Marshal Pleads Guilty In Corruption Case
by Melissa Bailey | March 7, 2008 2:17 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
While pursuing a criminal justice degree, judicial marshal Jill D’Antona (pictured) was learning another skill on the side: How to game the system by taking thousands of dollars in bribes to push business towards the city’s most prominent bail bond family.
D’Antona, a former marshal at the Elm Street courthouse, has admitted to accepting over $5,000 in bribes from the Jacobs bail bond family over the past five years. The lucrative relationship ended when one of them, after being snared in a federal corruption probe, agreed to secretly tape their transactions and turn her in.
The government detailed that sting operation for the first time Friday at a plea hearing in U.S. District Court. D’Antona, who’s 37, resigned from her judicial marshal job Friday and pleaded guilty to a felony theft and bribery charge. She now faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
The government, represented by federal corruption-buster Nora Dannehy, is recommending a prison term of four to ten months,a fine of $1,000 to $10,000, and $600 restitution.
Standing upright in a khaki jacket and black dress pants, D’Antona clenched and unclenched her hands behind her back as she entered her plea before Judge Janet Bond Arterton Friday morning. She waived her right to a trial and admitted to soliciting and accepting $600 in bribes for favors she did while working in the cellblock at New Haven Superior Court.
D’Antona told the court she is currently studying for her B.A. in Criminal Justice at an online university.
She and Cynthia Nixon, a clerk at the same courthouse, were the next in a line of suspects snared in a federal probe into the bail bond industry. Robert, Philip and Paul Jacobs saw their family dynasty fall when they pleaded guilty in a bribery scheme involving ex-city cop Lt. William White. The Jacobs trio is set to be sentenced April 9; White’s sentencing date is April 7.
The Setup
D’Antona worked at the Elm Street courthouse from 2000 to Dec. 2007, when she was put on leave. In her job at cell lockup, she served as a conduit between bail bondsmen and prisoners. Greasing her palm meant better, quicker access to prisoners in need of a bond.
After their March 2007 arrests, Robert and Philip Jacobs admitted they paid D’Antona cash in exchange for her pushing business their way at the courthouse, according to court documents.
D’Antona admitted to helping the Jacobs in various ways, in exchange for bribes: She would give them a heads up when a prisoner came into lockup in need of a bond. She’d give them financial and personal info on prisoners, or hold prisoners in lock-up longer, to help the Jacobses seal the deal with prisoners. She’d escort them to the clerk’s office to be released. In return for pushing business their way, and she’d get a cut of the profit on each bond.
Dannehy (pictured) detailed how Philip Jacobs ended that relationship and ensnared his former collaborator. After his March 2007 arrest, Philip Jacob agreed to go back to the courthouse, this time wearing a wire, allowing him to set up and secretly record corrupt deals with D’Antona. He met her on three occasions and dished her a total $600 reward. As part of her plea, D’Antona admitted to taking part in the deals described below.
On May 11, 2007, Philip Jacobs heard there was a prisoner who needed a bond. He asked D’Antona to hold the prisoner until he could get a bond written. She detained the prisoner and let Philip Jacobs secure a $17,500 bond. Philip Jacobs met her in the basement of the courthouse.
“What’s up?” D’Antona said. Philip Jacobs told her “one of those bonds paid nice.”
“Oh good, okay,” she replied, and accepted a $100 reward, provided by the FBI.
On a second occasion on July 17, 2007, Philip Jacobs asked D’Antona to get him the phone number of a prisoner’s relative so he could make a quick deal on a $150,000 court-set bond. The bondsman made $2,000 on the deal; he met D’Antona in a McDonald’s parking lot and slipped her $200 for the job. She asked him for a $500 loan, and he met her a second time, slipping her $300, according to court documents.
In court Friday, Arterton asked the defendant to say in her own words what she was pleading guilty to.
D’Antona uttered a quick five-word response: “Accepting gratuities, in my employment.” Shortly past 11 o’clock, she said the word “guilty” and entered her plea.
Free on a $25,000 non-surety bond, D’Antona walked away down Orange Street with her lawyer, Michael Dolan, after court. She is set to be sentenced on May 27 at 3:30 p.m.
Comments
Posted by: WEBblog 1
| March 7, 2008 4:18 PM
Disgusting...
All the while the innocent, not yet proven guilty prisoner has to pay more for his/her bail bond freedom.
This is just the tip of the iceberg involving the justice system manipulating a court system where bail is a inherent right of the 5th. & 8th Amendments.
Shame on you Jill D'Antona, and Cynthia Nixon.
Posted by: THREEFIFTHS | March 7, 2008 4:48 PM
First I must say I Agree with Webblog1, Now To Mr pro law And Order HeightsResident who said that i have a soft spot to the crminals and that these people use the revoling door of our jails and continue to pray on our society with impunity. Hey mr pro law and order Look at you crooked slime bags friends taking bribes!!! What excuse are you going to make for these crooked law enforcement officers,Wake up this is becoming more
of a problem than you want to admit to, So since you seem to be a sleep on this you need to repeat
these words three times as you sleep there are crooks in law enforcement and when you wake up this will now be in your mind!!! P.S. I did not forget about you 50 year minimum Charlie should this not apply to these slime bags!!!
