War Memorial Approved

by Thomas MacMillan | October 18, 2007 7:54 AM | | Comments (2)

bofpcomm10170701.jpgWhen will the war in Iraq be over? That’s now up to the New Haven Department of Parks, Recreations and Defense — er, Trees.

The board of parks commissioners delved into foreign policy Wednesday night while approving a proposal to create a “temporary” downtown monument to those who have died in the war in Iraq. The monument will exist only as long as the war in Iraq continues.

The board heard the proposal from Stephen Kobasa (pictured above), a representative of Reclaiming the Prophetic Voice, a Connecticut interfaith peace and justice group. The monument, to be erected at the corner of Broadway and Elm near the Civil War memorial, will consist initially of a cairn of 56 ten-pound stones, representing the 56 months since the start of the Iraq conflict. Antiwar activists have maintained a weekly vigil there.

Kobasa explained that a new stone will be added to the pile every month that the Iraq war continues. Each stone will be engraved with the month and the number of Iraqi and American deaths during that month. Kobasa described it as “a way of giving weight to the numbers, both literally and metaphorically.”

Kobasa’s proposal is for a “temporary” memorial, lasting only as long as the war in Iraq. It was not lost on the commissioners that with no end in sight to the conflict, the pile of stones could be there for a very long time, getting larger every month.

“A terrible irony,” Kobasa noted.

bofpcomm10170703.jpgIn recognition of the distinct possibility that the Iraq war will not have a clear ending, the board decided that it will be up to the parks department to determine when the war is over and the memorial should be removed.

“We’ll put up a big ‘Mission Accomplished’ banner,” joked Commissioner Michael Tucker (pictured). The commissioners approved the proposal with only one opposing vote. “As a long-haired, radical hippie, I’m all for it,” said Tucker.

bofpcomm10170704.jpgCommission Vice President Clifton Bush (at right in picture) voiced his approval, saying it was a “no-brainer.” Vice President Clifton, describing President George W. Bush as “arrogant and stupid,” said that “it’s up to us as concerned citizens to draw attention to what’s going on.”

Commissioner Kevin Walton, the lone dissenting vote, made reference to the current controversy in the city over temporary sidewalk memorials to murdered New Haveners. “Is this memorial any different?” he asked, saying, “Some people say that there’s a war in New Haven.” After the meeting, Walton said that he voted against for the proposal “out of respect for the people involved in the deaths in New Haven.”

bofpcomm10170705.jpg“I totally disagree with the war,” said Walton (pictured), “but there’s this violence hitting closer to home. And where’s the symbolism for that?”

Commissioners were concerned that the stones could be stolen or thrown at cars. The proposal was passed with the condition that if there were problems with theft or vandalism that the monument would be moved to a new location or dismantled entirely. Another condition was, of course, that the parks department will have the power to declare the end date of the Iraq war and New Haven’s temporary monument to the war’s casualties.







Comments

Posted by: Stephen H | October 18, 2007 10:38 AM

I do not agree with the war but I do support our troops. If and when the conflict does end a permanent memorial would be a good idea.

A memorial to those who fought and those who have died and the design should be left up to the familes of the fallen.

This makeshift memorial sounds more like protest art (I don't agree with the war myself) then a memorial. Why don't we try giving our soldiers the respect they deserve weather they come home alive or in a casket.

Don't forget this war has names and faces.

Posted by: fairhavener [TypeKey Profile Page] | October 18, 2007 12:38 PM

""I totally disagree with the war," said Walton (pictured), "but there's this violence hitting closer to home. And where's the symbolism for that?""

I have an idea in which the symbolism of this proposed monument can be multifaceted. We somehow help the NHPD detectives find the violent criminals. We take them down to the memorial and throw the stones at them. Or, in the more likely event that they are never caught (and the whole legal and moral issue of stoning someone), we can just set up straw men for each violent criminal at which to throw the stones. More symbolism could surely be derived from the juxtaposition of the stones (soldiers - good people) to the straw men (violent criminals - bad people).

BTW, as far as I know, a vast majority of people support the troops but are opposed to the war. So, instead of everyone repeating this over and over why not just assume you do unless you say otherwise. I don't get it. This has been going on for years. Of course we all support the troops they are our brothers and sisters, sons, daughters, mothers and fathers, and friends, and neighbors.

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35