A Financial Katrina

by Patricia Dillon | September 17, 2008 2:39 PM | | Comments (9)

This week’s meltdown on Wall Street is a financial Katrina. Just as a hurricane in the Gulf was foreseeable, a correction in the market for structured finance was foreseeable. Corrections are part of the cycle, as are tropical storms. Neither the hurricane nor the correction was caused by government.

But in both cases, the catastrophe — and for many, it will be — was a result of the failure of governmental institutions to plan for disaster, or to safeguard the safety and soundness of our markets and therefore the financial security of our citizens. The results will be felt in loss of jobs, losses in our state pension funds, loss of state revenue — particularly, but not only, in Fairfield County — loss of adequate revenue to cities, loss of access to credit, and reductions in retirement accounts just as large numbers of baby boomers are retiring.

In this case, the backdrop happens to be partisan and ideological, because reforms enacted by FDR during the Depression in the wake of the stock market crash were repealed by Republicans. Complex areas of the market operated without transparency, much less regulation.

The table was set in 1999, when the Republican Senate in Congress, led by Senator Phil Gramm over the threat of a Clinton veto, repealed the Glass-Steagall Act which had prevented banks from making risky investments with customer’s deposits. Another Depression reform (1938) was the uptick rule restricting short selling. Bush’s SEC repealed the uptick rule in 2007.

Depression reforms certainly created winners and losers, and markets had changed, so reform was needed. But Phil Gramm didn’t want update or reform. He wanted repeal, and after a standoff with the Clinton White House, he got it. Then he went to work at UBS and was a McCain spokesman — until he called Americans “whiners.”

This ideological bias against governmental regulation continued even after the
collapse of Bear Stearns in March 2008.
Bush and Christopher Cox, chair of SEC, responded to a systemic problem as if it were a problem with individual institutions. Therefore, they did nothing to look at the capital reserves of lenders, at the lack of transparency of hedge funds, at unregulated credit swaps, at the consequences of repeal of Glass Steagall or the effect of the uptick rule repeal in a down market.

Instead, Cox walled off 19 institutions and restricted the ability to sell their stocks short. That order expired Aug. 12.

The Bush administration’s emergency order was flawed for several reasons, all stemming from their insistence on seeing Bear as an individual bank run, not a symptom of systemic failure. For example, the order protected some institutions and not others, harming their rivals. In addition, those same institutions themselves had been selling short.Further, the administration had no plan after Aug. 12, the expiration of the limited order. After that, the floodgates opened.

Why is this happening now? The slide began almost as soon as the limited order expired. But an important date looms. This Friday is Triple Witching Friday , one of the four days a year when all options expire and markets become volatile - up or down. If anything would go wrong, it would go wrong this week.

It is telling that last weekend the SEC was invisible, and the Fed came to the fore, framing the issue as whether or not the government should bail out firms with taxpayer dollars.

That’s the wrong question, and the outcome was predictable. Lehman’s collapse triggered a run on others. If AIG had gone down, Citibank was surely next. So after doing nothing, the Bush administration intervened. Now we own AIG.


This year is a presidential election, sort of like witching Friday except in politics. So the Bush administration and Senator McCain, because they are the party of incumbents, will look for scapegoats. Wall Street and short sellers will be blamed and symbolic actions proposed. Everyone will be indignant. Perhaps a commission will be appointed.

But this is not over. Federal policymakers are just shifting blame and buying time.

Today, the SEC once again trotted out reforms of short sellers. Lame and late.

Short selling can be a legitimate tool of risk management if proper rules are set and markets are transparent. Short sellers exacerbated this, but are not to blame. And pace John McCain, the “greed” of Wall Street (exempting Phil Gramm presumably) is not to blame either. On the ground, a trader, whose salary is largely an end of year bonus, sees only his (or her) rivals.

It’s the role of government to set, and enforce, ground rules to prevent dishonest traders from getting an advantage over honest ones. It’s the role of government to protect the public from the incompetent.

For anyone expecting to retire within in the next five years, check your retirement account (or don’t). Our state pension funds lost $50 million when only Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went under. We’ll find out the rest of the losses later.


