East Rocker Query: Why The Teardowns?

by Melinda Tuhus | December 22, 2009 10:20 AM | | Comments (9)

coeee.JPGMichael Coe had a question: Why must Yale bulldoze existing buildings “in order to build a glass box”?

Coe (pictured), a Yale anthropologist, asked that question directly to Yale officials Monday night.

He was referring to Yale’s planned new School of Management complex on Whitney Avenue across from the Peabody Museum. The retired Yale professor said he’d rather see creative re-use of existing architectural gems than demolition that makes way for construction of brand new buildings..

That was just one objection raised in the hour-plus meeting convened by the East Rock Management Team at East Rock Global Magnet School. Some 25 neighbors showed up. The main topic: The $145 million SOM campus, which won approval from the City Plan Commission last week. It next comes before the Board of Aldermen for final approval. (Click here for more on that.)

Coe said he lives on nearby St. Ronan Street. He used to work at 175 Whitney, a former Yale information tech center that’s now one of two adjacent buildings slated for demolition to make way for the “glass box” of the new SOM facility.

“I think when Yale looks to do something new, or expand something, they really could save what is there architecturally, which they often don’t do,” Coe said.

“And why is it that Oxford and Cambridge, for instance, our English counterparts, maintain themselves as two of the greatest universities in the entire world, and yet don’t tear down all their old architecture? If there’s an adaptive reuse, they figure out how to do it. But Yale goes ahead and bulldozes it, and then waits for the money to come in to build a glass box. I think this is a mistake.”

laura%20cruickshank.JPGLaura Cruickshank (pictured), Yale’s director of university planning, construction and renovation facilities, explained the university’s thinking to the crowd.

She said the large structure — four stories high at some points, with underground parking — will be glass-walled in order to present a more inviting facade to passing pedestrians and motorists. It will have an inner courtyard and round “teaching pods” (“also known as classrooms,” quipped Yale Associate Vice-President Michael Morand) specifically designed to encourage interactions among students and professors.

Cruickshank said the greenspace surrounding the building will expand from 25 percent to 40 percent. The new building will assume the function of the dozen or so buildings — mostly converted large homes — a few blocks west of the site that now comprise SOM.

After Cruickshank’s presentation, about a dozen residents challenged various aspects of the project, mostly because of its size but also its design. Neighbor and Yale political scientist David Cameron said he got a degree from Dartmouth’s business school, which didn’t have a courtyard, and he didn’t suffer for it. “It’s wasted space,” he opined.

Cruickshank said Yale, being an urban institution, needs a courtyard, while perhaps Dartmouth, situated in rural Hanover, N.H., doesn’t. She said Yale’s team of planners had discussed all possible options “40 ways to Sunday” and had determined that the best plan was to demolish the existing buildings on the site and start from scratch.

She reminded the audience that “as of right” Yale could build on this property, which it already owns. It legally could have pursued a design as out-of-scale as the Kline Biology Tower, but didn’t consider that for the new SOM campus.







Share this story

Share |

Comments

Posted by: anon | December 22, 2009 11:48 AM

Could Yale really have pursued a Kline Biology Tower here? Is that an accurate statement given zoning restrictions?

Posted by: streever | December 22, 2009 11:51 AM

I'm sure this line will be fixed, but this was so hilarious I had to save it for posterity--it's a perfect example of lolspeak:

"Why must Yale has to bulldoze"

Posted by: sjbj | December 22, 2009 12:00 PM

"She reminded the audience that “as of right” Yale could build on this property, which it already owns. It legally could have pursued a design as out-of-scale as the Kline Biology Tower, but didn’t consider that for the new SOM campus."
Now isn't that a nice, community-sensitive comment? And people wonder why the community hates Yale...

Posted by: robn | December 22, 2009 12:41 PM

hmmm.

Correcty me if I'm wrong but don't Columbia University as well as Harvard University function in fairly urban environments without locked courtyards?

Posted by: Q | December 22, 2009 4:58 PM

SJBJ, I agree it's a pretty amusing statement. "We could just put up a huge tower if we don't get our way, so don't you forget that!"
They could also just put SOM over in the parking lot further down on whitney, but they simply HAVE to have it in this spot.

Posted by: Elmer | December 22, 2009 5:10 PM

I like the idea of taking the space of SOM's private courtyard and converting it to an outdoor park - a transition from Bradley Street and Whitney Avenue along the side and rear of the site. Still call it the "SOM Courtyard" by name, and let the park be Yale's memorial to it's attempt to integrate its needs along with its neighbors. I'd have lunch there!

Posted by: concernedneighbor | December 23, 2009 5:04 PM

Does anyone know the best way to find out about future meetings on this building? I'm a neighbor and would have liked to have expressed my discontent with the design. I hope the board of aldermen rejects it. It's ugly and even if you dont think so, it clearly does not fit the landscape. I agree with Mr Coe - remodel the existing buildings or at least rebuild with something that complements the surrounding buildings. This is a mostly residential area with beautiful 100-150 yr old homes. It honestly blows my mind that Yale likes this design.

Posted by: Ned | December 23, 2009 10:46 PM

When the time comes, for the proposed building to be torn down, I can't imagine that anyone will come to its defense. Also, the bugbear of planning, in New Haven, i.e., excessive, expensive parking requirements, have an adverse effect on the design of any development in the city - e.g. , the underground garage of the proposed SOM building and 360 State.

Posted by: ANstress Farwell, New Haven Urban Design League | December 24, 2009 2:46 PM

Concernedneighbor:

You, and anyone else needing more information about this project, are welcome to contact us. We are working with other concerned neighbors and organizations to foster plans that would protect the integrity of the neighborhood and the Whitney Avenue corridor.

Anstress Farwell
203 624 0175
urbandesignleague@att.net

Sections

Neighborhood News

Special Sections

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links


Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

NHI Store

Buy New Haven Independent Stuff

News Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35