Sections
Neighborhoods
Features
Follow Us
NHI Newsletter
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- 5 Snacks After 10
- Abram Katz
- African independent
- At Risk for HD
- Back To Basics
- barista
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- Conn Art Scene
- Cornwall-On-Hudson
- Crosscut
- CT Business Litig
- CT Capitol Report
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- CT Watchdog
- CTV
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- Hartford Guardian
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Media Nation
- Medical Intelligence
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC Connecticut
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- NH Youth Map
- Northampton Media
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Reddit NH
- Road To Greenness
- Saved By Design
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- Specials In NH
- St. Louis Beacon
- Taste Of NH
- Tom Ficklin
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- VT Digger
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- YourCT
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Agency on Aging
- Animal Shelter Volunteers
- Arte Inc.
- Arts Council
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bike New Haven
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- Creative Arts Workshop
- CT BAEO
- CT Tech Council
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Elm City Cycling
- Elmseed
- Empower NH
- Friends Of Wooster Sq.
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Info New Haven
- IRIS
- Jazz Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- Labor History
- LEAP
- Legal Aid Network
- Literacy Coalition
- Magrisso Forte
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Chorale
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- NH Bulletin
- NH Land Trust
- NH Symphony
- NH/Leon Sister City
- NHS
- Orchestra NE
- PAR
- Parents Available to Help
- Pat Dillon
- Peace News
- PechaKucha
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Promoting Enduring Peace
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Rainbow Girls
- Register Calendar
- REX
- ROOF
- SAMA
- SCSU Events
- Share Our Voices
- Shubert
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- Squash Haven
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Ward 25 Blog
- Ward 26 Blog
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Westville Synagogue
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva Of NH
- Youth Continuum
Jewish Home, Bleeding Money, Up For Sale
by Paul Bass | Aug 17, 2010 1:25 pm
(7) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author
Posted to: Health Care, The Hill
In another sign of the decline of the urban nursing home industry, New Haven’s hallowed Jewish Home For The Aged is struggling to pay the bills and on the verge of sale to a for-profit company.
Like other city-based nursing homes with mostly low-income patients, the 226-bed not-for-profit home on Davenport Avenue in the Hill neighborhood has wrestled with deficits for years because of low Medicaid reimbursements.
Now the home is on the verge of drawing up a contract to sell to a for-profit company, board Chairman Jay Kossman reported Monday.
“It’s tragic. It’s sad that after 96 years, we have fallen on such difficult times,” Kossman said.
“There is a buyer. There are negotiations underway. We would hope to sell the Jewish home in the near future.”
Kossman declined to name the potential buyer. A name change and mission change are likely, he said: “It will not be run by a board of lay leaders. It will likely be for-profit.”
And if the sale falls through?
“I would not be optimistic on the future of the home,” Kossman said.
The Home reported losing $845,000 in 2009, $830,000 in 2008, and $953,000 in 2007, according to the state’s Department of Social Services (DSS).
DSS helped the home stay afloat this year by advancing it $1.5 million from an emergency fund to help struggling homes continue to care for long-term Medicaid patients “pending a sale,” according to agency spokesman David Dearborn. Dearborn said DSS is to receive the money back upon a sale of the home, as part of the proceeds.
He also said DSS negotiated in talks earlier this year on a potential sale that fell through. (He said DSS is doing the same in negotiations with a potential buyer for Stamford’s Courtland Gardens.)
Kossman stressed that the Jewish Home has not had to sacrifice on quality of care during tight fiscal times.
Last Thursday workers reported not receiving paychecks. Kossman attributed that to a “computer glitch” that was fixed, and said workers were eventually paid.
“At first I thought it was a holiday. Then I said, ‘It’s no holiday,’” said one grounds assistant on Thursday.
The home has 189 unionized workers represented by District 1199/SEIU. Union spokeswoman Deborah Chernoff said the union is considering legal action to recover dues that the home extracted from paychecks but failed to forward. She said the home owes $36,000 for five months’ worth of withheld dues.
Kossman said he didn’t know about that. The home’s director, Beth Goldstein, failed to return repeated phone messages left over several days.
The union’s pension fund has also gone to court to try recover $250,000 in delinquent pension contribution and health insurance premiums, Chernoff said.
Those debts could complicate a pending scale.
Chernoff noted that the Jewish Home, like all urban nursing homes in the state, faces a state reimbursement crisis. Like its counterparts in other cities, the Jewish Home relies almost exclusively on state Medicaid reimbursements for its patients—over 90 percent, according to Kossman. The statewide average is 69 percent, Chernoff said. Nursing homes lose an estimated $18 a day on Medicaid patients, meaning the Jewish Home loses in the neighborhood of $1 million a year just from Medicaid underpayments, according to Chernoff.
The Jewish Home has few paying patients to make up the difference. She also said the most recent census at the home showed occupancy down to around 77 percent, well below the industry minimum of 94 percent needed to stay profitable in the face of fixed overhead costs.
A Broader Crisis—& An Evolution
The state earlier this year shut down another New Haven nursing home experiencing funding woes, West Rock Health Care.
