Police OK Labor Contract
by Melissa Bailey | October 1, 2009 8:40 AM | Permalink | Comments (13)
New Haven’s longstanding police union president declared victory Wednesday not just for a labor contract, but for his union’s unity.
Sgt. Louis Cavaliere said he was “surprised” by an overwhelming vote Wednesday to approve a new, three-year contract for New Haven police.
The union rank and file voted 276 to 45 in favor of the contract.
“Forty-five no’s — that’s nothing,” said Cavaliere, president of AFSCME Local 530. “From a lot of the negative that we’ve been hearing, this was an overwhelming show of confidence for this executive board.”
The vote came after a drawn-out negotiation process that at times seemed destined for binding arbitration. The last contract expired on June 30, 2008. A tentative accord was finally reached last week. It was passed on to the rank and file with the union executive board recommending approval.
The contract calls for: two 3 percent raises over three years; a new health plan and a hybrid pension plan for new hires; a “bad boy” clause for on-the-job corruption; a new evening motorcycle shift; reductions in clothing allowance and longevity pay; and a slight decrease in overtime pay. Cops with fewer than 20 years on the force who are injured on the job will now be guaranteed medical benefits until they are 70 years old.
Older members benefit under the deal because it boosts the retirement age from 65 to 67, which would give cops a couple more years to accrue pension benefits. Younger members are losing a program that would let them retire after 15 years by cashing in sick time for a 20-year pension. That program affects over 60 percent of the force, according to the union.
Cavaliere said he expected the vote to be much closer.
In the days leading up to the contract, a division emerged between senior members of the force and some younger officers, who felt they were giving up too much.
The apparent division between young and old was the buzz around the police department as cops changed shifts from 3 to 4 p.m.
“I can tell you this — a lot of the younger cops will be voting no,” said one officer with 10 years on the force. A rookie next to him agreed. They said they didn’t want to give up the option of retiring after 15 years. Under the new contract, they’ll have to work for 20 years before cashing in sick time for pension benefits.
A few blocks away, 51-year-old Officer Domingo Paul (pictured) was keeping an eye on traffic outside the fast-rising 360 State project. He has 18 years on the force. He said he supports the contract — even though it means he won’t qualify for a pension for another two years.
“The young guys are against it — I don’t know why,” said Paul. “What company in the world has a 15-year retirement?”
He said the rookies who opposed the plan didn’t know anything about labor contracts. If the union rank and file voted no, the contract would have been sent to binding arbitration — where, Paul argued, “we could lose it all.”
An arbitrator, taking into account the city’s recession-era poverty, would likely weigh in the city’s favor on costly benefits such as pensions, supporters of the contract argued.
As it stands, cops get a pension that’s equal to the average of their four highest-paid years on the job — including overtime pay and extra-duty work. That benefit is also included in the new contract.
“But you go to arbitration, they could kill that,” Paul said.
The city was also pushing for police to move toward a 401(k) instead of a defined-benefit pension fund. The city’s current police and fire pension is under-funded by about 50 percent, due in part to a stock market crash. That leaves the city on the hook with a large liability. Under the new contract, new hires will have a hybrid pension — part 401 (k), part traditional pension fund — but current cops will retain their defined-benefit pension plan.
“I wouldn’t take a chance” with binding arbitration, Paul said. “I’d rather take what we’ve got now.”
Several other cops interviewed agreed with him.
One said he wasn’t happy with it, but he felt the contract is his only choice and he feared what would be lost in arbitration. “Our hands our tied,” he said.
Over the course of the day, officers cast their ballots at a makeshift voting station in a gymnasium on the second floor of the police department. There, retired Sgt. Arthur Granucci (pictured) and Sgt. Ricky Rodriguez oversaw the voting process. Cops circled “accept” or “reject” on a piece of paper and slipped it into a ballot box (pictured at the top of this story).
Voter turnout was 77 percent, according to the union.
When the votes were tallied at 7:30 p.m., the young voices of dissent were far outnumbered.
“This really hushed them,” said Cavaliere. “We had the support.”
Cops favored the contract by a margin of 6 to 1.
Cavaliere walked away with a conclusion: “The vote does not reflect the old against the new,” or the “young against the old.” He said it reflected a desire for “unity” instead of divisiveness.
The three-year contract will be retroactive to July 1, 2008.
Mayor John DeStefano said last week he expects this contract to set a standard for an upcoming round of other AFSCME contracts, in terms of concessions to health care and pensions. He sent a press statement applauding the pact.
“It isn’t easy to achieve an agreement in such a difficult economy” he said, “but we’re comfortable with what we were able to accomplish by working together.”
