DeStefano: Foreclosure Plan Ready

by Allan Appel | March 28, 2008 7:58 AM | | Comments (10)

nhimayor%20002.JPGSaying that he worries more about the mortgage crisis than a widening budget gap, Mayor John DeStefano told a Westville audience that he’ll unveil his anti-foreclosure initiative next week.

Only a small crowd turned out Thursday night for the meeting, DeStefano’s neighborhood road show to explain his proposed $466 million city budget for the coming fiscal year, which begins July 1. That proposal’s gap widened another close to $10 million Wednesday. (That story here.)

Those who did show up to St. Aedan’s Church on Fountain Street included Denys Turner (pictured above with the mayor), an academic immigrant from Cambridge, England. He’s pleased to be living on Cleveland Road. But he is appalled at his property tax increase. By the end of the evening the mayor’s skill at explaining the budget turned him into a new fan. DeStefano also made some significant pronouncements.

The Budget Picture

The mayor clarified that the current gap between his proposed revenue and expenditures is $15 million, after the state legislature appears unlikely to boost by $10 million the amount the city receives from the Payment in Lieu of Taxes program for tax-exempt property. (DeStefano had counted on a $10 million increase in drawing up the budget.) Restored by the state’s Appropriations Committee (pending approval by the full legislature and governor) were $2 million in funds for Early Reading Success that provides literacy coaches and paraprofessionals.

The mayor was also counting on $6 million for the sale of the city’s solid waste transfer authority that may not appear because of an amendment added by aldermen this week. The aldermen approved Hill Alderman Jorge Perez’s amendment to insert a sunset clause requiring any potential sale of the operation to be subject to review within three years.

The city administration had counted on revenue from the sale not just for the next fiscal year’s budget, but last year’s too, before the aldermen got a chance to review the plan, let alone approve it. Then City Hall urged the aldermen to rush approval of the project to fill budget holes. (Click here to read about that.)

“I think Jorge Perez and the Board of Aldermen made a very serious, tragic mistake, and I would urge them to reconsider,” he told the sparse crowd, which included Westville Alderwoman Ina Silverman, and the mayor’s budget braintrust, Larry Rusconi, and Controller Mark Pietrosimone. The mayor’s numbers men worry this will disable the sale of bonds from a future authority and undermine confidence in it, or block efforts to lock contractors into long-term contracts.

Hard Times For Homeowners

But the mayor’s strongest pronouncement was to say that he is less concerned about closing the budget gap —- “We’ll figure out how to do that in the coming weeks and months ” — and more about the effect of a spreading mortgage crisis on the city.

Foreclosures rose 80 percent in New Haven this past year. They’re supposed to continue climbing this year amid a nationwide credit crisis. The mayor formed a task force to explore ways to tackle the problem.

“I’m dramatically more worried about mortgage problems,” he said, “and how they might filter down to areas where we have put in a lot of development effort.”

To that end he said that next week he would announce a citywide foreclosure initiative. Although he wouldn’t reveal details, he said, “The idea is to keep people in their homes, to provide counseling. I’m extremely worried that the very areas of the city where we have put the most effort into community development are going to be hardest hit. If we have abandonment and foreclosures, we’ll likely have tax collection issues,” he said. “And even if out of state banks, for example, do the foreclosing and pay the taxes, they often don’t care about the properties or maintain them.”

Click here
for a previous story in which his task force members elaborated.

DeStefano recalled a time when the city had 1,500 vacant buildings. “We spent enormous sums boarding up and then re-boarding up vacant buildings, whole blocks of them. We do not want to allow this to happen.”

Next week, the mayor said, he will hold a press conference to announce that for the first quarter of the year burglaries and larcenies are up. More serious crimes like murder are pretty much at last year’s levels.

“We could cut some of the new cops, and save money that way,” he said, “and did deliberate internally, but the feeling was that public safety was paramount, that the people spoke, especially here in Westville, that they wanted the cops, and they’ll have them.”

So where do we cut? Libraries? No. “And then some people tell us to take on the public employees. I happen to feel the average public employee is not overcompensated. Let’s not make them the piñata.”

The mayor provided no more specifics than to strike his familiar themes that the state did not have a sense of urgency about property tax reform or about all the tax water the city carries for the rest of the state — for example, through the homeless-shelter population in New Haven.

The mayor also announced that his future budgets would not rely on one-time budget-closing items, such as the transfer station sale.

nhimayor%20004.JPGEventually, and invariably at these gatherings someone asks about their property re-evaluation. This time it was Denys Turner, who teaches medieval religious studies at Yale. As a Brit, he said, he expected the tax burden to be lighter here than in Europe, but it was not the case. His taxes more or less doubled in a year on their house on Cleveland Road, he said. More troubling: He didn’t see any comparable increase in services.

“I don’t mind taxes. I rather like it in fact,” said Turner, who enjoys bus-commuting to Yale with his senior discount “for a weekly pass of four-dollars-twenty. But I want to see what I get. I don’t want to rub it in, but it feels like taxation without representation. If I’m going to pay so much, I’d rather pay income tax.”

“The way to do that,” said the mayor, “is to fully fund PILOT, think about issue of equity, as to why, for example, many Connecticut companies like G.E. don’t pay any corporate income tax, and then the property tax might be reduced.”

Turner said the mayor gave good answers, but he and his wife are concerned that their neighbors got some tax reductions and they, being new and not knowing the revaluation appeal process, did not. Mayoral Chief of Staff Sean Matteson talked to them about such matters. The Turners left impressed that the mayor would spend so much time with them.

nhimayor%20005.JPGOf course, there were not a whole lot of other members of the public to spend time with. Tim Holahan, who recently ran unsuccessfully for a Democratic ward committee co-chairmanship, said he was shocked at the small turn-out.

