Sections
Neighborhoods
Features
Follow Us
NHI Newsletter
Legal Notices
Some Favorite Sites
- At Risk for HD
- barista
- Branford Eagle
- Business NH
- Chris Volpe Photography
- Crosscut
- CT Capitol Report
- CT Enviro Headlines
- CT Local Politics
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- CT Watchdog
- Design New Haven
- Gotham Gazette
- I Love New Haven
- Josiah Brown
- Karman Turn
- La Voz Hispana
- Laurel Club
- Media Nation
- Middletown Eye
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- NHV.org
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Reddit NH
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- St. Louis Beacon
- Taste Of NH
- Tom Ficklin
- Valley Independent Sentinel
- Voice of SD
- VT Digger
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Agency on Aging
- Animal Shelter Volunteers
- Arte Inc.
- Arts Council
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bike New Haven
- Cancer Support
- Chabad of Westville
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children’s Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- Creative Arts Workshop
- CT BAEO
- CT Best Restaurants
- CT Tech Council
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Elm City Cycling
- Elmseed
- Empower NH
- Friends Of Wooster Sq.
- GAVA
- GNH Community Chorus
- Habitat For Humanity
- Info New Haven
- IRIS
- Jazz Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- Labor History
- LEAP
- Legal Aid Network
- Literacy Coalition
- Magrisso Forte
- Mary Wade
- Music Haven
- Neighborhood Music School
- New Haven 828
- New Haven Chorale
- New Haven Reads
- New Life Corp.
- NH Bulletin
- NH Land Trust
- NH Symphony
- NH/Leon Sister City
- NHS
- Orchestra NE
- PAR
- Parents Available to Help
- Pat Dillon
- Peace News
- PechaKucha
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Promoting Enduring Peace
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Rainbow Girls
- Register Calendar
- REX
- ROOF
- SAMA
- SCSU Events
- Share Our Voices
- Shubert
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- Squash Haven
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- Ward 25 Blog
- Ward 26 Blog
- Westville Renaissance
- Westville Synagogue
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Yeshiva NH Shul
- Yeshiva Of NH
- Youth Continuum
Sisters Claim Racial Profiling In Traffic Stop
by Melissa Bailey | Jul 13, 2012 8:29 am
(9) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author
Posted to: Legal Writes, Dixwell
When two city cops pulled over two sisters who made a midnight visit to Hudson Street, the cops did so because of the color of their skin—and because of a systemic failure to address racial profiling in the police department, a new federal suit charges.
The suit, filed in federal court Tuesday by Lashunda and Ronda Adkins, stems from charges that came from what they called a fishy traffic stop—charges that a prosecutor later decided not to pursue. The plaintiffs claim they were charged because of the color of their skin, as the result of the city and police union’s failure to properly train cops on how to avoid racial profiling.
The suit, filed by Attorney Michael Deem in U.S. District Court, names Mayor John DeStefano, city cops Jason Jemiola and Christopher Cacela, the local police union and its parent union, AFSCME Council 15, and the city of New Haven as defendants.
Click here to read it.
“The City of New Haven will respond more fully at the appropriate time to this slapdash and meritless filing,” responded city Corporation Counsel Victor Bolden. “Nevertheless, when all is said and done, it will be abundantly clear that legitimate public safety concerns and not race were the basis for the stop underlying this lawsuit.”
The story in the suit begins at 12:20 a.m. Sept. 2, 2010. Lashunda Adkins and her sister, Ronda Adkins, of Beaver Hills, were in a car with a man named Albert Eaddy. Lashunda was behind the wheel.
Two city cops, Jason Jemiola and Christopher Cacela, saw Lashunda stop the car on Hudson Street in Dixwell. Someone got out of the car, got in again and proceeded. Cops pulled the car over on Crescent Street and charged Lashunda with parking in the middle of the one-way street and failure to drive in the right lane. They also charged her with a third, unnamed citation, based on information that “arose after the vehicle was stopped.”
Police spokesman Dave Hartman said the police report is not available because the case is under investigation.
As the case made its way through state court, Lashunda chipped away at the basis of the arrest—whether the cops had reasonable suspicion to pull her over.
Jemiola wrote in a police report that he and Cacela had “received numerous anonymous complaints from a known source” of drug activity at 34 Hudson.
However, according to the suit, Cacela testified in state court that he and Jemiola “knew they did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle driven by Lashunda for suspected drug activity, but had agreed to stop the vehicle based on the parking and driving violations in hopes of finding something.”
Jemiola conceded in court that Lashunda’s driving did not violate state statutes, according to the suit. The way the car stopped did not constitute parking, the defense argued.
Attorney Deem concluded that Jemiola’s claim to have “received numerous anonymous complaints from a known source,” and the driving charges he came up with, were “pure fabrications, and mere attempts to cover up their misconduct of racial profiling as well as cover up the City of New Haven’s custom and practice of racial profiling.”
State prosecutors ended the case with a nolle, meaning they determined not to pursue the criminal charges.
The plaintiffs claim they were “intentionally discriminated against” on a basis of their race. The suit claims they suffered violation of their First, Fourth and 14th Amendment Constitutional rights, violation of the state constitution, “loss of physical liberty, emotional distress and fear of law enforcement personnel, and humiliation and embarrassment.”
The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages.
Profiling Pattern
In the federal suit, attorney Deem argues that this wrongful arrest occurred because of a systematic failure on the part of the city and police union.
