Deal Struck On Trash Plan
by Melissa Bailey | April 8, 2008 8:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (9)
Aldermen have struck a deal that would save the city trash plan from what this man called the “kiss of death.”
The deal concerns the creation of a new independent agency to manage the city’s trash and recycling. The new municipal waste authority was pushed by the mayor as a way to fill a short-term budget hole, with the hopes of also increasing long-term efficiency.
Amid feelings that the plan was being rushed through, aldermen approved the plan at their March 24 full board meeting, but slapped on a sunset clause that said the agency would be dissolved unless aldermen voted to continue its existence in three years. (Click here for the details).
Aldermanic President Carl Goldfield (pictured above) tried to intervene, saying the sunset clause would kill the whole plan by making it impossible for the city to sell long-term bonds.
Hill Alderman Jorge Perez, who proposed the sunset amendment, argued it would be a healthy review and would force accountability.
City finance staff later warned that the city may have to go for a mid-year tax increase to fill a budget gap that was supposed to be closed by the trash plan.
Both parties, Perez and Goldfield, announced Monday they’d come to an agreement that would be less chilling to bond-buyers’ bones.
Sunset Revoked, Review Kept
According to the new deal, the sunset clause would be revoked, but the trash authority would still have to report to aldermen with annual reports and a tri-annual review of policies, procedures, finances and operations.
The deal comes in the form of an ordinance amendment introduced by Fair Haven Heights Alderman Alex Rhodeen (pictured). Rhodeen was one of three aldermen who are typically mayoral loyalists but enraged the administration by voting for Perez’s sunset clause anyway.
Why did he change his mind? Rhodeen said he wasn’t aware at the time of the vote of the impact the sunset clause would have. After the vote, he was told that “the language of the sunset clause would hamper the city’s ability to sell bonds.”
That argument was made on the floor by Goldfield at the March 24 meeting, but sunset proponents argued that the difference between review and sunset was not substantive, because aldermen already have the power to dissolve the agency at any time they wish.
The bond counsel argued that the sunset clause would scare off rating agencies and people buying bonds when they saw the agency might not exist in three years.
“I don’t necessarily agree” with the bond counsel’s assessment, Rhodeen said, “but if it makes people more confident that they can sell bonds, then it seemed reasonable to me.”
Perez said the deal was struck in a leadership meeting with the mayor, then discussed with other board members like Rhodeen.
Perez said the intent of writing the amendment as a sunset clause was to “force the meeting,” so it didn’t get lost in the shuffle of committees, the way his ethics proposal did.
Did the removal of the sunset clause take the teeth out of his proposal?
Perez said no. “The spirit of the amendment” — to make sure aldermen get to scrutinize the new agency — “is still there,” he said. “My goal was not to kill it [the trash plan]. I don’t have a problem rewording in a way that bond counsel and the rating agent feel more comfortable with.”
Goldfield welcomed the proposal, and both sides said there was consensus on the board to ensure passage when the new amendment comes before the board at its April 22 meeting.
Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook
Comments
Posted by: ROBN | April 8, 2008 9:04 AM
Can we use the money to buy back the water authority?
ENRON
Posted by: facChek | April 8, 2008 11:17 AM
"Why did he change his mind?
Rhodeen said he wasn't aware at the time of the vote of the impact the sunset clause would have. After the vote, he was told that "the language of the sunset clause would hamper the city's ability to sell bonds."
That argument was made on the floor by Goldfield at the March 24 meeting.
It appears from the article that Rhodeen was fully aware of the city's objection to the Sunset plan before the first vote. He now says:
"if it makes people more confident that they can sell bonds, then it seemed reasonable to me."
This is a sorry-ass reason to change his mind and his vote, it is this kind of knee jerk reaction that is precisely the flaw of the BOA. They vote on issues that they are not fully aware of , or , fully understand.
At the same time, the BOA has not fully vetted the issue of new debt the city will incur, regardless of whose name it is under. The city will be selling the transfer station, which is now in debt. Should the sale not produce positive results, the city will re-inherit the old, as well as, the newly accrued debt.
Indeed, this is a Enron in the making... only in the city's case, they are telling us the real accumulative debt story in pieces. The problem is, no one, not even the Aldermen is listening.
Posted by: cedarhillresident
| April 8, 2008 1:08 PM
ROBN
YUCK YUCK.... I second that!! When does the citizens of New Haven get a say so???? that is my question??
And ditto on the
ENRON!
Posted by: cedarhillresident
| April 8, 2008 1:28 PM
Can't this be put up for some kind of a vote???
