Lieberman’s Revenge
by Paul Bass | September 3, 2008 12:25 AM | Permalink | Comments (24)
(News analysis) His party loves him after all. It’s just not the party that first elected him to the U.S. Senate.
Connecticut’s prodigal U.S. senator, Joe Lieberman, basked Tuesday night in a prime-time nationally televised address before an adoring crowd of the party faithful — the Republican Party faithful.
In a keynote address at the GOP convention in Minneapolis, Lieberman delivered a passionate, cogent argument for the presidential candidacy of his friend, John McCain. (Click on the play arrow to watch the address.)
The address packed a punch because of how Lieberman presented himself: a “Democrat” who was backing a Republican for the nation’s highest office out of a patriotism that overrules the partisan party politics that has bedeviled Washington. Not even an “independent Democrat,” the moniker he’s been using since his party rejected him two years ago.
You’d never know that for the past two years Lieberman and his former party have been at war. Tuesday night’s speech was the latest battle. Call it Joe Lieberman’s Revenge.
“What, after all, is a Democrat like me doing at a Republican convention like this?” Lieberman asked the crowd Wednesday night. “The answer is simple. I’m here to support John McCain because country matters more than party.”
There were two ways to interpret Lieberman’s argument Wednesday night. It all depends on how you view the road Lieberman has traveled since emerging in 1970 as a formidable and unpredictable campaigner in the trenches of New Haven politics. And especially on how you view the turn his career took the past two years.
One view: Lieberman was once again the independent-minded maverick who put the national interest before his party or his career.
But there’s another view: Lieberman Tuesday night was the bare-knuckle Republican in Democratic disguise who once again brilliantly advanced the career of one Joe Lieberman.
The Patriotic View
For the story Joe Lieberman told America about John McCain Wednesday night is also the story he’s been telling about himself: about an independent politician who angers the “partisans” in his own party because he cares more about the good of his country.
That’s why, even though he’s a “Democrat,” he’s crossing party lines to back a Republican who’d make a better president, Lieberman said.
“I’m here because John McCain’s whole life testifies to a great truth,” Lieberman said. “Being a Democrat or a Republican is important. But it is nowhere near as important important as being an American.”
He spoke of how McCain angered his own party by pushing for campaign finance reform, limits on lobbyists, sanctions against influential corporations receiving government contracts, and immigration reform that made room for more newcomers to the country. He spoke of how McCain worked with Democrats and Republicans alike to achieve those goals.
Lieberman has cast himself the same way. He entered the State Senate in 1970 by toppling a powerful machine incumbent, Ed Marcus, with a message of liberal reform and open government. Eighteen years later he toppled an incumbent Republican senator with strong Democratic support, Lowell Weicker — by running to his right, courting anti-Communist Cubans and conservatives like William F. Buckley. In Washington, from his first days in the Senate, he built alliances with the ascending right-wing of the Republican Party, voting with the likes of Jesse Helms on anti-gay laws and Alphone D’Amato on tax breaks for the wealthy and decreased regulation of corporations; forming groups with the likes of Ralph Reed and Lynne Cheney to smoke out liberal influence in U.S. universities and support increased military spending and foreign wars; speaking up for Alberto Gonzalez and his legal justifications for torture during confirmation hearings for the job of U.S. attorney.
(Click here for a longer tale of Lieberman’s political education.)
When a Democratic president faced impeachment for lying about having oral sex with an intern, Lieberman scolded him on the floor of the Senate.
At each step Lieberman portrayed himself as a bipartisan bridge-builder putting the country’s interest above personal advancement or party ideology.
He said it more often the past four years as he and his party bitterly split apart. First, in 2004, he was humiliated in an attempt to gain traction as a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. His support for the Iraq war doomed him. Then, in 2006, his own party rejected him in a primary for his Senate seat. Lieberman had to run as an independent in the general election to regain the seat. He needed the votes of Connecticut Republicans — and crucial help from the Republican White House — to do it.
He returned to Washington calling himself an “independent Democrat.” He caucused with his old party, which needed him to maintain a one-vote majority in the Senate. In return the party gave him an influential chairmanship, of the Homeland Security Committee.
The “Joe First, Second & Third” View
But with a larger Democratic majority looming in the Senate next year, all sides know that deal is off. Lieberman will be lucky to earn a spot on the Water Cooler Committee, let alone a chairmanship, from his old party.
If, on the other hand, he helps John McCain win, he’ll emerge more influential than ever. He and McCain are old pals. They’ve worked together for decades and admire each other. Lieberman has been McCain’s sidekick on travels from Baghdad to Georgia the past months, whispering advice in his ear and standing by him for the cameras. McCain reportedly wanted pick Lieberman as his running mate in this campaign, but aides quashed the idea because of a feared backlash from Evangelical Christians.
