Hospital Area Traffic Improvements Will Take Extra Year

by Melinda Tuhus | November 16, 2009 7:19 AM | | Comments (3)

doug%20at%20map.JPGIt will take more than a year before pedestrian improvements linked to the completion of the city’s new cancer hospital will be in place. That was not what safety advocates had been hoping to hear.

That message was delivered at a meeting Friday about pedestrian safety.

About 20 people — including Yale-New Haven Hospital administrators, Yale security officials, traffic engineers, the city’s director of transportation, and medical students from the Transportation Safety Group — gathered in a medical area conference room. They listened as YNHH Vice President Steve Merz summed up the safety enhancements already in place on the streets around the Smilow Cancer Hospital.

steve%20m%20with%20hands.JPGThe improvements include a traffic signal for vehicles coming off Route 34 onto North Frontage Road; a new truck loading dock and a roundabout creating a new exit from the Air Rights garage; road signs to direct traffic onto the Route 34 connector to I-91 and I-95; more visible crosswalks; and curb extensions lessening the distance across three College Street intersections.

In another couple of weeks, said Merz (pictured), electronic signs will be installed on North Frontage off York Street and on South Frontage near Park Street to warn motorists that they are approaching busy pedestrian crossings.

City transportation chief Mike Piscitelli said the state Traffic Commission has approved installing eight of 12 new signals around the medical area, from Orchard Street to College Street — which were part of the development agreement between the city and YNHH, and have been jointly funded up to $3.5 million. The last four signals should be approved next week.

“Then we can advertise the job and get it out for construction,” Piscitelli reported. “Construction’s about a year, and we need about two to three months to advertise it and get the contract documents in order.

But Piscitelli added, “There’s a limit to what technology can do. We’re seeing a very frustrating behavioral thing with drivers right now, because they know there are pedestrians there, and they’re still plowing into the space.”

Several people at the meeting said they appreciate the efforts of the hospital, which Merz said cost almost $10 million). They also said pedestrian safety has not improved.

karen%20muth%20writing.JPGKaren Muth (pictured), who works at the Yale Child Study Center on South Frontage, said, “I still see trucks on the [old] loading dock.” That was where trucks were forced to back up onto South Frontage Road at York Street. A truck backing up there was part of the scenario that led to the tragic death of fourth-year medical student Mila Rainoff last year, which was the impetus for the formation of the medical area traffic safety group. Click here and here for stories on that.

Merz said the cancer hospital’s new underground loading dock, when fully implemented, will mean that trucks use the old one only for late-night deliveries.

Nancy Angoff, associate dean of student affairs at Yale Medical School, said, “I’m concerned that I’m hearing there won’t be any tangible improvements in pedestrian safety for another year.” She said she fears one of the “improvements” — the signs directing vehicles onto the interstates via Route 34 — encourage motorists to speed up on Frontage Road, “because they see they are almost there” to the highway.

Doug Hausladen (in photo at top of story), vice-chair of the Downtown-Wooster Square Community Management Team, asked for clarification of the timing between opening the cancer hospital and finishing the traffic improvements.

Merz said the original plan was to finish both at the same time. But when the traffic engineers the hospital hired got into the project they discovered it was much more complicated, necessitating more time and money.

“At that point [October 2007], the signal construction was delinked with the opening of the Smilow Cancer Hospital,” Merz said. “There’ve been statements that the Smilow opened inappropriately because the signals should have been upgraded,” but he said only a few dozen patients are being seen there now, and there won’t be a big increase in occupancy until early 2010 — still, many months before the signals are upgraded.

IMG_4016.JPGFourth-year medical student Natalie Spicyn (pictured), a new co-chair of the transportation safety group, said she was surprised to hear that the delinking happened that long ago. “Everything I heard from my predecessors who ran this group after Mila’s death, [indicated] that linking was still there,” she said. “What was done on your end to push the timeline?”

Joe Balskus, with Tighe & Bond engineers, responded, “We have bugged the STC [State Traffic Commission] to no end on review of this project.”

“This is a long-term work in progress,” Piscitelli said. “The city is very pleased with the effort the hospital’s made.” He said it fits into a bigger proposal to redesign the whole Route 34 corridor.

