Maybe The Sea Lions Will Return, Too

by Allan Appel | September 11, 2007 8:51 AM | | Comments (8)

riv%20st%20003.JPGWhen they build a walkway by the river in Fair Haven, will people come? Helen Rosenberg (at left in photo) bets they will. Not if the drag-racers are still making River Street a speedway, cautioned Erin Strugis-Pascale (at right).

Rosenberg, the city economic development official behind the revival of the River Street area, and Sturgis-Pascale, a Fair Haven alderwoman, were envisioning the riverfront future Monday night at a public information meeting at the John Martinez School. The meeting concerned plans for public access to the water near the emerging River Street light-industrial district.

The city’s planning a beautiful walkway along the waterfront linking Criscuolo Park to Quinnipiac River Park, complete with cantilevered fishing pier, a kayak launch, and even a section that straddles a pocket of preserved wetland, and even if it’s beautifully landscaped and full of nautical and historical signage. The question under consideration Monday night: Will people come down to utilize it?

Rosenberg and the city-hired design firm for the River Street Municipal Plan presented their preliminary ideas and sketches for a project that embraces some of the city’s most historic waterfront, from Chapel Street down to the water, from James Street to Quinnipiac River Park.

riv%20st%20001.JPG“We’ve finished phase one,” Rosenberg announced. That phase included buying properties, lots of environmental remediation, and finally the paving of River Street. A number of the properties have been leased for future use, one by Suraci Metals and a second by Capasso Restoration. There has been some recent interest in the Hess and Bigelow properties too, which will be moving along in the months ahead, she announced optimistically.

“Now phase two is going to feature the repaving of Poplar, Lloyd, and Blatchley, and the riverfront walkway.”

Rosenberg said the city does not have in hand all the funds necessary for this work, including the expensive stabilization and/or replacement of 1,400 feet of river bulkhead, only 200 feet of which is reclaimable. But the city has enough money to get started. “We have $1.5 million from the federal government, and another $1.5 million from the state, and we hope the state is going to move ahead on the bonding of another $5 million.” The entire project is about $23 million, in which the city has already invested $10 million.

riv%20st%20004.JPGThe city has retained Milone & MacBroom, Inc, of Cheshire as architects and designers of the project. Three staffers (left to right) Mark Arigoni, Jeanine Armstrong Bonin, and Steven D. George engaged about 25 well-informed and vocal participants, such as architecture activist Chris Ozyck.

An initial concept they presented featured the long walkway or park with three or four “nodes,” or focuses of activity.

One node would be a hammer-head shaped park area at the base of James Street where it abuts the water; now people climb over a fence to fish there. If a small pocket of tidal wetland in this area can be preserved, the walkway might bridge it.

The second node would be a kind of launch for car-top boats, such as kayaks and canoes, at the base of Lloyd Street.

The third would be a pier, perhaps cantilevered, for observation at the wide base of Blatchley Street, complete with nautical and historical signage; and a fourth would be a fishing pier at the end of Poplar Street behind the Suraci Metal properties.

riv%20st%20009.JPGThese preliminary ideas were met with both enthusiasm and preliminary caution. In addition to being concerned with the racing down River Street, Sturgis-Pascale and others feared that unless some residential elements were part of the plan, people would simply not use the walkway.

Mike Piscitelli, the city’s transportation chief, suggested that with regard to the racing down River Street, speed bumps would not work. “There are too many trucks, and the violators in general are not your garden-variety speeders, but rogue racers, kids. We have to deal with that, but in a different way.”

Regarding the possibility of residents moving into the area south of River Street, he said that the rezoning of the historic area of the district, including the Bigelow building, would support features such as artists’ lofts.

“The main idea, however,” said Rosenberg, “is to create jobs. We hope some 300. People eat lunch down there, and we hope they might come back in the evening. And some of the businesses have night shifts too.”

A certain amount of skepticism remained as to how to connect the residents of Fair Haven above Chapel Street and east near Quinnipiac River Park with the new area and its landscaped walkway.

riv%20st%20007.JPG“If you’re going to build a walkway down by the water,” said Fernando Pastor, an architect (with two kids at the nearby Cold Spring School), consider the potential to get kids from Cold Spring and from the new Columbus Academy (he’s designing that school) up on Grand Avenue at Blatchley. “That’s a thousand kids. They’d like to use the park, too. But you’ll need a pavilion, and bathrooms.”

A theme of the evening was competiton between needs of the light industrial businesses being attracted to the area and those of the visiting, recreating public.

riv%20st%20005.JPGLynn Mathison, a principal with the Phoenix Press on James Street and a leader with the River-James Street block watches, said that her company often let kids use the bathrooms. Because there’s so much vandalism in Criscuolo Park, the city has locked up the bathrooms there. (Officials bring portable johns in when there are big baseball games or other events).

And (on the left, below) Mary Lou Aleskie, executive director of the International Festival of Arts and Ideas, fantasized about Louis Kahn’s music barge anchoring in the area. And then what? “Without some restaurants and residences,” added Heather Findlay, it’s just not going to work.” (Click here and here for past stories on the barge.)

riv%20st%20008.JPGAnother local resident, Ian Christman (in background of photo), said he’s been documenting the river via kayak and with camera in hand. He asked: What people will look at from the walkway?

“It’s a kind of industrial wasteland out there,” he said, referring to the much ignored properties across the river in property owned by the Port Authority. Piscitelli said that while some owners there were finally roofing their buildings and getting them in shape, a kayak launched from the new walkway would not have the Port Authority as a destination point.

“There are some pockets of wetland out there,” Chris Ozyck added. Then he gave the designers a laundry list of other issues to think about as they move from preliminary drawings to a plan to be submitted to the city: “Emphasize fishing,” he said, “and do stuff in keeping with the oystering history of the area. Any way you can help us bring back sea lions to Fair Haven? The area was called Dragon,” he explained, “in their honor.”