The crisis facing urban nursing homes became an issue in the Democratic gubernatorial primary; click here to read what the candidates had to say about it.
Kossman noted that the home’s fate coincides with broad changes in the industry, not just in cities, but everywhere. Federal and state government budgets are only getting tighter, meaning Medicaid reimbursements are likely only to dry up further. Meanwhile, more of an effort is being made to keep elderly people in their homes longer, with the help of nurses as well as new technology like “telemedicine devices that can monitor various functions.”
“There’s a lot that can be done without institutionalizing people,” Kossman said.
The challenge of caring for frail elderly patients who do need institutionalized living will remain a challenge.
The Jewish Home’s volunteer leaders have wrestled for years with how to address an increasing Medicaid patient load, as its original prime population—Jewish families, many of whom could afford the care without government help—moved to the suburbs. Its location on Davenport Avenue discouraged some families from placing elderly relatives there, rather than in suburban locations, partly because some didn’t want to come to the neighborhood to visit.
Originally the Jewish Home’s board explored transitioning to a “continuing care” community on land adjacent to the Jewish Community Center in Woodbridge. It would include some frail elderly rooms but also apartments for people who can live more independently with some nursing help. That plan never materialized. A “separate entity” is now pursuing a version of it, according to Kossman.
Back in 2007 the home was in discussions to sell its Davenport Avenue facility to Amistad Academy charter school as part of such a move. The plan failed to attract the needed support of some key politicians.
Post a Comment
Comments
posted by: Morris Cove Mom on August 17, 2010 4:51pm
I cannot seem to understand this. They LOSE $18 a day on each and every Medicaid patient? And most patients are Medicaid? Does that mean that this is a budget crisis, a Medicaid issues, or a sign of the times?
Is there a way to fix this? Can they reorganize, cut back, layoff a few employees? Install solar panels, anything?
We have to do better than this. Our elderly population is exploding, and living longer than anyone thought they would. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
posted by: Jon-Jay Tilsen on August 17, 2010 4:58pm
The story say, “Its location on Davenport Avenue discouraged some families from placing elderly relatives there, rather than in suburban locations, partly because some didn’t want to come to the neighborhood to visit.”
Over the years I have spoken with numerous families who either placed or considered placing their relatives in the Jewish Home. I’ve heard a lot of reasons for their ultimate decision, but never heard that they didn’t like the neighborhood (right be Yale Hospital). The reasons for going elsewhere were either true to my knowledge or consistent with my experience with the home. Mostly they had to do with administrative hurdles or quality of care.
So what is the basis for the assertion in the article?
[Note: The Home’s board chairman said that. So have other Home officials over the years.]
posted by: Lynda Faye Wilson on August 18, 2010 12:32pm
To All This May Concern,
I am so very sorry to have ran across the article posted in the New Haven Independent
on-later paper. I know/knew a many person’s
over the years resided in your facility. As a
matter of fact, avery dear to my heart person
utilizes the DAY CARE PROGRAM there now.
Her name is ILDRA CARROLL. She just loves it.
She has not mentioned to me of the up-coming
transition (she may not know). Because the pop-
ulation you service is so delicate, I choose not
to mention it to her.
May the ALL MIGHTY be with both staff and clients every step of the way in ALL your decisions. God has kept you all this time, I
have faith he will not continue being with you
ALL. According to “Miss Sue” (Ildra Carroll)
the staff is wonderful.
A HEARTFELT THANKS TO YOU A L L .
posted by: Dee on August 18, 2010 12:35pm
I feel sorry for the patients at the Jewish Home. My father was placed there for over two years and suffered alot. He was not cared for, changed, bathed or fed properly or on time. He was blind and could not fend for himself. Many times we would come in to find him in dirty diapers and his health deteriorated so much that we had to remove him from the facility. Unfortunately not soon enough. While there are a few workers, nurses, etc. that offered good service, not everyone really cares. I am happy that the Jewish Home is going to be upgraded by a new buryer and hopefully things will run much better. If people do not want to place their loved ones at the Jewish home its not because of the neighborhood, its because of the poor assistance their loved ones receive at the facility. I would never ever place any of my loved ones at this facility regardless. Sorry I allowed my father to suffer so much.
posted by: Concerned on August 19, 2010 12:27pm
They need David Hunter at Mary Wade he has done great things with Mary Wade home maybe he can turn this around
posted by: Debbie on August 22, 2010 12:00am
@ Morris Cove Mom, in each facility nursing homes lose money on Medicaid residents daily. The reimbursement does not cover cost. Laying off people will affect care. This has been going on for years. Despite what DSS thinks, we are not paid enough to cover all resident expenses daily. They have not given us an increase in 3 years and expect us to use the same pay scale as all uncontrollable expense’s increase. Some homes lose higher then $18 a day. The state does not seen to want to recognize this. It is hurts the care of residents, and amount of staffing. Being a Medicaid facility also hurts because not all cases get granted, and families fail to turn over the portion of the residents income that is mandatory while all their needs are being met at the nursing facility.
