Sections
Neighborhoods
Features
Follow Us
NHI Newsletter
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- barista
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- CT Business Litig
- CT Capitol Report
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- CT Watchdog
- CTV
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Hartford Guardian
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC Connecticut
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- NH Youth Map
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Reddit NH
- Road To Greenness
- Saved By Design
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- Specials In NH
- St. Louis Beacon
- Taste Of NH
- Tom Ficklin
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- VT Digger
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- YourCT
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Agency on Aging
- Animal Shelter Volunteers
- Arte Inc.
- Arts Council
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bike New Haven
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- Creative Arts Workshop
- CT BAEO
- CT Tech Council
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Elm City Cycling
- Elmseed
- Empower NH
- Friends Of Wooster Sq.
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Info New Haven
- IRIS
- Jazz Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- Labor History
- LEAP
- Legal Aid Network
- Literacy Coalition
- Magrisso Forte
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Chorale
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- NH Bulletin
- NH Land Trust
- NH Symphony
- NH/Leon Sister City
- NHS
- Orchestra NE
- PAR
- Parents Available to Help
- Pat Dillon
- Peace News
- PechaKucha
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Promoting Enduring Peace
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Rainbow Girls
- Register Calendar
- REX
- ROOF
- SAMA
- SCSU Events
- Share Our Voices
- Shubert
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- Squash Haven
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Ward 25 Blog
- Ward 26 Blog
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Westville Synagogue
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva Of NH
- Youth Continuum
City Quietly Initiated Foreclosure On 99 Homes
by Leonard J. Honeyman | Apr 27, 2010 2:28 pm
(8) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author
Posted to: City Hall, Housing
A year late, aldermen received a list of homes the city has foreclosed on—and discovered the names of 99 homeowners they didn’t get a chance to help first.
City officials gave the list out Monday night at an Aldermanic Affairs Committee meeting at City Hall.
It was the sequel to an earlier meeting, on May 18, when the aldermen discovered that the tax collector’s office hasn’t been notifying them in advance when the city plans to begin foreclosure proceedings against homeowners. Aldermen had ordered the tax collector to do so last May.
As a result, the Board of Aldermen imposed a 30-day moratorium on city foreclosures on owner-occupied homes until city officials could produce more information. The rule is intended to enable aldermen to inform constituents in danger of foreclosure about options to help them hold onto their homes.
Tax Collector Maurine Villani (at left in photo) appeared before aldermen again on Monday night with other budget officials—and with more info.
Along with the list of 99 houses in the foreclosure process, aldermen also received a list of a dozen properties that had gone through the process and been sold since the May 2009 prior notification order. One of the properties, on Dixwell Avenue, was sold even though the owner had filed for bankruptcy protection, said Wooster Square Alderman Michael Smart, the panel’s chairman.
In a tense two-hour meeting, Villani, Corporation Counsel Victor Bolden, Controller Mark Pietrosimone (at center in photo above, with Alderman Darnell Goldson at far right) and Kathleen Foster, an assistant corporation counsel, answered questions about tax collection and foreclosure practices.
“The [tax] collection rate is the highest we have had,” Pietrosimone said, citing a 98 percent collection rate for the city’s approximately 27,000 taxable properties. He said foreclosure is one way of persuading recalcitrant taxpayers to pay up.
“It works as far as collecting taxes is concerned,” he said.
The system has a built-in delay and does not immediately seek foreclosure orders against tardy taxpayers, he said. Several letters are sent, with the first notice sent around the first of October for taxes due the end of July. It takes more than a year for the process to reach foreclosure, with legal collection activity only starting five or six months after the taxes become overdue.
If taxpayers contact the tax collector’s office, they can set up a payment plan or apply for relief. There are more than 350 taxpayers now in payment plans, Villani said.
Newhallville Alderman Charles Blango, committee vice chairman, wanted to know how the tax collecting apparatus is getting the message out to taxpayers that they might be eligible for some kind of relief, either with abatements or tax freezes for certain taxpayers over 70 years old. Abatements eventually have to be paid back, while freezes do not, legislative staff told the panel.
Villani told the committee about a flyer that is supposed to be included with tax bills. The flyer, put out by the mayor’s office, explains the various programs, such as ROOF (Real Options Overcoming Foreclosures) as well programs for the blind, disabled, veterans and active duty military personnel. It also talks about payment plans.
Of the dozen aldermen seated around the table, none had ever gotten the flyer with their bill. Others around the room also said they never got one.
“This is a major issue,” said Newhallville Alderwoman Katrina Jones.
West Hills-West Rock Alderman Darnell Goldson, who is not on the committee but who attended the meeting, requested that lists of overdue taxes be given to aldermen soon after the August and February grace periods end.
He then dug into the list of foreclosures, asking why properties appraised for as much as $800,000 sold for $67,000.
