City Eyes New School Model

by Allan Appel | February 12, 2008 8:08 AM | | Comments (8)

nhi-boefeb12%20004.JPGA UConn expert came before the Board of Education Monday night selling a new school reform model never seen before in Connecticut. Board members were all ears.

The model is not a charter, not a magnet, but a “CommPACT School.” It promises to close the achievement gap and restore the joy of learning, and it won’t cost an additional dime.

So claimed Gene Chasin, of the Neag School of Education at the University of Connecticut. He said the key element is “ownership” or “buy-in.” The CommPACT school model would be the first time not only in Connecticut but the country in which the teachers unions, the principals and districts, and parents along with the State Department of Education come together at the outset.

nhi-boefeb12%20003.JPGThe schools are going to be selected primarily based on the commitment of teachers, staff, parents, and local community to reorganize in the most grassroots, local way to achieve goals. That is the “buy in” or “ownership” that Chasin (pictured) called the sine qua non for success.

The acronym expresses the buy-in: Community, Parents, Administrators, Children, Teachers.

The basic idea is to take a school and have the teachers, parents, the districts, and community go through an assessment, setting of goals, and application of what Chasin called “evidence-based best practice” to restore genuine learning, at the same time as the school will meet all testing goals of the state.

Translated out of educationese, this means that choice of curriculum, governance, even the length of the school day, all governance and budgeting will all be done locally by the agreed-upon group of teachers, district, principal, parents and community in concert.

Initiated by the teachers unions and the principals, the state has given UConn staff $500,000 in a pilot project to send its school-change gurus to six schools in the state. The commitment, said Chasin, is to stick with the chosen schools for five years, because, he said, “three to five years are the minimum required for systemic change.”

“And we are facing a real crisis in the schools, and we all know it,” Chasin said. “More than 50 percent of teachers leave the profession after a few years, and it’s generally not because of low pay. It’s because the culture in a school is not one where the teachers have an equal sense of ownership. Creating that culture is what this model is all about. When the culture is there, the application of best practices can succeed. Without the culture, no.”

Statewide, so far there have been 13 applications for the six slots. None yet from New Haven, although discussions have been under way since the fall among Chasin, Superintendent Reggie Mayo and a handful of New Haven Public Schools that Mayo thinks might be suitable.

nhi-boefeb12%20005.JPGDave Cicarella, the president of the New Haven Federation of Teachers Local 933 (pictured here with Davis Street Magnet School Principal Lola Nathan), said the response among teachers he has talked to is “super excited.”

“We’re for the first time,” he said, “equal partners with the district, with the superintendent. On March 1, when the application is due, Dr. Mayo has to write a letter and so do I. If during the planning stages there’s a problem, we don’t agree, any party can opt out. Usually what happens in school reform is that the teachers have input, but then it’s left to the district to administer and so forth. In this model, we are equal partners in the marriage.”

For the teachers, what is new about the CommPACT School model is they decide among themselves, for example, if extra training requires them to come in on Saturdays, or to have summer retreats.

“All that,” said Cicarella, “is set up in side agreements to the contract, so everyone knows what is expected in advance. “It’s really not about money, because the district may find the extra money or the teachers may do it on their own time, but everyone’s clear at the outset, from the teachers to principal, to the state.”

Chasin stressed that “buy-in” from the teachers at a school, plus the principal, parents would be critical in deciding which six would be the first schools to be accepted.

The reorganized schools have, he said, a sense of ownership by all participants, and that is the key to success. “Evidence-based methods for teaching,” he added, “often fail because the method might be good, but if the conditions at the school are not right for method x, for example, it could fail. Then best practice z might be the choice. This kind of choosing the best ways to teach reading or math — and the attendant budgeting, staffing, and governance — are precisely what Chasin and his staff bring to the schools.

All the UConn staff would not breeze by casually, he said, but be “embedded” in the school, its classrooms, and daily life.

He said the state is committed to each of the schools it chooses for five years. The first batch deadline for applying is March 1; they will be selected April 1, when the initial phase, the reassessment will begin immediately. Reorganized schools on the CommPACT model will be set to go in September.

Board members — pictured at the top of the story, from right to left: Michael Nast, Susan Samuels, Frances Padilla, and Carlos Torre — were more than intrigued by the prospect, although one member did point out that this has never been attempted before.

Superintendent Mayo said, “New Haven is a system of choice, with many options. I hope that one of our schools will apply and be accepted.” The schools applying have to be elementary.

Although officials wouldn’t reveal which were the leading candidates, Chasin apparently has talked to at least a half-dozen schools — their teachers and principals — beginning in the fall. Since the initiative is targeted at high priority urban districts it’s likely one school in New Haven, and according to some at the BOE meeting, two might be in the first group.

