Looney Proposes Gun Offender Registry

After a year when 22 New Haveners were shot to death, State Sen. Martin Looney Thursday put forward a made-in-New Haven proposal to set up a Connecticut gun offender registry to keep track of crooks with itchy fingers.

The New Haven proposal is inspired in part by a similar Baltimore law that, in its first year, succeeded in seeing only three of 200 jail-sprung registrants get rearrested.

Accompanied by New Haven Police Detective Richard Pelletier and other city constituents, Looney presented his proposal to the state legislature’s Public Safety Committee.

His proposal would have the state public safety commissioner keep a registry of people convicted of gun crimes, with a database (available to law enforcement, but not the general public) containing information on offenders from the past four years; have registrants check in annually with local cops and report changes of address; and make it a crime to fail to register.

The concept is similar to the state’s sex offender registry, except for the fact that it restricts information to law enforcement, Looney told the committee Thursday.

He said that the idea was suggested to him by New Haven Police Chief Frank Limon. Mayor John DeStefano got some blowback when he proposed the idea last year.

Looney agreed to put forth the legislation, which didn’t receive any opposition publicly Thursday because of the 22 homicides with a firearm in New Haven last year, almost double the amount from 2009.

There were also 116 non-fatal shootings in New Haven last year.

“Keep in mind this is a city of only 123,000 residents. The total of 138 deadly and non-deadly shootings in New Haven last year was around 1 per 900 New Haven residents,” said Looney, the State Senate majority leader.

Viewed this way it means New Haven has more than two and half times as many shootings per capita as Boston, which has a population almost five times larger than New Haven’s.

Currently there are five gun offender registries in cities throughout the country and many require registration for three or four year periods of time, unlike sex offender registries which require at least 10 years of registration.

Looney said the 2010 recidivism report published by the Office of Policy and Management found that those convicted of gun crimes are more likely to be rearrested. It’s something Detective Pelletier sees all too often.

Pelletier told the committee he’s been in law enforcement for 23 years and most of the time when he interviews subjects arrested with firearms they tell him they have the guns to protect themselves.

He urged the committee to pass the legislation and give law enforcement one more tool to help stop gun violence.

Click here to read the full article.

Post a Comment

Commenting has closed for this entry


posted by: THREEFIFTHS on February 10, 2011  6:42pm

How about a law that makes all firearms work with a fingerprint sensor.

posted by: Sex Offender Issues on February 10, 2011  6:58pm

With each new registry created, more tax payer money is wasted.  Why not save us all money, and put all sinners on an online registry/hit-list?

If a registry is good enough for sex offenders, then it’s good enough for all other criminals as well.

posted by: cba on February 11, 2011  7:22am

Another make work publicity proposal from this professional politician who doesn’t realize that he should be working on solutions for the State’s fiscal mess and not grandstanding

posted by: bjfair on February 11, 2011  9:42am

All due respect to Sen Looney…I don’t see how having someone’s name on a registry prevents them from shooting someone. The sex offender registry has not prevented sex crimes yet has created a monster that legislators never expected. I hope it doesn’t become a “means to yet another unintended consequence” initiated by well meaning legislators.