New Haven Independent: Fence Sparks Neighborhood Debate

Fence Sparks Neighborhood Debate

by Nicole Allan | September 26, 2007 1:52 PM | Permalink | Comments (5)

Eric Traester said he feels like he’s living in a prison. Despite the quaint, well-kept brick front of his Dwight apartment building, every time he looks out his window he’s confronted with a looming, shiny metal fence he feels is more suited to a “white-collar prison complex” than a residential neighborhood. When he slips out his back door and through the Miya’s-adjacent parking lot to Howe Street, he’s confronted by another fence with three rows of razor wire.

“The fences give people the wrong impression about the neighborhood,” Traester said. He’s especially peeved about the taller one, recently erected in place of what he claims was a shorter version, and calls the replacement “an eyesore” and “overkill.”

These fences enclose the backside of 70 Howe, an attractive brick apartment building owned by Howe Place Apartments.

Like a provocative work of art, the fence is viewed differently by different viewers. Their strong feelings reflect a deeper divide over how to respond to crime in an urban neighborhood that is on the upswing.

Susan Bradford, the leasing agent, said that the new fence is the exact same height and form as the old one, except for stronger posts.

“We put our tenant safety and security first,. Some neighbors had a determination to knock [the old fence] down,” Bradford explained, so Howe Place Apartments chose to construct a stronger fence due to various damages.

Miriam Felton-Dansky, a resident of 70 Howe, received a general notice about the new fence but hadn’t seen it yet. Asked if she felt safe in her neighborhood, Felton-Dansky replied, “New Haven has a lot of economic disparity and that’s evident in this neighborhood. But I don’t feel unsafe here.”

Neither does Jennifer Nelson, who lives in the neighborhood. Though she hadn’t seen the fence either, she said she thought it was “probably not helping. I believe in more concrete measures rather than signposts indicating something’s wrong.”

The Chelsea Company has taken these concrete measures, said Matt Short, who manages the company with his mother, Ardelle Cowie. They’ve installed security cameras, better lighting, and electronic lock systems and have cultivated relationships with the police and public works departments. Short removed a chain-link fence behind 80 Howe to avoid what he calls the “broken window effect” — when a property looks rundown or overly fortified and thus attracts more crime. “I frankly don’t have any idea why [Howe Place Apartments] is choosing to do this,” he said about the new fence. “Before the changes were made, their approach was already 100 percent different from ours. Now it’s 110 percent.”

Ardelle Cowie and her husband began buying properties in the Dwight neighborhood during the late ’70s, and her family retained faith in the area even when it was known as a red-light district during the 1980s. Now, with focused efforts by the city as well as Yale expansion projects — a new sculpture building (pictured) sits at 32 Edgewood, while a sleek gray parking lot hovers over a new Yale security station directly across from 70 Howe — the neighborhood has seen the addition of more attractive housing options and hip restaurants like Ahimsa.

“This neighborhood is in great shape,” Short said, “and it’s only continuing to improve. The question is, what does this fence communicate about our neighborhood?”

When asked whether she thought the new fence was a necessary security measure even in the improved neighborhood, Bradford replied: “I will leave it to you to look at police reports and make that decision.”

To follow Bradford’s instructions, take a look at the Independent’s Crime Log. Within the month of August, the quarter-mile radius around Chapel and Howe saw 110 incidents ranging from false fire alarms and traffic tickets to auto theft and assault.

Ultimately, it will not be up to Bradford to decide whether the new fence is a necessary measure for her tenants’ safety. Frank Gargiulo, a zoning administrator at the Livable City Initiative, explained that any fence equipped with razor wire or over eight feet tall is against state statutes. If the new fence is indeed taller than the old one, a LCI inspector could call for removal or alteration. As for the other, razor-wired fence (shown), many neighbors wonder why, in the burgeoning neighborhood around Chapel and Howe, it’s still standing.

Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: Matt Short | September 27, 2007 11:17 AM

One point of clarification:

As far as I'm aware, the Howe Place apartments are well maintained and provide good service to their residents. In that respect they are not 100% different from the Chelsea Company. My comment regarding the differential in the approach going from 100% to 110% pertains only to the change from the old gigantic fence with razor wire to a new, stronger gigantic fence with the same general specs.

Matt Short

Posted by: robn | September 27, 2007 1:06 PM

Can NHI tell us readers how Yale and the City define tax-exempt and non-exempt property? Does Yale get exemption for a whole parking structure if it happens to have a classroom or a police station jammed under one corner.??? or do they pay taxes by each square foot of commercial property, regardless of adjacent institutional program that might be in the same building?

Posted by: Edward_H | September 28, 2007 11:54 AM

Eric Traester said he feels like he's living in a prison. Despite the quaint, well-kept brick front of his Dwight apartment building, every time he looks out his window he's confronted with a looming, shiny metal fence he feels is more suited to a "white-collar prison complex" than a residential neighborhood.

Then move out. There is no shortage of rental housing in New Haven. Obviously you have a landlord who cares about the safety of the tenants and the security of the building. The fence may not be built to state statutes but at least they spent the money to put one up. Or should they wait for an incident to happen before addressing a possible security breach.

If the new fence is indeed taller than the old one, a LCI inspector could call for removal or alteration.

Was the old fence eight feet tall? I did not see a confirmation of that height of the old fence in your article. Don't you mean if the fence is taller than the eight feet allowed by law?

Posted by: joe dwight | September 30, 2007 12:55 AM

So, if you don't like the barbed wire "then move out". Well. Edward. If you don't like Traester's comment you should stop reading the news. Does that kind of logic still make sense when you're reading it about yourself rather than writing it about someone else? I'm curious.

Next. Read more carefully. The bldg in question with the barbed wire is on Howe. Traester lives on Dwight ergo the landlord with the fence is not his landlord.

Anyways. Read closer. This article pretty obviously communicates that this is a spite fence - the result of a neighbor dispute rather than a response to crime. The neighbors were trying to tear their fence down so Bradford built a bigger stronger one. The building in question has only two or three neighbors, so the answer to this question can't be too far away, but how important is it really if Bradford wants to keep on with her fence and her dispute and if Traester and other people who don't like the fence and the City officials who say its illegal either can't or won't do anything about it...then its a moot point...just one of those things people do that never really get reconciled. Just a stupid fist fight on the playground.

Posted by: Kevin | October 5, 2007 11:35 AM

This law may also be relevant (a rod is 16.5 feet)

Sec. 47-47. Barbed wire between adjoining premises or enclosing grounds of public buildings. No person shall use barbed wire in the construction of fences, or have barbed wire upon existing fences, between his own premises and those of an adjoining proprietor, within twenty-five rods of any house or barn belonging to such proprietor, unless either premises are used in connection with raising livestock, without first obtaining his written consent. No barbed wire shall be used in the construction of fences, or retained upon existing fences, connected with or enclosing the grounds of any public school or public building, except a Department of Transportation storage facility or a vessel operations area of a state-owned waterfront facility or aircraft operations area of a state-owned airport. Any person who violates any provision of this section shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars.

New Haven Independent

Fence Sparks Neighborhood Debate

Comments

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

News Feed