Whatever Cabinet post a President McCain would offer Lieberman, one thing is for sure: When an international crisis brews, Vice-President Palin won’t be in the Oval Office helping decide whether to launch nukes. Lieberman will.
All of which is why Lieberman’s speech Wednesday night just as easily fits into a long-running counter-narrative: that of the politician who postures on ever-shifting principle that always conveniently advances his career.
Lieberman wrote in a political autobiography of why he stopped sounding like a liberal when he ran for office in the late ’80s: he’d lost a Congressional race by being painted as one at the dawn of the Reagan era. He’d never let that happen again.
He may have launched his career by taking on machine Democrats. But he quickly made his peace with them, and the Teamsters who helped pull their votes, as he ascended to the position of Connecticut attorney general, then U.S. senator.
When he began making alliances with the Republican right in Washington, he was cultivating powerful friends among a network of politicians and operatives who came to dominate the federal government and the national discourse. He became a star.
When he ran as Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore’s number-two in 2000, he suddenly backtracked on those principles: He no longer called affirmative action “un-American.” He embraced civil rights again and warned against dangerous Republicans.
When he ran on his own for president in 2004, he positioned himself as a Scoop Jackson Democrat, hoping to capture the votes of conservative Democrats. But he was still seeking the votes of partisans. So he ditched the bipartisan, bridge-building talk.
Let’s Go To The Videotape
Exhibit A: this video, posted Tuesday on an influential liberal website, Talking Points Memo. It features clips from Lieberman’s speeches on the primary campaign trail in 2003-4. The quotes offer a remarkable contrast to the speech he gave at Tuesday night’s GOP convention: They’re a cascade of taunts and warnings about the evils and dangers of Republicans. (Click on the play arrow to watch.)
“Americans are increasingly connecting their worries about the future with the frail leadership of George W. Bush.” Lieberman said then.
“He’s committed almost $3 trillion in our national treasury in these tax cuts which we cannot afford, which were unfair… Today it is the Democratic Party that is the party of fiscal responsibility and economic growth… The current tax system is unfair. The middle class is squeezed by the poor economy, by insecurity, by health care costs…
“Let’s not let George Bush and the Republicans claim they have a monopoly on values… They don’t … When they give away the national treasury to the people who don’t need it in tax cuts because they’re so wealthy. They don’t have the money to help our children who are poor…”
You get the idea.
Then came the final repudiation by Connecticut Democrats in the 2006 primary.
Back in Washington, Lieberman reserved all his public jeremiads for Democrats. He attacked their patriotism. He became President Bush’s most vocal ally in support of the Iraq war.
And on the trail for John McCain, he seemed to take glee in attacking Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama. At one point Fox News asked Lieberman if Obama is a Marxist. Lieberman responded that that was a “good question.”
Back home, Lieberman’s base continued to wither. And not just Democrats; independents too. The latest Quinnipiac poll showed that if McCain had picked Lieberman as his running mate, he would have lost votes in Connecticut. And check out these “buyer’s remorse” numbers. One influential moderate Democrat called last week to have Lieberman expelled from the party — now. Nationally, liberal groups have demanded that Senate leaders not wait until January to strip Lieberman of his committee chairmanship. His only hope for remaining relevant rests with his Republican soulmate running for the nation’s top job.
Bipartisan Again, For 1 Night
You wouldn’t have know that watching Lieberman’s GOP convention speech Tuesday night, though.
While he made some criticisms of Obama, Lieberman strayed from his recent harsh attacks. That wouldn’t have sold. The script on Tuesday called for “Democrat” Lieberman once again preaching post-partisanship.
“As you well now we meet tonight in the wake of a terrible storm that’s hit the Gulf Coast,” he said. “It really hurts all of us no matter where we live, because we are members of the larger American family. Right? …
“John [McCain] understands that it shouldn’t take a natural disaster like Hurricane Gustav to get us to take off our partisan blinders and work together to get things done. It shouldn’t take a natural disaster to teach us that the American people don’t care much if you have an ‘R’ or a ‘D’ after your name. What they care about is: are we solving the problems they are up against every day?
“What you can expect from John McCain as president is precisely what he has done this week: which is to put country first. That is the code by which he has lived his entire life, and that is the code he will carry with him into the White House. I have personally seen John over and over again bring people together from both parties to tackle our toughest problems we face.”
“God made only one John McCain. And he is his own man.”
It was convincing theater — for anyone who hasn’t been watching Lieberman back home and subscribing to one of the two narratives of his political journey.
Share this story
Comments
Posted by: cm | September 3, 2008 8:12 AM
Joe
What makes you think Connecticut loves you...you speak with a forked tongue...do us all a favor move out of ct. for good..
