Primary Puts Plantation Politics To A Vote

by Paul Bass | September 4, 2007 7:55 AM | | Comments (7)

Ward%2022%20Hopkins%20Lisa.jpg
Ward%2022%20Morehead%20Greg.jpgA central issue has emerged in a three-way rematch race for aldermen in Ward 22: How should Dixwell deal with City Hall and with Yalies?

The issue reflects an age-old debate in ward politics in neighborhoods like Dixwell, Newhallville, Fair Haven, and the Hill. What’s unusual is how starkly the three candidates in this race articulate and represent three poles in that debate.

The rematch election takes place next Tuesday, Sept. 11. The election is a Democratic primary, which in one-party neighborhoods like Dixwell has historically been tantamount to a general election.

Alderman Greg Morehead (pictured at left) is seeking to hold onto a seat he won five months ago in a spirited special election. Once again he is running with the support of the citywide Democratic Town Committee’s vote-pulling operation and its allies in Yale’s Democratic Party. The ward comprises the Dixwell neighborhood as well as four of Yale’s residential colleges.

Neighborhood organizer Lisa Hopkins (pictured at the top of this story), who lives across the street from Morehead, is running against him, as she did in April. She’s pitching her campaign to voters seeking independence from City Hall and party leaders and other organized groups from outside the ward.

cordelia.JPGCordelia Thorpe (pictured), another neighborhood activist who ran in that April special election, is technically running in Tuesday’s primary. But Thorpe, who’s backed by some prominent older black politicians from outside the ward who are currently at odds with City Hall, said she’s concentrating her efforts on an independent candidacy in November’s general election. She argued that Democratic leaders prevented the chance of a fair primary because of their manipulation of party rules.

Morehead: City Hall A Needed Ally

“I don’t mind being called the mayor’s puppet,” Greg Morehead said in a conversation Friday outside the Community Resource Center at Monterey Place. “Because I know the job I’m doing for my constituents.”

City Democratic Party leaders, bypassing a vote by the ward’s party committee, chose Morehead as their candidate in the April special election. They brought in experienced vote pullers from across the city to identify and bring loyal machine voters to the polls. In addition, they worked with City Hall-friendly Yale undergraduates to bring some 90 Yale students into Dixwell to vote for Morehead in that election. Even though Yalies make up only a small portion of the ward, few longtime residents vote in the ward. (One exception: 1989, when voters waited in line for hours to help elect New Haven’s first African-American mayor.) With four candidates running in the April special election, still only 439 people voted.

Morehead said he made a point of reaching out to Yale students. “I want to get them involved,” he said. Even though most students stay here only four years, he noted, “there’s a lot of resources they bring when they’re here. Why not bring them in?” He noted that he still would have won the special election without the Yale votes.

He also reached out to Mayor John DeStefano and leaders of the Democratic Party to back him in the primary. “I felt it would be counterproductive for the ward to go in without the mayor’s support,” Morehead said. With City Hall’s support, an alderman has a better chance of obtaining benefits for the ward, he argued.

In office, Morehead, an entrepreneur who gives motivational speeches to inmates, has organized events for kids and seniors. He said he’s proudest of working with the company that manages elderly complexes at 114 Bristol St. and 69 Webster to open a senior community room and hire a coordinator to plan activities for seniors.

“They felt like they were in a prison” without anyting to do, he said of the seniors.

On citywide issues, Morehead has proved a loyal, and largely unquestioning, vote for the Democratic administration of Mayor John DeStefano.

For instance, Morehead expressed full support for the city’s proposed deal to sell (for $1) land and subsidize the construction for a 31-story tower on the Shartenberg site at Chapel and State streets.

Asked why, he responded, “Gosh, you’re hitting on all the issues. I had only one concern [the $1 sales price]. But on the flip side of that, the company coming in, what he wanted to do and bring is going to be real beneficial for New Haven. It has the potential to create a lot of revenue for New Haven. That more than makes up for it.” He also likes that the plan includes 50 subsidized “affordable” units.

Morehead voted for the $443 million city budget, a 6.54 percent increase over last year. “I’m a homeowner myself. I was voting to raise my own taxes,” he said. He said he voted against last-minute budget-cutting amendments introduced by aldermen independent of City Hall because they would have delayed the hiring of cops and firefighters. In the future, he said, he’d like to see a review of people in office who make a lot of money” in “various departments” to see if some of their jobs can be cut.

Hundreds of people recently turned out in Dixwell to complain that community policing has withered under the DeStefano administration the past few years. Morehead said Friday he believes “we’re on the right track” with community policing, although “more can be done.”

