City: Eyesore Coming Down

by Paul Bass | November 15, 2007 12:50 PM | | Comments (3)

235%20Winch%201.jpg
The Winchester Avenue wreck above could come down by year’s end — as a three-year-old battle with a former NFL safety-turned-developer (pictured) enters the final quarter.

Andrew Rizzo, chief of New Haven’s Livable City Initiative (LCI), said this week that he’s moving fast to demolish the three-story building at 235 Winchester. “I’m hoping it’s going to be down in the next month or two,” he said.

The 18-unit hulking brick corpse, near the corner of Henry Street and across from Science Park, has been weighing down a transitional stretch of the Dixwell neighborhood since builder Kenny Hill and the Livable City Initiative (LCI) became embroiled in a dispute over a lead-paint removal grant.

The two sides have negotiated, to no avail, as the building itself has remained a windowless, vacant testament to blight — a waste of more than $150,000 in government money meant to clean up properties. It has remained open to vagrants and surrounded by trash and overgrown weeds.

So Rizzo (pictured) reissued a demolition order on Oct. 11 “due to the advanced deterioration and the possibility of structural failure… [I]n the interest of public safety and welfare of the City of New Haven, I have determined the structure to be unsafe in violation” of the city’s building code.

Usually Rizzo would have to wait another 90-day “waiting period” to proceed with the demolition because the building has a National Preservation Trust historical listing. Rizzo invoked a city public-safety statute to waive that waiting period and has begun seeking demolition contractors.

“At this point,” Kenny Hill said this week, “we’re not going to have any choice” but to proceed with a long-threatened federal lawsuit to stop the demolition and to seek a six-figure recovery of money he claims he lost to city wrongdoing.

“We know” the demolition order could spark a suit, said Rizzo, who faults Hill, not the city, for the property’s woes. “I just decided I had to do something about the building” to protect the public.

From NFL To New Haven

“It is tragic that the property has sat there for the past few years,” Hill said. Hill (pictured at the top of this story) was a star cornerback for Yale’s football team. Then he went pro. Over a ten-year career (an eternity in the NFL), he played strong safety for three Super Bowl-winning teams, the Oakland (then L.A.) Raiders in 1981 and 1984 and the New York Giants in ‘87. He returned to New Haven in 2000 to launch a home-buying and renovation company with a friend from Yale’s athletics department. (Click here for a previous story on his background.)

“There’s over $600,000 in that building,” he said of battered 235 Winchester. The figure comes from adding the $420,000 his partnership (MBMB LLC) spent to buy the property in 2003, money invested since then on preliminary work to renovate the 18 apartments, and a $168,000 federal loan administered by the city to remove lead paint.

That loan was the source of all the problems. Hill said the city forced him to hire an incompetent contractor to remove the lead. The contractor took the money and failed to remove the lead, Hill said.

john%20ward%20photo.jpg“We totally dispute that,” City Corporation Counsel John Ward (pictured) said this week. “They brought this guy in who wasn’t on our [approved] list. We put him on our list to make them happy.” Hill claimed he had never even heard of the contractor until the city insisted on hiring him.

Read the details about that and a subsequent series of disputes in this previous Independent article. Two years after that article, the two sides are no closer to resolving the dispute, and the building has continued to deteriorate, dragging down the block. The two sides today disagree on who promised — and then failed — to keep the building secured, as well, the trigger for Rizzo’s demolition order.

“They make demands so ridiculous, it’s not worth responding to,” Ward said this week. Despite the lawsuit threat, “we’ve got to do something about it.”

“Clearly we could have gotten [the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development] involved” sooner in this dispute, Kenny Hill said. “We were probably mistakenly under the impression that the city wanted to resolve it.”

The city arranged a Sept. 1 foreclosure sale on 235 Winchester because Hill’s partnership owed over $20,000 in back taxes. The sale was cancelled at the last minute. Hill said he had refused to pay the taxes because in his view the city had caused the property to be worthless yet was continuing to charges taxes as though it were worth lots of money. He decided to pay the money at the last minute to stave off the foreclosure “on the advice of my attorney.”

He said he’s not giving up the property without a fight. “If they try to demolish this building now,” he vowed, “it’s going to be aproblem.”







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: winfield | November 18, 2007 9:51 AM

Is this the location where the new owner of Science Park wants to put a parking garage? Odd that after 2 years LCI suddenly has to act immediately. Nevertheless, almost anything will be an improvement.

Posted by: -FairHavener- | November 19, 2007 12:16 PM

This is exactly what LCI should be doing. Good job guys. I know myself and plenty others are behind you on efforts like this.

""At this point," Kenny Hill said this week, "we're not going to have any choice" but to proceed with a long-threatened federal lawsuit to
stop the demolition and to seek a six-figure recovery of money he claims he lost to city wrongdoing.""

So, waste more of our tax dollars on this failure. Lets see:

600,000 total spent
420,000 cost of building
168,000 our tax dollars wasted on this project

That leaves about $12,000 dollars actually spent (I doubt they paid 420k cash up front for this). Wow, good job guys. You are really invested in this project it seems. And I am not even sure how this fits in to the picture: "a waste of more than $150,000 in government money meant to clean up properties."

"That loan was the source of all the problems. Hill said the city forced him to hire an incompetent contractor to remove the lead. The
contractor took the money and failed to remove the lead, Hill said."

LCI "forced" Hill to REMOVE the lead not hire a shady contractor. Hill's statements and attitude (like saying "forced" instead of "required" or following "regulations") leads me to believe he would have left the lead if not for LCI. Everyone in this position has to remove the lead.

Hill HIRED the incompetent contractor NOT LCI - that is the result of the inexperienced trying to cut corners - that is why there is an approved list. Plus, if Hill & Co. isn't even competent enough to get past the first steps, how do they plan on competently hiring everyone needed for the entire rehabilitation of this building?

""They make demands so ridiculous, it's not worth responding to," Ward said this week. Despite the lawsuit threat, "we've got to do something
about it.""

You mean like removing lead and boarding up your abandoned building project? Or do you mean the extra step that would be making a "Livable
City"? You know, like competently completing your project and improving the built environment.

"Clearly we could have gotten [the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development] involved" sooner in this dispute, Kenny Hill said."

Yes clearly. If they "could have" they would have. I bet, at this point, HUD wouldn't touch this project with a 10 foot pole. And what a
surprise, here are another couple of guys trying to make a buck off taxpayers' money. Footing the bill and paying the rent (well not entirely, but you get the point).

"The city arranged a Sept. 1 foreclosure sale on 235 Winchester because Hill's partnership owed over $20,000 in back taxes."

Another surprise. At least Hill's lawyer has enough sense to advise him to pay it.

"He said he's not giving up the property without a fight. "If they try
to demolish this building now," he vowed, "it's going to be
aproblem.""

Yeah, a problem for Hill. This is LCI doing a fine job ridding us of blight. I think a lot of people are interested in stopping these types of "projects" from coming to town. These types of "building projects" attempt to make money off taxpayers and typically result in creating a
mess everywhere.

Good Job LCI.

BTW Hill & Co, thanks for trashing, neglecting, and causing the
demolition of yet another of our historical buildings that make up our
architectural heritage. Thank A LOT. The only optimistic thing I can
see is at least the building was spared the fate of being stripped of
its character, and then covered with vinyl, then left to rot again.

Posted by: John | December 10, 2007 12:17 PM

So what's the update? Has the building come down? Who is Hill in business with?

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35