The union contract now moves to the Board of Aldermen for approval.
Share this story
Comments
Posted by: jjlowe332 | October 1, 2009 9:42 AM
Oh this is great. Good job give more and get less. Well I hope we can get more back from the fire department who gets a raise for the next two years and still has the top healthcare (Century preferred). We can save on money if the Fire deparment stops driving the trucks to the stores to shop for groceries and go to an intoxicated person call. I laugh when I see the firefighter washing their personal cars on City time. The fire department needs to stop getting high pay (they only let things burn then water it out) and next contract give back like all the other unions and come back to the same benefits the teachers and public works have now. Mr. Mayor was your father a cop or a fire fighter because the police gave up something the past three contracts. Can't wait to see what happens in two years!
I want to thank the police for the low numbers on crime and the long hours they put on the streets away from their family. I think its sad that you spend so much time fighting someone every shift and not have the luxury only responding to a call (fire) every so often.
This contract will bring in less qualified persons to do your work. Its sad some already got through the process but now the more qualified wont apply. Its easier to qualify to be a firefighter not having an extensive backround check (and they get better contracts). Like they say if you can't be a cop be a fire fighter or work for public works. Bad deal bad contract. Maybe the cops should have the Fire fighters Union!!! They will get paid to shut one police station down a night and get good benefits. PLEASE!!!!!! Good luck in the long run officers you got bagged.
Posted by: louis | October 1, 2009 1:22 PM
ATTENTION JJLOWE332: Sounds like sour grapes. Just because you got screwed, don't take it out on our brother and sister public safety professionals (and brother and sister union members) on the NHFD, who come to our (PD) aid when we are injured, rescue us when we are trapped in our wrecked cars, ect. Lets not race each other to the bottom, pay and benefits-wise. When we are at each other's throats, that only benefits the administration.
Posted by: Disgruntled | October 1, 2009 4:24 PM
�This really hushed them,� said Cavaliere. �We had the support.�
Sgt. Cavaliere, are you kidding? Making comments like this clearly shows your intentions with this contract. You and and Union Board used the scare tactics of going to arbitration to sell this contract. You had only one thing in mind which was to look out for your own. As a Union and Union President your job is to represent the entire Union body. You failed in doing that and you are publicly stating that you support all the cops with time on the job and you sold the new cops down the river. You failed with this contact and opened to door for even more concessions down the road.
Why are there so many individual stipulations within this contract? Increasing the retirement age does NOT benefit the majority of the Union body? Who cares about the motorcycles?! Of course your son does. This contract is a disgrace and you and your buddies sold it just like you promised the mayor.
Thanks for nothing. You will not be reelected as Union President the next time around. You might as well put in your papers now since you preserved your benefits.
Posted by: tom | October 1, 2009 4:42 PM
WoW, if your not happy as a cop leave the job. see if you can get a better deal/contract at another police department, or in the civil field,
Posted by: jjlowe332 | October 1, 2009 4:44 PM
Hey Loius I'm not your brother I'm not in the profession of public safety. You firefighters cry enough about being pulled over or who is in charge of a scene so you can ruin yourselves. Trust me I rather have a true medical professional help me before a firefighter. Firefighters only control a fire and let a building burn before getting control of a fire anyway. Go fight the supreme court for a promotion will you.
I only have a problem with everyone else giving something back and we got layed off and you firefighters gave nothing except kiss up to the Mayor when he was running for Governor. You dont protect the streets just sit on your chairs in front of the firehouse because your bored!!! My taxes are high and you need to GIVE BACK!!
Posted by: kamb | October 1, 2009 8:42 PM
You're all (insert explicative here that starts with F)"F#$@! in the head."
The contract is absolutely fair, and way better than any other P.D. in the state. Yes, New Haven is an absolute dangerous disaster of a city run by an incompetant mayor, and the P.D. should have one of the best contracts, so things are not that bad considering the city is a financial mess.
It's a good contract. The onyl thing you should be worried about is, is that the city starts becoming more strong economically, by real businesses coming to the Elm City and someone defeating King John who has a real plan, and idea of how the city should progress through the years.
Posted by: SGT KNICK | October 1, 2009 8:54 PM
Excuse me for using this sight. We all have differences on what we want and don't want in our contract. We can settle this in a different forum. I do not believe blogging and backstabbing is a suitable meens to reach a common goal. Everyone has their own goals and personal expectations in a binding contract. Do we really need to air our own agendas in a public forum so the public thinks we are a divided group not willing to work with one another, the community, or the FD? Which of course we all know is not true. I don't have the answer, but I know attacking each other on a public forum is not the one. Thank You. Knick
Posted by: Morris Cove | October 1, 2009 9:11 PM
JJlowe
Okay already, we know your mad but don't take it out on the Fireman because they got a better deal, the times were better ( fiscally speaking ), when they went through contract talks. There is no need to belittle what they do or travilize the good work they do, I'm friends and neighbors to cops and fireman, and you guys are great, so don't get into an us against them, it's counter productive and serves nobody.
