Man Forged Check To Pay Prostitute

by allison schwartz | August 26, 2009 8:17 AM | | Comments (9)

In his last days of freedom before heading to jail, Arnold Payne bought sex from a hooker — and ended up buying two more years in the slammer, too.

That’s the story that unfolded in Connecticut Superior Court on Elm Street at a sentencing before Judge Richard Damiani.

DSCN3317.JPG“Even a dummy wouldn’t write a check to a prostitute,” chided Damiani (pictured) before sending Payne to jail for four years.

As Damiani spoke, laughter erupted in the back of the courtroom. Marshals quickly tried to regain silence.

Payne’s alleged run-in with the prostitute took place during a period of freedom as he awaited a prison sentence on separate charges. The itinerant criminal pleaded guilty in April to two charges of violating probation and violating a protective order. He was released from custody for a few months of freedom before going to prison.

The grace period was granted with a caveat: If he committed any new crimes in between his plea and when he turned himself in, Payne would face a maximum sentence of seven years. Payne used that free period to seek treatment for a brain tumor.

His freedom ended on Aug. 4, when he was arrested on charges that he paid a prostitute with a fraudulent check.

Payne, who’s 5 foot 7, showed up in court last week wearing a white t-shirt, handcuffs, and blue jeans.

He sought to defend his innocence in the face of six new charges: Patronizing a prostitute, conspiracy to commit third-degree larceny, two counts of forgery in the third degree, and two counts of conspiracy to commit forgery.

Two Costly Checks

The charges stemmed from an investigation in early June, when police were called to the Bank of Southern Connecticut to investigate a check fraud. Here’s what happened, according to his arrest warrant affidavit:

A woman tried to cash two counterfeit checks. Subsequently, all banks were issued a fraud alert. When police finished their investigation at the bank, they entered a copy of the check and DVD footage of the woman cashing the check.

Police were then able to locate the woman and interview her. She told police she received the two checks from man named A.P. His first name was Arnold.

She said she met him at the Tee Cafe in Fair Haven.

Arnold asked her if she would have sex with him in exchange for two checks. She agreed.

They went back to her place where the final exchange took place. Arnold told her not to cash the checks until June 9. She had to wait for his lawyer to verify the checks, Arnold said.

The women cashed the first check at the Bank of Southern Connecticut. When she went to cash the second one, the teller said it was a fraudulent. Both checks were marked with the name of a Moss and Cirillo, a law firm. The woman said she was not in anyway associated with the firm and she saw Arnold sign the two checks.

She identified Arnold Payne as “Arnold” from a photo board police showed her.

The police also interviewed Frank Cirillo, one of the partners at the law firm. He explained that he had not seen Arnold Payne in eight months. Payne had been a client of his. Payne was not authorized to issue checks on the firm’s behalf, Cirillo told police.

After interviewing Cirillo, police obtained a search warrant and arrested Payne.

Prison Time Doubles

When Damiani questioned Payne about the allegations in court last Thursday, Payne denied them. He said he did not know the prostitute nor would he have used one. He has children. He called himself a “family man.”

Payne claimed he did not know who forged the two checks.

“I didn’t pay a prostitute,” he insisted.

Damiani told Payne the name of a woman who tried to cash the forged checks. (The Independent is withholding her name to protect her privacy.) Damiani asked if Payne knows her.

Payne said he does not.

Before Payne entered a plea, Damiani asked, “Is there anything else?”

Damiani shuffled through Payne’s file. He looked back at Payne.

“Even I know about the Tee Cafe,” said the judge.

Alluding to Payne’s lengthy criminal history, Damiani said, “You have been in court more than I have.”

Smirks were once again exchanged in the back of the courtroom.

When Payne was finally asked how he would plead, there was a moment of silence. Payne shifted his weight from one leg to the other.

Payne’s attorney, Gerald Harmon, broke the silence. Payne will plead guilty under the Alford doctrine, he told Damiani. That means Payne has not agreed to the events as the state alleged but concedes he faces enough evidence to be convicted.

Damiani sentenced Payne to four years in prison related to his eight guilty pleas.

The checks proved costly, Harmon said: Because of the run-in with the prostitute, Payne’s prison sentence doubled from two to four years.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: LOL | August 26, 2009 8:41 AM

I know Arnold Payne, he comes from a huge family from the Dixwell neighborhood, you never messed with those folks.

Do you think that the DeStefano/Voigt might recruit him to run for Alderman?

Posted by: JackNH | August 26, 2009 11:35 AM

What is it that the judge knows about the Tee Cafe? Never been there, but I live nearby. Is it a hang-out for prostitutes? If so, why has it still got its liquor license? Geez!

Posted by: robn | August 26, 2009 6:32 PM

Gee...thats kind of "stiff" penalty.

Posted by: streever | August 26, 2009 11:37 PM

JackNH:they probably prosecute a lot of cases that involve it!

Posted by: nfjanette [TypeKey Profile Page] | August 27, 2009 11:01 AM

Cost of those forged checks to Connecticut tax payers: four years of prison at $26K+ (2001 calculation - must be significantly higher now) a year. Not clear to me that sentence makes dollars and sense.

Posted by: James | August 27, 2009 1:26 PM

NFJANETTE

Let him off because it's more costly to punish him? Or just a cheaper punishment? If you want punishment that makes financial sense, a 9mm bullet costs around $0.30 and I'm sure there's a shovel around somewhere to dig a shallow grave. Would that work? I mean, from a dollars-and-cents perspective...

Posted by: anon | August 27, 2009 1:32 PM

I agree with NFJanette.

Posted by: James | August 27, 2009 3:30 PM

What, ANON? You agree that the justice and penal system is expensive? Well done. You wind the Captain Obvious award for the day. So what's your point? Somebody who is either dumb or arrogant enough to commit crimes while waiting to go to jail knowing full well that getting caught will result in extra jail time is, well, I forgot where I was going with this. So in closing;

A) He paid a whore with a check? A postdated check? LOL
B) The whore TOOK a check? ROFLCOPTER.

Maybe, ANON, it's the system that failed him. If only he had the same eduction and opportunities as others. If only he had been in class that day when they taught the lesson on not paying hookers with bad checks while awaiting prison time.

Posted by: Nick George | August 30, 2009 8:33 PM

I would just like to say that it seems as though the Independent has a new rising star in this reporter. I've read several articles now and found myself snickering quite loudly much to the dismay of the other patients in my ward; and it wasn't until just recently that I noticed that all of these articles seem to be coming from this this one young reporter! I think it's her appreciation for a sort of "subtle nuance" that makes me die with laughter. (Is that what a ROFLCOPTER is?)

In any case, I hope to see many more articles from this starlet, and maybe when my hearing comes up in a year or two she will write about me!

P.S. ROBN--Tsk-tsk.


Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35