Posted by: cedarhillresident | September 3, 2008 8:15 AM
OH MY FREAKEN GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I vote this one!!!!
".....was the bare-knuckle Republican in Democratic disguise who once again brilliantly advanced the career of one Joe Lieberman.
GRRRRRRR
Can we ban him from our state?? Can we do a recall and kick him out of office???
Posted by: robn | September 3, 2008 8:17 AM
ARRRRGH!!!!!
Once again...to Dems who stabbed their party in the back and voted for Joe. THANKS A LOT!
Posted by: KAMB | September 3, 2008 8:23 AM
Joe is a stand-up man with solid beliefs. He's smart to support a real candidate with experience rather than a media-hyped well-spoken puppet with no experience.
Posted by: fran | September 3, 2008 9:36 AM
Thank you for this story -- it's been so hard for me to describe to my friends out here in Colorado why Joe Lieberman is not to be trusted. I gave up on him back in 2000 when he only half-heartedly committed to the national ticket, leaving his name on the CT ballot for Senator. If Gore/Lieberman had won, Gov. Rowland, a Republican, would then have been able to appoint a new U.S. Senator, most likely a Republican. Joe seems to always put himself first -- and his new friends in Washington have reaped the benefits while we wait for him to make good on his pledge to elect a Democrat to the White House in 2008. (That's what he said in 2006 when he ran for re-election). I only wish we could recall him. BTW: for the sake of transparency, yes I did donate to Ned Lamont in both the primary and general election.
Posted by: Westville Mom | September 3, 2008 9:58 AM
Lost my patience...can't even finish reading this rambling, ranting diatribe--the latest effort by this NON-independent writer to execute his vendetta against Lieberman.
"Whatever Cabinet post a President McCain would offer Lieberman, one thing is for sure: When an international crisis brews, Vice-President Palin won't be in the Oval Office helping decide whether to launch nukes. Lieberman will.".....right (!) and we should thank God he will because he is the only Democrat who understands that Ahmadinejad will make mincemeat out of Obama and eat the Israelis for dessert. Does the writer REALLY not understand that it is Israel at stake here? Does the writer REALLY believe that Obama will defend Israel when push comes to shove----or does be believe that Obama's charismatically electric personality will magically persuade the European weaklings to do the job---which, of course, they won't. Ossetia and Abkhazia are proof of that, should we need any more. Lieberman gets it. The Republicans get it. You don't.
If you wish to cover the convention, why don't you cover the attack on the Connecticut delegation and leave your prejudiced anti-Lieberman views for your "Compost" opinion segment, which is at least honestly opinionated.
Posted by: cedarhillresident | September 3, 2008 10:01 AM
My rendering of Joe
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b381/happypixie/joe.jpg
Posted by: Peter Gemmell | September 3, 2008 10:18 AM
Oh No !!!!!
Posted by: elmcityguy | September 3, 2008 10:29 AM
Hey Paul, some of your comments made the front page of Daily Kos. Nice going!
Posted by: robn | September 3, 2008 11:05 AM
Sen Lieberman has had a long track record of progressive voting, but when it comes to middle east issues, specifically the Iraq invasion his priorities are not focused upon Connecticut's interests. The war was resoundingly rejected by Sen Lieberman's constituents when Ned Lamont was given the nod by Dems. Sen Lieberman's insistence that we stay in Iraq is a wrongheaded hawkish attempt to keep Israel safe. I for one believe that an unstable middle east equals an unstable Israel. ...and this war has nothing to do with WMD, nothing to do with Al Quaeda, nothing to do with 911, is based upon lies and has been our countries undoing.
Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008 11:28 AM
Thanks to James Amann and other democrats who betrayed their party and voted for independent Joe in 2006. We told you so!
Posted by: Westville Mom | September 3, 2008 1:20 PM
ROBN: Your opinion is as valid as any other, but your referral to Lieberman's "constituents" is vague and misleading. Senators, be they Democrat or Republican, once elected, are supposed to represent ALL the residents of their state. Were it otherwise, our founding fathers would have stipulated that each state have one Dem.(or equivalent) and one Rep.(or equivalent) Senator, which they did not. Your views may be mainstream Democratic, but are certainly not characteristic of ALL Lieberman's constituents.
Posted by: ROBN | September 3, 2008 2:17 PM
WVM,
BTW...Before you accuse me of rendering an opinion over fact...heres some cold hard factS coming at you...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/06/politics/main1868295.shtml?source=RSS&attr=HOME_1868295
Posted by: Jim T | September 3, 2008 3:56 PM
westville mom - I will add my name to the long list of constituents who are against Lieberman. I seriously doubt (at the very lest hope) that we will not be seeing Lieberman as the Senator from Connecticut after the next election. It is a shame that he has strayed so from from the people who once stood behind him.