What about a recent consultant report that portrayed community policing as having lost community support and the police department as in need of severe structural change? “It was all right,” Morehead said. “I looked at a few pages of it. I feel the report and what they found was correct.”

Hopkins: Paging “Independent Thinkers”

“Are we even doing community policing right now?” Lisa Hopkins responded when asked about the same issue.

In a conversation on her front porch Friday, Hopkins, an affordable-housing consultant, disagreed with Morehead on each citywide issue.

She said community policing won’t come back until people in neighborhood like Dixwell organize more block watches. (She recently got one going on at the Victory Gardens complex and is organizing another on her street, Frances Hunter Drive.)

She said she would have voted against the Shartenberg project. (“We’re spending so much time on building luxury developments, oversaturating the housing stock with luxury housing with subsidies… It amazes me how we bend over backwards to help a develop to get a property for a dollar when we can’t help taxpayers who are being killed” by the budget.)

She also would have voted against the city budget, she said. “In three years, there will be [new homeowners] on my street who can’t afford the taxes.”

Where would she have found new revenues or budget cuts to balance the budget? In the short term she would have supported the last-minute proposal by Alderman Jorge Perez and other aldermen independent of City Hall to delay filling some unfilled jobs in the fire, police, and education budgets, Hopkins said. Ultimately she believes significant cuts can be found from the city workforce if a hard look is taken, especially at political appointees. She noted the swarm of city employees from all over town who were able to take off work during the day during the special election to help Greg Morehead defeat her in April — a swarm found every election day in wards targeted by City Hall and Democratic leaders to preserve loyal votes or defeat potential critics. If they all had vital work to do, they’d be at their jobs those days, Hopkins argued.

More broadly, Hopkins departs from Morehead on the political strategy Dixwell should take toward City Hall and Yale. It shouldn’t be confrontational necessarily, but it should be independent, she said.

For instance, she said, she doesn’t see a purpose “bitching and moaning” about how party leaders organized the Yalie vote for Morehead. She, too, is reaching out to Yale students in this election, but not, she said, by making her political bed with party leaders from outside the ward. She has been meeting with the Black Student Alliance at Yale and generally making a pitch to “independent thinkers” on campus.

“Yale produces independent thinkers,” she said. “Sometimes the political machine supsercedes that” by lining up the votes of well-meaning students who “want to be part of the in group, whatever the mayor’s doing right now. I’m reaching out to all students who are independent thinkers, who can appreciate a Democrat who may not be part of the political machine and has something to offer.”

Within the Dixwell neighborhood, too, she is pitching to “independent”-minded voters. Since the rise of a one-party state in New Haven in the mid-20th century, many aldermen from black or Latino neighborhoods like Dixwell have openly worked with the machine under a tacit understanding that has gone by the name of “plantation politics”: They produce reliable votes or little argument on citywide issues of concern to a strong mayor and their support for his campaigns. In return they’ll get more jobs or paved sidewalks or government grants for people in their wards.

Critics have long argued that that arrangement works in the self-interest of the aldermen but rarely pays off in terms of significant support for their wards — and can hurt everyone in the city, including the aldermen’s ward, by shutting democratic debate and independent scrutiny of development and budget and police issues that affect all of New Haven.

Hopkins falls in the category of such critics. While not ditching the Democratic Party, she didn’t seek the mayor’s support in the April special election; nor did she run against him. As a neighborhood organizer she has taken on City Hall over what she calls broken promises by a city-aided developer who built the subsidized homes on Frances Hunter Drive; she has been the leader of a homeowners’ group that has won concessions.

“Playing ball with the mayor gets you nothing but a title of of being hand-picked. You’re able to push the mayor’s agenda. But it’s a new day. I don’t think that’s the way things get done,” Hopkins said. She argued that City Hall-allied aldermen “still get the short end of the stick” in neighborhoods like Dixwell. “The history shows it… You garner more respect” by “remembering who elected you” and staying independent and building support primarily from the neighborhood, Hopkins argued.

Thorpe: Go Outside The Party

Candidate Cordelia Thorpe stands somewhere between Hopkins and Morehead on citywide issues, but takes a harder line on what she calls machine control of ward politics. She tried to get the results of the special election thrown out in April by appealing to the state Democratic Party in Hartford, arguing that the local Town Committee had violated party rules by not allowing ward committee members to vote on an endorsed candidate. She looked for support from veteran black political figures from outside the ward who are currently at odds with City Hall, such as the Harp family and former Mayor John Daniels.

