Sections
Neighborhoods
Features
Follow Us
NHI Newsletter
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- At Risk for HD
- barista
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- Chris Volpe Photography
- Crosscut
- CT Capitol Report
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Local Politics
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- CT Watchdog
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- I Love New Haven
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Media Nation
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- NHV.org
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Reddit NH
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- St. Louis Beacon
- Taste Of NH
- Tom Ficklin
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- VT Digger
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Agency on Aging
- Animal Shelter Volunteers
- Arte Inc.
- Arts Council
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bike New Haven
- Cancer Support
- Chabad of Westville
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children’s Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- Creative Arts Workshop
- CT BAEO
- CT Best Restaurants
- CT Tech Council
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Elm City Cycling
- Elmseed
- Empower NH
- Friends Of Wooster Sq.
- GAVA
- GNH Community Chorus
- Habitat For Humanity
- Info New Haven
- IRIS
- Jazz Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- Labor History
- LEAP
- Legal Aid Network
- Literacy Coalition
- Magrisso Forte
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- Neighborhood Music School
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Chorale
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- NH Bulletin
- NH Land Trust
- NH Symphony
- NH/Leon Sister City
- NHS
- Orchestra NE
- PAR
- Parents Available to Help
- Pat Dillon
- Peace News
- PechaKucha
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Promoting Enduring Peace
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Rainbow Girls
- Register Calendar
- REX
- ROOF
- SAMA
- SCSU Events
- Share Our Voices
- Shubert
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- Squash Haven
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Ward 25 Blog
- Ward 26 Blog
- Westville Renaissance
- Westville Synagogue
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva Of NH
- Youth Continuum
Looney Proposes Gun Offender Registry
by Christine Stuart | Feb 10, 2011 4:50 pm
(4) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author
Posted to: Legal Writes, State
After a year when 22 New Haveners were shot to death, State Sen. Martin Looney Thursday put forward a made-in-New Haven proposal to set up a Connecticut gun offender registry to keep track of crooks with itchy fingers.
The New Haven proposal is inspired in part by a similar Baltimore law that, in its first year, succeeded in seeing only three of 200 jail-sprung registrants get rearrested.
Accompanied by New Haven Police Detective Richard Pelletier and other city constituents, Looney presented his proposal to the state legislature’s Public Safety Committee.
His proposal would have the state public safety commissioner keep a registry of people convicted of gun crimes, with a database (available to law enforcement, but not the general public) containing information on offenders from the past four years; have registrants check in annually with local cops and report changes of address; and make it a crime to fail to register.
The concept is similar to the state’s sex offender registry, except for the fact that it restricts information to law enforcement, Looney told the committee Thursday.
He said that the idea was suggested to him by New Haven Police Chief Frank Limon. Mayor John DeStefano got some blowback when he proposed the idea last year.
Looney agreed to put forth the legislation, which didn’t receive any opposition publicly Thursday because of the 22 homicides with a firearm in New Haven last year, almost double the amount from 2009.
There were also 116 non-fatal shootings in New Haven last year.
“Keep in mind this is a city of only 123,000 residents. The total of 138 deadly and non-deadly shootings in New Haven last year was around 1 per 900 New Haven residents,” said Looney, the State Senate majority leader.
Viewed this way it means New Haven has more than two and half times as many shootings per capita as Boston, which has a population almost five times larger than New Haven’s.
Currently there are five gun offender registries in cities throughout the country and many require registration for three or four year periods of time, unlike sex offender registries which require at least 10 years of registration.
Looney said the 2010 recidivism report published by the Office of Policy and Management found that those convicted of gun crimes are more likely to be rearrested. It’s something Detective Pelletier sees all too often.
Pelletier told the committee he’s been in law enforcement for 23 years and most of the time when he interviews subjects arrested with firearms they tell him they have the guns to protect themselves.
He urged the committee to pass the legislation and give law enforcement one more tool to help stop gun violence.
Click here to read the full article.
Post a Comment
Comments
posted by: Threefifths on February 10, 2011 6:42pm
How about a law that makes all firearms work with a fingerprint sensor.
posted by: Sex Offender Issues on February 10, 2011 6:58pm
With each new registry created, more tax payer money is wasted. Why not save us all money, and put all sinners on an online registry/hit-list?
If a registry is good enough for sex offenders, then it’s good enough for all other criminals as well.
posted by: cba on February 11, 2011 7:22am
Another make work publicity proposal from this professional politician who doesn’t realize that he should be working on solutions for the State’s fiscal mess and not grandstanding
posted by: bjfair on February 11, 2011 9:42am
All due respect to Sen Looney…I don’t see how having someone’s name on a registry prevents them from shooting someone. The sex offender registry has not prevented sex crimes yet has created a monster that legislators never expected. I hope it doesn’t become a “means to yet another unintended consequence” initiated by well meaning legislators.
