Sections
Neighborhoods
Features
Follow Us
NHI Newsletter
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- barista
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- CT Business Litig
- CT Capitol Report
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- CT Watchdog
- CTV
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Hartford Guardian
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC Connecticut
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- NH Youth Map
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Reddit NH
- Road To Greenness
- Saved By Design
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- Specials In NH
- St. Louis Beacon
- Taste Of NH
- Tom Ficklin
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- VT Digger
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- YourCT
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Agency on Aging
- Animal Shelter Volunteers
- Arte Inc.
- Arts Council
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bike New Haven
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- Creative Arts Workshop
- CT BAEO
- CT Tech Council
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Elm City Cycling
- Elmseed
- Empower NH
- Friends Of Wooster Sq.
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Info New Haven
- IRIS
- Jazz Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- Labor History
- LEAP
- Legal Aid Network
- Literacy Coalition
- Magrisso Forte
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Chorale
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- NH Bulletin
- NH Land Trust
- NH Symphony
- NH/Leon Sister City
- NHS
- Orchestra NE
- PAR
- Parents Available to Help
- Pat Dillon
- Peace News
- PechaKucha
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Promoting Enduring Peace
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Rainbow Girls
- Register Calendar
- REX
- ROOF
- SAMA
- SCSU Events
- Share Our Voices
- Shubert
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- Squash Haven
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Ward 25 Blog
- Ward 26 Blog
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Westville Synagogue
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva Of NH
- Youth Continuum
Hauser Spending Triggers Another Grant To Lemar
by Thomas MacMillan | Jul 29, 2010 1:59 pm
(2) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author
Posted to: Campaign 2010
East Rock state representative candidate Debra Hauser’s campaign has spent enough money to trigger a second pile of campaign cash to her Democratic primary opponent, Roland Lemar.
The State Elections Enforcement Campaign (SEEC) voted Wednesday night to issue a second publicly financed grant of $6,500 to the Lemar campaign. Under the rules of the Citizens Election Program, the grant was triggered by Hauser’s campaign spending over 125 percent of the amount that Lemar has raised and received in public money.
The two candidates are vying for New Haven’s lone open state representative seat, representing the 96th General Assembly District. The district includes parts of Hamden and New Haven. State Rep. Cam Staples is stepping down from the seat at the end of this year.
Lemar, an East Rock alderman, is a participant in the state’s young Citizens Election Program (CEP), which provides state dollars to campaigns that raise certain amounts of money from a certain number of donors. He qualified for an initial grant of $25,900 by raising $5,000 from at least 150 donors.
Hauser (pictured), an East Rock psychologist, is not participating in CEP. She’s funding her campaign through donations and with money of her own. According to an SEEC filing on July 27, Hauser had donated $15,000 to her campaign committee and spent $13,546.45 of her own money on campaign expenses as of July 26.
Under CEP regulations, a participating candidate is entitled to supplementary grants beyond an initial grant if his or her opponent’s spending passes certain thresholds. Hauser passed one such threshold last week, resulting in a $6,500 grant for Lemar. On Wednesday, the SEEC voted to issue another grant of the same amount, based on Hauser’s July 27 filing. Both grants are first for state representative races in Connecticut.
Candidates may not be receiving such supplemental grants for long. A federal ruling is expected before the general election on a challenge to Connecticut’s law. Nationally, supplemental matches are believed to be doomed because of a novel new theory of free speech rights: That a wealthy self-financing candidate might hesitate to spend money on more advertising (speech) if he or she knows that will mean the opponent will get extra money.
Lemar’s campaign manager, Yale Alderman Mike Jones, said that the most recent supplemental grant was triggered only because Jones noticed mailings that were sent out by the Hauser campaign that had not been accounted for in her campaign’s filings to the SEEC. Based on those mailings, Jones submitted an application for a supplementary grant, he said.
Jones said that Hauser has violated the rules of the CEP by intentionally avoiding reporting expenses.
“She’s free to raise and spend as much as we want,” he said. “All we ask is that she respect the campaign finance laws.”
Jones also noted that the Hauser campaign has been spending money faster than it has been taking it in. According to the most recent filing, the Hauser campaign incurred nearly $8,000 in unpaid campaign expenses between July 22 and July 26. Most of that money was spent on consulting fees to CampaignsWon.com. As of July 26, the Hauser campaign had only $297.51 on hand.
“There is such a thing as operating with fiscal restraint,” Jones said.