.







Share this story: digg / newsvine / facebook

Comments

Posted by: anon | September 17, 2008 2:50 PM

http://www.courant.com/community/news/hfd/hc-ctbudget0917.artsep17,0,934998.story

Hartford is already collapsing. New Haven is next, unless the state seriously considers new policy issues, like creating an additional 50% tax on all incomes over $100,000.

Posted by: AllanBrison | September 17, 2008 3:55 PM

Though I think that Pat Dillon is right in her analysis that it was the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act of the 30's that set the stage for the current crisis by allowing a single institution to use its assets derived from its customers to make risky, hedge fund type investments, I think that it is self-serving for her to lay all the blame on Phil Gramm and the Republicans. Though God knows Gramm deserves much of the blame.

But so do the Democrats. The bill to repeal Glass-Steagall was passed by overwhelming majorities in both houses with huge Democratic support and signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton.

One more example of how the Democrats talk out of one side of their mouths when they want our votes and out of the other side when they want campaign funds from Big Banking and other large corporate sources.

Hey, Barack Obama is right up there with McCain is getting funds from Wall Street.

Allan Brison
Alderman, Ward 10

Posted by: Rep. Pat Dillon [TypeKey Profile Page] | September 17, 2008 5:01 PM

Alan
There is a difference between the first Senate vote (I referenced) and the conference report you cite. The Senate vote found here
was supported by one Democrat, Fritz Hollings.
It is true that the vote on the conference report was overwhelming - eight votes against. But by that time, the Clinton White House had withdrawn the veto threat, and Community Reinvestment Act language was included, so senators were unlikely to oppose it.

Posted by: robn | September 18, 2008 9:11 AM

Cut the cr@p Allen,

Republicans wasted $30M chasing the president for having consensual sex and then when he was on the ropes, passed Glass Steagle on essentially a party line vote. The biggest myth ever, spread by both greedy Republicans and bitter Greens, is that theres no difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. The difference couldn't be clearer based upon this vote and the overwhelming, unprecedented wave of anti-democratic party line votes inflcited upon the American people by Republicans in the last 8 years. You and that old crank Ralph Nader can take this two party duopoly BS and shove it.

Posted by: doctorj2u | September 18, 2008 8:35 PM

As a person that lived the true Katrina:
America, how long are you willing to live with an administration that has brought this country to its knees?

Posted by: robn | September 19, 2008 11:14 AM

correction...Republicans "repealed" glass steagall on a party line vote

Posted by: AllanBrison | September 19, 2008 12:03 PM

Pat

Thanks for the clarification. Nevertheless, even with the Community Reinvestment Act, passing it was a terrible mistake.

Robn

It is a matter of public record that Glass-Steagall was repealed by a large majority of Democrats in both houses of Congress.

Posted by: Rep. Pat Dillon [TypeKey Profile Page] | September 19, 2008 5:24 PM

"Passing it was a terrible mistake"

Yes, that's the kindest interpretation. That first Senate vote was the test, though those who voted against it probably faced a lot of pressure from regional banks to vote the other way. The Clinton White House, weakened by other issues, folded.
That was 1999.
Then came a presidential election. The new SEC went even further, loosening capital requirements, and then in 2007 - a year ago - repealed the "uptick rule" and opened the door to abuse of short selling.
The uptick rule was first proposed by Joseph Kennedy (who had been appointed by FDR to clean up Wall Street) because predatory shorting had eroded the capital base of companies after the 1929 crash. In an internet age this practice can be even more volatile and destructive, making it impossible for a stock - like Lehman for example- to climb back in a down market.
The rating agencies are part of this too btw.

Some of the details can make our eyes glaze over, but they matter a lot. That's our money.


Posted by: robn | September 22, 2008 4:18 PM

Allen,

You're right about the final vote for Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,and I apologize for jumping down your throat, but the Dems revised their votes after bargaining for the strengthening the community reinvestment act. ...something Republicans would never do, and something which clearly sets the parties apart.

Post a comment

Please Note: Commenting is only open for 30 days after the entry is posted.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35