City Sales Tax Dies
by Melissa Bailey | April 2, 2008 7:21 AM | Permalink | Comments (8)
(Updated) Shoppers like Tanea Drummonds (pictured) won’t be slapped with an extra tax to buy an IKEA bed: A proposal to create a city sales tax is dead.
Drummonds was strolling through IKEA’s bedroom section this week looking to outfit her daughter’s new room. She was one shopper who would have been the target of a so-called penny tax proposal at the state Capitol. The bill would send distressed cities some added revenue by allowing them to add one percent to the 6 percent sales tax.
New Haven’s Mayor John DeStefano, Jr. joined mayors from three other cities in lobbying at the Capitol for the bill. DeStefano argued the bill would help make up for the city’s reliance on state aid. The city prayed for the penny tax to inject $15 million into the FY07-08 budget, which faces a $9.5 million shortfall.
The bill was raised before the legislature’s joint Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, which faces a Thursday deadline for approving all its bills.
(Update: The penny proposal didn’t shown up on the agenda at the committee’s final meeting on Wednesday. The idea had failed.)
While committee co-chair New Haven State Rep. Cameron Staples (at right in photo, debriefing City Hall lobbyist Laoise King) refrained from calling the proposal “dead” on Tuesday, the mood at the Capitol was that the bill has little chance of surviving the week.
“I do not expect it to come before committee,” said State. Sen. Eileen Daily, who co-chairs the committee alongside Staples.
“Members thought it was too chaotic a proposal,” she said. With the potential of driving business out of city limits, the proposal could end up “a revenue loser, not a revenue enhancer.”
A sister proposal, also supported by New Haven City Hall, would have raised the state sales tax by half a penny, with new funds sent to the regional Council of Governments. That bill appears similarly doomed, according to Daily.
“You’re not likely to see a sales tax increase” approved this session, the senator said.
The penny tax was supported by the cities of New London, Stamford and Bridgeport, where the mayor considering selling City Hall to balance the city’s books.
Hartford’s Mayor, Eddie Perez, was absent from the lobbying crew. “Mayor Perez has concerns with any effort that could discourage business in Hartford,” said his spokeswoman, Sarah Barr. She said he was concerned that both shoppers and businesses would be driven outside Hartford unless the tax were levied uniformly across the state.
DeStefano himself has admitted the penny tax is far from perfect. The proposal arose “because we came increasingly discouraged” with property tax stress, he said in an interview last week. “None of us are crazy about this penny tax idea but we’re less crazy about the pressure that’s being put on residential tax payers.”
The City of New Haven estimates the penny tax would pour $21 million in revenue over a 12-month period into city coffers. If enacted in October, it would produce $15 million for the city’s FY08-09 budget. Most of the revenue would come from the IKEA furniture store.
Some shoppers at IKEA said they thought they could swallow an extra penny tax, because IKEA has good deals anyway and attracts suburban shoppers. “Look at the cars in the parking lot,” said Justin Thomas, a young dad from Norwich. “It’s not all college kids here.”
Drummonds, moving between the bookshelves and bed frames, balked at the idea of more taxes.
“That’s highway robbery!” she said. Drummonds rents a home in New Haven’s Dwight neighborhood, where she keeps “falling in potholes everywhere.”
“It’s not fair,” Drummonds said. “They need to stop taking our money and fix our streets.”
Reached after a caucus huddle Tuesday afternoon, Staples said the committee is “exploring other options” besides the penny or hay-penny tax. (A third bill that would have let municipalities share a portion of hotel tax was also passed over in committee Tuesday.)
“The Democrats on the committee are very concerned about providing additional relief for municipalities,” Staples said.
Comments
Posted by: cedarhillresident
| April 2, 2008 8:45 AM
"The Democrats on the committee are very concerned about providing additional relief for municipalities," Staples said.
Cam they can be concerned but are they willing to do something is the question!
Posted by: Gary Doyens | April 2, 2008 11:45 AM
I don't know why it's called a penny tax - it's not a penny - it's a 16% tax hike in the sales tax or a 1% hike. A penny makes it seem like nothing. That's how DeStefano and the other tax and spenders at the Council of Governments got through a sales tax on our homes - which is now renewed and at a higher level than before that costs homewowners about $2500 when they sell.
Try limiting spending. It's amazing how we are expected to make cutbacks in our family expenditures and yet, nobody in city government or their powerful associations think they should do the same. They think they should just demand, and then take more.
Posted by: Esbe
| April 2, 2008 11:55 AM
A city-specific increase in the sales tax is a terrible idea. But CT is (by far) the richest state in the union and the State could do much, much more for its (very poor) urban areas.
It is ridiculous that New Haven (together with Hartford, Bridgeport etc.) is expected to raise the tax money to deal with such a large fraction of the state's social problems. Poor and (and even lower middle class) families are completely zoned out (by law!) of most CT towns, who then pretend surprise that social problems arise elsewhere.
The State passed a law saying that PILOT would reimburse cities 77% of lost revenue on colleges, etc. and then every year the legislature in fact votes a much lower percentage payment. Harp, Dillon and the rest are quite satisfied with this, as long as a small fraction of social service agencies in town get a bone or two, often at the explicit expense of the rest of the city.
Posted by: cedarhillresident
| April 2, 2008 12:55 PM
Esbe
***I am standing up and clapping*** on that last statement!!!
And yes gary I know the city needs to stop spending! But the state also needs to give citys the 77%
Posted by: robn | April 2, 2008 1:18 PM
If the PILOT 77% is statutory, why doesn't New Haven just sue the state to make the legislature pay us back what they've shorted?
Posted by: visitor | April 2, 2008 1:47 PM
good. i am glad. it was a stupid idea. All it would have done is made people go elsewhere to shop.
Posted by: Esbe
| April 2, 2008 2:07 PM
ROBN -- since it is statutory, not Constitutional, the legislature only has to pass a new bill every year to override the percentage "this year."
I wonder what is the process for amending the State Constitution?
Posted by: DowntownNewHaven | April 2, 2008 3:07 PM
I agree with you, Esbe.
Instead of a sales tax, however, a better bet would be to raise the gasoline tax to plug the budget gap. This would encourage more mass transit use, which could ultimately allow for improved service (if coupled with simple, low-cost improvements like GPS systems on CT Transit).
Improved mass transit would encourage more families to stop relying on their car, allowing them to save massive amounts of money per year --- currently, families spend an average of 25% of their income on transportation, which is money that could be used for education, housing, food, fixing the streets, etc., instead.
Another option is to create a millionaire tax.
This can be discussed in more detail at the above website, if anyone is interested.
Post a comment
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Some Favorite Sites
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Branford Eagle
- Brian's Commentaries
- Business NH
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Folk Alley
- Gina Coggio
- Gotham Gazette
- Hamden Daily News
- Josiah Brown
- La Voz Hispana
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Medical Intelligence
- Metrocrawl
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- Some Stuff To Do Today
- St. Louis Beacon
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bioregional Group
- Boys & Girls Club
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- NH Land Trust
- NH Safe Streets
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- New Haven 828
- New Life Corp.
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Register Calendar
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- W'ville Synagogue
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Youth Continuum
Legal Notices
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35