School Board, Critics Fail To Bury Hatchet

by Allan Appel | December 12, 2007 8:20 AM | | Comments (10)

boe%20aug%20006.JPGAn attempted air-clearing meeting between top school officials and their most vocal critics backfired into a new round of recriminations.

In a city with a muted public discourse about the Board of Education (BOE), the occasional criticisms of an advocacy group called ConnCAN (Connecticut Coalition for Achievement Now) have stood out. Mayor John DeStefano (pictured with schools chief Reggie Mayo) and his appointees on the school board have attacked the group for its criticisms. The two sides met on Nov. 29 with the aim of airing differences and moving forward — then emerged as divided as ever, with starkly different accounts of what happened.

City officials resumed attacks on the group. ConnCAN’s board chair called the mayor and school officials more interested in “happy talk” than “straight talk” about the state of public education.

Click here for an earlier story on the dispute, which centers on accountability and performance of the public schools.

At Monday night’s Board of Ed Meeting, Mayor DeStefano, Chairman Brian Perkins, and Superintendent Mayo offered their version of the Nov. 29 meeting with members of ConnCAN’s board headed by Jonathan Sackler. Sackler and other ConnCAN members did not attend Monday’s board meeting.

The aim of the Nov. 29 get-together, according to the mayor, was to ask ConnCAN to temper what is perceived as public-school bashing on a wide range of issues, such as the slow pace of closing the achievement gap. DeStefano said he went to protest what the BOE considers inaccurate data showing off the success of charters and under-appreciating the NHPS’s student achievements. He said he asked ConnCAN demonstrate that it is not simply a pro-charter school organization by accepting a mayor, a superintendent, and a board of ed chair from a public school district — and DeStefano, Perkins, and Mayo volunteered — to be on the board.

Their offer of service was not accepted by ConnCAN.

The Board of Ed’s Side

Here are some excerpts from the transcript of the lively BOE discussion on the subject Monday night:

Mayo: “It was a very disappointing meeting. Their leadership had an opportunity to pledge to stop this bashing, and they didn’t seize it …They as much as admitted they were less about closing the achievement gap, and more pro-charter.”

Perkins: “This board is not hostile to charter schools. But ConnCAN is really an interest group focused on pitting charter against non-charter when we are both public. Their agenda is unfair, full of disingenuous information. There are countless children let go from charters for behavior issues.”

Ann Levett:” That’s right. The playing field is not equal. We do not and cannot let children go for behavioral reasons. I’m happy for this discussion, and we must publicize this.”

Michael Nast: “Data about students coming back to us from the charters and the 2500 special ed kids and the English language learners we have that affect test scores… these kind of data need to be better known.”

DeStefano: “Look, the record of charters in New Haven and nationally is inconsistent. Why is the talk always comparing New Haven? Because we have here Amistad, a highly funded charter, and, to make their case, to compare to us, they need us, to bash us to make their point.”

Perkins: “We’ve received many awards in our system, and we need to call for responsible reporting of it… And I feel that board’s [ConnCAN’s] leadership is not legitimate. As the mayor says they don’t meet regularly…”

DeStefano: “There’s a lot at stake. Funding is at stake. When charter funding is increased, it is at the expense recently of the fine magnet schools… Well, I’m not sure where it’s going to go next. We wrote a letter to them after the meeting, but haven’t yet heard back.”

Here are excerpts from that letter:

“Dear ConnCAN Director and Advisory Board…

“I remain concerned about ConnCAN’s using inaccurate information… We have been disappointed over the past year by several disparaging comments made by members of ConnCAN staff regarding public schools in general and NHPS in particular… your refusal to acknowledge our concerns is disheartening… We would like a commitment in writing that ConnCAN will cease to make disparaging comments about the public school system. The City is prepared to make a similar pledge. …

“From the organization’s continued reliance on problematic and incomplete data to illustrate and manipulate a conclusion that charters outperform traditional schools to ConnCAN’s actions lobbying the legislature for funding shifts from public schools to privately run charters, it has become clear the organization has never served its stated mission… If you are truly committed to improving the state of public education, why are there no public school superintendents, board presidents or chief elected officials on your 45-member Board?”

ConnCAN’s Side

For his part ConnCAN’s Jonathan Sackler wrote the following to his board about the meeting.