For more information on the initiative, contact Chasin here.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: daniel sumrall | February 12, 2008 9:25 AM

Arent the GreenDot schools in LA using this model?

Posted by: WestvilleMom | February 12, 2008 10:06 AM

"New Haven is a system of choice, with many options.".... why is this myth so enduring? Why are these statements never challenged? Your "choice" of school is determined by lottery. Do we "choose" our politicians by lottery? Do we "choose" our school superintendent by lottery? Do we "choose" our homes or apartments by lottery? Anyone who has a child in college knows what a "lottery" is, as applied to dorm rooms. Sometimes you win---sometimes you end up in a "triple" or off on the edge of campus. The college administration never tries to peddle this as a "choice." They are at least honest about the shortcomings of their system. If you don't like it, your "choice" is to go off campus. Entering into a lottery is a gamble. Gambling should have no place in the educational system of a city. At least a college student can usually switch rooms yearly. The decision of where to place your child in school should have nothing to do with gambling, because children need stability and shouldn't be jerked around from one school to another until their number comes up. My children have "lost" in the NH public schools' lottery three times. We made a TRUE choice...to go "off campus" to the private schools---which, by the way, benefit greatly by receiving the refugees from the NH lottery system. It's ironic that this article is all about having a feeling of "ownership"---I can tell you what engenders a feeling of "ownership"---paying $25,000 a year for school. Now THAT'S ownership.

Posted by: rich | February 12, 2008 12:27 PM

So lets go with an unproven model rather than a successful one with a proven track record: Amistad Academy/Achievement First???

The AF model is even done at a lower cost per pupil saving taxpayer's money.

Posted by: Fr Jim | February 12, 2008 6:49 PM

We forget about another well proven school model, the Catholic School.

Parents and parishioners are invested in the success of the school. As a pastor of a parish that has a Catholic School (Saint Rose of Lima School, 12 Richard St.), I have come to appreciate the dedication of the teachers and our principal, Sister Maryalice Ackerman, ASCJ. It is remarkable what a Catholic education can offer a child and the family.

New Haven is blessed to have St. Rose of Lima, St. Francis, St. Bernadette, St. Aedan, St. Brendan, and the Martin DePorres Academy. You do not have be Catholic to attend them; indeed some of the city's Catholic schools have a large number of non-Catholics. Why do we not hear more about them?

I was at St. Rose of Lima from 1997 to 2000. On my return to the Saint Rose as pastor, I have met more than a few of our former students. They are either on with their careers, trades, or in college studies.

Recently, I officiated at the marriage of a graduate of St. Rose of Lima School. He entered the 4th grade when he arrived from Peru. He was completely immersed in English, and given extra tutoring. When graduated St. Rose of Lima, he went on to study at Fairfield Prep, on a full scholarship, then on to Cornell. He is in a select management training program for an international bank based out of New York. He is just one of many stories, an immigrant success story. Another graduate is serving our country as a US Marine in Iraq. The two college students awarded the John Martinez Award last year, Nelson Cruz, Jr. and Camile Alverado, were graduates of Saint Rose of Lima. Talk to both of these parents, they are well known in Fair Haven, they will attest to the quality education that their children received.

Our parents come to our school insisting that their child learn English. We have neither the funding nor is it part of our mission to offer bilingual education. Catholic Schools prepare our students for life, and to be active participates in our society. While our worship is Spanish, our school is 100% English. (To ensure that the parents are part of their child's education, materials and parents meetings are in Spanish.)

Teachers enjoy teaching in our school because of the faith, discipline, attention to the whole person, and they can truly teach. As I understand it, and I may be wrong, but some public school teachers find themselves teaching to the Connecticut Mastery Test.

Curiously, Catholic Schools are not eligible to take the Connecticut Mastery Tests. It might be a good thing if we did, so our claims about our success are not simply testimony, but can be measured quanitatively.

Posted by: mary | February 12, 2008 10:17 PM

This looks to be another great program that will help our schools.

Posted by: Wiseman45 | February 13, 2008 3:43 AM

Another Slogan, among the many past slogans, brought to us by the BOE.

Posted by: Ned | February 13, 2008 8:21 AM

So is the "crisis" that "More than 50 percent of teachers leave the profession after a few years.." or is it that the students are bored out of their minds? Maybe teachers aren't leaving because of the pay, but I bet a lot of the high paid administrators stick around because the pay is so lucrative and there's no accountability for failure - like running a "drop out factory". Never mind, the taxpayers will be bent over for another reaming, while the "edumacators" ("is our children learnin?") serenade them with "educationalese", or, in "plain" English, BS.

Posted by: rich | February 14, 2008 11:03 AM

Isn't it funny how the BOE's attitude changes when the union is invited to participate.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35