He urged the designers to keep in mind the recreating patterns of the many Latinos in the neighborhood. “They are not, by and large, kayakers. It’s a real city. You’ve got to be culturally sensitive. Also, if we get a world-class new bridge replacing the Q Bridge, maybe people will come down there to check it out. Also consider using gravel on the walkway. Kids love to crunch it, and maybe having grades and declines to give different kinds of water views from the trail. Above all, we need to have the walkway connect not only with Front Street but to downtown, via Wooster Square.”

riv%20st%20010.JPGBonin took a lot of notes. Even in the best of all possible worlds, with permits required for riverine work from the Army Corps of Engineers and the state Department of Environmental Protection, to say nothing of city commissions and agencies, work on the park might begin some time next year, and take at least two years

“But it’s important we begin the walkway,” Rosenberg added, “so potential developers can see the whole package, the park that anchors the area.”

riv%20st%20002.JPGRosenberg said that a potential developer for the Bigelow complex could be before the city plan commission as early as next month. She also revealed that, at the far, eastern end of the River Street Municipal Development area, the Seaboard Oil Company is considering its own marina and residential units. If so, the walkway instead of sticking the entire distance to the water might have to make a right turn, and come back up to River Street before rejoining the water — ideally — as it runs under the restored Ferry Street Bridge.

“Yes,” said Sturgis-Pascale, “but let’s not forget how much additional traffic is going to be coming off that bridge as well.”







Comments

Posted by: Esbe | September 11, 2007 11:58 AM


I love these stories where really bright and good-hearted New Haveners get together to exchange ideas and maybe actually get something done.

Chris Ozyck, as usual, is right. Fishermen are really important -- they provide a steady presence in a neighborhood like this. Picnic tables for nearby workers would bring out a lunch crowd in good weather.

A bike/walking path that actually connects to other places would bring out a lot of folks. Can there be a bike lane on Chapel to Wooster square and beyond to the Farmington Canal connection to Long Wharf (and north to Hamden) -- what about up the "Mill River Trail" (that some volunteers have been trying to clear) to East Rock?

Posted by: charlie | September 11, 2007 12:14 PM

The most important points to be gleaned here:

1) The path should connect to a comprehensive system of bicycle & pedestrian infrastructure that connects East Haven to downtown New Haven. That's the only way to get a significant fraction of the population to use the system.

2) Environmental design is a major concern. That means smart urban design is needed, ideally including residences, retail, parks, schools and other 24/7 mixed uses integrated into the plan, if the city wants to make the area more desirable (more tax revenue) and safer in the long-term. People are not going to come there in large numbers unless it is a nice place.

Posted by: FairHavenRes | September 11, 2007 4:36 PM

Too bad I did not know about this meeting. I am not blaming anyone, just curious of where I should look for meetings like this.

It would be nice to see meeting attendees that are more reflective of Fair Haven, especially if your talking about development and a park in the place where we live.

I hope you are figuring security. Any car left unattended in an out of a way area is a target for thieves. Of course that might keep the traffic down.

Posted by: JP | September 11, 2007 8:11 PM

Sounds nice, "let's put lots of money into redeveloping the undesirable people out of the neighborhood."

I guess racers don't have a place in New Haven, but let' make sure the gentrifiers get what they want.

Posted by: fairhavener [TypeKey Profile Page] | September 11, 2007 9:12 PM

I wish I knew about the meeting as well. It is interesting how I get notified for some things but not others.

Anyway, anything that connects Fair Haven to other areas and generates traffic through here is a great idea. Check out the City Plan idea for this area. The actual design is not that great, but the overall vision is.

Posted by: East Rockette | September 11, 2007 11:01 PM

Can we look to Providence for some ideas here? I'm thinking of the Waterfire event, which although a little cheesy, is also brilliant at bringing people downtown to the river on a summer evening. http://www.waterfire.org/about-waterfire/welcome

And also the Providence bike path that runs along the eastern shore of the harbour, connecting the city to the smaller towns.

And how about some sort of cool, inspiring play area for kids and grown-ups. Like Waitangi Park, in Wellington, New Zealand, another waterfront park that's being constructed on formerly industrial grounds... there's a playground, a skatebowl, boardwalks, climbing walls, a petanque piste. It's great:

http://www.venueweb.co.nz/north/10_wellington/waitangi_park/waitangi.htm
http://www.wellingtonwaterfront.co.nz/development/waitangi/waitangi_park_introduction/area_one/state_of_the_art_playground/index.htm

Posted by: Carole [TypeKey Profile Page] | September 12, 2007 6:33 PM

JP,

Do you really think drag racing (which, besides being illegal, is a serious danger to people's lives as well as a source of air and noise pollution) SHOULD "have a place in New Haven"? Or the activity that litters Criscuolo Park with needles and broken glass? I agree it's important not to push poor people out. They deserve a clean, safe neighborhood as much as anyone else. It's not a question of who has a place, but of what activities we tolerate.

Posted by: cedarhillresident [TypeKey Profile Page] | September 13, 2007 9:03 AM

JP I see what your fear is about pushing people out of the city never fear the poor will always be here and the rich will to it is the middle class that is starting to move out.

But, I LOVE THIS idea, I would love a to see a place like West Haven has in my city. They do little music shows every weekend and all kinds of small quaint events to draw people to the water front strip. Nothing big and fancy just local artists and bands. Dancing lessons for the Seniors and kids ect.
Now I know I drive out to West Haven to walk there strip but if I had one right here I, with out a doubt would use it IF we can make it as friendly and warm as the west haven strip is.

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35