Candidate: Never Mind Taxes

Sections

Neighborhoods

Features

NHI Newsletter

Legal Notices

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

by Thomas MacMillan | Aug 2, 2010 1:43 pm

(12) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author

Posted to: Politics, The Heights, Campaign 2010

Thomas MacMillan Photo Upstart candidate Boaz ItsHaky is back this year to run against U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro for the second time, now as an Independent. He’s offering a new solution to the nation’s economic woes: an “income tax holiday.”

ItsHaky (pictured) said he’d like to see all taxes—income, property, city, state, and federal—suspended for a period of six months or a year. It would put money back in the pocket of consumers and kick the economy into gear, he said.

ItsHaky presented that idea on Friday afternoon at the Bella Vista retirement community in Fair Haven Heights, where he made an appearance as part of his quest for signatures to appear on the ballot In November for U.S. representative for Connecticut’s Third Congressional District, which includes New Haven and 24 surrounding towns. That seat is currently occupied by 19-year incumbent U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, against whom ItsHaky ran two years ago, when he was a Republican.

ItsHaky, a Bethany acupuncturist who has never held public office, appeared with a slate of state and federal candidates from a new organization, the Independent Party. His tax idea is loosely based on a plan offered by Warren Mosler, a millionaire financial analyst, banker, and race car entrepreneur who’s the party’s candidate for the U.S. Senate seat now occupied by Sen. Chris Dodd, who is retiring at the end of this year. Mosler later cautioned that ItsHaky’s idea was not exactly what he, Mosler, had in mind.

Other Independent candidates at the Friday event included Chester First Selectman and gubernatorial candidate Tom Marsh and Waterbury Alderman and candidate for Lt. Governor Cicero Booker.

Those candidates, including Mosler, have already secured their spots on the ballot in November. ItsHaky is still working to gather the signatures he needs before the deadline on Wednesday.

Wearing a tie-less white shirt, sports coat, jeans, and sneakers, ItsHaky stepped in front of a group of 20 seniors to explain why he’s thrown in his lot with the Independents. He began by saying that he’s originally from Israel. He arrived in the U.S. in 1989. “It would be an understatement to say I am in love with this country,” he said.

After 9/11, when ItsHaky was in acupuncture school in New York, he was inspired to run for office. He initially planned to begin his political career as an independent candidate, but was soon convinced that he would need to join one of the two major parties in order to have any real influence. After running for State Senate and then for a U.S. Representative seat in 2008, ItsHaky became disillusioned with the Republican Party. “They are more concerned with their political gains than with the people themselves,” he said. “I have no desire for power. I have a pure desire for public service.”

The number-one issue in this election is the economy, ItsHaky said. The government response, the stimulus package, has not gotten to the people who need it, he said. “Where is this money? It stayed on the top.”

His cure? A payroll tax holiday for anyone making less than $1 million a year and for businesses employing 1,000 people or fewer. The wealthy citizens of Connecticut will continue to support the state through taxes, and the federal government can kick in some extra money, ItsHaky said.

After his comments to the seniors, ItsHaky filled in the details of his plan. “It’s a way to think outside the box,” he said. For six months or a year, people would pay no property taxes, no income taxes, no state taxes, “No nothing,” he said. “It stimulates immediately at the Main Street level. ... It will force the government, because of limited resources, to be more efficient.”

But won’t the government collapse without the revenue it depends on?

“The federal government never runs out of money,” ItsHaky said. “Taxing is not what drives this country.”

ItsHaky said his thinking has been influenced by conversations with Mosler (pictured), the Independent candidate for U.S. Senate. Mosler said the payroll tax holiday idea is his, but not the whole package suggested by ItsHaky.

Mosler’s plan is to have an indefinite suspension of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) payroll tax only, not all taxes across the board, he said. The FICA tax is a “highly regressive, punishing tax” that disproportionately affects poorer people, Mosler said.

“Taxes don’t function to raise revenue for the federal government,” Mosler said. “For the federal government, the purpose of taxes is to regulate the economy.” Money works differently at the federal level from the way it does at the state or local level, he said. Because the federal government is issuing the money, the money means something different to the federal government than it does to the user. It’s like subway tokens, which are worthless to the subway operator, but valuable to the subway rider, he said.

