Bike Planner Offers Tips

by Melinda Tuhus | August 10, 2008 12:03 PM | | Comments (3)

speaker.jpgOur horse-friendly streets were ready for cyclists, but cars got in the way.

So said bicycle transportation guru Bob Patten, who spoke at a gathering at Miya’s restaurant on Howe Street Friday afternoon about how to integrate bicycles into the urban streetscape.

Patten has worked on bicycle transportation issues around Washington, D.C., for 15 years. He still considers himself a “displaced Oregonian,” having grown up in Portland, now the urban bicycling mecca of the country.

paul%20and%20morris.jpgAbout a dozen people (most of them his in-laws, the Wessel family, like former city transportation czar Paul and his dad Morris, pictured) sat around a long table at Miya’s as the rain poured down outside and Patten responded to the question of how to make cities like New Haven friendlier for cyclists.

“That’s a lot harder on the East Coast” than the West Coast, he said, because the streets have been around for hundreds of years and are usually narrower and more unforgiving than those in younger parts of the country. He added, “The roads were originally designed for horses, which are more like bikes than cars.” But over the last century motor vehicles have taken over.

Patten pointed out that perhaps the biggest impediment to more people taking up regular cycling in urban areas is the (well-placed) fear of motorized traffic. One solution: create streets that are more like off-road trails, where bicyclists can be safely separated from other traffic. But creating that connectivity depends on many factors: the level of institutional competence, personal lifestyles, differences in class and culture, and political will. (See, for instance, this story about the state transportation department’s resistance to making room for separate cycle lanes in its upcoming widening of Whalley Avenue.)

Patten said that when people talk about bicycle commuting they often mean just getting back and forth from work. That leaves out the majority of trips that urban dwellers make — to shop, to run errands and to visit friends and family. He prefers the term “utilitarian bicycling” as opposed to purely recreational or competitive cycling.

Doored Zones & “Sharrows”

In describing the minimum widths of travel lanes and bike lanes, Patten said the door zone can become a big concern. That’s the area of a bike lane where a rider can be hit by a car door as a driver opens it after parking next to the curb. Because New Haven streets are so narrow (the city has determined that only a dozen or so are wide enough to safely accommodate a bike lane), this is a major problem. For example, most of the bike lane on Orange Street is in the door zone, forcing riders to straddle the white line demarcating the bike lane from the motor vehicle lane.

Patten showed pictures of “sharrows” — markings on the road indicating that bikes can legally share the lane with cars. He said they are included in the official standards that transportation engineers use when designing roads. Some cycling advocates in New Haven have pushed for these, while others are less sure it’s the safest way to go.

Patten also described other road markings, like bike boxes. These are squares (usually of a different color than the road surface) painted at intersections to indicate that cyclists can get out front of motor vehicles at red lights, and be the first to move when the light changes.

His general message: “Road markings can have an impact.”

erin%20at%20miya%27s.jpgFair Haven Alderwoman Erin Sturgis-Pascale (pictured) had a busy bike-related day. In the morning she attended the August Bike to Work Day breakfast in front of City Hall, sponsored by Elm City Cycling, where she thanked cyclists for their advocacy. She said she has introduced Complete Streets legislation that the board will be taking up later this year, that takes into account the needs of pedestrians and cyclists as well as motorists.

At the afternoon event at Miya’s, she asked a lot of questions that indicated her expertise on the issue, having to do with road design and markings







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: anon | August 11, 2008 1:02 PM

"the city has determined that only a dozen or so are wide enough to safely accommodate a bike lane."

That statement is not accurate.

Posted by: David Streever | August 11, 2008 4:17 PM

Which part of the statement?

That the city has made this determination, or the determination itself?

I can think of:
Chapel
Elm
State
as down town streets that really are wide enough for bike lanes... without removing the lanes.

We don't have real shoulders here. I don't know where we'd get the 10 feet needed for actual, safe bike lanes.

The bike lanes on Orange street are a beacon for dooring: ask the guys who work at Orange liquor, or anyone else who owns a store front there. One day I stopped in there & they had seen THREE doorings in a row that day alone.

I would rather people learned how to bike (or didn't, and walked, its' not exactly "drive or bike" here) then we had an influx of sidewalk riding, incompetent cyclists putting themselves in harm.

I would see the city spend money on education than striping every lane in the city. The general incompetence of riders I see all day, every day, on Orange street speaks to the reality here: riders ride against traffic, on sidewalks and in bike lanes, then make turns across oncoming traffic when they reach the road. It's incomprehensible, and all too often, the headphone wearing cyclist does not even seem to notice the car that brakes hard to avoid hitting them (while driving 20 miles per hour through a green light, startled at the sudden bike flying off the sidewalk in their path).

Forgive the anecdotes. I'm just describing my day to day experience, which leads me to think we need to train & teach cyclists just as we do motorists. Lanes that they don't use, that put them in the door zone, aren't really something we need to drop on every street.

There really has to be another way to slow down traffic.

Posted by: Michael Dunlap | August 12, 2008 9:59 AM

I agree with David...to a degree. I commute from Hamden daily on Whitney; I find it a very safe commute as long as I follow the rules. Being a predictable rider, being aware of what's going on around you (no headphones!) and being conscientious to other vehicles are very important skills to hone. However, it's only half the equation. We also need to educate motorists that bicycles belong on the streets and that they must be alert for us.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35