The city only bids the amount it is owed and sometimes, as with the Dixwell property where the bankruptcy had been filed, the city gets the property, Villani said.
After Villani and Pietrosimone had left, Bolden called it problematic that the aldermen had the right to demand the 30-day freeze. “The Board of Aldermen does not have the authority to order the tax collector not to do it,” he said. But “I am not aware of any foreclosures since it was passed,” he added..
A frustrated Smart (pictured) asked if the board “had any teeth” or was just there to be ignored.
Smart said he “hoped so” when asked after the meeting if there really was a moratorium after Bolden’s statement. We expect it to be but “there were more questions than answers today,” he said. Many of the questions about procedures and rules were asked of the city officials and answers were promised.
Smart said there was little time to waste to keep people in their homes.
“We need to get with these folks and identify if they are elderly or qualify for tax abatement. We could get them in and try to figure out where in the bankruptcy process they were,” he said.
“The whole intent of the order was to make sure that none [no foreclosures] were approved,” he said. He said he was confident that the committee members would be notified 30 days before foreclosure actions commenced.
“We need to go through the list and find out where they are. Some of the committee members want to see taxpayers get a refund because policies were not followed. The order that said that the alderperson be notified before any foreclosure wasn’t followed” he said.
“I think you have a lot of alderpeople who are really concerned about their constituents. They know people are hurting. They [the aldermen] want to make sure they have teeth,” he said, alluding to his earlier statement about the board having teeth.
Post a Comment
Comments
posted by: streever on April 27, 2010 3:46pm
I don’t agree with much of Smart, but think he deserves a lot of credit on this.
This is ridiculous that the city shows this little care for it’s tenants after our mayor made a fool of himself attacking banks and other groups for foreclosure.
What’s the take-away, it’s OK when we do it and bad when they do it?
posted by: Doyens on April 27, 2010 3:59pm
If this proposed budget with 15 and 20% tax increases is approved, you will have a lot of work to do because a lot of people cannot afford this - retirees who don’t meet the guideline; young people who are starting out and even older folks who have experienced financial problems in this economy. It’s going to get really ugly….The final public hearing is tomorrow. Tell the mayor no thank you to $100 million in new debt and the largest tax increase in the state.
posted by: Walt on April 27, 2010 5:20pm
HOPEFULLY THEY ARE MORE HONEST OR CONSCIENTIOUS NOW, THAN UNDER THE PREVIOUS TAX COLLECTOR WHEN THEY DRAGGED US TO COURT CLAIMING I OWED $70,000 IN TAXES ON AN ATWATER STREET PROPERTY THAT WE HAD NEVER OWNED, LIVED IN, OR PROBABLY EVEN SEEN BEFORE WE WERE SUED ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NEW HAVEN.
NOTE, NOT YELLING. CAPS KEY STUCK!!!
The Mayor eventually forced the Tax Collector et ux to drop the suit, but only after they had hassled us for several months
Watch out—-a bunch of creeps as I see it..
posted by: Threefifths on April 27, 2010 7:41pm
Again this is what happens with the two party system.Keep on voting for them and this is whatyou get.Also the people who are going to lose there homes should move into the new 43 millon dollar school,After all that is where they tax dollars went to.
posted by: Anon on April 27, 2010 8:08pm
I too think this is a big deal. For example, the city owns a house it bid $80+K for, that was assessed for $800+K, didn’t send the flyer with the tax bill describing the programs, put someone on the street who was having trouble for some reason in what is a terrible economy. It will flip that house for far more or sell it to some friend of city hall for barely more or even less?
Did I get this right?
posted by: Charlie O'Keefe on April 27, 2010 8:58pm
The message is clear. If you alder people want to keep people in there homes you’d better vote to sell off the parking meters so the city has the money to do it. For now. ..
posted by: cedarhillresident on April 27, 2010 9:57pm
Come to the meeting Tomorrow or tonight depending on when you read this.
Let the mayor know he is forcing people to leave the city. Not to mention lose there homes and all the heart ache of just having to leave a place they love because we can not afford to live here anymore. BIG DEVELOPERS SHOULD BE WORRIED. YOUR BUILDINGS WILL BE EMPTY! Rich and poor and nothing in between and no business because it cost to much to do business here…and what do you have Hartford and Waterbury.
We can not afford another tax increase!
CITY HALL 6:30 Weds April 28th tell him and our leaders in person. Last public hearing on the budget.
http://www.nhcan.org/archives/474
Side note: Laoise King, Esq. Chief of External Affairs New Haven Public Schools sent out a email and that email resulted in notes sent home with K-8 kids saying there programs will be cut to scare parents to stand by the mayors budget. that was the only way people would come out and rally. So come help us stand up against the this. And ask who paid for that lobbying