As far as Lou Cavilere goes, yeah he took care of Jr., on the motorcycles but come on he protected the pension and kept the medical the same, and in the end if you can protect those two things your way ahead of the game, trust me look at the private sector. If Lou says that was the best deal he could get, trust him, he's an honorable man, I've known him for 18 years.
Posted by: Happytohaveajob | October 1, 2009 9:39 PM
Wow disgruntled, I think the union membership recognized what was important and it was to preserve what they can. If the city is in poor shape come the next contract, more concessions might have to be negotiated anyway. Why do all the newbies think they know it all? I remember when I was a know-it-all rookie and, once I sat back, shut my mouth, and listened, I actually learned a few things. Lou could have retired a LONG time ago and stays here because of his belief in unions. How dare you insinuate he is here for his sons, particularly his one on the motorcycles, another hard-working union rep. Easy to hide on a blog. You should have the balls to approach him and say the same thing to him. The people who have been here know the value of Lou. When he is gone someday, you'll realize it too. Let's see how well you negotiate for the union. Very easy to complain...very difficult to get involved. "Disgruntled" says it all. You should think about leaving and, once you see what other departments have, or more importantly, don't have, you'll come running back so fast you'll leave skid marks. Just ask they guys who left and came back. Peace
Posted by: young VS old | October 2, 2009 12:02 AM
time to move one.. I was opposed to this contract. I believed that as a whole people had difficulty understanding what they were voting for. Questions about the contract were not answered completely either by mistake or by willingful choice. The vote has been counted and the results are final. We need as a union to take a moment and realize that continuing to fight will only make our possition weaker. Understand what occured durring this negotiation and remeber what has both upset you and pleased you. Put these issues in the back of your mind and make a change if needed when the next election arises, but until that time, we need to suck it up, take the pro's we did recieve and remeber the cons that we gave. Remeber we as a union have the ability to vote differently when the next election comes. Until that time, we need to realize for or against this issue, we all deal with the streets together...I got your 6 if you got mine
Posted by: kamb | October 2, 2009 7:14 AM
sgt knick,
the definition of blog is to voice your ideas and opinions. thats exactly what this forum is for!
what forum do you suggest? .. . we meet at chucky cheese and dedcide our differences over a game of air 'whacka a mole?!'
Posted by: Unreal | October 2, 2009 12:08 PM
Jjlowe332,
I have 2 solutions for your whining,
1- If the job of new haven firefighter is so appealing and luxurious take the next test.
2- If you don't like your taxes, move!!!
Until then go to your cushy desk job and let the brave men and women of the NHPD and NHFD protect you and your family.
Posted by: Sgt Knick | October 4, 2009 9:22 PM
KAMB, did you actually read what i wrote? The people who decide on this contract, our union, should not be discussing "our contract" outside of "our membership" by backstabbing each other in a public forum. You can blog all you want, but i find it disheartening to our 450 plus members that they are airing assaults at each other in the view of everyone, there are alternatives. If u r a concerned citizen, i encourage u to voice ur opinion. if u r Local 530 and hiding behind ur pseudonym, then go whack ur mole.
Special Sections
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- CT Business Litig
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- Reddit NH
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- St. Louis Beacon
- Tom Ficklin
- VT Digger
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- ALSO-Cornerstone
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- All Our Kin
- Alliance Theatre
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Bar Assn.
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bikur Cholim
- Bioregional Group
- Birthright
- BlackinCT
- Boys & Girls Club
- CCA
- CCNE
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City Point
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- DESK
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Elm Shakespeare
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- Fellowship Place
- Food Bank
- Friends of East Rock Park
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Halsey Associates
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- NH Land Trust
- NH Museum
- NH Safe Streets
- NH Scholarship Fund
- NH Youth Soccer
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- Neighborhood Music School
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- PAR Newsletter
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- ROOF
- Rail Trains Ecology
- Register Calendar
- Rotary
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Sister Cities
- Social Media Club
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- South Central Behavioral Health Network
- Squash Haven
- Temple Emanuel
- United Way
- Upper State Street Association
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Visiting Nurse Association of South Central Connecticut
- W'ville Synagogue
- W. Square Blockwatch
- WalkBIkeCT
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva of NH
- Youth Continuum
Flyerboard
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35