nothin Hausladen Testifies For Safer Streets | New Haven Independent

Hausladen Testifies For Safer Streets

On Wednesday, New Haven Director of Department of Transportation, Traffic and Parking Doug Hausladen testified at a hearing of the state legislature’s Transportation Committee on three bills that have ramifications for the city.

The first, a House bill introduced by State Rep. Roland Lemar and other members of the New Haven delegation, would modify guidelines for urban street designs to improve the safety, economic life and vibrancy of urban streets.” Specifically, that means new uses of parking spots, rules for one-way intersections, lower speed limits, and handicap accessibility concerns.

The second, a Senate bill proposed by Stanford State Sen. Carlo Leone, would increase the fees remitted to municipalities — as in, directly to New Haven — for moving (i.e. driving) violations like running stop signs. 

The third is intended to increase safety at pedestrian crosswalks.

Following are his testimonies. 

Proposed H.B. 6966: An Act Modifying Guidelines for Urban Street Design

Dear Co‐Chairs Lemar, Cassano, and Logan and the Planning and Development Committee,

My name is Doug Hausladen and I serve as the Director of the Transportation, Traffic & Parking department for Mayor Harp in the City of New Haven. In New Haven we have a good problem to solve: too many people want to be in New Haven. The past two decades of revitalization in
downtown and our neighborhood business districts has resulted in a lot of users trying to occupy the same public rights of way. At the same time, New Haven and the nation has seen a growing number of crashes. More can be done to mitigate these public health hazards and to
promote active transportation among our residents in Connecticut. 

In contrast to the State of Connecticut at large, over twelve percent of our residents walk to work, three percent bike to work, and almost half do not drive themselves to work. We rank in the top five in medium‐sized cities for walking to work nationwide; this is an incredible feat considering we have a long way to go in providing up to date infrastructure with our handicap ramps and pedestrian signals. In order to meet the growing demand for active transportation, we need more flexible design standards to help unleash the potential of our streets to be used as more than simply a roadway.

This bill will enable our community the ability to design for itself, rather than design to an outdated manual made for vehicle‐centered design.
Our Department of Transportation agrees that we need to update our design manuals. Commissioner Redeker has recently led efforts to update our foliage manuals and led the charge to increase shoulder widths for future accommodation of bicycle markings on state highways. Urban Streets are much more complicated and dynamic; they require a more flexible approach which we have proudly piloted in New Haven with the use of Terrasses” (a dining deck that seats 10 people inside of a parking space in the heart of downtown). We are only scratching the surface of our possibilities in New Haven with street design, however others across the nation are leading the way as Connecticut looks longingly through our windshield as we are left behind.

I look forward to working with our legislators and the Commissioner’s office on flushing out this bill. Focusing on safety we need to work together to create new standards for high pedestrian areas like Historic Chapel Street and Grand Avenue in New Haven. We need to make more room for parking of alternative vehicles like smart cars, scooters, and e‐bikes. We need to make room for low speed vehicles that are networked. We
need to adjust parking statutes that limit parking on one‐way streets unnecessarily. 

In 2015 we identified issues with statutes that prevented best‐in‐class street design for the cyclist. We ask you to consider working together again to change our statutes to favor more urban design standards: shared streets, slow streets, and open streets. Streets are the greatest asset in a community and they deserve to be safe and shared by all for the greatest good. 

Proposed S.B. No. 655: An Act Increasing Fees Remitted to Municipalities for Moving Violations 

The City of New Haven is requesting that municipalities receive a reasonable increase in the revenue sharing derived from infractions and violations issued by the New Haven Police Department for moving violations within the jurisdiction. As presently configured, municipalities, including the City of New Haven, receive a tiny fraction of each moving violation citation issued. The remainder is retained by the State of Connecticut for processing the
violation.

The high costs associated with maintaining a professionally trained and equipped police force of sufficient size to police the City of New Haven combined with the high costs of enforcement and low revenue yield forces municipalities such as New Haven into a position where enforcing motor vehicle moving violations is cost prohibitive, even with its potential for increases in safety. Currently in the Governor’s Budget there are conversations regarding costs relating to work performed by State Troopers on behalf of towns; the high cost of policing needs to be shared in cost and revenues by levels of government that benefit from having our public safety teams working for the best outcomes of all residents in Connecticut.

Permitting municipalities including the City of New Haven to retain a greater share of each moving violation citation issued will significantly reduce the heavy fiscal impact associated with motor vehicle enforcement, and will greatly increase safety by ensuring that enforcing motor vehicle infractions is cost effective. 

Proposed H.B. No. 6274: An Act Concerning Pedestrian Safety at Crosswalks

The City of New Haven supports the passage of Proposed Bill 6274 An Act Concerning Pedestrian Safety at Crosswalks.” The Bill clarifies that vehicles must stop – not merely yield – for pedestrians as they approach a cross walk will greatly increase pedestrian safety.

Stating definitively that a motor vehicle must stop for pedestrians will clarify the status of pedestrians as vulnerable users’ vis a vis vehicles and will improve safety to our most vulnerable. A policy and statute change like this signals that our state is serious about Complete Streets and the prioritization of all users, not simply drivers. In New Haven, one in eight of our residents walk to work. We can and must do more to protect our most vulnerable populations.

