Rebuilding A Community, Not Just A Road

by Allan Appel | April 9, 2008 7:58 AM | | Comments (11)

nhiqredo%20006.JPGNeighbors broke into applause upon hearing the latest plans to re-do traffic-troubled Quinnipiac Avenue. They were truly cheering, not joking.

This remarkable turn of events occurred at the Waucoma Yacht Club Tuesday night after City Engineer Richard Miller unveiled before 75 neighbors the latest plans for a main drag that has bedeviled the neighborhood for years.

Few of the plans were a surprise, because the community has been involved in the evolution of the plans since they began, in earnest, in 2002.

Triggered by the closing of the Ferry Street Bridge and the sudden traffic onslaught on Quinnipiac, local people formed the Quinnipiac River Community Group, under whose auspices Tuesday’s meeting was called.

nhiqredo%20004.JPG“The people here,” said Miller (on left in photo, with Fair Haven Heights Alder Alex Rhodeen), “talked, and we listened.”

The original plan, he conceded, was car-centric, focusing on how to move all that new traffic volume. Through a dozen community meetings and the advocacy of locals like Chris Ozyck and current and former alders, a shift occurred. Miller put it this way: “We realized we weren’t just rebuilding a road. We were helping to rebuild a community.”

Federal and state highway money is in the pipeline to the tune of some $6 to $7 million, the estimated costs. The city taxpayers, through the capital budget, are paying $600,000 to $700,000 for the design.

The plan calls for significant traffic-calming measures along the avenue from Fulton to Clifton Streets, as well as the rehabilitation of the stretches of historic redstone walls, and construction of new ones that fit into the historic district’s aesthetic.

Traffic calming features include a roundabout at Ferry Street, traffic islands at Lancraft and Clifton, and better sight lines along the whole length. At the frequently bottlenecked Grand Avenue Bridge intersection, the re-do forsees elimination of the left turn lane, so reduction from three lanes to two, and pedestrian bump-outs. The bump-outs will protect stretches of parking lanes alternating both sides of the avenue, narrowing the road significantly and thereby slowing traffic.

There have been many traffic accidents and fatalities in the area. Families with young children have pleaded with Miller to focus on residents and pedestrians more.

Miller heard. “Traffic engineering has changed. The character and use of the road,” he said, “should where possible be dictated by the use and character of the local residents.”

Lawyer Peter Treffers (pictured in top photo between Miller and Rhodeen), whose 19th-century house graces the southeast corner of Grand and Quinnipiac, reflected the partnership in action. He said he loved the idea of the bump-outs, which will broaden the sidewalk. “But that will mean,” he said, “that Dick Miller will move my wall back and then rebuild it. I’d like to make sure I see in advance exactly what the rebuilt wall will look like,.”

Miller said he would see to it.

Period stones from the abutments beneath the railroad bridge at Lenox, which will be demolished, will be re-used for fill-ins like Treffers, as well as a new retaining wall to run along the river side of Quinnipiac Avenue in front of the sloping forested section that drops down to the oyster businesses.

The road will be entirely dug out to its base — some two feet — and then repaved, eliminating bumps and hips.

nhiqredo%20001.JPGNeighbors such as Maryanne Davis (left) and Esther Armmand came with letters from the state Department of Transportation Right of Way Office (there is such a thing) requesting temporary permission for future contractors of the re-do to move and reconstruct walls, or to grade the new road down to private driveways.

Miller said because federal money is involved, respect for private rights is especially scrupulous. In some instances, property owners may be compensated, but most of the easements are temporary, with no loss of property.

Armmand’s Turnbridge Condominiums at the southwest corner of Grand Avenue intersection, across from Treffers, will lose a little land to make way for the bump-out. She said the condo association had received a letter from DOT; a meeting is planned.

Was Armmand, a city employee, happy? “Yes,” she said, “the meeting was very useful and informative.” She was particularly happy that Turnbridge’s driveway out onto Quinnipiac Avenue would be regraded, and the right-turning traffic bearing down on them slowed. “We’re lobbying also,” she said, “for the right turn on the red light to be forbidden.”

Alex Rhodeen, who organized the meeting, said not only has Dick Miller worked tirelessly on the project, but the citizens of Fair Haven and Fair Haven Heights deserve kudos as well for their partnership. He added that even with the re-do at Clifton, that steep intersection remains troublesome because of its unavoidable narrowness. “We have a request with Traffic & Parking,” he said, “to replace the current flashing red light with a full fledged red-yellow-green.”

nhiqredo%20005.JPGThe plan, being finalized for the city by Ron Dagan of Luchs Engineering, is about 70 percent “mature.” If all the property owners sign off on their easements, the plan could be submitted to the state for final review and go out to bid this year, with construction beginning in 2009 and taking approximately one to two years.

