The View from Anthony’s: Not All Ocean

by Allan Appel | November 27, 2007 12:38 PM | | Comments (5)

IMG_3100.JPGSpurred by neighbors’ complaints, City Plan commissioners pressed the lawyers for Anthony’s Ocean View to move faster on razing neighborhood eyesores it bought in order to expand.

The latest small chapter in the ongoing saga of the expansion of the controversial expansion in Morris Cove took place last week.

A larger issue in the saga — the legality of the creation of a PDD, or a planned development district — is no longer in question. It was decided by a 2006 State Supreme Court ruling. That ruling overturned a 2004 Appellate Court’s blocking the right of the city to pave the way Anthony’s expansion by creating a “Planned Development District,” or PDD. PDDs override local zoning rules.

Still in play is the slow pace of demolition of several community eyesores — houses adjacent to Anthony’s that the restaurant’s owners bought several years ago, but have been slow to demolish for the expansion.

Lawyers for Anthony’s were back before the commissioners last week specifically to fulfill requirements for more detailed drawings (see below) of the restaurant’s proposed new parking area, the new canopy, açade, and other features that were deemed too schematic in the previously submitted documents.

According to City Plan staffer Joy Ford, these were reviewed and seemed to have passed muster, although no vote was taken at the meeting.

However, the commissioners also wanted to know the status of the demolition plans for three houses, among them the one pictured above, on Bristol Place, along with a derelict nursing home that faces the harbor, which Anthony’s has purchased over the years. The idea was to demolish these and utilize the land to expand the parking and enhance the catering capacities of the restaurant. These steps were approved back in 2004, but progress has been slow.

As a result, for several years now the buildings have remained abandoned yet still standing. When the PDD fight was lost, local people grew particularly vocal about the increasingly dilapidated conditions of the buildings within the tidily kept Morris Cove community. Residents previously had appeared before the commission describing dangerous conditions, including fire hazard in the buildings, and possibly drug dealing. In previous appearances before the commissioners, nearby Morris Cove homeowners had demanded that the buildings be boarded up or demolished, and Anthony’s fined.

IMG_3048.JPGNo local people were present at last week’s public hearing on the parking, servery, and facade to speak on the issue- either for or against. But the commissioners were cognizant of the past community concern. They added a condition before the expansion would be allowed: namely, requiring a timetable for the demolition of the Bristol Place houses, preferably within the next three months.

Reached by email, Susan Campion, one of the Morris Cove community leaders on the matter, wrote: “The neighborhood’s oversight of the PDD, even now, may be likened to a root canal — an awful but necessary action… We trust that the city in its oversight of the PDD will do nothing more or nothing less than is required by its own regulations and ordinances.”

As a result of the controversy over Anthony’s, State Rep. Robert Megna spearheaded in 2007 a new state law with more stringent criteria for the city if it goes the PDD route in future developments. In 2008, Campion, writes, she and residents from around the city, who attended Megna’s presentations, have formed a new group, the New Haven Citywide Planned Development Collaborative 2008 Initiative. Its aim is a full review of lnd use policies and zoning with an eye to establishing best practices standards for urban development in New Haven.

She described the collaborative as in its early stages of development and treading gingerly on complex issues and vested interests.

However, since Anthony’s expansion was granted before the new law, it will be allowed to proceed, as long as it meets the commission’s ongoing requirements.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: -FairHavener- | November 27, 2007 2:06 PM

I have to say, and I am an expert, that is the most hideous (proposed) design I have seen in a long time. What is that? It looks like a very poorly designed, low budget nursing home. Is that really what people want to see in such a beautiful location?

(I particularly like the asphalt (which is shown everywhere) with the big white arrows - subtle, but very nice touch. Do the Anthony's people own stock in an asphalt company? By the way, asphalt comes in colors, not just black.)

It's too bad that it is such a rarity to have Vision, Intelligence, and Money ALL in the same place at the same time when projects like this arise.

I wonder how many resources have been wasted on just this project (how many tax dollars?). Is the "New Haven Citywide Planned Development Collaborative 2008 Initiative" (NHCPDC08I) the best way to prevent such waste and free up these resources to devote to actually improving our built environment?

Posted by: Common Sense | November 27, 2007 4:10 PM

I recently attended an event at Anthony's Ocean View Restaurant and while looking over the beautiful waterview of New Haven Harbor from the patio area I noticed that the old vacant Morris Cove Convelesent Home and another building were no longer standing. The land was cleared at that area. It looks likes progress has been made except for the Bristol Place buildings. I'm looking forward to a happy ending on this long drawn out controversy.

Posted by: bugupit | November 27, 2007 10:23 PM

It was perhaps 2005 when I tried asking Megna about his legislation. He said that, really, Campion's group was writing it. Did this change over time and process? Can he now speak to the issue and legislation? Hey, I am glad it passed, but maybe the politician just played the role of the politician and the advocate should be credited.

Posted by: Robert Megna | November 28, 2007 11:58 AM

Mr. Bugupit,

Legislation is normally written on a cooperative basis and I think spearheaded was a good description as to my role. The legislation was something I believe in. Susan Campion was the real driver behind the issue. It was Susan and the many many other homeowners about this great city who empowered me. All New Haven State Representatives supported us. Majority leader Senator Martin Looney was the power and voice in the Senate as well as Senator Toni Harp.Without the Senate the law would not have happened. You can call me anytime to discuss the issue, 469-4327

Posted by: king james v | November 28, 2007 1:37 PM

Bob Megna is the most earth friendly, straight shooting, honestly concerned politician new haven has, and although i don't live "over da bridge" he's been helpful, and more importantly honest, when i've asked him for both help and opinions.
He's indebted to nobody, and if you look at his record you will see he's done more to clean up New Hvaen, the sound and all of south central Conecticut than anyone.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35