Westville Readies Whalley Alternative

by Thomas MacMillan | July 25, 2008 8:54 AM | | Comments (6)

072408_Whalley-2.jpgCould rotaries come to the Whalley speedway?

That was one of many traffic-calming ideas raised as Westville planner Chris Heitmann and a new neighborhood coalition met to devise the Whalley Avenue of their dreams — in hopes of convincing the State Department of Transportation (DOT) to revise its plans.

Heitmann and several dozen other Westville neighbors locals gathered at Congregation Beth El Keser Israel Thursday night to strategize for a public hearing next Thursday night with DOT officials. The state will be answering questions about its 30-year-old plan — on which construction is now about to begin — to widen Whalley Avenue between Emerson Street and the 69/63 junction. Some neighbors fear the plan will make the deadly stretch more of a speedway rather than a pedestrian- and bike-friendly road.

Heitmann (pictured) and the new community group, Coalition for a Livable Whalley, hope to work with the state to incorporate “traffic-calming” changes.

The purpose of Thursday’s meeting, attended by State Rep. Pat Dillon and Westville Alders Ina Silverman and Sergio Rodriguez, was to refine that vision, so neighbors they have a clear picture to present to the DOT. Heitmann reported that officials told him DOT’s plans are not yet “set in stone.” He’s hoping that there is still time to change them to include the suggestions of locals.

The “Community Workshop” is part of a recent wave of citizen traffic-calming activism in New Haven. The movement was galvanized last month by the death of Gabrielle Lee. The 11-year-old girl was struck and killed by a car at the corner of Davis and Whalley, part of the section that is now scheduled for widening.

Heitmann began the meeting with a summary of what it known about the Whalley plan. The state plans to widen the street by an average of four feet, making it a total of 48 feet wide. “Curb radii” will also be widened, making for faster turning and longer pedestrian crossing distances. The road will be made into a total of four lanes in some spots. (More details about the plans here.)

Heitmann explained that the current design was based on 15-year projections that see a large increase in daily traffic on Whalley Avenue. Heitman presented statistics showing that the DOT’s projections for Whalley traffic have not historically proved to be accurate. Furthermore, he argued, with gas price continuing to rise, traffic is not likely to increase.

Heitman voiced the biggest question for the state: “If traffic counts are flat, why increase the roadway?”

What We Want

072408_Whalley-3.jpgAfter a PowerPoint primer on the basics of traffic calming, meeting participants got a chance to brainstorm and come up with their picture of an ideally redesigned avenue. Breaking into small groups, neighbors scribbled on printouts of satellite images of Whalley, drawing in rotaries and dedicated turn lanes, and “reverse angle” parking.

The group reconvened to discuss its desires for the future of Whalley. A “What We Want” list included improved parking, workable public transit, a reconsideration of the necessity of four lanes, improved timing of traffic lights, bike lanes, consistent sidewalks, and a “safer and more pleasant” avenue.

Heitmann presented the widening of Whalley Avenue as ripe with possibility. “There’s a lot of interesting things you could do with 48 feet,” he said.

“This is a once in 40 years opportunity,” he added, explaining that these kind of traffic projects take a long time to plan and then last for years and years. “We just want to make sure we do it right.”

Honey and Ice Cream

Heitmann closed the meeting with a call for diplomacy for next week’s meeting. “‘You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar,’” he quoted.

After the meeting Heittman said that he was optimistic about working with the DOT.

One Whalley resident, who asked not to be identified, said she had been impressed with the DOT when they came to her house several years ago and listened to her concerns about traffic.

Parking is available right in front of her house on Whalley, but several years ago she started parking around the corner and walking to her house. Her parked car had been hit too many times by cars speeding past her house, where two lanes merge into one.

“I want to get it safe, get it slowed down,” she said. “I want to be able to walk across the street and get an ice cream cone.”







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: anon | July 25, 2008 10:58 AM

With roundabouts, incidents like this week's dirt bike collision (or worse - for example, a head on collision of two cars filled with 5 kids each) can largely be prevented, because they slow traffic a bit and prevent most head on and side collisions.

I'm not sure why the state/city insist on having stop signs and traffic lights on roads like this, which enable high speeds and directly cause death and injury. Other cities have been sued for having them.

Posted by: pedro | July 25, 2008 11:48 AM

Roundabouts are not a cure-all, and come with their own design challenges.

http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=36043258
This study points out that for bicyclists in Belgium, roundabouts actually INCREASED the accident rates.

If you are going to integrate roundabouts, then you need to make them of a design that's bicycle friendly and keep cyclists from entering the flow of the roundabout.

As I've said before, I think that there are ways to combine the needs of automobile drivers, pedestrians and cyclists to keep traffic flowing smoothly while at the same allowing the surrounding area to become safe and walkable.

Posted by: anon | July 25, 2008 2:49 PM

There are different types of roundabouts. The study you refer to talks about higher-volume ones, not smaller mini circles like the ones that could replace smaller stop sign intersections like those on Woodward Avenue (where most cyclists seem to report a much more bike-friendly street, and the city reporting a ~10mph reduction in average speed, following installation of the roundabouts). Obviously, traffic systems should be designed with bicycles and pedestrians in mind regardless of what they are, and I agree with you that they can be if people are willing to invest the time. Do you have a copy of the study you could share? I'm not sure if the injury numbers that the authors observed might have increased because of an increase in traffic, not because of an increase in risk -- it sounds like they didn't take volume into consideration.

Posted by: Rep. Pat Dillon [TypeKey Profile Page] | July 25, 2008 3:13 PM

Anon
Link in English:
http://www.ictct.org/workshops/05-Helsinki/S3_Daniels.pdf

You can just search "Stijn Daniels" on Google Scholar to get the studies in English.
I just found it and haven't read it, and it isn't clear what methods they are using for 'observational'.

Posted by: pedro | July 25, 2008 3:33 PM

All of this talk about road redesign has me very excited. Are there areas and/or cities that have implemented stuff like this in the Northeast? Maybe it's worth having some sort of field trip of interested people to see what's possible.
I have visited the Amherst college area which I linked to in another post (i'm an alum) and the difference in traffic for both the driver and pedestrian is substantial. Since there are crossings with flashing lights and a different texture, students no longer dart randomly across the street. The choke points near a major crossing, make it clear that people need to slow down, but importantly, signal to drivers that there is something different, and that they need to pay attention.

Average speed was brought down from 45 to 35 mph (which is coincidentally the speed limit).

Posted by: anon | July 25, 2008 3:46 PM

Here's another:

A recent study in the Netherlands of 181 mini-roundabouts that were converted from three- and four-leg intersections found injuries to bicyclists decreased on average from 1.30 casualties per year to 0.37 casualties per year: a 72-percent reduction. (C. Shoon and J. Van Minnen. "The Safety of Roundabouts in the Netherlands," Traffic Engineering and Control, March 1994, pp. 142-148.)

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Legal Notices

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35