Sections

Neighborhoods

Features

Follow Us

NHI Newsletter

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

Criteria OK’d For Grading—& Closing—Schools

by Melissa Bailey | Feb 23, 2010 9:11 am

(6) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author

Posted to: Schools, School Reform

Melissa Bailey Photo Will each school get a number grade, or a letter from A to F?

Neither, said Garth Harries. The schools’ first report cards, which are due March 15, will look more like a 3-D matrix.

Harries (pictured), matrix mastermind and school reform czar, painted the picture at Monday’s meeting of New Haven’s Board of Education.

Harries recommended, and the board unanimously approved, criteria by which the district’s 47 schools will be “graded” and placed into three tiers as part of the city’s nascent school reform drive.

Those tiers are part of a new system where schools will be managed differently according to their performance. Top-performing schools will be placed into Tier I and given more autonomy. A handful of lowest-performing schools in Tier III will be closed and reopened under new leadership, possibly as charter schools, with more flexible work rules.

Not all schools will be put into tiers right away: Schools Superintendent Reggie Mayo plans to start with a few schools this fall.

By union contract, Mayo has until March 15 to grade an initial batch of six to eight schools and place them into three tiers. Of those, one or two so-called “turnaround schools” will be closed at the end of the school year, and teachers will have to reapply if they want to continue working there.

Starting next school year, all the 47 schools in the district will be graded annually.

How will schools be graded?

Grades will rest on three factors: students’ absolute performance on standardized tests, improvement on those tests, and “school climate” factors.

The new guidelines came with the blessing of the reform committee, a group of teachers, parents and administrators who are drafting key components of the school reform effort. Teachers union vice president David Low, who sits on the committee, said the group agreed that the district is doing its best to come up with a makeshift grading system without key data.

“It’s incomplete data, so it’s not a perfect world,” Low said, “but we have to go ahead” and meet the March 15 deadline, he said.

Data is most incomplete in the “school climate” category, which aims to evaluate how engaged students are in their school. The school reform team is drafting new surveys to measure the “climate” of schools, but those surveys won’t be ready by March. So the district will use two existing measurements: average student attendance, and something called the Teacher Child Rating Scale, which is a survey teachers fill out about how their kids behave in class.

In the future, student improvement will be measured by a more sophisticated measurement based on Colorado’s “growth model,” according to Harries. For now, the school system has to use the data it has.

What will a school’s first report card look like in March?

It won’t be a simple number grade, Harries said.

It will look more like a matrix. Or a cube. Or a 3-D vectorspace with one axis jumping out at you from your computer screen.

That picture arose during a roughly hour-long discussion before the school board.

Harries presented the proposed criteria to the board. They remained largely unchanged from the ones he presented two weeks ago—.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) for a back story.

One notable change was made to reflect feedback from the school board: a “qualitative factor” section that gives the superintendent wiggle room to look at more than just numerical scores. Mayo had said he wanted that wiggle room, but he hadn’t spelled out what factors he’d be using. The draft Monday clarified that he will look at the “quality of school leadership team,” the “readiness of school team to engage in collaborative planning,” and “community and other resources available to support school-level planning efforts.”

Education watchdog Alex Johnston, a school board member, took pause at the qualitative factors. He pressed for a quantitative system that’s transparent and easy to understand. The district should take into account qualitative factors, like how ready school leadership is to take on reform, but those factors should be taken into account after schools are graded into tiers, not before, he argued.

From Harries’ description, board members weren’t sure whether all schools would be graded the first time around, or whether Mayo might just pick six to eight schools and grade only those.

Johnston urged that all schools be graded along with the initial batch of six to eight, so that the public—and school communities—can see how Mayo arrived at his decisions.

“We need an objective way to tier schools,” he said. “Otherwise, you, Dr. Mayo and your team, you kind of go back behind close doors” and emerge with a list of schools for the pilot program. “I’m not sure that’s transparent enough for people,” Johnston said.

Mayo acknowledged the need for an “objective” measurement, but said he needs added “flexibility” given the time constraints of getting the pilot program up and running.

Johnston asked Harries about another concern: The guidelines lay down the criteria for grading, but they don’t say how much each factor would count. Would student test performance make up 30 percent of a school’s grade, or 80 percent? Johnston said he was uncomfortable approving criteria without knowing how much each factor would count.

He asked Harries if each school would get a final number grade, like in New York City, where schools get a grade from A to F.

No—at least not this time, said Harries. The grading system for future years is still evolving, but Harries laid out a proposal for the initial batch of report cards due March 15.

He said the district wouldn’t use a weighted average to compute the three factors into a final composite score.

Instead, Mayo would eyeball a few lists and look for outliers, Harries said.

The schools would be ranked in two pools—K-8 schools and high schools. For each category, Mayo would come up with a ranked list. He’ll lay those three lists next to each other and look for extremes. He’ll identify schools that fit easily in one of three tiers—a couple schools that sit high on all three lists, a couple that sit right in the middle, and a few more that sit at the bottom across all three categories.

High schools would be measured across only two categories: The district doesn’t have student improvement data for high-schoolers because they don’t take the Connecticut Mastery Test.

Elementary schools would be graded on all three categories, with three levels on each.

That means schools would be graded on a three-by-three matrix, or a cube, Johnston observed. Where a school lands inside that cube determines its tier.

Harries accepted the illustration.

He did not commit to creating a giant laser cube when he presents the initial round of school grades to the board, but he did say he’d make the big “matrix” public, so anyone can see what went into grading the schools. That means each school could find out how it fared in each category.

The board approved the guidelines, with an amendment ensuring that the matrix be made available to anyone who’d like to look at it.

