nothin Redeker Holds Firm As Union Station Bill… | New Haven Independent

Redeker Holds Firm As Union Station Bill Advances

James Redeker brought a check and a smile to New Haven Tuesday, but he wasn’t budging in his opposition to the city’s efforts to gain control of Union Station from the state — an idea that advanced this week.

Redeker, the commissioner of the state Department of Transportation (DOT), said he was caught off guard when New Haven officials put forth a bill that would put control of Union Station into city hands. He thought they had a deal to have the city remain in charge of managing the station for three years —- after which point he’d like to put management out to bid.

We have a letter from the city and the parking authority,” Redeker said after a press event at City Hall where he presented New Haven Promise with $10,000 to help support scholarships for future engineering students. Actually we were surprised by the action to take a different course.”

A bill containing a provision for transferring ownership from the state to the city was unanimously approved by the legislature’s Government Administration and Elections Committee Monday, and is headed to the full body for consideration. (Click here and here for previous stories about the arguments Mayor Toni Harp and her administration are making for city control.)

Redeker said he was aware that the city has a different vision for the train station, but the state has its own vision. He said that revolves primarily around the train station as a transportation hub, rather than a way to generate revenue.

We have a vision for the station which requires substantial state support,” he said. In just the last five years over $22 million was put [into Union Station] by the state. More is necessary. It needs that kind of funding. If it’s not in the stewardship of the department, I wonder and worry about where that would come from.”

Markeshia Ricks Photo

Redeker at City Hall Tuesday.

Redeker said he believes that state would be in the best position to make those additional capital investments and that the opportunities for future growth with the new parking garage being built by the state lend themselves to three separate contracts that manage parking, maintenance of the station and the commercial development of the station.

City officials disputed testimony that Redeker gave in Hartford that Union Station accounts for 68 percent of the New Haven Parking Authority’s administrative fee, but he stuck by his number Tuesday.

The parking authority has a much broader scope that goes outside of the station,” he said. So, they manage other parking facilities and they have other responsibilities. If you take my administrative cost as a percentage of the total, it’s in the 30s. But for me —I’m only responsible for paying for a restricted account for the station and the parking — that’s my number and it comes right out of their audit report.”

He also stuck by his criticism of a PILOT [payment in lieu of taxes] contribution by the parking authority to the city, which he said the state is paying on top of the administrative fee. Again, city officials disputed the charge, saying that the parking authority using unrestricted funds generated from all of its other facilities for the PILOT payment. Union Station funds are restricted. (Click here to read the city’s full rebuttal to accusations Redeker has made about its stewardship of the train station.)

Our position has never been to give the city the asset, even if we were to enter into a contract with the city it wouldn’t be to turn over the asset,” he added. It is the state’s project, we own the building. We own the station and the parking lot. It is leased to the city for their operation and maintenance. That was the agreement.”

Redeker also held firm on his position regarding 16 empty lots in the city owned by the state. Somebody’s got to pay the federal government back for any property that that entity paid for, and it shouldn’t be the state.

It’s a work around so the city doesn’t have to pay what they’re supposed to pay by federal law and by state requirement,” he said.

Following is a status report on bills of particular interest to New Haven before the state legislature this session:

The 2017 Agenda

Bill #StatusSummarySponsors
SB11/ HB5539Committee DeniedWould legalize, tax recreational use of marijuana.Candelaria
Dillon
Lemar
Walker
Porter
et al
SB 17Committee ApprovedWould make certain undocumented immigrant students (DREAMers) eligible for state college financial aid.Looney
HB 5434Committee ApprovedWould have CT join with other states to elect the President based on popular, rather than Electoral College, vote.Winfield,
Porter
Albis
Elliott
D’Agostino
et al.
HB 5458, HB 6058Committee ApprovedWould establish electronic tolls on state highways.Genga
HB 5575/HB 7126Passed SenateWould regulate companies such as Uber and Lyft.Scanlon
HB 5589Passed HouseWould expand disclosure requirements for contributions to campaign funds.Dillon
Lemar
D’Agostino
Elliott
et al.
HB 5591Passed HouseWould require equal pay for employees doing comparable work.Dillon
Walker
Lemar
Albis
D’Agostino
Elliott
et al.
HB 5703Committee DeniedWould have CT enter into an agreement with other states to limit poaching” of each other’s businesses.Lemar
HJ 13/HJr 95Passed HouseWould amend the state constitution to permit early voting.Lemar
HJ 16In CommiteeWould amend the state constitution to permit absentee voting for all voters.Lemar
SB 1/HB 6212Committee ApprovedWould require employers to provide paid family and medical leave for their employees.Looney
SB 2Committee ApprovedWould make the education funding formula more equitable.Duff
SB 8Committee DeniedWould allow municipalities to adopt a 0.5% sales tax.Looney
SB 10/HB 5743Passed SenateWould strengthen hate crime laws.Winfield
SB 13/HB 6208/HB 6456Committee ApprovedWould increase the minimum wage.Looney
Winfield
et al.
Albis
Candelaria
D’Agostino
Elliott
Lemar
Paolillo
Porter
Walker
SB 137Committee DeniedWould expand birth-to-three and provide universal pre-school, among other things.Gerratana
SJ 5/HJ 1Passed HouseWould amend the state constitution to create a lock-box” for transportation funding.Duff
HB 5588Committee DeniedWould limit certain bond allocations.Dillon
Lemar
Albis
Walker
Elliott
et al.
HB 5912HB 6127Committee DeniedWould establish a 1‑cent/ounce tax on sugared beverages.Lemar
Elliott
et al.
HB 6554Committee DeniedWould tax carried interest as ordinary income.Porter
Albis
Lemar
Elliott
Winfield
Candelaria
Dillon
D’Agostino
et al.
HB 5831Committee DeniedWould provide bonding for transitional housing for NH female ex- offenders.Porter
Candelaria
Lemar
Winfield
Looney
Paolillo
SB 631Committee DeniedWould provide bonding to make structural improvements to the Shubert Theatre.Winfield
Looney
Walker
Porter
Lemar
Candelaria
Paolillo
HB 6863Committee DeniedWould authorize bonds for renovating the Barbell Club as a youth/ community center.Canelaria
Porter
Paolillo
Lemar
Winfield
SB 649Committee ApprovedWould allow local building officials to impose fines for building w/o a permit.Looney
Winfield
Walker
Candelaria
Lemar
Porter
Paolillo
Et al.
SB 590/591Committee DeniedWould limit police ccoperation w/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (590); establish an immigrant’s bill of rightsWinfield
SB 20Committee DeniedWould require affordability to be considered in reviewing proposed health insurance rate hikes.Looney
HB 6352Committee ApprovedWould establish a deposit system for car tires.Ritter
Gresko
McCrory
HB 6901Committee DeniedWould impose a surtax on large employers that pay an average wage less than $15/hour.Elliott
HB 7278Passed SenateWould convey various parcels to New Haven, among other things.Gov’t Administration and Elections

Tags:

Sign up for our morning newsletter

Don't want to miss a single Independent article? Sign up for our daily email newsletter! Click here for more info.


Post a Comment

Commenting has closed for this entry

Comments

Avatar for One City Dump

Avatar for JCFremont