“I don’t know,” said the mayor, “we emailed Ina’s [Silverman’s] list, and it’s a long one.”

Still the mayor’s take on the state’s role in the city’s woes — from an excess of the paroled and probationed arriving without a plan or a buck to the draconian dependence on the property tax — Holahan found persuasive.

“Look,” the mayor said, as he and his staff shut down Saint Aedan’s parish hall lights and packed up the doughnuts, “we can’t be naïve. The state budget funding is collapsing, and that raises new concerns, and for the first time in my 14 years as mayor I’ve seen an increase in vacant buildings.”

Despite the serious budget challenges and the minuscule turnout, you couldn’t help but feel that the mayor left the parish hall with an optimistic gait. Or maybe he was just happy the road show was finished.







Comments

Posted by: Ned | March 28, 2008 8:13 AM

"And even if out of state banks, for example, do the foreclosing and pay the taxes, they often don't care about the properties or maintain them." Give me a break. Yeah, all those flippers and absentee landlords, mortgage scammers and slumlords really do a fine job of maintaining their properties - must be why two thirds of New Haven looks like a freak'n garbage dump. Who's pals are going to get the bailouts handouts? Now's the time to max out your credit cards, "do the refi", get shiny wheels on your Lincoln Navigator and then go to city hall and boo,hoo,hoo about how you can't pay your bills.

Posted by: on whalley | March 28, 2008 8:52 AM

I know DeStefano trying to up the sales tax in New Haven will both help those struggling to make their mortgage payments and entice people to move into the city.

To think I was almost sort of impressed when you admitted New Haven was set to become a place of the very poor and those wealthy enough to insulate themselves. I feel so dirty and used.

It seems like a pretty local thing the mayor wants to do. Where's the NHI story?

Here's the WFSB one: http://www.wfsb.com/news/15699963/detail.html

Posted by: robn | March 28, 2008 10:58 AM

How about a flat property tax so the burden is spread evenly through the city (or even better the state)? This may sound unprogressive, but the problem with the current system in cities is that taxation on value create a disincentive for owners to keep up their homes.

Posted by: Your Tax Dollars at Work [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 28, 2008 12:43 PM

Are folks voting with their feet? Is the non-attendance at these meetings a sign the voters don't believe the Mayor can come up with a program that will reverse the current downturn in the business cycle?

Posted by: Gary Doyens | March 28, 2008 9:52 PM

People don't come to these dog and pony shows because they accomplish nothing and have no impact on the mayor's thinking at all. The mayor runs through the same speech on how it's all the state's fault and not his wretched addiction to spending other people's money. He can put lipstick on a pig in the dark and make you think it's Cinderella. To those who have not studied the budget - it even sounds reasonable when he knows damn well it's not. It's a house of cards barely standing up - and all he can say is that he's not going to change his spending ways - it's full steam ahead with new employees, new spending and a new scheme to raise money to pay for it all which means he will be in your pocket ever deeper even as he figures out what other asset to sell or what other gimmick he can employ.

Do take note to his glowing support for public employees - a convenient and poor straw man that nobody has raised. What do you expect? He's never held a real job in his entire life. He's spent a lifetime governing others and taking their money by force. It's all he knows.

Posted by: robn | March 29, 2008 7:02 PM

In past articles on this subject, many commenters have resisted the idea of public assistance for troubled borrowers on the grounds of personal accountability and with strong denial of any lender complicity. FYI NHI readers, Chase bank just got caught red handed with their how-to manual on feeding untenable mortgages to unqualified borowers.

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/business/120658650589950.xml&coll=7

Posted by: 360 Months | March 29, 2008 7:07 PM

Small crowd? Where was the notice? NHI? I got notice of a Mayor's Night IN on this subject. So far as I know, it was not even published through our Management Team.

Posted by: Ned | March 30, 2008 9:56 AM

Why should taxpayer's bailout banks, absentee investors, or people who sucked all of the non-existent equity out of their properties? Most of the properties, in New Haven, in foreclosure, are functionally obsolete, neglected, energy inefficient, high maintenance, over assessed, overtaxed future slums that need to be demolished. How many foreclosures are due to unpaid sewer bills (a lot), mortgage scammers, speculators, etc... Turn the vacant lots into gardens or plant them with trees.

Posted by: robn | April 2, 2008 10:51 PM

ned,

I recently read that 80% of subprime defaults are owner occupied homes, not second home speculators. Maybe we should be concerned about it becuase its in our own best interests for houses in the city to be occupied. I agree with you about not bailing out banks though...they're packed with highly educated people who should know better.

Also, New Haven has got some of the nicest turn of the century housing stock in the country...houses that can be made energy efficient with some care and investment. All houses need maintainence.

Posted by: Ned | April 3, 2008 12:54 PM

Robn,

80% of subprime defaults, in some areas, may be owner occupied properties, but looking at foreclosures, on the "wrong side" of Orange St. to Nash St., you will not find any foreclosed or REO properties that are or were owner occupied, but does that matter? There is a property, on State St. @ Blatchely - a gateway to the city from I91 - that has been abandoned for the past seven years + - where is the Mayor's concern? Who's to say the owner/occupant wasn't speculating? Who's going to get bailed out? and who's going to get stuck with the bill? From today's NY Times: "Fed Officials Defend Rescue of Bear Stearns". Prosecute fraud.
Houses can be made (somewhat) energy efficient with some investment - agreed - tens of thousands of dollars. All buildings need maintenance - which the current tax scheme, building permit fees discourage.
I'm interested in seeing the Mayor's proposal.
I hope I'm not taxed out of my home; I'd like to see the trees that I planted mature.

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35