During discussion preceding the vote, Mayor John DeStefano jumped into a somewhat esoteric debate on whether the district needs to define a weighted average for each component of the grade, or whether it’s OK to do as Harries suggested—map them out and see where they fall.

DeStefano said he’s OK with the latter. At least for the first round of grades, a Tier I school would smell like a Tier I school, so to speak. You would “know it when you see it,” he said.

Tags:

Share this story with others.

Share |

Post a Comment

Comments

posted by: FIX THE SCHOOLS on February 23, 2010  9:45am

The concept of “Wiggle room” is potential for politics, or as my friend 3/5 says “poli-tricks”. 

Obviously qualitative factors are vital for any thorough grading system, but the use of judgemental factors here should be as transparent and standardized as possible. 

Remember that our initial goal is not to produce 500 future MIT scientists graduating from Cross or Hillhouse each year.  What we are trying to do is to produce LOTS more graduating 12th graders who can read and understand a novel, write an essay, compute, and are ready for a four year experience in college.  Given where we are starting from, CMTs and CAPTs in CT. right now are perfectly fine for assessing students’ basic skills, schools starting tiers, and early stage progress towards fixing our schools.

posted by: Threefifths on February 23, 2010  11:24am

This is why there is a lawsuit in New York and other state’s to stop this corporate take over of the school system.Look how the ventriloquist
dummy board of ed rubber stamp this.This race to the top is nothing more than No child left behind with so addtion.And then you are going to base closing the school on standardized tests. Check this out a friend sent this to me.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=520DAgjCHdc&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSTzLILQx3c&feature=related

 


Also you notice how they are telling you that if a handful of lowest-performing schools in Tier III will be closed and reopened under new leadership, possibly as charter schools, with more flexible work rules.Notice is says it may
possibly open as charter schools. You want to bet.Charter schools will not be need because all they have to do is put in more flexible work rules in the school system that they have now. Also you will have the same teachers apply who work at the closed school. By union contract they get the first shot!!! And what do you do with the charter school teachers who do not meet Connecticut Certification Requirements.

Connecticut Certification Requirements
 
To teach for a Connecticut Board of Education, an educator must hold a valid certificate appropriate for the assignment or position. The certificate must be issued by the Connecticut State Department of Education. An out-of-state certificate is NOT acceptable for holding a regular, contracted position with a Connecticut Board of Education. How many charter schhol teachers have this.

Check this out.Dr.Mayo said he wanted wiggle room, but he hadn’t spelled out what factors he’d be using. That is a code word for RUBBER ROOM!!! And here is how they are going to bring in the RUBBER ROOM.Rember what they said
if a schhool close down teachers will have to reapply if they want to continue working there. What happen’s to the teachers who are waiting to hear if they are going back to the school that closed or wait to get into a school. Rember you can’t fire them,So they will stiil get paid. so were do you put them in the meantime. You put the down town to work while they wait to be called.Bingo there is your RUBBER ROOM.


http://www.rubberroommovie.com/

 

Forget it Alex Johnston when you take the king meat you must o the king biding, ow you like you meat well done? last this is why we need a elected school board.

posted by: City Hall Watch on February 23, 2010  12:19pm

If the criteria for grading schools is solid, then every school should be graded by March 15th. It should be open, and published. This board has proposed spending $176 million in local tax money. I’d like to see how it assesses the quality of education at all these schools which will tell us once and for all, from their perspective, just how big a mountain we have to climb. There should be no wiggle room and the criteria for grading schools should be fixed, firm and well reasoned.

posted by: Anonymouse on February 23, 2010  3:49pm

This is such a weak assessment plan, and not surprising. 

They’ll survey teachers to find out about the school climate, ignoring student or parent perception of school climate.  Nor are they bothering to look at existing statistics around suspension, expulsion and what students are getting suspended for (for instance an increase in instances of bullying could point to a bad school climate).  Nor are they looking at their bullying reporting mandates as a possible indicator of school climate.

And under achievement, rather than look at the percentage of kids who graduate from college, they’ll just look at the percentage that matriculate because that will give them an easier and more palatable number (talk to any community college folks about the high number of black/hiHispanictudents that enter community college and drop out).

posted by: Same old NHPS, how sad. on February 23, 2010  9:10pm

When was New Haven told school improvement was going to be done by Reggie Mayo?  Mismanagement, cronyism, and New Haven Public School dysfunction starts IN HIS OFFICE.  Now he gets to fudge reality to protect the administrators he hired?  (“he will look at the “quality of school leadership team,”” and “readiness of school team to engage in collaborative planning”)  BULL!

This is a sad development for kids in New Haven schools.  Reggie is said to be a “faithful”, church-going man.  How does he make peace with himself?  He and his greedy pals rob the public coffer and directly sabotage the chances of our kids.  Lousy schools start with lousy administrators who don’t help/remove lousy teachers.  Great schools ALWAYS have great teachers.  Coincidentally, teacher quality is a variable that is completely missing from this “tiering”.

How sad.

posted by: PauloFreire on February 26, 2010  7:20am

David Low is the Vice President of Secondary Schools on the Executive Board- Tom Burns is in fact the Vice President of the NHFT.

All schools should be ranked by March 15. Have potential “turn-around” schools been put on notice? Are any of them on plans of improvement?

get ANDI

Events Calendar

loading…

SeeClickFix »

no right on red traffic sign to turn right on to to Brewery ST.
May 24, 2012 9:04 pm
Address: Intersection Of Brewery St And Sargent Drive New Haven, CT
Rating: 1

There is a no turn on red sigh=n. for the right hand turn on to...

more »
Burnt out or shorting bulb
May 24, 2012 7:33 pm
Address: 158 Porter St. New Haven, CT
Rating: 2

Street lamp doesn't come on at night.

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

smartpill design