To make his case, Deem crunched numbers reported to the state African-American Affairs Commission and determined that police have a pattern of discriminating against black drivers. The city police department reported the numbers to the commission according to a long-ignored requirement by (PERF), recommended the city create such a system in the wake of a theft and bribery scandal in the city’s narcotics squad. PERF recommended the system as part of a 2007 report; however, amid concerns that the job evaluations would be made public, the police union and city declined to create such a system in the next police contract, which was signed on Nov. 17, 2009.
A job evaluation system would have given the police department the opportunity to train, supervise and discipline cops who engaged in racial profiling, Attorney Deem argued.
Without a job evaluation system, the city, police union and its parent union “created a policy, custom or practice of deliberate indifference to the training, supervision and disciplinary needs of its police officers.”
The omission of a performance evaluation system amounts to “highly unreasonable conduct, involving an extreme departure from ordinary care, in a situation where a high degree of danger was apparent, specifically the violation of constitutional rights of black drivers within the City of New Haven,” Deem charged.
Deem said the omission was especially unreasonable in light of the PERF report and the Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act, which “prohibits any law enforcement agency from stopping, detaining, or searching any motorist when the stop is motivated solely by considerations of the race, color, ethnicity, age, gender or sexual orientation.”
Reached Thursday, Louis Cavaliere, Jr., the incoming head of the city police union, AFSCME Council 15 Local 530, declined to address specifics of the traffic stop. He did say the union opposes an annual performance review.
“Why would we want a report card on our own officers?” Cavaliere said. “The officers have already been tested when they got on the job.” He said cops don’t need to be “tested time and time again.”
Jeffrey Matchett, executive director of Council 15, refrained from comment because, he said, he has not seen the lawsuit.
Attorney Deem has also filed suit on behalf of a passenger in the vehicle, Albert Eaddy, who ran from police after the car was pulled over and is claiming police brutality in connection to his subsequent arrest. Prior to the traffic stop, in May of 2010, Eaddy was convicted of third-degree assault, violation of a protective order and possession of narcotics.
Post a Comment
Comments
posted by: JustAnotherTaxPayer on July 13, 2012 9:24am
There is something missing in this story. Who is Albert Eaddy? When the reporter discovers this he may have a story that is balanced.
posted by: UNH Grad on July 13, 2012 10:54am
“Cops pulled the car over on Crescent Street and charged Lashunda with parking in the middle of the one-way street and failure to drive in the right lane.”
So basically translated, they committed a motor vehicle infraction and were stopped by the police, who were in the area due to citizen complaints of drug activity. What an unconscionable, egregious violation of your civil rights. Someone get Al Sharpton on the next train from NYC.
Clearly they stopped you because you’re a minority and not because you’re an incompetent driver…
If you want to stand up for yourself plead not guilty to the ticket and argue it in court, I’m sure the judge will be more than impressed by your theatrical abilities. Otherwise, stop wasting everyone’s time with your inability to act like an adult.
posted by: Perspective on July 13, 2012 11:31am
“Why would we want a report card on our own officers?” Cavaliere said. “The officers have already been tested when they got on the job.” He said cops don’t need to be “tested time and time again.”
Why wouldn’t you want an evalaution of performance? Poor arguement by the union leader. Our police officers should be continuously evaluated to ensure consistent and up-date procedures and policies are being upheld. Countless jobs are evaluated (teachers, administrators, even military) why not police officers?
posted by: villeboy on July 13, 2012 12:02pm
Illuminating and timely reading as it pertains to the suit described in the article above:
Mason, C. (2012). “JAY-Z’S 99 PROBLEMS, VERSE 2: A CLOSE READING WITH FOURTH AMENDMENT GUIDANCE FOR COPS AND PERPS.” St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 56:567.
http://slu.edu/Documents/law/Law Journal/Archives/LJ56-2_Mason_Article.pdf
posted by: SteveOnAnderson on July 13, 2012 1:05pm
Thanks, villeboy. Great article. I couldn’t get your link to work because of way the link splits, so I thought I’d provide the full link:
http://slu.edu/Documents/law/Law Journal/Archives/LJ56-2_Mason_Article.pdf
posted by: downtown dweller on July 13, 2012 10:13pm
“Why would we want a report card on our own officers?” Cavaliere said. “The officers have already been tested when they got on the job.” He said cops don’t need to be “tested time and time again.”
Is this for real? Maybe the police union should take a look at themselves and see if they can work out why they have so little respect.
posted by: Jacques Strap on July 17, 2012 8:06am
I’m white and live in the suburbs. If I stopped my car in the middle of a one-way street and an officer saw me, I would definitely be pulled over and at least questioned as to why I didn’t pull to the right when stopping.
Now, in the case above: Police saw a car stopped in the middle of a one-way street, with people getting in and out, in a known drug area. COMMON SENSE dictates the police make a stop even if it’s for nothing else than to inquire about why the car didn’t pull to the far right.
I work in one of New Haven’s toughest areas. I’m willing to bet that when these people were pulled over, they got angry and displayed a combative attitude when officers attempted to question them. I’m not stating that as a fact, but many people in neighborhoods both like the one in which I work and the one in this story dislike the police and are easily angered, especially by white people in positions of authority.
It’s time to stop this whole race card nonsense. It’s time for people to take responsibility for their actions, regardless of race. And it’s time for people like Lashunda and Ronda to grow up.