“The city has plantation-style politics,” said Thorpe, who runs a home day-care center. “What I’m trying to do is work for democracy.”

Click on the play arrow to watch a video report by the Yale Daily News’ Andrew Mangino on Thorpe’s and Daniels’ adventures pressing their case in Hartford.

On specific citywide issues, Thorpe said in a conversation last week that the cops are “doing the best they can under the circumstances” with community policing. Asked about the recent consultant report calling for major structural changes at the police department, Thorpe said, “I have read” it.

Her view on the Shartenberg project?

“What’s the pros and cons?” she responded. “If they’re going to hire minorities, I’m for it. If they’re going to hire all outside people, no.”

Thorpe said she would have voted against the budget. She said she would look to new revenue, through development of new business, rather than budget cuts in order to avoid tax increases.

Thorpe said last week that she’s focusing more on an independent November run because “The Democratic Party doesn’t want to be inclusive.”







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: WEBbloger 1 | September 4, 2007 1:22 PM

The following two quotes below by Greg Morehead is exactly why the label of Plantation style Politics fit Morehead best.

1.
"I felt it would be counterproductive for the ward to go in without the mayor's support," Morehead said. With City Hall's support, an alderman has a better chance of obtaining benefits for the ward, he argued.

The problem here is that Morehead believes he works for the mayor. In actuality, the mayor works for the BOA, and has taken an oath to work in behalf of the entre city. Since most of the current aldermen think like Morehead, is the reason the Mayor can pick and choose and play one off the other.

2.
What about a recent consultant report that portrayed community policing as having lost community support and the police department as in need of severe structural change? "It was all right," Morehead said. "I looked at a few pages of it. I feel the report and what they found was correct."

The Perf report is 197 pages and Morehead only looked at a few pages!! This shows an inability to read and understand in order to cast an informed vote. Here Morehead is wating for someone else to read the report and tell him what to do.
Morehead by his own statements displays his ineptitude and lack of reading, understanding, and independent thinking.

Morehead should not be re-elected based on his own declarations of a "plantation Alderman"

Posted by: Noah | September 4, 2007 2:05 PM

As one of the students who worked hard for Greg in April and a Ward 22 voter, I'd like to set the record straight on Yale participation in the election.

First, Yalies are more than a small portion of the ward. Four of the residential colleges are in Ward 22 in addition to Swing Space. That adds up to over 2000 students who live in the ward, not counting those who live off campus.

There are two options for college students: voting at home, which many do, and voting in New Haven. I consider New Haven my home now - I spent the better part of the year here and really care about the city. Yalies should be encouraged to vote in New Haven and feel like it is their city. If my vote is considered part of "plantation politics," that ultimately only strengthens the walls between Yale and the rest of the city, which helps no one.

Second, neither I nor any of my friends who worked for Greg did so because City Hall decreed it. My organization, New Haven Action Fund hosted an on-campus forum for the four candidates and spoke separately to all four as well. We chose to endorse Greg afterwards based on a number of issues. We felt that he had a strong workable plan for reaching out to youth in the ward and we respected the outreach he did to Yale students because ultimately both sides of the ward are strengthened by connections between them. This is not to say that Hopkins or Thorpe's plans are not strong candidates; it certainly took time for us to come to consensus. I can't speak for the process of the Yale College Democrats but I doubt that the characterization of them as DTC-affiliated is accurate.

In fact, I wonder who on campus Paul Bass spoke to for this article. There are no quotes from Yale students or references to any of us by name, so it is hard to tell.

What is exciting about Ward 22 in many ways is that because it is split between Yale and Dixwell, the alder has the opportunity to help negotiate a better relationship between long-time community members and Yale students who sometimes don't feel any need to identify with their city or their neighborhood. I support Greg because I think he has done good work on that front. To describe Yale students voting as part of the machine or as plantation politics is false, but also prevents those ties from being made.

Posted by: Gary Doyens | September 4, 2007 10:22 PM

Plantation politics is the administration's way of subverting democracy. It's goal is to undermine and redirect the allegance of machine candidates from representing ward residents to representing Mayor DeStefano and his agenda. It's actually much worse than what this excellent article points out -- many of those on the board owe their jobs to the mayor. They work at the BOE; the housing authority, probate court, the parking authority and other nooks and crannies of city government. But you'll also find our tax dollars in the pockets of non profits operated by spouses of alders and at other times, our tax dollars or property will show up at select churches of influential community leaders with the goal of producing group think and reliable support for the administration.

