Review Board Hearing More Cop Complaints

by VJ Vitkowsky | August 15, 2008 8:47 AM | | Comments (5)

Capt%20J%20Peterson.JPGComplaints against police officers are up. Capt. Joann Peterson, who runs the police internal affairs division, said that’s a step in the right direction.

“We have had more cases, but every complaint that comes in is getting a case number, even the ones that are sent to patrol,” Peterson told the Civilian Review Board on Thursday night in the chief’s conference room at 1 Union Ave.

Board members and top police officials received a copy of the most recent Civilian Review Board Coordinator’s report, compiled by Reginald Thomas, which lists brief descriptions of every open and closed case IA received in the last two years. Click here to download the latest report.

Both Thomas and Peterson offered the same explanations for the rise in complaints — that the system is working better.

In the past, the board has been criticized as so ineffective or quiet that people didn’t bother bringing complaints to it.

Serious allegations are investigated by internal affairs. Less serious allegations are often handed down to district managers, Peterson said, but for the first time, every complaint that is issued receives a complaint number and gets entered into an XL database. The new process for receiving complaints was one factor Peterson and Thomas said contributed to the increase in complaints.

Peterson said the new way of keeping track of complaints came from the “PERF” report, a document prepared by a panel of experts to overhaul the police department in the wake of a federal corruption investigation. The department followed PERF’s recommendations, Peterson said, “Because they are really good.”

The other factor: A series of public hearings following the corruption scandal put internal affairs under the spotlight, Peterson and Thomas said, which ultimately encouraged people to come forward with complaints.

“We went out there a lot with the Public Safety Committee, I personally went out there and talked with a lot of people,” Peterson said after the meeting. “And the Public Safety Committee was out soliciting business for us, which really helped.”

“Quality Control”

Chief of Police James Lewis said he also implemented a “quality control” exercise to monitor the complaint process. He said district managers will give a transient a few dollars to go and make a complaint, then see if the complaint went through, and if the officer was courteous. Lewis was careful to add he was not about to conduct a “witch hunt” to go after the bad apples.

“I want them to see this as a quality control effort. I don’t want them to think this is a disciplinary action, this is a training exercise” Lewis said.

Lewis said he plans to unveil a new organizational chart for the department Friday morning at the Board of Police Commissioners meeting. If that structure is accepted by the commission, nine of the PERF recommendations will have been met, with the rest following a time line that “may become a moving target,” Lewis said.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: Doriss William | August 18, 2008 8:08 AM

Why is it that some of your most topical stories receive few, if any , comments? This important story has been up there for almost 3 days, with 0 comments.

I don't buy it. I, for one, submitted a carefully crafted comment on Friday, since I have real-life experience with your Civilian Review Board. Or should I say non-review by the CRB? Am still waiting for a response to my comlaint of July 29, 2003, submitted on official forms supplied by Mr. Thomas. Reggie, are you there?... You promised me a case number and a response. I'm waiting, and waiting, and waiting. (Nice work if you can get it!)

On May 1, I wrote, "I find it strange that the Independent posts only 2 comments on this "story of the year," while posting 15 -17 on a garden variety of other topics above." It's deja vu time all over again at the Independent.

A properly functioning civilian review process is the single most important implementation on the road to reform of a corrupt and incompetent police department. This story deserves some reader feedback and input, or my name is not Doriss.

Posted by: James | August 18, 2008 3:37 PM

Likely because it is a rather matter-of-fact article. What is there to say other than, "Sounds good, I've heard it before, let's see how it goes"?

There's nothing controversial in the article and not much to generate an opinion. If I don't have anything to say, I tend to keep my mouth shut.

Posted by: Fedupwithliberals | August 18, 2008 5:15 PM

This CRB is a load of crap! You want police protection, but every time they come in to do their job, you gotta harass them with complaints of police brutality. The butts that you ought to be kickin and taking names of are the crimunals, not the cops.

As other bloggers have written, ye reap what ye sow.

Posted by: James | August 18, 2008 8:22 PM

I disagree, Fed. Somebody has to watch the watchers. Doesn't mean the system isn't abused on both sides and that it couldn't use improvement, but you'll never convince me that there aren't legitimate cases of abuse of power and other inappropriate actions taken by the police. I do believe that such cases are an exception rather than the rule, but it is naive to think that there should be no oversight.

Posted by: Insider | August 18, 2008 8:32 PM

Hey Dorris, I'm confused as to what you hoping to read?. That people share your twisted views on policing, or your elistist attitude in general?

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35