“Dear Friends …

“The mayor presented his views in a very aggressive manner, questioning both ConnCAN’s legitimacy as an organization, the quality of its work, and its motives… They requested that ConnCAN refrain from ‘denigrating’ New Haven public schools, and that we fire or at least muzzle [staffers] Alex Johnston and Marc Magee… They alleged our reports are cooked up, and that public funding for charter schools comes at the expense of the ‘real’ public schools… They went on to complain that the board could not fairly represent the interests of public education since it does not include elected officials or school administrators…

“Many attempts were made to clear the air about our mission, motives, and record, and in every case these attempts were angrily dismissed by the mayor. In fact, the more reasoned the discussion from our side, the angrier and more aggressive he became. It was clear that the mayor is not prepared to be dissuaded from his views for reasons of his own…

“Whatever the source of the mayor’s desire to generate a conflict with ConnCAN, that’s not our mission. Our mission is to make great public schools available to all children in the state of Connecticut…

“With the nation’s largest achievement gap, we will continue to do this in an appropriate and factual manner — straight talk… Although this part of our work may be uncomfortable for some who are accustomed to managing public opinion with ‘happy talk,’ we believe straight talk is essential if the state is going to come to grips with this urgent problem….

“Unfortunately, any constructive partnership with Mayor DeStefano and his colleagues appears infeasible for the time being, but we certainly remain open to this possibility as we move forward and continue to pursue our advocacy efforts statewide.”

Alex Johnston, executive director of ConnCAN, said in a telephone interview that he couldn’t comment on the BOE meeting.

He did defend his group’s approach: “In the success stories we tell there are lots of public schools including New Haven schools. Troup Middle, for example, has one of the highest Hispanic achievement rates in the state. Rubbing people the wrong way is not our intention, but unfortunately sometimes that happens. But we continue to be open to partnerships everywhere as we focus on our work statewide.”







Comments

Posted by: FIX THE SCHOOLS | December 12, 2007 11:13 AM

It's one thing to fight with ConnCAN over stats.
But it's an entirely different matter to attack the life line for over 1,000 New Haven school children who attend New Haven's Achievement First Schools (Amistad Academy and Elm City College Prep.)

What in the world would cause this group to actually try to cut Amistad's funding?

Almost 5% (over 1,000) of New Haven's public school kids now attend either Amistad Academy or Elm City College Prep. The vast majority are African-American or hispanic and poor. They are admitted by random school choice lottery. They enter on average 2 years behind grade level and after only two years in the program, 70% to 80% perform at or above grade level - and are on their way to college.

The city of Bridgeport just sold Achievement First a school building for $1 so that it could open a public school in the east end of town. Hartford is also trying to lure Achievement First to their town with the promise of funding.

So why do the cities Bridgeport, Hartford, and even New York City seem to see things so differently than DeStefano and Mayo? Who knows. But just contrast our Mayor and Superintendant's statements about Amistad to those made by Joel Klein, New York's schools Chancellor in this AF teacher recruiting video posted on Youtube.


Copy and paste:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w304EAMct1E

Posted by: New Haven Taxpayer | December 12, 2007 2:08 PM

Let me see if I understand this. Recently, several Schools were listed in a national report as drop out factories. State Board of Education stats, reported by New Haven, report that nearly 65% of the kids at high schools like Hillhouse drop out and never graduate. CAPT test scores are below 50%. Yet, the Board of Ed President, Superintendent, and the Mayor all beleive the solution to these achievement problems are to fire the leaders of ConnCAN and stick their collective heads into the sand.

Can anyone spell "New Leadership"?

Posted by: Shirley Ugest | December 12, 2007 5:01 PM

The sad truth that everyone should know - if the BOE would fess-up - is the the number of kids that fail to make proficient is disproportionately higher than the kids, the Public Schools themselves, have designated to have social emotional problems. The truth is the don't manage these children in an effective way that keeps them from interfaring with the educational experience of the others. Standards are lowered so as not aggitate these kids, thus giving the rest a false belief in their own achievement in the classroom. Some of these kids who graduate from New Haven Public Schools have trouble reading training manuals for minimum wage jobs. That is a very serious failure.

Posted by: Esbe [TypeKey Profile Page] | December 12, 2007 6:15 PM


OH, no, are we back to this argument? Where the leaders of the city and ConnCan act like delinquent 14 year-olds? "Did you diss me? Yes, you did!"