Traffic would be open on the avenue throughout, although the slowness due to construction, Miller said, would eventually drive away all but local people so congestion would be tolerable. The project would not start until after the Ferry Street Bridge reopens — and before the Grand Avenue Bridge closes for its turn at repairs.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: eastshoreguy | April 9, 2008 8:18 AM

Yeah for traffic calming!

Now just bring it down to us in ward 18. The Townsend ave calming measure has been great, despite what some may say.


Posted by: PowertothePeople | April 9, 2008 9:48 AM

Congrats QRCG.

This is what can happen when a neighborhood organizes themselves. It appears that it was successful because they didn't react to a plan that someone else put together but instead presented a plan and let the city react. Then there was the willingness to collaborate rather than immediately resorting to a fight.

I just love it when I see the people working on their own governance. Democracy is about 'we the people' not 'they the government.'

Congrats again QRCG but stay the course. The opera ain't over til the road is done.

Posted by: Esbe [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 9, 2008 12:39 PM


Great story! Kudos to all involved: the super-citizen activists, the city and even the Feds (for funding it.)

Posted by: nfjanette [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 9, 2008 1:14 PM

Period stones from the abutments beneath the railroad bridge at Lenox, which will be demolished,

I knew it had to be removed some day, but I'm still sad: that's the last, most visible monument to the old route of the main shoreline railroad from when it crossed the river near the Grand Ave. bridge. The current path takes it up North to just before Rt. 80 and then over the river into the Cedar Hill RR yards.

Posted by: nfjanette [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 9, 2008 1:16 PM

At the frequently bottlenecked Grand Avenue Bridge intersection, the re-do forsees elimination of the left turn lane, so reduction from three lanes to two, and pedestrian bump-outs.

How does elimination of a left-turn lane improve traffic flow? In general, New Haven suffers from a significant lack of dedicated left-turn lanes with appropriate signaling.

Posted by: Webblog 1 | April 9, 2008 1:29 PM

"The project would not start until after the Ferry Street Bridge reopens -- and before the Grand Avenue Bridge closes for its turn at repairs".

OK...
So riddle me this:
Ron Dagan of Luchs Engineering,
When the heck will the Ferry Street Bridge be completed, re-opened and at what cost to the taxpayers for both bridges??


Posted by: pedro | April 9, 2008 4:39 PM

Apparently ferry street is opening under budget and ahead of schedule this fall. The cost is $16 million, and I think the state paid for it. Scheduled completion Feb. 5 2009, but I read that it's going to be open hopefully this coming October.
It's going to look gorgeous once done:
http://www.cityofnewhaven.com/uploads/Ferry%20St%20Br%20sm(1).JPG

Posted by: Chris | April 9, 2008 4:53 PM

NFJannette- I agree about the rail line wall but we did save one. At first the plan was to remove both, we asked for one to be saved- they wanted to remove the northern section and we ask to save that one and remove the other. The northern wall is more vissible as you travel on Q Ave. As for the turning lane- Ferry Street Bridge is the left turn off of Q Ave into Fair Haven. The majority of residents near the intersection want the turn lane gone- the intersection worked perfectly well prior to the closing of the Ferry street bridge. Also you may have missed the premise of all this context sensitive design for Q Ave. The goal was not to move traffic but to calm traffic and restore our historic walkable community.

Posted by: Fairhaven Dave [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 9, 2008 10:26 PM

I received my easement paperwork a few days ago and wanted to warn folks to "double check" before signing. For example, they have listed my steps as concrete while they are stone. My retaining wall as stone even though it is concrete and listed my name as Donald.

Not a big deal perhaps, but I want to be sure a paperwork snafu doesn't prevent my steps from returning in concrete form.

I'm sure Donald feels the same way. Whomever he is.

-Dave

Posted by: kevin | April 19, 2008 11:12 PM

I just got my easement letter from the DOT. Sadly this was the FIRST I heard of any of this project, so I am playing catch up. I just read this post and it sounds like life is gonna suck for a while. Other than losing 1/2 my front yard(and my antique staircase) the only two things I don't like are the loss of the left turn lane off the Grand ave bridge and the light at Cifton street. That left turn lane is the only thing that got me through all these years of losing the Ferry street bridge. As aggravating as the traffic lights are in this town I can't stand the idea of one more light even if it is 100 yards from my house.

Posted by: haley | April 22, 2008 3:46 AM

I live near Q-avenue and rue the loss of a smoothly running road along the eastern edge of New Haven. I never have had a problem crossing the street, walking along the sidewalks, or enjoying the neighborhood along with the sometimes speeding cars. The only things wrong were that a few places lacked sidewalks and we needed a bike lane. If that had been fixed, cars and bikes and pedestrians could have coexisted a bit better.

All that other garbage -- more stoplights, stop signs at little-used intersections, removing the turn lane -- is just that, garbage.

As far as I'm concerned, the neighborhood activists working to "calm traffic" are doing us a disservice: we're going to end up with clogged, slower traffic, more headaches, and aggravation. If you don't want to live on a busy avenue, don't buy a house on one and then try to change what you've bought into.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35