When the federal government collects taxes, it’s simply changing numbers in a computer, the way a bowling alley changes your score when you knock pins down, Mosler said. “How many points does a bowling alley have?”

The reason the federal government levies taxes is to check inflation, Mosler said. He explained through and analogy: Imagine the national economy as a big department store, with a Gross Domestic Product, the value of all goods and services bought and sold, of $16 trillion. If there are no taxes, the people in the U.S. go in the department store and buy $16 trillion dollars of stuff. But if the government wants to buy things, it needs to take money from the people. If it just printed money and bought, say, $4 trillion of stuff, then prices would go up 25 percent in the store. “So the government takes four trillion from us,” Mosler said.

Taxes serve as a regulation of the system, to check inflation and to make sure people have enough money to keep the economy functioning properly, Mosler said. What the economy needs now is lower taxes to feed the economy “from the bottom up.” Then people will go back to buying things, he said.

It’s a fundamental misunderstanding to think that the federal government needs tax dollars to spend money, Mosler said. It’s one of “Seven Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy,” outlined in his new book by that name.

But states do need tax revenue to spend money, Mosler said. Hence, he didn’t back ItsHaky’s idea to extend the tax holiday to state taxes: “The state of Connecticut can’t do that because they will bounce checks.”

ItsHaky is not the only Independent candidate influenced by Mosler’s theories. His ideas have taken root in the small slate of Independent candidates. Booker, the candidate for lieutenant governor, called Mosler an “economic genius” and gubernatorial candidate Marsh praised his theories as well.

Mosler, who’s originally from Manchester, told the seniors at Bella Vista that he moved back to Connecticut in March to run for U.S. Senate. He has an investment firm and owns a small bank in Florida, where he lived before moving to St. Croix. He said his net worth is between $65 million and $255 million.

He’s also the founder of Mosler Automotive. That company built the MT-900 race car, which can reach 60 miles per hour in less than three seconds and gets 30 miles per gallon on the highway, Mosler said. He said he built the car just to prove it was possible to make fuel-efficient high-performance vehicle. He said he’s shown the technology to major car companies, but they weren’t interested.

“Nobody seems to care,” he said.

Comments

posted by: anon on August 2, 2010 1:57pm

Massively raising taxes on anyone making $300K+ and eliminating them for any families making less than $150K isn’t a bad idea, given how wide the income gap has grown over the past 50 (and especially, the past 10) years. Doing this would do more than just get the economy back on track.

posted by: Threefifths on August 2, 2010 3:06pm

How about Flat tax.

posted by: Townie on August 2, 2010 3:14pm

Is this guy for real? He said the Federal Government never runs out of money. So, I guess the national debt is just an imaginary figure used to compel us to spend and consume? Eliminating taxes, in the way he suggested, would further ruin this country’s economy. The wealthy would just shelter their income in foreign banks and markets. The only way to repair the economy is to cut spending, restrict international trade and re-invigorate industry. The Federal income tax should also be eliminated, for everyone. Of course I could go on, but I won’t.
This candidate is obviously way out of touch with reality. Sadly neither the Republicans or any Independent organization can field a candidate that will defeat DeLauro, a person who has proven to be a proponent of the State-Welfare system that some Democrats are trying to create.

posted by: Threefifths on August 2, 2010 3:28pm

posted by: Townie on August 2, 2010 4:14pm

Is this guy for real? He said the Federal Government never runs out of money.

Some what right.This is what they do.

Control of the Economy through the Federal Reserve

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIMB2nXWiIQ

posted by: Somewhere in CT (maybe New Haven, maybe not) on August 2, 2010 4:14pm

I guess I am one of the few who doesn’t mind paying taxes. Weird.

Stop and think for a second. It costs, according to the national average (not CT average), $10k a year to educate ONE child. If you have one child in the school system, the question I will ask you: “Did you pay more than $10k in state/local taxes last year?” Most people do not. That’s only with ONE child. Most households have more than one kid. My sister-in-law has 6 children (in NY).

