Anti-Graffiti Law Gets Teeth

by Melissa Bailey | December 2, 2008 12:16 PM | | Comments (12)

DSCN0023.JPGThe next time “Lark” sprays a sign, the vandal could face a $50 fine.

Penalties for selling spray paint to minors and for possessing “graffiti implements” in public were established by a vote at Monday’s Board of Aldermen meeting in City Hall.

The ordinance amendment came after objections that an anti-graffiti law that aldermen passed in September didn’t have any teeth. The law was proposed by Fair Haven Aldermen Joey Rodriguez and Erin Sturgis-Pascale in response to a wave of graffiti in their part of town.

The law banned the sale of spray paint to minors under the age of 18. It also shifted the responsibility of graffiti cleanup from property owners to the city. (Click here for a back story).

Until Monday, there were no penalties attached.

Monday, aldermen amended their previous work by specifying fines. Click here to read the text of the law.

If a store is caught selling spray paint to a minor, it will be fined $50 for the first offense and $50 for each additional offense, up to $250, which is the maximum allowable under state statute.

If a person is caught possessing a “graffiti implement” in a public place, that person may also be fined, $50 per offense up to $250.

What is a “graffiti implement?” It’s defined as: “Any aerosol paint container, broad tipped indelible marker, gum label, paint stick or graffiti stick, etching equipment, brush or other device capable of scarring or leaving a visible mark on any natural or manmade surface.”

Where is it illegal to possess these implements? “While in or upon any public facility, park, playground, swimming pool, recreational facility, or other public building or structure owned or operated by the City unless otherwise authorized by the City.”

Sturgis-Pascale said the fines were added in response to her colleagues concerns that a stronger deterrent was needed to prevent people from vandalizing the streets. The amount of the fine is the same as the one established in 2000 for using Silly String or other “nuisance products” in a public place.

The new fines were approved by a vote of 24 to 1 vote. Hill Alderwoman Jackie James was the sole objector.

“I just think it’s another piece of feel-good legislation,” she said after the vote. “I mean who’s going to enforce it?” She said cops already have their hands full addressing more serious crimes.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: Hill Resident | December 2, 2008 2:40 PM

"Hill Alderwoman Jackie James was the sole objector. I just think it's another piece of feel-good legislation."

Coming from a person who has not passed one meaningful legislation since elected. - Give me a break

Posted by: THREEFIFTHS | December 2, 2008 3:25 PM

All you got do to is go to another town and buy the paint or markers.

Posted by: Bobo | December 2, 2008 3:33 PM

First it's bikes on sidewalks now it's graffiti, how about focusing on real issues in New Haven i.e. shootings, murders.

Posted by: streever | December 2, 2008 4:17 PM

montreal seems to have done a nice job with this issue
buildings/restaurants/etc hire or encourage local artists to do murals/semi-meaningful graffiti on their walls.

It's vibrant, colorful, and pleasing. They don't use "free walls" or other silly fixes, it's commerce driven.

The only (I think) non-sanctioned graffiti I saw in a noticeable place was "I LOVE CHEESE" on a wall. Not bad. (that and silly mustaches drawn on the cardboard political posters)

Posted by: Ben | December 2, 2008 4:46 PM

Fortunately some neighborhoods in New Haven behave themselves well enough that small crime such as graffiti and car break-ins are a concern.
Sweat the small stuff!

Posted by: Fedupwithliberals | December 2, 2008 8:15 PM

BEN

The small stuff leads to big stuff. Remember broken windows theory of crime control in NYC. Seemed to work very well.

Posted by: John Fitzpatrick | December 3, 2008 6:43 AM

A recent study published in the journal Science demonstrates the importance of preventing indications of disorder such as litter and grafitti.

http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12630201

Posted by: BEN | December 3, 2008 11:45 AM

FEDUP,
I Agree. I think you misread. I said, "Sweat the small stuff"

Posted by: robn | December 3, 2008 1:00 PM

Theres an ant trail of small graffiti from Audobon to Lincoln Street...the cops could consider sending grafffito mugs shots to the principal of Cooperative High School, who might be seeing the same thing in the school and might know who it is.

Posted by: cedarhillresident [TypeKey Profile Page] | December 3, 2008 8:10 PM

david where did you see "I LOVE CHEESE"??? Some one I know may be in alot of trouble

Posted by: laststraw | December 4, 2008 5:22 PM

"Theres an ant trail of small graffiti from Audobon to Lincoln Street...the cops could consider sending grafffito mugs shots to the principal of Cooperative High School, who might be seeing the same thing in the school and might know who it is."

Robn, there is an entire department of the NYPD that does this. They literally have small index cards with photos stapled to them on the front of each file -- although I'm sure by now they've gone paperless. The only problem with actually tracking like this in New Haven is that no one outside of the 'graff world' seems to understand it all (as evident from the comments the last time that "Lark" photo was used on the NHI). Graffiti, once understood, is NOT hard to keep track of.
If you really want to get this under control, the city needs legal walls. In addition to legal walls, they should utilize Channel 1 and the various "kings" that now reside in New Haven -- much like the recent project at the Acme Wall on Crown Street. I watched those kids work on that wall, and the Channel 1 guys and the old school graffiti guys kept referring to it as aerosol art (never "graffiti"), and kept explaining to them the difference between art and vandalism. They talked about using a "piece book" or spare plywood vs. commercial walls as practice space. You're never going to eliminate graffiti entirely, so giving these kids a legal outlet gives them an option other than some storefront.
Heck, if the NHPD really wants to get a grasp on this, respond here -- I'll gladly give 'em a brief rundown of what it all means (and it only needs to be brief). I'd much rather see the "young guns" under the tutelage of the "kings", so they could grow their art without the need for random vandalism.

-SES ONE, TES735 (HA! CREW)

Posted by: ROBN | December 8, 2008 11:46 AM

LS,

Thanks...I agree with you about the qualitative difference between tags and art....as far as enforcement, all I'm looking for is for malicious taggers to be put on a clean up crew...maybe as a follow up, to make it a positive experience, the NHPD could sit the former taggers down with some kings. The ACME installation is great.

Sorry, Comments are closed for this entry

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35