Let's get the facts straight. Charter schools, in general, are frequently not very good. New Haven public schools face all kinds of very real problems and nonetheless employ many fine, hard working and talented educators. There are success stories in BOE schools, as well as massive failures.

Achievement First (Amistad) schools, however, are simply, truly fantastic. Its true: other cities are dying for Achievement First to move in.

I don't care if their success is "unfair". They are saving many kids right now in New Haven and they could save many more. And our mayor and BOE have a simple answer: no way, we won't let those kids be saved, because it wouldn't be fair.

Posted by: Gary Doyens | December 12, 2007 11:44 PM

This battle is so classic - DeStefano and his loyalists demonizing and marginalizing anybody who dares raise a challenge to his platitudes, happy talk and lack of results. If ConnCan has ideas and a track record that shows positive results, and they appear to, then perhaps there are aspects to their approach that makes sense and should be embraced. But that as usual, would be too easy. Whether its the State Department of Public Works, the DOT, YNHH, Tweed Airport Authority, Easthaven or the Regional Development Authority - it's always the same: bully, demean, demonize and destroy anybody who challenges the status quo.

Despite what the mayor, the BOE and Super Mayo keep saying - the NH public schools are in deep trouble despite being flush with cash that far exceeds better performing districts across the country. Wilbur Cross, one of our best performing schools seated one of the largest freshmen classes this year - more than 600 students. Four years from now, more than half - more than 300 students will not be graduating. That national study listed WC as one of three drop out factories in New Haven referenced above.

If we don't quit holding our breath at CMT time, hoping to fail less than the previous year, but posting failing scores nonetheless, seducing ourselves with mediocrity and justifying poor results, we will never get out of this rut and our children will continue to suffer. It's important to be a cheerleader for NHPS - it's more important to be a leader.

Now, Mayor DeStefano and Super Mayo: Is this the best, the very best we can do?

Posted by: evst1 | December 13, 2007 10:28 AM

Can you say "elected school board"? This city is more of a third world dictatorship than anything else. Castro and Chavez, you've got company.

Posted by: bjfair | December 13, 2007 9:19 PM

"demonizing, demeaning and attempting to destroy anyone who challenges the status quo". That has a familiar ring. This should not be about demonizing those who are educating our children. It should be about who's not educating them and taking action. When the smoke clears an admission must be made that NHPS student scores indicate a failure of the system in educating the majority of their students. You can't dispute the facts. Grow up and stop blaming the messenger for delivering the message. This should be about giving our children the best education that state and federal dollars can buy. It should be about sitting down with CONNCAN and finding out what they are doing right and getting out of the way when you no longer have the stamina or committment to do the right thing for our children This is about their future well being.

Posted by: -FairHavener- | December 14, 2007 6:16 PM

I don't know if this is a comedy, a tragedy, a catch 22 for DeStefano & Co...

I mean, DeStefano & Co obviously cater to certain types of people, all of whom don't vote. There is no question about it. From what I read here and elsewhere their policies and decisions drive out the middle class, educated, and pretty much anyone who votes, all of whom probably make up the majority of people who would be actively involved in their child's education.

Then the hordes of kids of the non-voting, apathetic masses of parents come back and burn DeStefano & Co through the public schools with their poor performance and insane drop-out rates. And don't forget these youngsters' extracurricular activities like "marking" people by shooting them.

Well, if all goes as planned (Big D's Plan that is), the children will drop-out, grow-up, go to prison, come back to New Haven, get a place to live through HANH, choose not to vote, get a city job (remember that article?), then start voting DeStefano. (People who read NHI a lot will get this joke - I am not going to dig up a bunch of articles.)

Posted by: -FairHavener- | December 14, 2007 6:20 PM

I forgot to add, I am actually a huge fan of public education, and like DeStefano (cringe) I oppose charter schools for a number of reasons. Public education (not some-of-the-public charter, or some-of-the-public-religious charter) and the separation of church and state are two of the greatest accomplishments in human history. Those people who want to undermine the public education system based on New Haven and this administration are short sighted and need a course or two in history.

Posted by: Shirley Ugest | December 15, 2007 1:35 AM

Here's an interesting notion. Why not let ConnCan provide funding to Amistad for a law suit in order to gain equal funding per student. It's worked in other states.

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35