Sections

Neighborhoods

Features

Follow Us

NHI Newsletter

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

Mayor’s Campaign Nets $7K

by Melissa Bailey | Jan 22, 2010 7:53 am

(3) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author

Posted to: City Hall, Politics

Melissa Bailey PhotoThis time, the leftover money has to go to a good cause—not to the party machine.

Mayor John DeStefano, who was elected to a record ninth term in November, closed out the year with about $7,000 left in his campaign piggy bank, Democracy Fund Administrator Rob Wechsler announced Thursday.

Because of new rules governing the city’s clean elections program, DeStefano can’t do what he did the previous election cycle—funnel the money to fellow Democratic candidates who support City Hall.

This year, DeStefano has three options: give the money to charity, give it back to the contributors, or give it to the Democracy Fund, the board set up to administer the city’s public financing program for municipal campaigns. The voluntary program gives grants to qualifying mayoral candidates who agree to limit campaign spending. The aim is to curtail the influence of lobbyists, contractors and political action committees and level the playing field for democracy.

The rules were clarified in early 2009 to address how participating campaigns can use leftover money, explained Wechsler at the board’s meeting Thursday in City Hall.

DeStefano’s 2007 campaign wrapped up the year with $12,500 in the bank. Campaign staff said they didn’t know what to do with the money, because the guidelines weren’t clear. They turned the money over to a political action committee called the James Hillhouse Society, which in turn used the money to work against aldermanic candidates who threatened the mayor’s power.

The Democracy Fund concluded the campaign “flew in the face” of the spirit of the clean election campaign, but didn’t break the letter of the law. The board ended up giving DeStefano a pass for abusing a “loophole.”

This year, the loophole is closed, Weschler said.

The rules are clear now, said Democracy Fund board chair Caleb Kleppner with a tone of relief.

“You can’t give surplus funds to a PAC,” he asserted.

The mayor’s campaign took in about $191,000 in contributions for DeStefano’s 2009 reelection run, said Weschler, who summarized DeStefano’s latest campaign filing for the board. The filing covers Oct. 21 to Dec. 31, 2009.

After potential foe and former state Rep. Bill Dyson decided not to run, DeStefano ran virtually unopposed. He won handily with 71 percent of votes cast.

The mayor’s campaign was the only one to receive matching funds from the clean elections program. In exchange for agreeing to limit spending and to cap contributions, his campaign received $11,390 in taxpayer money.

The mayor’s campaign spent about $184,000 on the campaign, leaving it with $7,000 in the bank.

Recent expenses included $2,000 paid to the Elm & Oak PAC, with which the campaign shared office space and a phone.
The Democracy Fund has requested a state investigation into the fishy relationship between the campaign and the Elm & Ivy PAC. Click here to read more. Weschler calculated the DeStefano campaign paid 35 percent of the rent and 20 percent of the phone bill for the shared headquarters.

DeStefano 2009 campaign manager Keya Jayaram could not be reached for comment Thursday. An automated email response indicated she is on a honeymoon.

Tags: ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

Post a Comment

Commenting has closed for this entry

Comments

posted by: Funky Chicken on January 22, 2010  1:27pm

I said it before and I will say it again, keep on making this a pain for the Mayor and he will not participate in a publicly financed election again. He raised close to $180,000 by himself and got $11,400 from the Democracy Fund. Next time he will work a bit harder to raise an additional $15,000 and not have to put up with the Fund telling him how to raise and spend money. More-so look at the Supreme Courts ruling and there is even less of an incentive for an established office holder to use public funds…

posted by: what on January 22, 2010  8:28pm

So what are you saying Funky Chicken? Because he can raise so much money, just let him keep breaking or making the rules as he likes? I would prefer that he didn’t use any public funds at all than to have him flagrantly using the public funds to fund campaigns against challengers.

posted by: Funky Chicken on January 25, 2010  3:31pm

Hi “what”

I hear your point, but would like to point out that in the past the Mayor’s campaign did not violate any rules or laws. The case in front of the State Elections Board is still pending.

I am not defending the Mayor but I am saying that if a real contender does enter the area and that person needs to make real use of the public financing option, that other candidate will be in a even weaker position because the Mayor will not participate. I am not talking about an ideal scenario just a realistic one.

get ANDI

Events Calendar

view the full calendar »

SeeClickFix »

pedestrian button broken
Feb 11, 2012 11:46 am
Address: South Orange St And George St New Haven ct
Rating: 1

The button for the walk signal at the corner of Orange and George is broken. The...

more »
Pothole on Crown near York
Feb 11, 2012 11:12 am
Address: 305 Crown St New Haven, CT
Rating: 1

Deep pothole on north side near curb in vicinity of 305 Crown St

Flyerboard

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

smartpill design