Posted by: cedarhillresident
| March 7, 2008 7:55 PM
Little Fraction,
Again I love your posts. Yes they are slimbags :) but as you know I agree with charile about the 50 years, well maybe not 50 but appropriate time for people with guns and violent crimes. The only way it is going to stop is if the laws are enforced the way they use to be. Do the crime, do the time it is that simple. But now a days, that is not a true statement anymore. Do the crimes and get out in 3/5's of the time, or even less. But yes a criminal is a criminal.........stop it, I know what you are about to say (undocumented are criminals to)........ and yes it is a crime but I still think that is a moral issue as well that needs to be addressed first.
Posted by: Sally Joughin | March 8, 2008 9:32 AM
Just as the illegality of drugs tempts some law enforcement individuals into corrupt behavior, so does the bail bond system. It is unfair that poor people who have no intention of fleeing have to lose money to bondspeople. They should be able to post the whole bail and then get it back when they appear in court and the case is settled. In other words, bail amounts should be high enough so that a person would not want to loose it but low enough so that it is possible to get the money together from family and friends who trust you to appear. We shouldn't have middlemen making a profit off of poor people whose bail amounts are impossible to post.
Posted by: Heights Resident | March 8, 2008 10:00 AM
Threefiths
Hey where have you been?, I kind of missed these exchanges. First off she is not a cop, or in law enforcement, she's a marshal ( sort of like a guard for the court house ), secondly your venom should be aimed at Phil Jacobs.
Little rich boy who when faced with a little prison time turned on his father and brother and wore a wire to implicate two workers.
I'm not saying she was innocent , but come on, he couldn't reel in a bigger fish? I can't respect that, there was a good article in the register about him and his rich life style ( Woodbridge Mansion ).
Hey Threefiths like always you backing the wrong horse in this race.
Posted by: debbie | March 9, 2008 9:21 PM
For those of you that read the so called "news" you shock me that you believe everything you read.... it goes to show you have no filter of truth..... the reporters that write give people something to read...not the facts of what actually transpired...so the reporter that wrote this article either 1. Was not in the court room and gathered his/her info from gossip and I think this is what went down or 2. Does not understand the English language.... because what I heard and what they wrote seems to be a far stretch from what actually transpired in that court room!!!! So sad to say that you don't look at the world through your own eyes and believe and listen to those who write it....like they are GOD....reporters are the bottom of the earth that make a living exploiting/lying about or if asked stretching the truth..... to actual facts....and to those of you that have written....wanna be's...get the real story....the facts...before you comment on others......
From: been their with the reporters done that.... my advice to you is don't read it....because they will write what sells....... NOT THE TRUTH!!!! Let's not forget that "Jacobs" rolled to save his own sorry old "BEHIND"
Posted by: Steve | March 11, 2008 1:32 PM
I don't know if the people who are leaving comments here are from the State of Connecticut or not, but if you are, you are very ignorant of Connecticut General Statutes
Those of you calling her "nothing more than a guard"?
CT. Judicial Marshals are, under CT General Statutes, "Peace Officers", and as such, have arrest powers. If this does not make any sense, all I can say is CT Marshal's have "Arrest Powers" and CT. Correctional Officers don't.
The only difference between a CT. Marshal and the cop who shows up on a call to your home, is that the Marshal's jurisdiction is, in and around the Connecticut Judicial Branch, the Courts and other facilities the State Judicial Branch owns or operates.
If you walk into a Connecticut Courthouse with illegal drugs or weapons, it's going to be a "Marshal" who will arrest you, not a guard. If you decide to assault a Marshal, you will be charged with "assault on a Police Officer" a felony, not a simple assault.
As for what this Marshal has pleaded guilty to? I can tell you this much, she was a "sacrificial lamb" offered up, for system of corruption that she had at the very most a very limited connection with.
The problems with the Bondsman,the CT. Judicial Branch and all the other corruption associated with this are "SYSTEMIC". The bondsman in question set this Marshal up, so not to give up the real corrupt individuals who really make this bondsman's nefarious practice an almost exclusive monopoly in and around New Haven County. I can only hope, that if your one of those Marshal's or Bail Commissioners who are reading these comments, you can live with yourselves. Yes, your the ones who should have been exposed, not a single mother guilty of asking a wealthy man to borrow money. Jill was in the position she was in, because someone for many,many years trained her for that position, told her this was the way "GA23" worked and was trained by someone who held her last assignment for many, many years. We are talking more than a decade.
Besides, everyone inside the Marshal's Service and the Judicial Branch, knows RIGHT NOW, who is really corrupt and who is really WORKING FOR THE JACOBS family. They are NOT at a New Haven courthouse. They are driving in cars that the Jacobs have bought and paid for, and I am sure are still working hard for them like none of this ever happened.
I would have hoped that an informed public, would be intelligent enough to read between the lines. Otherwise, you must also still believe we are still looking for those "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.
So Bobby and Phil gave up the very, very least they could, to protect the nefarious practice they have been doing for well longer than Jill D. ever was a Marshal, Deputy Sheriff or wore any uniform for that matter.
Post a comment
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Some Favorite Sites
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Branford Eagle
- Brian's Commentaries
- Business NH
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Folk Alley
- Gina Coggio
- Gotham Gazette
- Hamden Daily News
- Josiah Brown
- La Voz Hispana
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Medical Intelligence
- Metrocrawl
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- Some Stuff To Do Today
- St. Louis Beacon
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bioregional Group
- Boys & Girls Club
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- NH Land Trust
- NH Safe Streets
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- New Haven 828
- New Life Corp.
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Register Calendar
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- W'ville Synagogue
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Youth Continuum
Legal Notices
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35