Bailey | July 10, 2007 1:00 PM | | Comments (2)

IMG_9166.JPGThe Board of Aldermen Monday night agreed to reconsider a proposal it previously knocked down, to add more public oversight over the construction of big parking structures, after Beaver Hills’ Moti Sandman had a change of heart.

The ordinance requires parking garages of over 200 cars to come before the City Plan Commission for a special permit. Such projects would have to submit a traffic study and go through a design review, neither of which are required now. The city had pushed the zoning change as a way to give City Plan more control over upcoming projects like the Shartenberg site, the mid-block garage and Union Station. Click here for a previous story.

When the proposal came before aldermen at last month’s regular meeting, it flopped by a 11-6 vote, falling short of the 16 votes needed to pass a new ordinance.

This time around, it was re-introduced by one of its prior opponents, Alderman Sandman. The board voted unanimously to revisit the issue, then nearly unanimously approved the ordinance, with a 24-1 vote.

East Rock Alderman Roland Lemar touted the added oversight as “an exceptional way of gaining control over these large structures,” making sure they are integrated into neighborhoods instead of overshadowing them.

Sandman, originally apprehensive of the plan, changed his mind. Why?

“When it was originally put forth, I saw it as a blunt instrument to be used to hamper economic development,” Sandman said. After talking with colleagues, he became reassured the tool would be “wielded responsibly.”

In other aldermanic business, the corner of Brewster Street and Dixwell Avenue was designated as “Bishop Austin Atkinson, Sr. Corner.”







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: WEBbloger 1 | July 10, 2007 2:19 PM

"When it was originally put forth, I saw it as a blunt instrument to be used to hamper economic development," Sandman said. After talking with colleagues, he became reassured the tool would be "wielded responsibly."

Sandman gets a second bite at the apple, unforturatly, he could not originally see the trees because of the forrest.

This is the same Sandman who voted against all amendments to reduce the budget in May, while at the same time joining Rodriquez, silverman, Goldfield, Lehtonen, Rhodeen, Salek and others, including, Shah and Blango, to produce the largest increase ever, for tax payers of New Haven.
Why didn't he have second thoughts then??

While your at Mr. Sandman, revisit the parking status proposed by City plan for the gateway community college nighmare at George and Church sts.

Posted by: Ned | July 10, 2007 11:07 PM

Sort of off topic, but why does development in New Haven (Connecticut actually) always seem so pathetically lacking in creativity, so hopelessly status quo, so completely stuck in the past? People make the place...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070622.whappyurbanmain0623/BNStory/lifeMain/home/

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35