Plantation politics doesn't yield good public policy - it yields an agenda that may or may not be good for the entire city. That's why it's wrong. It limits public debate, public input, and financial controls to name but a few. That's why last year's budget had mission creep, growing by another $6 million over what was originally approved. Group think yielded that overspending which was then picked up and made permanent this year. Group think gave preliminary approval of Shartenburg without an appraisal - and group think approved it tonight with all of its tens of millions of dollars of tax payer subsidies in place even though they found out the city left another $2 million on the table by not doing its homework. Group think doesn't hold anybody accountable for runaway overtime expenditures, lack of community policing, or gains in education.

As important as they are, students at Yale who think what's at stake in this city begins and ends with a better relationship with them have a very immature understanding of the many complicated issues confronting those of us who permanently live here.

As for Greg Morehead, he not only didn't read the PERF report's 197 pages - which directly affects the people in his ward, it is doubtful that Greg read the full budget either which is a much heavier, more robust read. In it, Greg would have found parking fines and fees which also disproportionately affect his ward, were increased by 25%.

As for me, I'm still waiting for the mayor and the machine to produce "good politics" - the kind he said was possible back in the Spring.

Posted by: Noah | September 6, 2007 1:58 AM

"As important as they are, students at Yale who think what's at stake in this city begins and ends with a better relationship with them have a very immature understanding of the many complicated issues confronting those of us who permanently live here."

I hope that no one would think that the relationship between Yale students and the rest of the city is the only issue at stake. However, I believe that it is important because it is a tool for addressing other issues. Yale as an institution will act differently if Yale students understand their relationship to the city differently, for example.

Posted by: Josephine Dixon-Banks | September 8, 2007 10:41 AM

Plantation Politics totally apropo for:

THE NEW INNER CITY SLAVE-PLANTATION

The now-a-day slave or labor force
The ruling-class determines the course
The political master's pastor contorts
Politics and policy aborts

The new inner city slave-plantation
Human and civil rights violation with extreme taxation

Work like a blind jackass
Support and finance the ruling class
Being bi-partisan-just a mask
Cultured career criminals civilizing crass

The new inner city slave-plantation
Human and civil rights violation with extreme taxation

The political engineers of The Greater Good own
The inner city war-zone
The psychotropic drug sets the tone
Slavery as the new world order is the throne

The new inner city slave-plantation
Human and civil rights violation with extreme taxation

Multi-tasking a labor saving device
Freedom of movement has no right
Monopolized government enslaved all might
The inner city slave- plantation private and prime
Real estate blight

The new inner city slave-plantation
Human and civil rights violation with extreme taxation

The thirteenth amendment of the constitution
On the inner city slave-plantation no social, no economical,
No educational, no political absolution

On the inner city slave-plantation, indentured servants,
Chattel slaves, still considered Black Gold
By the God Fearing slave codes used to control

The new inner city slave-plantation
Human and civil rights violation with extreme taxation

On the new inner city slave-plantation
The American Flag can not wave
Even Democracy is revered as a Black Slave

Copyright 2005
JOSEPHINE DIXON-BANKS

Politics Policy Proceeds

We the people, the true labor force
Our functionality sets the course
New administrations enslave the courts
Political potentates practice global intercourse

Politicians in the poke, devalue people after the vote
Crimes against humanity justifiably provoked
People have no value after the vote

Politics, policy, propaganda perpetuate
The colonization of the political fake
To allow those on the take
To escape their judicial fate

Corruption, extortion..white collar crimes incarcerate
Poor people's physical and mental state
Patriotism used to confiscate-Patriotism used to obliterate
While industrial justice desecrates God, country, faith

Bureaucracies pilfer, plunder, loot
A victorious and glorious tribute invoked
People have no value after the vote

COPYRIGHT 2006 JOSEPHINE DIXON-BANKS


Posted by: THREEFIFTHS | September 9, 2007 9:50 PM

I Agree With Banks, In Fact To Piggy Back On Her
Post I Was Told Years Ago That If The People Want Freedom That We Should Not Trust Banks Politicians
And Prechers Follow The Money Trail And You Will Find All Three At The Helm!!!

Posted by: 2Faced | September 10, 2007 7:49 AM

I agree with the progressive thoughts of Banks and ThreeFifths...Lets just hope the masses begin to understand that many of the so called community leaders, church clergy and alike participate in Politricks...this spells total economic disater for the hard working residents of New Haven...If you have viable challengers running in your ward in the Primary and General Election...Vote for them and end the long standing reign of the malfunctioning political machine!

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35