Hauser declined to answer Jones’ charges directly.
“I have answered numerous and repeated question about the Clean Elections Program and my not participating in it,” she said. “I’m in compliance with reporting. We are filing on time. We are following all the rules. And there’s nothing more that I’m going to say about my spending. I am raising and spending what I need to run a winning campaign.”
All the talk about spending from her opponent’s campaign has become “silliness” that distracts from the important issues of the election, Hauser said. “This is what losing campaigns do.”
“The Citizens Election Program is optional,” Hauser stressed.
“My opponent continuously complains about my spending yet is applying for more and more money, and in fact my spending is benefiting his campaign,” Hauser said.
Lemar (pictured) said that although his campaign manager has been looking at the SEEC filings, he himself has been spending his time talking to voters. He said he agrees with Hauser that the amount of money that a campaign raises should not be the lead story about a campaign. That’s why the clean elections program was created, so that money wouldn’t be the main factor in a race, he said.
“I fundamentally disagree that campaign finance isn’t an important issue,” Lemar said. “The role of big money in this campaign is only a destructive force.”
Later, Hauser said that although she has been spending her time working on connecting with voters, she finally got a chance to look at her opponent’s campaign finance filings. She said she had found a couple of suspicious items. First, the Lemar campaign paid $225 in rent on July 21 for an office at the corner of State and Edwards Streets. “There’s no way on State and Edwards you can rent something for that money,” Hauser said. She said it looks to her that someone gave the Lemar campaign an illegal campaign contribution in the form of a sweet deal on the rent.
She also noted that the Lemar campaign’s filings do not indicate that it has spent very much of its money. Yet Lemar campaign workers are out on the streets and mailings have gone out, Hauser said. She said that seems suspicious.
“We don’t have to pay our campaign volunteers to knock on doors,” Lemar said. “We don’t need to pay consultants to design our literature. ... We write our policy statements ourselves.”
Jones said the $225 in rent is a pro-rated payment for a half-month’s rent, since the campaign moved in mid-month. The full rent of $450 per month is comparable to what other tenants pay, he said.
Jones said it’s “awfully hypocritical” for Hauser to say that talk of campaign finances is a distraction from the issues and then to “go through our filings” and “portray our spending in a false light.”
Post a Comment
Comments
posted by: streever on July 29, 2010 2:44pm
Deb’s points are nonsense.
The website, mailers, etc, have all been done by volunteers. Even those of us who go to bed at 10 each night have been up as late as Midnight.
Roland and Anika work late, despite having a newborn, on the campaign. I receive e-mails from them that are dated at 2am!
For Hauser to not declare her spending and then claim that it’s Lemar who is being fishy is more than disingenuous. I think she knows that those of us knocking doors for Roland are doing it for free & as volunteers. If she wants to hire people to write her position & her campaign ideas, that’s fine, but she can’t claim that it’s “fishy” that Lemar doesn’t show any payments for campaign ideas/positions.
Ask any state rep in the region if they pay consultants to write their positions for them! Considering the job pays 28k a year or whatever, I imagine they will all laugh & call the idea preposterous.
posted by: Doyens on July 29, 2010 7:15pm
Ok. I’ve had it. Weak, flaccid and pointless is how I would describe the postions of Jones and Lemar. Here we go again with a who gives a damn issue. Public financing does not guarantee a better representative, Mike. You should know this already. Further, it’s offensive to keep going to the public trough like pigs in heat if a) you don’t need the money b) just because you can and c) the state is broke. Yes, the state is broke, gentlemen - just as broke as the city whose budget the two of you so lustfully embraced.
Here’s an issue maybe you haven’t taken the time to care about: Assessor Bill O’Brien’ absolute abuse of taxpayers and even co-workers. Why are the two of you so silent on something that affects so many people? Too busy writing those campaign position papers by candlelight at the dining room table, positions that don’t mean anything to anybody, positions that will be compromised in the name of expediency?
I still haven’t hear a word from Lemar on the state budget - it’s almost $4 billion in the hole even as he promises more bonding, more PILOT and takes more grants. On education funding, we spend more than just about any state - have some of the poorest results - solution? It’s time to talk about real issues, not fake ones. And it’s time to reign in your grants if you are not spending the money, have no need for the money and are taking it from taxpayers simply because you can. That’s a bigger issue for taxpayers than how much of Hauser’s own money she’s spending.
