Parents Question Skittles Suspension

by Allan Appel | March 11, 2008 5:00 PM | | Comments (4)

nhiboemarch10%20007.JPGShelli and William Sheridan’s special education 8th grader Michael was suspended from school because he bought candy from another student — a punishment the parents said “crushed” their son and made him consider leaving the school.

The parents showed up at Monday’s Board of Education meeting to make their complaint in public.

That’s far from the full story, said BOE officials, who were visibly pained at the parents’ testimony. They said a fair and sensitive resolution is in process, and the family has a meeting with the superintendent on Wednesday.

A systemwide evaluation of suspension policy is ongoing in the New Haven Public Schools, with various experts and parent groups being solicited for their input. Click here to read a previous story on the subject.

The Sheridans, residents of Derby and parents at Sheridan Communication and Technology Interdistrict Magnet School, said they went public with their story because of what they felt were inappropriate policies and inadequate responses particularly from the school’s principal.

The incident occurred, according to Shelli Sheridan’s testimony, on Feb. 26. The next day was an honors dinner, which meant a great deal to their son, Michael, and he was in danger of missing it. Sheridan said she talked to the principal, Eleanor Turner, and then to Deirdre Welds, a director of instruction, the same day. The suspension was reduced to one day, but it had to be served on the day of the dinner, which the child missed.

William Sheridan said, “Why couldn’t he serve it on a different day! Anyway, who ever heard of suspension for buying a candy bar? Why not detention?”

At the heart of the matter, from an institutional point of view, appears to be confusion on the part of parents, such as these, as to what offenses lead to what punishments. The Sheridans said they repeatedly asked for the student handbook or policy guidebook indicating that buying or selling candy was an offense punishable by suspension, and one could not be found or provided.

Deirdre Welds said she preferred not to comment on the particular matter of the Sheridans’ situation except to say the story as presented is partial, that it is ongoing, but that in her view proper protocols were followed and the child and parents were treated in a fair and sensitive manner.


Previous installments in the Independent’s series on parental involvement in local schools:

Parents Want Say On Suspensions

Brandon Earns His Blue Shirt

Mr. Via Procures The Evidence

Son Gets Pills; Suspension Policy Targeted

Campaign for Recess Mounts


Dad Never Misses A Game


Dad Goes To The Top, Gets Results


Parents, M&Ms Join In Math Lesson

Xena Tunes Up. Mom, Too.


Brandon Aims For The Blue Shirt

Mr. Via Confers, Brings Ice

Night-Shift Waitress Hangs Up Apron

Xena Aces Bingo


Mom Gets A Politics Pep Talk


Dad Meets The Teachers. All Of ‘Em

Ms. Lopez Moves Brandon’s Seat

Night-Shift Waitress Gets Xena To Class On Time

Dad Marked Present

Fifth-Graders Get “Amistadized”

Board of Ed To Parents: Get Involved!

Sumrall Looks To Parents

Task Force Hones Plan for Kids

The New St. Martin DePorres Comes Home

Parents Graduate

Parents Hit the Books

“Parent Power” Hits The Park

Good-Bye Recess. Hello Take 10.

Sumrall Looks To Parents

Task Force Hones Plan For Kids

Parents Graduate

Parents, Teachers, Docs Seek An Earlier Start







Comments

Posted by: jms | March 11, 2008 8:57 PM

Unless the student was concealing a prison shank in the candy bar the punishment (suspension) is way out of line with the crime.

JMS

Posted by: NLG | March 12, 2008 3:08 PM

Apparently NHPS have adopted a wellness policy that does not allow candy sales (or maybe even consumption?) in schools.

This is seems like and example of well-intentioned policy-making being administered poorly.

I truly hope that school administers reconsider.

Perhaps the media attention will help. This story made CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/12/skittles.suspension.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

Posted by: on whalley | March 12, 2008 3:32 PM

Between this, boy scouts getting suspended for their pocket knives and that poor girl who had a steak knife in her lunch to cut the steak she had for lunch getting suspended I don't see why we can't establish a zero tolerance policy against bullshit.

Sure that would probably shut down 80% of the government and throw nearly every "official" and politician into prison but we'd all be much better off.

Posted by: Paul | March 14, 2008 5:48 PM

I read the report about the Skittles suspension clear out here in Colorado where fortunately our students are still able to possess, trade and sell bags of Skittles. I was so furious that we have idiots worried about bags of candy instead of focussing on education. My advice would be for anyone with a sane mind left in New Haven to run for your lives!!!!! If you decide to move out West to escape the idiocy of the leaders, please do me a favor and look over your shoulder to make sure they don't follow you out West!

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35