Posted by: Daniel Sumrall | April 9, 2008 1:07 AM
New Haven had its vote last year and decided to pretty much keep all the same players--only you guys in ward ten lucked out Cedarhillresident. And next year, will New Haven again vote status quo and then spend the next two years complaining? Probably, because it's easier than growing a spine and putting new faces in city hall.
Posted by: cedarhillresident
| April 9, 2008 8:21 AM
Daniel
Your right! I am not to sure how government works but I am quickly learning.
But.... is there a way to put this up to a special vote with the citizens of New Haven. There must be a way? I the public does not agree with the way the Alderman voted. Anyone Know???
Posted by: eastshoreguy | April 9, 2008 8:24 AM
Rhodeen: latin translation flip-flopper maximus
Posted by: Chris | April 9, 2008 9:09 PM
A Few comments-
This is a deal to lease not sell the trash assets. Like taking an equity line of credit today to pay back tomorrow with interest, but the city still owns the assets.
Water authority (RWA) good - Water pollution Authority (WPCA) ...
There was almost no citizen representation at the Aldermanic public hearing on the trash deal.
As a active skeptic but not cynical resident of ward 13- Rhoodeen has been a stand up guy on all heights issues. On this matter I think he stood up and then sought compromise- he may not be good on the spin game -but isn't that good?
Posted by: jeffreykerekes
| April 10, 2008 9:54 AM
Cedarhill Resident:
Our charter allows for us to have non-binding referenda. In other words, you can get something on the ballot for people to vote for, but the Mayor/BOA does not have to follow the outcome. The charter does not allow for a "binding referendum". We would need Charter Revision. The Charter must be reviewed every ten years but CAN be reviewed at any time in between.
There are ways to get involved. Here are some important April meetings:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vital April Meetings
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
April 29, Tuesday @ 7:00 PM -- FINAL Public Hearing on the Budget, BOA Chambers @ City Hall
May 27, Tuesday @ 7:00 pm -- BOA Vote On The Budget, BOA Chambers @ City Hall
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Important April Meetings
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
April 23, 2008 @ 6:45 pm -- Hearing on Creating a Used Car Lot on Olive Street
April 23, 2008 6pm - 8pm -- Panel Discussion on the Budget
April 24, 2008 @ 6:00 pm -- Mayor's Budget Discussion Road Tour
D E T A I L S B E L O W
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
=======================================================================
Panel Discussion on the Budget. Confirmed panelists below.
Wednesday, April 23rd, 6 - 8 pm at the Courtland Wilson Branch of the Library (http://www.cityofnewhaven.com/library/Wilson.asp).
The Library has a decent-sized parking lot which is most easily accessed by driving down Daggett St toward Washington Ave. (There's a smaller entrance to the parking lot to the right of the Library on Washington.)
The event will take place in the Community Room, which is in the lower level of the building.
Definite
-------------------------
Paul Bass (moderator)
Jorge Perez
Carl Goldfield
Rob Smuts
Jacqueline James
Jeffrey Kerekes
Maybe
-------------------------
Ina Silverman
Pat Dillon
Bill Dyson
Martin Looney
=======================================================================
=======================================================================
Used Car Lot get info here: www.nousedcars.com
Dates to remember
Andy Ross will be holding a meeting on this issue at his house at 612 Chapel Street at 7 pm on April 14th Monday. Refreshments will be served. Please try to tell call him in advance if you are coming. 203-641-4666 or andy@andyrossgroup.com
The review Board meets at City Hall on April 23rd at 6:45 pm. We need you there!
City Hall, 165 Church Street, 2nd Floor.
=======================================================================
=======================================================================
"Community Budget Discussion" on Thursday, April 24 at 6:00pm.
Event: Community Budget Discussion "It's your City and your budget"
What: Informational Meeting
Host: City of New Haven
When: Thursday, April 24 at 6:00pm
Where: Nathan Hale School
=======================================================================
Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Branford Eagle
- Brian's Commentaries
- Business NH
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Folk Alley
- Gina Coggio
- Gotham Gazette
- Hamden Daily News
- Josiah Brown
- La Voz Hispana
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Medical Intelligence
- Metrocrawl
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- Some Stuff To Do Today
- St. Louis Beacon
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bioregional Group
- Boys & Girls Club
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City Point
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- NH Land Trust
- NH Safe Streets
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- New Haven 828
- New Life Corp.
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- ROOF
- Register Calendar
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- W'ville Synagogue
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Youth Continuum
Legal Notices
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35