Well, you may say, I don’t have a kid IN the system any more. My reply is “Have you paid $120k in taxes state/local taxes yet?” If you have, well then, let’s talk about the PD and FD. We’re JUST talking education.

And to the people like my wife and I who don’t have kids: Your taxes pay to educate the people who are going to be taking care of you in your old age.

I don’t mind paying taxes.

posted by: anon on August 2, 2010 4:25pm

I agree with Somewhere in CT. In fact, taxes should be raised. Teachers should be making $320,000 per year if we want to ensure that our next generation is actually educated, not just baby sat. Has anyone looked at our student-teacher ratios? Pay them more and hire more teachers by taxing the ultra-wealthy.

Currently, Warren Buffett pays more in taxes than an average janitor, as a percentage of his income, and he’s said he’s happy to pay more to correct that imbalance.

If everyone realized how much the income gap has widened over the past 10 years, or the tiny percentage of Americans who now own 90% of our country’s financial assets, there wouldn’t even be a debate about raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy.

posted by: Was there on August 2, 2010 4:51pm

Bo’s comments were taken out of context he never said for the tax holiday to include cities and states, what he said was the Federal income tax holiday should be extended to the city and state employees and those city savings extented to the taxpayes by way of lower taxes during the “tax holiday” Tom got it wrong truly shoddy journalism.

posted by: Somewhere in CT (maybe New Haven, maybe not) on August 2, 2010 7:14pm

Anon:

I get paid $5 per kid for an hour and twenty minutes.

Elementary school teachers get paid $10 a DAY. That’s less than $2 an hour.

I’m not in teaching for the money.

And, some say, well privatize education. Private school teachers actually get paid LESS than public school teachers. So I’d be making less in the private sector.

posted by: anon on August 2, 2010 7:37pm

More on Warren Buffett (btw he pays “less” than a janitor, not more):

“Warren Buffett, the third-richest man in the world, has criticised the US tax system for allowing him to pay a lower rate than his secretary and his cleaner.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/tax/article1996735.ece

posted by: Bill Saunders on August 3, 2010 12:54am

All this talk about raising taxes, eliminating taxes, blah blah f-ing blah.

If anyone on the stump is serious about this issue, they need to make the nexus between the benefits seen by the rich due to the Bush tax cuts and the loss of life savings in the middle class due to the economic crash.

My cynical side says it was all orchestrated on both counts by both parties.

posted by: rocket on August 3, 2010 3:56am

The problem when disgruntled voters decide to run all incumbents out of office is that deeper examination of the alternatives often does not take place. These newcomers range from highly qualified to flat-out irresponsible. Yes, let’s stop collecting taxes. We don’t really need police, or firefighters or garbage collection. We can do without waste-water treatment and I’m sure the thousands of kids roaming the streets won’t get bored and get into any trouble if given an extended summer vacation. There is a great deal of waste that can be eliminated from government, but every single tax dollar doesn’t represent waste.

posted by: Townie on August 3, 2010 6:49am

Threefifths: Money is more of an idea than a reality ever since turned currency into a fiat system. The US government has very little actual wealth, at least that we know about.

Somewhere: I don’t mind paying taxes, just not as much as we do to as many governments that we pay to (municipal, State and Federal). My ancestors fought a war against unfair taxation, the American model is one of small government and minimal taxes, at least it was in the beginning. It should’ve remained that way. Also, education does not have to be expensive in order for it to be high quality. Many poor nations have very good schools which operate on very, very low budgets. I agree teachers should get paid a bit more, but not too much more. They do only work a few months of the year and they do receive pretty good benefits and tenure deals.
This candidate, most candidates, fail to speak to the real issue which is the failure of the capitalist system. Taxation will not correct the problem, abolition of all taxation will also fail to correct the problem. A radical paradigm change is needed if we are to resuscitate our nation and create authentic liberty and prosperity. The minute a candidate speaks up for immediate socio-economic revolution is the minute I vote, until then citizens should remain committed to alternative methods of democratic action.

New Haven Independent

New Haven Independent Login Form