Winters are particularly problematic when in‐road pedestrian sign are removed for months to allow for snow removal. When pedestrians and drivers are confused about when a driver is required to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk, drivers are emboldened to refuse to stop and
pedestrians are more reluctant to exercise their legal rights of way to cross the street. Proposed Bill 6274 will clarify that all vehicles must stop for pedestrians as they approach a crosswalk and not only after a pedestrian has made himself or herself vulnerable by entering the roadway.

Every state, including Connecticut, has legislation that gives provides the pedestrians with some form of right of way to cross the street in a crosswalk. The biggest concern for pedestrians, the most vulnerable user of our streets, is how to make approaching traffic stop without physically
having to enter the dangerous area of the roadway. The most likely location for a pedestrian to be injured or killed is at a crossing. By changing the law, we will signal to drivers that they must provide for safe crossing for the human being simply trying to cross the streets. With increases
in pedestrian fatalities nationwide, it is time to prioritize our residents over vehicles and force cars to stop for pedestrians at crosswalks. Anything less would be insufficient to fulfilling the mission of our state’s Complete Streets law.

Following is a status report on bills of particular interest to New Haven before the state legislature this session:

The 2017 Agenda

Bill #StatusSummarySponsors
SB11/ HB5539Committee DeniedWould legalize, tax recreational use of marijuana.Candelaria
Dillon
Lemar
Walker
Porter
et al
SB 17Committee ApprovedWould make certain undocumented immigrant students (DREAMers) eligible for state college financial aid.Looney
HB 5434Committee ApprovedWould have CT join with other states to elect the President based on popular, rather than Electoral College, vote.Winfield,
Porter
Albis
Elliott
D’Agostino
et al.
HB 5458, HB 6058Committee ApprovedWould establish electronic tolls on state highways.Genga
HB 5575/HB 7126Passed SenateWould regulate companies such as Uber and Lyft.Scanlon
HB 5589Passed HouseWould expand disclosure requirements for contributions to campaign funds.Dillon
Lemar
D’Agostino
Elliott
et al.
HB 5591Passed HouseWould require equal pay for employees doing comparable work.Dillon
Walker
Lemar
Albis
D’Agostino
Elliott
et al.
HB 5703Committee DeniedWould have CT enter into an agreement with other states to limit poaching” of each other’s businesses.Lemar
HJ 13/HJr 95Passed HouseWould amend the state constitution to permit early voting.Lemar
HJ 16In CommiteeWould amend the state constitution to permit absentee voting for all voters.Lemar
SB 1/HB 6212Committee ApprovedWould require employers to provide paid family and medical leave for their employees.Looney
SB 2Committee ApprovedWould make the education funding formula more equitable.Duff
SB 8Committee DeniedWould allow municipalities to adopt a 0.5% sales tax.Looney
SB 10/HB 5743Passed SenateWould strengthen hate crime laws.Winfield
SB 13/HB 6208/HB 6456Committee ApprovedWould increase the minimum wage.Looney
Winfield
et al.
Albis
Candelaria
D’Agostino
Elliott
Lemar
Paolillo
Porter
Walker
SB 137Committee DeniedWould expand birth-to-three and provide universal pre-school, among other things.Gerratana
SJ 5/HJ 1Passed HouseWould amend the state constitution to create a lock-box” for transportation funding.Duff
HB 5588Committee DeniedWould limit certain bond allocations.Dillon
Lemar
Albis
Walker
Elliott
et al.
HB 5912HB 6127Committee DeniedWould establish a 1‑cent/ounce tax on sugared beverages.Lemar
Elliott
et al.
HB 6554Committee DeniedWould tax carried interest as ordinary income.Porter
Albis
Lemar
Elliott
Winfield
Candelaria
Dillon
D’Agostino
et al.
HB 5831Committee DeniedWould provide bonding for transitional housing for NH female ex- offenders.Porter
Candelaria
Lemar
Winfield
Looney
Paolillo
SB 631Committee DeniedWould provide bonding to make structural improvements to the Shubert Theatre.Winfield
Looney
Walker
Porter
Lemar
Candelaria
Paolillo
HB 6863Committee DeniedWould authorize bonds for renovating the Barbell Club as a youth/ community center.Canelaria
Porter
Paolillo
Lemar
Winfield
SB 649Committee ApprovedWould allow local building officials to impose fines for building w/o a permit.Looney
Winfield
Walker
Candelaria
Lemar
Porter
Paolillo
Et al.
SB 590/591Committee DeniedWould limit police ccoperation w/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (590); establish an immigrant’s bill of rightsWinfield
SB 20Committee DeniedWould require affordability to be considered in reviewing proposed health insurance rate hikes.Looney
HB 6352Committee ApprovedWould establish a deposit system for car tires.Ritter
Gresko
McCrory
HB 6901Committee DeniedWould impose a surtax on large employers that pay an average wage less than $15/hour.Elliott
HB 7278Passed SenateWould convey various parcels to New Haven, among other things.Gov’t Administration and Elections

Tags:

Sign up for our morning newsletter

Don't want to miss a single Independent article? Sign up for our daily email newsletter! Click here for more info.


Post a Comment

Commenting has closed for this entry

Comments

Avatar for robn

Avatar for THREEFIFTHS

Avatar for Weston

Avatar for One City Dump

Avatar for robn

Avatar for One City Dump