Regarding proposals at the meeting to lengthen the timing of existing walk lights, change the surface of intersections, or install immediate pedestrian signage, he said, “Let us think about it.”

After the meeting, Spicyn said, “I think the problem is just so big that these changes are good but insufficient. They’re better than good, but necessary pre-requisites to do more to change the way people feel when they’re crossing the street. When I’m crossing the street I don’t feel safe.”

Reached by phone after the meeting, Piscitelli summed it up this way. “I believe our commitment at the meeting was that we would take the extra time and sit down and see what additional work makes sense that’s complementary to the fuller signal projects. I’m not sure offhand what might work, but there may be a solution to kind of tide us over for a year.” He said whether the city needs approval from the state traffic commission for any of that work depends on which improvements might be pursued.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: streever | November 16, 2009 8:36 AM

electronic signs, curb extensions, loading dock: sounds good.

The only thing we're missing is some traffic signals? Out of a list of 5 things we have 4 in place or about to be in place? That sounds pretty good to me.

Like anyone I wish that it was all done--believe me--and I'm positive that Piscitelli, Smilow, and the City also wish it was all done. Realistically, these types of delays happen. Hopefully it will be completed on the new timetable.

Posted by: anon | November 16, 2009 9:36 AM

Tiding over for another year is unacceptable. The community in the area requested signals to be immediately installed in 2006 and before, and several injuries and deaths have been reported in the area since (not to mention the fact that people can not cross the street or walk from their homes in the Hill to Downtown).

The city's efforts are appreciated and significant additional work beyond the signals themselves is needed to solve the problems here. However, following final state approvals this week, there will be no remaining reasons not to begin immediate construction. The bid processes and construction must be accelerated.

In other places, when a serious safety emergency is reported, bids are obtained within 24 hours and construction begins immediately, even if contractors must be called in at 3AM on a Sunday morning. City staff work around the clock if necessary.

Dozens of advocates have given up countless hours of their time -- away from their families and medical research -- working on this issue 24/7 in order to prevent more deaths from occurring here, and trying to remedy the current situation which cuts the city in two. There is no reason to expect anything less from the city officials and staff who will now have a green light from the state to begin construction.

If the city wanted to avoid this situation, they would have pushed harder for more rapid state approvals, particularly for the signals along College Street at the Frontage Roads. I did not see the Mayor camping out on the front door of ConnDOT.

Posted by: Norton Street | November 16, 2009 2:32 PM

Here's how we do it:
http://www.infrastructurist.com/wp-content/uploads/screenhunter_04-aug-04-1720.gif

http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs066.snc3/13354_1173486012413_1085910074_30446290_8182360_n.jpg

http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs066.snc3/13354_1173486052414_1085910074_30446291_4719976_n.jpg

http://www.cityofnewhaven.com/uploads/rt34-ariel.bmp

Here's how the French did it:
http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs066.snc3/13354_1173487012438_1085910074_30446293_2657993_n.jpg

http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs046.snc3/13354_1173487052439_1085910074_30446294_6895430_n.jpg

http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs066.snc3/13354_1173493612603_1085910074_30446321_5717203_n.jpg

http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs046.snc3/13354_1173487092440_1085910074_30446295_1210332_n.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Blv-haussmann-lafayette.jpg

To be fair, the Paris urban renewal occurred 100 years prior to America's urban renewal, so design was not focused around the car. Its easy to look back now and see why designing around automobiles was a poor decision, but to not be aware that investing massive amounts of money and resources into constructing road systems, and living arrangements in ways that would cost more and more money and resources to renew and maintain is just plain idiotic.
Paris was able to pay for the demolition and construction with the increased value of property along the boulevards. Not only did the new boulevards open up the city, they created desirable places for retail, offices, shopping, pedestrians, housing and life in general to occur. Paris had been a medieval city living in the dark ages, but the boulevards allowed Paris to propel itself into the 20th century with a city to be proud of.
The exact opposite occurred during America's urban renewal. The value of properties close to highways plummeted. The areas around the roadways were immensely undesirable to be around (and still are today). Its not good enough to just have route 34 be inhabitable and safe, it has to be desirable. People shouldn't look at it merely as a place they have to be in order to get to work, or to get from downtown to the Hill, it should be a place people try to get to just to be in. Paris' boulevards are destinations where people flock, which happens to make them safe as well.

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35