Posted by: Westville Mom | September 3, 2008 4:54 PM
JIM T: [final thought] One man's "straying" is another man's "profile in courage." Note to Democrats: preaching to the choir requires a lot less in terms of "cajones."
Posted by: Our Town
| September 3, 2008 4:59 PM
JIM T
Unfortunately, he probably won't run again, and we won't ever get the satisfaction of voting him out. The last election was our last chance.
Posted by: Nestor Makhno | September 3, 2008 7:53 PM
Based on his hawkishness, it is clear that Lieberman's real constituents all live in Israel.
Posted by: jackson | September 3, 2008 8:34 PM
Joe is 2-faced and self-serving, and that is being generous.Too bad that too many people didn't keep up with his about-face and thought they voted for the old Joe...Say what you want Westville mom, Obama is trying to build relationships with world leaders which is not such a bad thing. Many countries are resisting the bully tactics of the United States and are not afraid to fight back. All of this tough Republican talk has done nothing over the past 8 years except allow Hezbollah and Al Queda to get stronger. It doesn't take much to sit down at the table and talk, and at least establish some type of dialogue...and if peace is given a chance, it should trickle down and assist with the establishment of peace in Israel.
Posted by: shimson | September 4, 2008 6:47 AM
This is a brilliant description of Lieberman. It is accurate and fair.
Posted by: David Streever | September 4, 2008 8:08 AM
Right on Jackson. Old politics is the same fear-mongering, war loving, knee-jerk reaction to the world that we've been mired in for so long. Liebermen is working to protect israel, Westville Mom? That's funny, I thought Connecticut elected him! When does he stand up for our interests?
Posted by: robn | September 4, 2008 10:41 AM
Just so it doesn't dissapear down the memory hole...those of you who thought you voted for the old Sen Lieberman check this out.
"Does America have a good plan for doing this, a strategy for victory in Iraq? Yes we do."
Sen Lieberman WSJ Nov 29, 2005
"..as someone who voted for the war, I feel a heavy responsibility to try to end it as quickly and successfully as possible."
Sen Lieberman AP Aug 8, 2006 (just prior to primary loss, when polling low from anti-war sentiment)
"...John McCain had the courage to stand against the tide of public opinion and support the surge and because of that, today, our troops are at last beginning to come home, not in failure, but in honor!"
Sen Lieberman Sept 2 2008 Republican Convention
Posted by: Walter | September 4, 2008 12:51 PM
Joe Lieberman has followed McCain like a puppy dog, he wanted to get the V.P. spot or now hopes for a cabinet post.
Only thing he did was whisper in McCain ear on geography, Iraq is not bordered with Afganistan, its 800 miles away and is in Asia not the middle east.
Lieberman is a true double talker and thinks only in what is best for him and his cronies.
If Lieberman's desire is to become a real stateman stop being like a puppy dog, if McCain wins, this country will be a war and maybe become a 3rd world country.
Where have all our statemen gone.
I am a Connecticut republican that is discusted with most repblicans that are war mongers, I'm turning in my republican card and becoming an independent.
Enough is enough, lies. lies and more lies and more dirty tricks by the so called republican Karl Rove supporters, Mcain is a turncoat as well as Lieberman, all for the vote, not for the country
Shame in Connecticut for voting Liberman back in under the independent ticket, he has pulled the wool over many good people, it time to wake up.
an Angry, angry American
Posted by: robn | September 4, 2008 12:56 PM
...case in point...
http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/110192.html
Real friends of Israel want peace there and in surrounding nations.
Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- CT Business Litig
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- Reddit NH
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- St. Louis Beacon
- Tom Ficklin
- VT Digger
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- ALSO-Cornerstone
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- All Our Kin
- Alliance Theatre
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Bar Assn.
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bikur Cholim
- Bioregional Group
- Birthright
- BlackinCT
- Boys & Girls Club
- CCA
- CCNE
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City Point
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Elm Shakespeare
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- Fellowship Place
- Food Bank
- Friends of East Rock Park
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Halsey Associates
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- NH Land Trust
- NH Museum
- NH Safe Streets
- NH Scholarship Fund
- NH Youth Soccer
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- Neighborhood Music School
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- PAR Newsletter
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- ROOF
- Rail Trains Ecology
- Register Calendar
- Rotary
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Sister Cities
- Social Media Club
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- South Central Behavioral Health Network
- Squash Haven
- Temple Emanuel
- United Way
- Upper State Street Association
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Visiting Nurse Association of South Central Connecticut
- W'ville Synagogue
- W. Square Blockwatch
- WalkBIkeCT
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva of NH
- Youth Continuum
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35